Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.            )

Filed by the Registrant  

                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  

Check the appropriate box:

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [   ] 
Check the appropriate box:
[   ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[   ]
 Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X]
 Definitive Proxy Statement
[   ]
 Definitive Additional Materials
[   ]
 Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12

Hecla Mining Company

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

HECLA MINING COMPANY
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No fee required.
[   ]Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
[   ] Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[   ] Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.0-11


LOGO


MESSAGE FROM YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

1)Amount Previously Paid:
LOGO      
2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.

Board of Directors

From left (back): Charles B. Stanley, Ted Crumley, George R. Johnson, Phillips S. Baker, Jr., and Terry V. Rogers

From left (front): Catherine J. Boggs, Alice Wong, and Stephen F. Ralbovsky

  
 3)Filing Party:
  

Hecla’s Board of Directors believes strong governance strengthens the Company’s policies and performance and will distinguish Hecla as a respected precious metals producer. Operating transparently and with integrity has helped the Company earn the trust of our shareholders, credibility within the communities where we operate, and dedication from our employees.

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

As your Board of Directors, we are pleased to report that, in a year filled with uncertainty, Hecla had a record year both operationally and financially. Hecla was able to accomplish this due to our dedicated employees who were not only able to maintain the continuity of the business in the face of COVID-19 and the myriad of related challenges, but also able to achieve significant milestones, and to do so safely and innovatively.

Performance and Innovation in a Challenging Environment

Despite the challenging environment, Hecla performed well in 2021. Highlights include:

•  Produced 12.9 million silver ounces and 201,327 gold ounces, meeting production and cost guidance.

•  Second highest reserves for both silver and gold in Company history.

•  Developed the Underhand Closed Bench mining method at Lucky Friday, which contributed to the 75% increase in silver production and showed improvements in managing seismicity.

•  In 2021, the Hecla Charitable Foundation donated more than $464,000 toward education, youth activities, community programs, and health services activities in communities in which we operate.

  4)

•  Strong safety performance with an all-injury frequency rate of 1.45, 40% below the U.S. national average.

•  Returned $20.7 million, or 19%, of free cash flow to our shareholders through dividends.

•  Second highest cash flow from operations of $220.3 million and free cash flow of $111.3 million.1

•  2nd best performing stock in our peer group from 2019-2021.

Our People

For over 130 years, our people have been our most valuable asset. As of December 31, 2021, Hecla employed approximately 1,650 people. The vast majority of Hecla’s employees are full-time, and approximately 15% are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Since we are often among the largest private-sector employers in the communities in which we operate, it is important that we fairly compensate our employees. For many decades we have offered competitive wages and among the highest valued benefits where we operate. In addition to competitive base wages, we offer retirement benefits, health insurance benefits, incentive plans, and paid time off. We believe our retirement benefits, which include both defined benefit and defined contribution plans for U.S.-based employees, set us apart from many other employers.

Creating greater gender diversity in a predominantly male industry is among the priorities of Hecla in the coming years. Management is working to increase the representation of women, local and indigenous people (where applicable) and other diverse people throughout Hecla’s workforce.

Health and Safety

The safety and health of our employees is of paramount importance. Hecla invests in effective ways to operate our mines more safely. Our goal is to achieve world-class safety and health performance by promoting a deeply rooted value-based culture of safety and utilizing technology and innovation to continually improve the safety at Hecla’s operations. Hecla invests in our people with training and workforce development programs that focus on safety first. All employees receive training that complies with or exceeds applicable safety and health regulations as set by the applicable governing body where each operation is located. As part of Hecla’s commitment to safety, we track a variety of safety performance indicators, including injuries, near misses, observations, and equipment damages. Company-wide, Hecla’s all injury frequency rate dropped by 76% from 2012 to 2021.

1Date Filed:

A non-GAAP measurement. See Appendix A for reconciliation to GAAP.

2022 Proxy Statement    i


Message from Your Board of Directors

Approach to Sustainability and Advancing on Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”)

Hecla is proud to produce the essential metals that shape everyday life, and we take seriously our mandate to ensure that the process of extracting those metals has a positive impact on the daily lives of our communities. Our work provides large economic and social benefits to rural communities, yet our geographic and environmental footprint is small. In 2021, we reduced our greenhouse gas emissions by 43.7% from our 2019 baseline level and have offset 76,550 tonnes of emissions through purchasing and retiring carbon credits, achieving a net zero carbon emissions level.

Active Board Refreshment

Since 2016, 50% of the Board of Directors has changed as we have welcomed four new directors, including two women. This year we will say goodbye to Terry V. Rogers and Ted Crumley, who will retire after the Annual Meeting. With their departure, our average tenure will decrease from 12 years to 9 years. While we will miss Mr. Rogers and Mr. Crumley, and their wealth of contributions and experience, we look forward to the opportunity to further refresh the Board of Directors. As demonstrated by recent additions, we remain committed to recruiting additional independent directors who will expand our Board of Director’s skillsets, perspectives, and capabilities, with the objective of having a Board of Directors with expansive and diverse experience, a deep understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with our business, and a focus on value and sustainability for the benefit of all stakeholders.

Annual Meeting

For the past two years in response to the pandemic, we held our annual meetings virtually. This year, we will take a hybrid approach by having a live meeting, as well as a virtually alternative meeting via a live audio webcast.

As your Board of Directors, we want to thank you for your continued confidence in Hecla. We appreciate the opportunity to serve Hecla on your behalf as we continue to navigate through these unprecedented times but with excitement for what the future holds for the largest U.S. silver producer.

LOGO

Ted Crumley

Chairman

LOGO

Stephen F. Ralbovsky

Director

LOGO

Terry V. Rogers

Director

LOGO

Charles B. Stanley

Director

LOGO

George R. Johnson

Director

LOGO

Alice Wong

Director

LOGO

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

LOGO

Catherine J. Boggs

Director

ii     www.hecla-mining.com


PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

MAY 26, 2022

Table of Contents




Table of Contents


HECLA MINING COMPANY

PROXY STATEMENT

2016NOTICE OF 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

  125 Years of Mining For the Future iv 

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

1

Agenda and Voting Recommendations

1

2021 ESG Highlights

1

2021 Performance Highlights

1

SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

2

Say-on-Pay

2

ESG Matters

2

Corporate Governance

2

SUSTAINABILITY

3

Board Oversight and Management of Sustainability

3

Environment

3

Risk Management

4

Safety and Health

5

Human Capital Management

6

Community Engagement

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

8

Electronic Access to Corporate Governance Documents

8

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct

8

Whistleblower Policy

8

Communications with the Board

9

Board Leadership Structure

9

Board Refreshment

9

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

10

Majority Voting for Directors and Director Resignation Policy

13

Diversity

13

Size of the Board of Directors

13

Board’s Role in Oversight of Strategy and Risk Management

13

Succession Planning

16

Committees of the Board and Committee Assignments

16

Board and Committee Independence; Audit Committee Financial Expert

19

Compensation Committee Procedures

19

2021 Board Meetings and Attendance

19

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

20

Board and Committee Self-Evaluation Process

20

Evaluation Process

20

Director Candidates Submitted by Shareholders

21

PROPOSAL 1 - ELECTION OF CLASS III DIRECTORS

22

Biographical Information

22

Current Class  III Nominees for Election to the Board – Term Ending at the 2022 Annual Meeting

23

Continuing Class I Members of the Board – Term Ending at  the 2023 Annual Meeting

24

Continuing Class II Members of the Board – Term Ending at the 2024 Annual Meeting

25

COMPENSATION OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

26

Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Benchmarking

26

Components of Non-Management Director Compensation

26

Equity Compensation

26

Non-Management Director Compensation for 2021

27

Other

27

Non-Management Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

27 




Table of Contents



HECLA MINING COMPANY
6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200
Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408
208-769-4100PROPOSAL 2 - RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2022

29

Required Vote

29

Pre-Approval Process

30

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

30

Report of the Audit Committee

30

PROPOSAL 3 - APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF  OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

32

Required Vote

33

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

34

Executive Summary

35

Key Operating and Financial Results

36

Benchmarking and Competitive Analyses

37

The Compensation Committee Process and the Role of Management and Human Resources Department

38

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

39

Elements of Total Compensation

41

Overview of our Compensation Decisions and Results for 2021

43

Other

52

Clawback Policy

53

Insider Trading Policy

53

Change in Control Agreements

54

Tax and Accounting Considerations

55

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

56

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

56

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

57

Summary Compensation Table for 2021

57

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2021

60

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2021

62

Stock Vested in 2021

63

Stock Ownership Guidelines for NEOs

64

Pension Benefits

65

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2021

65

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

66

Summary of Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

67

CEO Pay Ratio

71

OTHER BENEFITS

72

OTHER MATTERS

74

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

74

Political Contributions and Engagement

74

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

74

Shareholder proposals to be included in next year’s Proxy Statement

75

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

75

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

78

APPENDIX A - Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP

A-1

2022 Proxy Statement    iii


LOGO

NOTICE OF 20162022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To the Shareholders of Hecla Mining Company:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that due to the 2016public health impact of COVID-19, and to support the varying levels of comfort regarding in person gatherings, this year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders (“Annual Meeting”) of Hecla Mining Company (“we,” “our,” “us,” “Hecla,” or the “Company”) will be held in the Eric A. Johnston Auditorium at the Northwest Museum of Arts & Culture, located at 2316 W. 1st Avenue, Spokane, Washington, on Thursday, May 19, 2016,26, 2022, at 10:008:30 a.m. PDT in a hybrid (virtual and in person) meeting format. The Annual Meeting will be held in person at the Elks Lodge #331, 419 Cedar St., Pacific Daylight Time, forWallace, Idaho, and virtually, via www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022, on Thursday, May 26, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. PDT. During the following purposes:meeting, shareholders will be asked to:

1.
Proposal 1  Elect three nominees to the Board of Directors, to serve for a three-year term or until their respective successors are elected;two Class III Directors;
2.Approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to remove certain 80% supermajority voting provisions;
Proposal 2  
3.Approve amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to permit shareholders to call special meetings of shareholders under certain circumstances;
4.Ratify the Audit Committee’s appointmentAppointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firmIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2016;2022; and
Proposal 3 5.Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers; and
6.Transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.officer compensation.

Shareholders will also transact such other business as may be brought properly before the meeting and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

Whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof, you are urged to submit your proxy as soon as possible so that your shares can be voted at the meeting in accordance with your instructions. To participate and vote your shares during the meeting, please see Attending the Virtual Meeting or Attending the Meeting in Person on page 78 for additional information.

The Board of Directors (“Board”) has fixed the close of business on March 23, 201628, 2022, as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and at any adjournment or postponement thereof (“Record Date”).

On or about April 4, 2016, we began mailing our A list of the shareholders of record asentitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for review by any shareholder, for any purpose related to the meeting, between 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. PDT at Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Dr., Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815, for ten days prior to the meeting and on the day of the Record Date, eithermeeting. The list will also be available to shareholders at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022 during the Annual Meeting.

PLEASE REVIEW THE PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:

LOGO

VIA THE INTERNET

Visit www.proxyvote.com

Follow instructions provided on your proxy card or voting instruction form

LOGO

BY MAIL

Sign, date and return your proxy card or voting instruction form

LOGO

BY TELEPHONE

Call the telephone number on your proxy card,
voting instruction form or notice (1-800-690-6903),
and follow the recorded instructions

LOGO

IN PERSON

Vote at the meeting by completing a ballot
online during the meeting at
www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on May 26, 2022. This Proxy Statement and our 2021 Annual Report are available at www.hecla-mining.com, and at www.proxyvote.com.

We are mailing our “Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) containingMaterials” to shareholders on or about April 12, 2022, which contains instructions on how to access thisour Proxy Statement and our 20152021 Annual Report (“Proxy Materials”) online,online. We are also mailing a full set of our Proxy Materials to shareholders who previously requested paper copies of the materials. Our Proxy Materials can also be viewed on our website at www.hecla-mining.com under “Investors” and then selecting “Annual Meeting,” or a printed copy of these Proxy Materials.at www.proxyvote.com.

By Order of the Board of Directors


LOGO

Michael B. White

Corporate Secretary

April 4, 201612, 2022

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

2022 Proxy Statement    iv


Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting to be held on
May 19, 2016. This Proxy Statement and our 2015 Annual Report are available at http://www.hecla-mining.com

ii www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents



PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
MAY 19, 2016

Table of Contents
NOTICE OF 2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSii
A MESSAGE FROM YOUR CHAIRMANvi
A MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERviii
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY1
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors1
Proposal 2 – Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to
Remove Certain 80% Supermajority Voting Provisions2
Proposal 3 – Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
to Permit Shareholders to Call Special Meetings of Shareholders Under Certain Circumstances2
Proposal 4 – Ratification of the Appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm for 20162
Proposal 5 – Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation2
Governance Highlights3
Shareholder Outreach3
Key Compensation Actions Taken In 2015 and 20164
Elements of CEO Pay Mix for 20155
2015 Summary Compensation and Realized Compensation5
PROXY STATEMENT7
Board of Directors Selection Process7
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS10
Director Qualifications and Biographical Information10
Current Nominees for Election to the Board – Term Ending at the 2016 Annual Meeting11
Continuing Members of the Board – Term Ending at the 2017 Annual Meeting13
Continuing Members of the Board – Term Ending at the 2018 Annual Meeting15
COMPENSATION OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS16
2015 Compensation Changes for Non-Management Directors16
Cash Compensation16
Equity Compensation16
2016 Compensation Changes for Non-Management Directors17
Other17
Retirement Age17
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS18
The Board’s Role and Activities in 201518
Role of Board in Risk Oversight19
Director Independence19
Family Relationships20
Board Leadership and Executive Sessions20
Board Self-Evaluation21
Committees of the Board and Committee Assignments21


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statementiii



Table of Contents



Diversity Policy23
Director Communications23
Succession Planning23
Electronic Access to Corporate Governance Documents24
Corporate Governance Guidelines24
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics24
Whistleblower Policy24
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions25
PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
AND BYLAWS TO REMOVE CERTAIN 80% SUPERMAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS26
Overview26
Current Provisions in Certificate and Bylaws26
Proposed Amendments to Certificate and Bylaws28
Required Vote, Our Board’s Recommendation and Additional Information28
PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
AND BYLAWS TO PERMIT SHAREHOLDERS TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS
UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES29
Overview29
Proposed Amendments to Certificate and Bylaws29
Required Vote, Our Board’s Recommendation and Additional Information30
PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 201631
Report of the Audit Committee32
Audit and Non-Audit Fees33
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS34
Executive Summary34
Key Operating and Financial Results35
Shareholder Outreach and 2015 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation36
Oversight and Determination of the Executive Compensation Program36
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives40
Elements of Total Compensation41
Overview of our Compensation Decisions and Results for 201544
Other52
Clawback Policy53
Insider Trading Policy53
Change in Control Agreements54
Tax and Accounting Considerations54
FUTURE COMPENSATION ACTIONS55
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION60
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT61
COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS62
Summary Compensation Table for 201562
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 201564
Outstanding Equity Awards at Calendar Year-End for 201565
Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 201566
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 201567
Change in Control and Termination68
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control70

iv www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents


EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION73
OTHER BENEFITS74
Retirement Plan74
Pension Benefits76
PROPOSAL 5 – APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION77
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION78
Stock Ownership Guidelines78
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management79
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE82
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING83
Record Date, Shares Outstanding and Quorum83
Votes Required for the Proposals83
Proxies84
Proxies Submitted but not Voted84
Methods of Voting84
Deadline for Voting85
Revoking a Proxy85
Costs of Solicitation86
Results of the Annual Meeting86
Annual Report86
Householding of Proxy Materials86
Electronic Delivery of Proxy Materials, Annual Reports, News Releases and Documents Filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission87
Shareholder List87
PROVISIONS OF HECLA’S BYLAWS WITH RESPECT TO SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND
NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS88
Shareholder proposals at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders88
Shareholder proposals to be included in next year’s Proxy Statement89
OTHER BUSINESS90
APPENDIX A CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION (WITH PROPOSED REVISIONS)A-1
APPENDIX B BYLAWS (WITH PROPOSED REVISIONS)B-1
APPENDIX C CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION (WITH PROPOSED REVISIONS)C-1
APPENDIX D BYLAWS (WITH PROPOSED REVISIONS)D-1
APPENDIX E RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP MEASURES TO GAAPE-1


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statementv



Table of Contents



A MESSAGE FROM YOUR CHAIRMAN

Your Board is committed to fulfilling its duties and to keeping the interests of our shareholders and employees at the center of our priorities.

Ted Crumley,
Chairman

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

It is the responsibility of the Board to maintain sound corporate governance practices and to oversee the Company’s strategic and operational activities in a manner that protects and creates long-term shareholder value. Your Board is committed to fulfilling these duties and to keeping the interests of our shareholders and employees at the center of our priorities.

Corporate Strategy

We are also committed to the Company’s strategic approach to creating shareholder value - consistent, long-lived production that increases and improves over time. This means we need long-life assets to profit from higher metals prices, strong geological understanding to increase reserves, and operating expertise to reduce costs and lower risks.

As the Company weathers the current decline of metals prices, our strong financial position should enable us to continue to grow the Company, and we are confident that we are well positioned to create long-term shareholder value.

Governance

The Board, directly and through its Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee, seeks to maintain corporate governance practices that are aligned with our strategic financial and operational goals. We do this by conducting processes at least annually to evaluate, optimize and update governance and practice guidelines.

Shareholder Outreach

The Board places great value on the feedback it receives from our current and potential shareholders, particularly with respect to our executive compensation program, as we believe in maintaining a high level of transparency in that area. One of the primary sources of feedback is through our shareholder outreach efforts pursuant to which we elicit the viewpoints of large shareholders and certain proxy advisory firms. In part because of the feedback we have received through our shareholder outreach efforts, we have implemented certain changes in our executive compensation program. We believe those changes helped us obtain a favorable vote of 83% on our say-on-pay proposal in 2015, which was 30% more favorable than our 2013 say-on-pay vote.

Our shareholder outreach program also seeks to identify corporate governance matters that are of concern to our shareholders, as well as the major proxy advisory firms.

During our shareholder outreach in 2015, two corporate governance issues were discussed with our shareholders: (i) the ability of shareholders to call special meetings, and (ii) the 80% supermajority voting requirement on certain amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws impacting special meetings. At our 2014 Annual Meeting, we asked shareholders to vote on a proposal to amend our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to permit shareholders to call special meetings under certain circumstances. Under our Certificate of Incorporation, this change required the approval by holders of 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock, yet we only received approval from 41%. We are again including this proposal on the ballot for the Annual Meeting. In addition, we are including another proposal to amend our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to change the required approval of amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws relating to the calling of special meetings from 80% to a two-thirds voting standard.

vi www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents



Board Composition

In December 2015, we were saddened to announce the passing of John H. Bowles, a director of the Company. John served on the Board of Hecla for over nine years following his retirement as a partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. He chaired the Audit Committee, and was also a member of the Executive Committee and Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical Committee. He leaves a long, distinguished legacy in our industry and as a member of our Board for which we are eternally grateful.

Shareholders continue to express a genuine and legitimate interest in finding effective ways to ensure thatboards of directors are comprised of the right people, with the right skills and qualifications, to effectively represent their interests. The issue of Board composition and refreshment is a priority of our shareholders, and we agree that refreshing the Board with new perspectives and new ideas is critical to a well-functioning Board. Accordingly, we have been actively pursuing new members.

In seeking new directors, the Board is also very conscious of the benefits of diversity on the Board. We have sought and continue to seek qualified candidates that would enhance our Board’s diversity.

Your participation and your votes are important to the future of our Company. We encourage you to vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations. Details of the items to be voted upon are provided throughout this Proxy Statement.


Ted Crumley
Chairman


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statementvii



Table of Contents



A MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT AND
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Persistence, perspective, and position – These are the characteristics that will enable the Company to grow and evolve even more in the next century.

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

On behalf of your entire Board and the management team, I deeply appreciate your support and faith in our Company. I also want to express my gratitude to our Board for its guidance and support as we execute our strategy, which we expect to yield long-term shareholder value. To all our employees, please accept my appreciation for your readiness to adapt, your responsiveness, creativity and willingness to work together towards attaining that success.

Our Responsibility

At Hecla, our Integrated Corporate Responsibility Policy (“ICR”) begins with the belief that a safe mine is a productive mine – each day, each shift, home safely. We will strive to guard the health and safety of our employees and the community. Second, we will be responsible environmental stewards and strive to minimize environmental effects during exploration, development and operations, and then reclaim our projects to productive post-mining land uses. Third, we believe that by being responsive to community needs, the Company builds trust and relationships that foster our social license to operate. This encompasses taking a mutually-beneficial approach to issues affecting the community, treating others with respect, and engaging in open and honest communication. Each of these aspects is fully integrated into our business planning as they are considered key to our core business strategy.

Our Strategy and 2015 Accomplishments

Our simple strategy is to explore, develop and operate properties that have consistent, long-lived production that grows and whose margins improve over time.

Despite lower metals prices in 2015, we finished the year strongly, with the most silver and silver equivalent production in our history. The Company also, for the 10th consecutive year, grew silver reserves to the most in our history, despite using lower price assumptions. We ended the year with $155 million of cash on the balance sheet, which was consistent with our expectations and using our balance sheet strength to invest in expanding mine life and increasing production.

In 2015, our key achievements included the following:

silver equivalent production of 37.5 million ounces, the highest in the Company’s history;1

silver production increased 5% to 11.6 million ounces, the highest in the Company’s history, at a cash cost, after by-product credits, per silver ounce of $5.85;2

gold production increased 1% to 189,327 ounces, with 127,891 ounces produced at Casa Berardi at an average cash cost, after by-product credits, per gold ounce of $772;2

highest year-end proven and probable silver reserve levels in Company history for the 10th consecutive year despite using $14.50/oz. silver for the calculation. Gold reserves remained unchanged despite using $1,100/oz. for the calculation;

12015 silver equivalent calculation is based on the following prices: $15.70 for silver, $1,160 for gold, $0.81 for lead, and $0.88 for zinc.
2Cash cost, after by-product credits, per silver and gold ounce represents a non-GAAP measurement, a reconciliation of which to cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, the most comparable GAAP measure, can be found in Appendix E underReconciliation of Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and Cash Cost, After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) to Cost of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (GAAP).

viii www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents



committed a significant level of capital expenditures (including lease additions, capitalized interest, and other non-cash items) of approximately $160.7 million, including $60.0 million at Lucky Friday, $46.0 million at Greens Creek, $35.3 million at Casa Berardi, and $4.6 million at San Sebastian;

performed exploration and pre-development activities during the year, drilling targets at our land packages in Alaska, Idaho, Quebec, and Mexico. Continued exploration success at our San Sebastian unit in Mexico which led to a return to production in 2015;

acquired Revett Mining Company, giving us ownership of the Rock Creek project in northwestern Montana;

operating cash flow of $106.4 million and adjusted EBITDA of $116.8 million;3

made the decision to develop a mine at our San Sebastian unit in the third quarter of 2015 and commenced production there in the fourth quarter of 2015; and

achieved the above milestones while ending the year with a cash balance of $155.2 million as of December 31, 2015.

Into the Future

2016 marks Hecla’s 125th anniversary. We believe our strategy and accomplishments will give shareholders value in all price environments, both compared to peers and when metals prices increase, and for what we hope is another 125 years.

We sincerely hope you will be able to attend and participate in our Annual Meeting. We welcome the opportunity to meet with many of you and give you a firsthand report on our progress, as well as express our appreciation for your confidence and support.


Phillips S. Baker, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer

3Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) represents a non-GAAP measurement, reconciliation of which to net income (loss), the most comparable GAAP measure, can be found in Appendix E underReconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) to Net Income (Loss) (GAAP).


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statementix



Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summaryIt does not contain all of the information that you should consider and youconsider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting. For more complete information regarding the Company’s 2021 performance, please review our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors (page 10)Agenda and Voting Recommendations

The Board and the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee believe that the three director nominees (Crumley, Rogers and Stanley) possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight

Proposal 1

Election of Directors

Board Vote Recommendation

FOR

Page 22

Proposal 2

Ratify the Appointment of
Independent Auditors

Board Vote Recommendation

FOR

Page 29

Proposal 3

Advisory Vote on

Executive Compensation

Board Vote Recommendation

FOR

Page 32

2021 ESG Highlights

Environmental

Social

Governance

•  Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions reduced 44% from 2019 baseline level to 76,550 tonnes CO2e.

•  Retired equivalent tonnage of United Nations Certified Emissions Reduction credits to be net zero (on Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions) in 2021.

•  In 2021, 99% of our electricity used at our mines was line power. Of that, 70% was generated from renewable hydropower.

•  Women comprise 10% of Hecla’s workforce, and 21% of managerial positions.

•  80% of our workforce is local to our operations.

•  In 2021, the Hecla Charitable Foundation donated more than $464,000 toward education, youth activities, community programs, and health services activities in communities in which we operate.

•  In 2021 at our Casa Berardi Mine, two five-year contracts were awarded to Construction Kiwetin for maintenance and transportation services and will employ 25 First Nation workers annually over the life of the contracts.

•  Four of eight directors joined the Board after 2016, including one in 2021.

•  1 director retired in 2021, and 2 directors will retire after the 2022 Annual Meeting, dropping average Board tenure from 12 years to nine years.

•  25% of our directors are women.

•  We will have a new Chairperson for the first time in 16 years.

•  Our Chairman of the Board is independent of our Chief Executive Officer.

•  Directors who receive more “Against” votes than “For” votes must tender their resignation to the Board for consideration.

2021 Performance Highlights

Operational Highlights

•  2nd highest reserves for both gold and silver in the Company’s 130-year history.

•  Developed the Underhand Closed Bench mining method at our Lucky Friday Mine, which contributed to the 75% increase in silver production at the Lucky Friday Mine and helped to manage seismicity.

•  Strong safety performance with an all-injury frequency rate of 1.45, 40% below the U.S. national average; 58% reduction from 2016 to 2021.

Financial Highlights

•  Record sales of $807.5 million with net income of $35.1 million.

•  Record Adjusted EBITDA of $278.8million.2

•  Cash flow from operations of $220.3 million, and free cash flow of $111.3 million3which is the second highest in Hecla’s history.

•  Returned $20.7 million, or 19%, of free cash flow to our common and preferred shareholders through dividends.

•  2nd best performing stock in our peer group from 2019-2021, based on total shareholder return.

2

A non-GAAP measurement. See Appendix A for a reconciliation to GAAP.

3

A non-GAAP measurement. See Appendix A for a reconciliation to GAAP.

2022 Proxy Statement    1


SHAREHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

We view engagement with our shareholders as a critical part of our businesscorporate governance and quality advice and counsel to the Company’s management.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR each Director Nominee

Director Nominees Recommended by the Board of Directors

  Name    Age    Director
Since
    Experience/Qualification    Independent
(Yes/No)
    Committee
Memberships
    Other Current
Public Directorships
  
Ted Crumley
Board Chairman
711995Former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of OfficeMax IncorporatedYesEC
CC
None
Terry V. Rogers692007Former Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Cameco CorporationYesHSET (Chair)
AC
CC
EC
Centerra Gold Inc.
Charles B. Stanley572007Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of QEP Resources, Inc.YesAC (Chair)
HSET
CG&DNC
QEP Resources, Inc.
 
  
Continuing Members of the Board
 
NameAgeDirector
Since
Experience/QualificationIndependent
(Yes/No)
Committee
Memberships
Other Current
Public Directorships
Term Ending at the 2017 Annual Meeting
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.562001President and Chief Executive Officer of Hecla Mining CompanyNoEC (Chair)QEP Resources, Inc.
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor742002President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Selex Resources Ltd.YesCG&DNC (Chair)
HSET
CC
None
George R. Johnson672016Former Senior Vice President of Operations of B2Gold CorporationYesAC
HSET
None
Term Ending at the 2018 Annual Meeting
George R. Nethercutt, Jr.712005Chairman of The George Nethercutt Foundation and Of Counsel for Lee & Hayes PLLCYesCC (Chair)
CG&DNC
ARCADIS Corporation
Stephen F. Ralbovsky622016Former Partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPYesAC
CG&DNC
None

EC: Executive Committee
AC: Audit Committee
CC: Compensation Committee
CG&DNC: Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee
HSET: Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical Committee



125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement1



Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


Proposal 2 – Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to Remove Certain 80% Supermajority Voting Provisions (page 26)

Our Certificate of Incorporation currently requires the approval of 80% of shares outstanding in order to make certain amendments to our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws affecting the ability to call special meetings of shareholders. This provision would be revised downward to a two-thirds vote requirement. If approved, the Companyintends to take the remaining steps required to implement the proposed amendments.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR this Proposal

Proposal 3 – Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to Permit Shareholders to Call Special Meetings of Shareholders Under Certain Circumstances (page 29)

We are seeking the approval ofsocial responsibility profile. Among other benefits, proactive engagement with our shareholders helps us to amendunderstand expectations for our Certificate of Incorporationperformance, maintain transparency, and Bylaws to add a right permitting shareholders who have held at least a 25% “net long position” in our outstanding common stock for at least 120 days to call special meetings of shareholders, subject to the conditions set forth in our Bylaws. Establishing a 25% “net long position” threshold for the right to call a special meeting would ensure that matters proposedfor consideration have significant support among our shareholders. If approved, the Company intends to take the remaining steps required to implement the proposed amendments.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR this Proposal

Proposal 4 – Ratification of the Appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (page 31)

The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the continued retention of BDO USA, LLP to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm for the calendar year ending December 31, 2016, is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. As a matter of goodshape corporate governance shareholders are beingasked to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of the independent auditor.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR this Proposal

Proposal 5 – Approval of Named Executive Officer Compensation (page 77)

The Company seeks a non-binding advisory vote from its shareholders to approve theand compensation of its named executive officers (“NEOs”) as described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 34 and the compensation tables beginning on page 62. The Board values shareholders’ opinions and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the advisory vote when considering future executive compensation decisions.

The Board unanimously recommends a vote FOR this Proposal


2www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


Governance Highlights

We are committed to good corporate governance practices and believe that Proposals 2 and 3 are in the best interests of our shareholders. We believe that if passed they would enhance Board and management accountability and help build public trust in the Company. In addition to Proposals 2 and 3 described beginning on pages 26 and 29, respectively, theCorporate Governance and Related Matters section beginning on page 18 further describes our current governance framework, which includes the following highlights:

7 of 8 directors are independent (we appointed two new directors to our Board in March 2016)
Independent Chairman of the Board
Regular executive sessions of independent directors
Regular Board and committee self-evaluations
Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies
Insider Trading Policy
Independent Audit, Compensation and CorporateGovernance and Directors’ Nominating Committees
Risk oversight by full Board and committees
Active shareholder engagement
Rigorous share ownership guidelines for NEOs and directors
Clawback Policy (in 2015, we amended our incentive plansto include clawback provisions)

Shareholder Outreach

policies. Over the last fewseveral years we have undertaken significant shareholder outreach efforts in order to elicit and understand the concerns of our shareholders. shareholders and other stakeholders. Participants include management of the Company, including our Senior Vice President – Chief Administrative Officer (“Sr. Vice President and CAO”), Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“Sr. Vice President and CFO), Vice President – General Counsel, Vice President – Corporate Development & Sustainability, and Assistant Secretary. If requested by a stakeholder, our chairpersons of each committee of the Board are available to join our engagements.

In advanceNovember and December 2021, we sought engagement with 30 of our 2015 Annual Meeting, alargest shareholders and three shareholders responded. We also spoke with one proxy advisory firm. All others who responded said they did not need to meet with us to discuss any matters. In 2021, management team (excluding NEOs)also conducted approximately 18 presentations for analysts and investors, held approximately 105 one-on-one and group meetings with investors, and hosted four quarterly conference calls with investors and analysts allowing for questions and answers with management. In addition, the Company responded to questions from investors and analysts by telephone and email throughout the year.

Say-on-Pay

In 2021, our Say-on-Pay proposal received 97% support. During our shareholder outreach this year, there were no significant discussions with, or concerns expressed by shareholders, holding over 15% of our common stock and obtained constructive feedback onabout our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee,

ESG Matters

Additional topics discussed with assistance from management and its compensation consultant, considered the opinions and specific requests expressed during these meetings, as well as the analysis provided by proxy advisory firms. After implementing certain changes in 2014 and 2015, our 2015 say-on-pay vote received 83% support. The Compensation Committee believes the changes made in 2014 and 2015 impacted the vote because they were responsive to the feedback from investorsshareholders and proxy advisory firms focused on net zero carbon emission levels, and enhanced the performance orientation of our executive compensation program. The current frequency of shareholder advisory votesgap and materiality analysis to reporting frameworks (Sustainability Accounting Standards Board – metals and mining standards, Task Force on executive compensation is every year.

Once again, in advance of our 2016 Annual Meeting, we engaged with our shareholders Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and others to seek their feedback. Our management team (excluding NEOs) again held one-on-one discussions with shareholders holding over 10% of our common stock, Global Reporting Initiative, as well as one-on-one discussions withour Canadian operations benchmarking against the Towards Sustainability Mining protocols). See Sustainability on the following page.

Corporate Governance

In our 2021 and 2022 shareholder outreach, we discussed board diversity and refreshment. We added two proxy advisory firms. The response was overwhelmingly supportivenew directors in 2016, one new director in 2017, and one new director in 2021, thereby reducing the average tenure of the changes we made to our executive compensation program in 2014 and 2015. The results of this engagement andBoard. We also have two directors who will not stand for re-election at the Compensation Committee’s ongoing efforts to ensure a strong alignment between executive pay and Company performance, led the committee to make no substantivechanges to its executive compensation program. However, in December 2015,Annual Meeting due to budget reductions for 2016,mandatory retirement, thus allowing us the opportunity to further refresh the Board.

We also discussed three of our Chief Executive Officer’s (“CEO”) base salary was reduced by 20%, and base salary for all other NEO’s was reduced by 10% effective through all of calendar year 2016. In addition, our Board’s annual cash payments were reduced by 10% through all of calendar year 2016.

In addition to seeking input on our compensation practices, our shareholder outreach program seeks to identify corporate governance mattersfeatures that are of concern primarily to our shareholders, but also tomay have an anti-takeover effect on the major proxy advisory firms.

During our shareholder outreach in 2015, two corporate governance issues were discussed with our shareholders:Company: (i) the abilityinability of shareholders to call special meetings,meetings; (ii) our classified Board structure; and (ii) the 80%(iii) supermajority voting requirement to amend provisions in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws impacting special meetings. AtBylaws. In prior years we have proposed amendments to our 2014 Annual Meeting, we asked shareholders to vote on a proposal to amend ourRestated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to permit shareholdersrevise these three provisions, but the voting results have never been close to call special meetings under certain circumstances. Under our Certificate of Incorporation, this changesufficient to implement change. The required the approval by holders ofvote is 80% of our outstanding shares voted in favor of common stock, yetany such change, and we only received approvalhave never obtained higher than 56% of outstanding shares voted in favor. The shareholders and proxy advisory firms unanimously told us that due to the repeated failure of proposals to change these provisions at past Annual Meetings, and the desire to improve the format and readability of our Proxy Statement and the resources involved in printing and mailing a lengthier Proxy Statement, they would not object if we did not include these proposals at our Annual Meeting.

The Board will continue to assess evolving best practices in corporate governance matters, including the subjects of the prior proposals discussed above. In future years, we may again include one or more of these proposals on the agenda for an annual meeting. Furthermore, the Board will continue to consider any formal proposals and other feedback that we receive from 41%. shareholders. And, we will continue our shareholder outreach efforts so that we can understand and appropriately react to the evolving viewpoints of our shareholders on corporate governance and other matters.

2     www.hecla-mining.com


SUSTAINABILITY

We are again submitting this proposal at this year’s Annual Meeting. In addition,committed to meeting the highest standards of environmental stewardship across our operations, respecting human rights in all our business practices, and prioritizing the health, safety and well-being of our workforce and host communities where we operate. We recognize that the long-term success of the Company and sustainable value creation are adding another proposaldependent on integrating into our business strategies, the ESG performance factors that are most important to amend our Certificate of Incorporationstakeholders and Bylaws to changebusiness. Thus, we measure our ESG performance against the required approval of certain amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws relating to the ability to call a special meeting from 80% to a two-thirds voting standard.following benchmarks:



125 Years
 2016 Proxy Statement3

the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”) – metals and mining standards;




Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

relevant aspects of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, Global Reporting Initiative; and



protocols of Towards Sustainable Mining (for our Canadian operations).

Key Compensation Actions TakenWe have also prioritized the United Nations Foundation Sustainable Development Goals that most directly align with our business, corporate strategy, and material sustainability issues.

On our website at www.hecla-mining.com, you can find Hecla’s ESG reporting and data and view our SASB-compliant 2020 Sustainability Report. We expect our 2021 Sustainability Report to be available on our website prior to the Annual Meeting. Governance is discussed in 2015 and 2016

Below is a brief summary of actions taken by the Compensation Committee in 2015 and 2016. The compensation of our NEOs for 2015 is more fully described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysisnext section of this Proxy Statement, startingso this section primarily focuses on page 34the 2021 highlights around the areas of environment, safety and health, human capital management, and community engagement.

Board Oversight and Management of Sustainability

Two committees of the Board provide ESG oversight. The Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical Committee of Hecla’s Board is tasked with overseeing ESG risks, strategic plans, and progress on issues that may potentially adversely impact Hecla’s operations, activities, plans, strategies, or reputation. The focus is primarily on internal matters and the technical requirements of ESG matters. The Governance and Social Responsibility Committee (“Governance Committee”) is tasked with reviewing and making recommendations to the Board for ESG matters. The focus is primarily on policy and external matters. Each committee relies on the activities of the other.

At the executive level, the Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (“Sr. Vice President and COO”), and the Vice President – Corporate Development and Sustainability report directly to our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and are responsible for implementing the Company’s ESG programs. At our operations, the Vice President – General Manager, and other employees ensure continuous improvement toward sustainability goals.

Environment

As the largest silver producer in the compensation tables startingUnited States, Hecla is proud to supply an essential metal used in critically important markets including renewable energy technology, medical products, and military defense technology. At the same time, we recognize the importance of responsible mining to ensure that our important work is also having a positive impact on page 62.the environments where we live and work. At each of our sites, we implement programs to reduce freshwater and energy consumption, reduce our carbon footprint, maintain local water quality backed by rigorous testing and monitoring, and reclaim the land once mining is complete.

AdoptionWe are committed to minimizing the environmental impact of Clawback Provisionsour operations through continuous improvement of our processes. We set reduction targets for greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions and energy use, and we also capture and track environmental data to benchmark our operations against industry standards to ensure accountability and transparency in our Incentive Plans (page 53). In February 2013, the Compensation Committee adopted a clawback policy with respect to incentive awards to executive officers. In December 2015, the Compensation Committee amendedprogress against our incentive plans (Annual Incentive Plan, Long-term Incentive Plan, Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan, and 2010 Stock Incentive Plan) to each include a clawback provision.goals.

Sustainability Targets

30% reduction of combined GHG emissions (Scope 1 and Scope 2) from our 2019 baseline emissions of 135,301 tonnes CO2e by 2030, while maintaining a net zero (Scope 1 and Scope 2) carbon footprint through the purchase of carbon emission reduction credits;

Utilize cleaner energy sources and increase the proportion of renewable energy in the Company’s energy mix, while committing to a 5% reduction in energy intensity in our operations from 2020 baseline levels; and

Continually improve our climate change disclosure by incorporating climate-related risks and opportunities into our risk management and strategic planning processes aligned with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures framework.

2022 Proxy Statement    3


Sustainability

Risk Management

Environmental Policies, Management System, and Training

Hecla’s Environmental Policy states our commitment to complying with all applicable federal, state/provincial, and local environmental laws and regulations that govern our facilities and going beyond them when minimal compliance does not meet Hecla’s values. Employees and contractors are also expected to comply with all applicable internal policies, programs, standards, and procedures as outlined in our Code of Conduct, and we conduct structured environmental reviews and audits to assess compliance at least annually.

We utilize our Environmental Management System (“EMS”) to provide consistency in our environmental programs company-wide and promote a culture of environmental awareness, innovation, and accountability across all our operations. The EMS is a 13-element program that promotes continuous improvement around issues including obligation registers, management of change, air quality, water and waste management, energy management, training, and reporting. The EMS program, which is benchmarked against ISO-14001 and complements Canada’s Towards Sustainable Mining program, is reviewed annually through internal audits and third-party reviews.

As part of our environmental management programs, we are committed to ensuring that our employees receive training to raise awareness of environmental issues and our processes to reduce environmental impact. In 2021, site workers company-wide received more than 1,500 hours of environmental training, focusing on job-specific environmental awareness, hazardous material management, spill response, and reporting.

Climate Change and Net Zero Targets

Hecla recognizes that the impacts of climate change are expected to create greater potential risks for our operations, including risks posed by increased frequency of droughts and more extreme weather events such as intense rainfalls. Potential risks to our operations include higher volumes of mine contact water requiring storage and treatment, increased requirements for stormwater diversion and associated water management systems, and reduced availability of freshwater. As part of our enterprise risk management processes, we are committed to incorporating climate-related risks and opportunities into our risk management and strategic planning processes aligned with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures framework.

At least every three years, we conduct structured high-level risk assessments (“HLRAs”) that include climate change considerations and appropriate materiality re-assessments. From these assessments, we develop site-specific management action plans that are assigned to the site management team for resolution. Each key risk identified in the HLRA response action plan is matched with an appropriate performance metric against which progress can be measured. Management and relevant employees meet quarterly with the Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical Committee of our Board to present project updates, including results from HLRAs and progress on material HLRA action plans.

Hecla is committed to reducing our carbon footprint. To demonstrate our commitment, we have set targets for reductions in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions. Company-wide, we achieved a 44% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions (76,550 tonnes CO2e) from 2019 (135,952 tonnes CO2e) and have seen the GHG Intensity score (Total Metric Tonnes GHG Emissions / Total Revenues US$M) reduced by 53% from 201.92 to 94.8 from 2019. We achieved a carbon neutral or net zero emissions level in 2021 for our Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by purchasing and retiring an equivalent emission tonnage of Certified Emission Reduction credits associated with the Tatay Hydroelectric Project in Base SalariesCambodia.

4     www.hecla-mining.com


Sustainability

  LOGO   

Environmental Highlights

Climate Change:

44% reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions from our 2019 baseline levels.

Total Energy Intensity:

We continue to reduce our energy intensity, exceeding our multi-year 5% energy intensity reduction goal.

LOGO

Integrated Environmental Working Groups:

Each of our sites has a Tailings, Waste and Water Working Group that considers, among other aspects, climate change-related impacts that could affect site operations which are then integrated into design of mine facility infrastructure.

Renewable Energy:

In 2021, 99% of our electricity used at our mines was line power. Of that, 70% was generated from renewable hydropower.

Closure:

Hecla continued reclamation at the Troy Mine by finalizing demolition of the office, maintenance, crushing, and milling facilities which were all located on U.S. Forest Service administered public land. Reclamation work completed resulted in release of nearly $8 million in financial assurance by the state.
At our San Sebastian Mine site, we progressed our open pit closure by placing over 3,800,000 tons of waste rock back into the open pits. We partnered with a local contractor for completion of this work.

Safety and Health

Hecla’s commitment to the safety and health of our workforce has been an essential part of our corporate culture for over 130 years and has enabled us to build the highest reputation for safety with our employees, our communities, and within the industry. We work to operate our mines safely by promoting a deeply rooted value-based culture, leveraging mining expertise developed over the Company’s long history, and innovating new practices that improve safety while increasing productivity. As an example, 2021 saw the development of the Underhand Closed Bench (“UCB”) mining method at the Lucky Friday Mine. The UCB method has improved our ability to manage seismicity at the mine.

  LOGO   

Safety and Health Highlights

All-Injury Frequency Rate of 1.45, 40% lower than U.S. National Average:

LOGO

Zero Fatalities:

In 2021, we had zero employee or contractor fatalities.

Decrease in Non-compliance Violations:

We had 93 total non-compliance violations in 2021, representing a 54% reduction since 2020.
In 2021, Hecla’s Casa Berardi Mine received the John T. Ryan Safety Trophy for the Quebec-Maritime Provinces Region for outstanding safety performance. The annual award is given by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum to the mine with the lowest reportable injury frequency.

2022 Proxy Statement    5


Sustainability

Human Capital Management

Hecla’s human capital management is dedicated to investing continuously in the technology, training, systems, and programs that help protect and support our people. We also strive to have our workforce mirror the local demographic diversity, including but not limited to gender, ethnicity and local indigenous people (where applicable). As of December 31, 2021, Hecla employed approximately 1,650 people, of which approximately 950 were employed in the United States, 650 in Canada, and 50 in Mexico. The vast majority of Hecla’s employees are full-time, and approximately 15% of the employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. Creating greater gender diversity in a predominantly male industry is among the priorities of Hecla in the coming years. Management is working to increase the representation of women, local and indigenous people (where applicable) and other diverse people throughout Hecla’s workforce.

At the executive level, the Sr. Vice President and CAO reports directly to the CEO and other NEOs (page 55). Effective January 1, 2016,is responsible for implementing the Compensation Committee approved base salary reductionsCompany’s human capital management program. The position is an executive-level position to reflect the priority we place on utilizing our human capital resources to meet our business strategy. At the local level, each operating site has a human resource professional whose primary role is to manage the Company’s human capital management program at their respective site.

  LOGO   

Human Capital Management Highlights

Gender Diversity:

10% of our workforce are women and 21% hold managerial positions.

Hiring Local:

80% of our workforce is local to our operations.

Hiring First Nations:

The number of First Nations persons hired from the Abitibiwinni (Pikogan) community by Hecla Quebec has more than quadrupled since 2018 from six to an average of 25 who worked at our Casa Berardi Mine in 2021.

Protecting Human Rights:

We conduct business in jurisdictions where human rights laws are respected and promoted and strive to conduct our business in a manner consistent with the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

Community Engagement

Over our 130-year history, Hecla has always been a strong partner in the communities where we operate. Through the continued growth of our responsible mining operations, we provide significant social and economic benefits to our local communities. We are the largest private-sector employer and taxpayer in Juneau, Alaska, near our Greens Creek Mine and in Wallace/Mullan, Idaho, near our Lucky Friday Mine.

We engage with stakeholders at all our sites during every stage of the mining life cycle to become a community partner and deepen our understanding of local concerns and issues. We communicate information through a variety of methods including community meetings, local and social media, and flyers, with all materials available in the local language with translation provided if necessary. We disclose the results of environmental, economic, and social impact assessments and partner with local stakeholders to mitigate any environmental and social impacts. We also work with local stakeholders to identify opportunities for our NEOs. Our CEO’s base salary was reduced by 20%, and all other NEOs’ base salaries were reduced by 10%.the Hecla Charitable Foundation to provide support for community initiatives.

6     www.hecla-mining.com


Sustainability

  LOGO   

Community Engagement Highlights

ReductionSupplier Code of Conduct:

The Company has a Supplier Code of Conduct that sets out the minimum standards of conduct expected from all suppliers wishing to do business with, or on behalf of, Hecla and its subsidiaries.

Indigenous Relations:

In 2021 at our Casa Berardi Mine, two five-year contracts were awarded to Construction Kiwetin for maintenance and transportation services, resulting in Annual Cash Compensationthe employment of 25 First Nations workers annually over the life of the contracts. A contract for clearing land for exploration drilling was given to Cooperative de solidarite de Pikogan, which will employ a minimum of two workers for a three-month period.

Supporting Communities through the Hecla Charitable Foundation:

In 2021, the Hecla Charitable Foundation donated more than $464,000 toward education, youth activities, community programs, and health services activities in communities in which we operate.

Engaging with Stakeholders:

Our Greens Creek Mine was named the Alaska Chamber’sLarge Business of the Year in 2021.

Building a Skilled Workforce:

In 2020, our Board (page 17)Greens Creek Mine renewed a partnership with the University of Alaska Southeast (UAS) Center for Mine Training with a gift of $315,000 for scholarship assistance over the next three years. This makes over $1.2 million invested by the Company in this program over the past 10 years.

2022 Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee recommended    7


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We are committed to effective corporate governance that reflects our values and the Board approved a 10% reductionsupports our strategic and financial objectives and performance. Our corporate governance practices are generally reflected in our Board’s annual cash compensation in 2016.Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, Whistleblower Policy, and committee charters.

Electronic Access to Corporate Governance Documents

Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) (page 44). For 2015,Our corporate governance documents are available on our website at www.hecla-mining.com by selecting the quantitative corporate performance factors (generally weighted intab entitled “Investors” and then selecting the aggregate at 50%tab entitled “Governance and Ethics.” These include:

Bylaws

Restated Certificate of Incorporation

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Whistleblower Policy

Code of Conduct

Code of Ethics: CEO and Senior Financial Officers

Supplier Code of Conduct

Human Rights Statement

Charters of the award) were divided proportionally into three factors: production (20%), adjusted EBITDA (20%)Audit, Compensation, Governance and cash (10%). For 2015, based on the assessment by the Compensation CommitteeSocial Responsibility, and Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical Committees of the Company’s overall performance on both qualitativeBoard

Shareholders may also request a free copy of these documents from: Investor Relations, Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408; (208) 769-4100.

Corporate Governance Guidelines and quantitative measures underCode of Conduct

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Conduct in accordance with the AIP, the committee determined Company performance to be at 115% of target. The 115% was measured by quantitative achievement at 50%, qualitative achievement at 35%, and discretionary at 30%.

2013 – 2015 Long-term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) (page 47). The 2013-2015 LTIP has a maximum potential unit value of $300. The Compensation Committee assessed performance under the 2013-2015 LTIP as follows:

  Performance Measure     Target     Actual Performance     % of Target     Value Earned Per Unit  
Silver Reserve Growth30.0 silver oz. added (millions)25.4 silver oz. added (millions) 85%$20.50
 Production Growth 54.1 silver oz. (millions) 59.2 silver oz. (millions)109%$43.50 
Cash Flow$848.49 cash flow (millions)$884.98 cash flow (millions)104%$31.50
Total Shareholder Return50% Hecla ranking vs. peers69.2% Hecla ranking vs. peers138%$34.50
#4 Shaft CompletionShaft Completed by 2/15/1610/26/16 completion date0%No Payout
Total Earned Per Unit$130.00

During the three-year period, performance in production, cash flow generation, and Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) exceeded the target, and silver reserve growth exceeded the threshold, but was below target, and #4 Shaft completion was below the threshold. As a result, with a range in potential value per unit of $0 to $300, in February 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that the total 2013-2015 LTIP payout was $130.00 per unit. The Compensation Committee further approved payout of the LTIP awards to be 50% in cash and 50% in Hecla common stock issued under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.


www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


Elements of CEO Pay Mix for 2015

CEO Total Direct Compensation
for 2015 - $3,373,250



2015 Base Salary – $605,000 (no increase since 2013).
Annual Incentive Plan Payout – $695,750 (115% of target). Paid 50% in cash and 50% in common stock.
Long-term Incentive Plan Payout – $1,072,500. In February 2013, our CEO was awarded 8,250 units under our 2013-2015 Long-term Incentive Plan. For 2015, the plan paid out $130.00 per unit. Paid 50% in cash and 50% in common stock.
Restricted Stock Units – In July 2015, our CEO was awarded 204,918 restricted stock units with a grant date fair value of $500,000 ($2.44 per share), subject to a three-year vesting schedule (one-third in June 2016, one-third in June 2017, and one-third in June 2018).
Performance-based Shares: In July 2015, our CEO was awarded 204,918 performance-based shares with a grant date fair value of $500,000 ($2.44 per share), the ultimate value of which is based on our three-year TSR ranking in a peer group (payable in 2018).

2015 Summary Compensation and Realized Compensation

Set forth on the following page is the 2015 compensation for each NEO as determined underU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. Total compensation, as reported in theSummary Compensation Table and calculated under SEC rules, includes several items that are driven by accounting and actuarial assumptions. Accordingly, it is not necessarily reflective of the compensation our NEOs actually realized in 2015. To supplement that disclosure we have added the “W-2/T4 Realized Comp.” column to the right of the table below to compare our NEOs’ 2015 compensation as determined under SEC rules with W-2/T4 income for 2015, which is the federally taxable compensation our NEOs received in 2015 inclusive of vested stock and exercised stock options, if any.

This supplemental table is not designed to replace theSummary Compensation Table for 2015 found on page 62, but rather to provide additional, supplemental compensation disclosure.

The differences between this supplemental table and theSummary Compensation Table are (i) the supplemental table includes compensation related to stock awards that became fully vested in 2015, whereas theSummary Compensation Table includes compensation for stock awards as it is expensed for financial accounting purposes; (ii) the supplemental table does not reflect the FASB ASC Topic 718 expense associated with equity awards; (iii) the supplemental table includes compensation related to bonuses that were paid in 2015, whereas theSummary Compensation Table includes bonuses as they are expensed for financial accounting purposes; and (iv) the supplemental table does not include the change in pension value and the Company matching contribution for individual 401(k) deferral. For more information on total compensation as calculated under SEC rules, see the narrative and footnotes accompanying theSummary Compensation Table for 2015 on page 62.



125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement5



Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY


2015 Summary Compensation and Realized Compensation
  
   Name and Principal
Position
   Salary
($)
   Stock
Awards
($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
   Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
   SEC
Total
($)
    SEC Total
Without
Change in
Pension
Value
($)
   W-2/T4 
Realized 
Comp.1 
($) 
   
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.605,0001,727,1741,768,250599,47715,9004,715,8014,116,3242,777,810 
President and CEO
James A. Sabala380,000583,700822,000174,07515,9001,975,6751,801,6001,585,582 
Senior Vice President 
and CFO
 Lawrence P. Radford380,000556,694890,000105,11415,9001,947,7081,842,5941,480,083 
Senior Vice President –
Operations
Dr. Dean W. A. McDonald275,000480,468580,000110,74315,9001,462,1111,351,3681,504,5582
Senior Vice President –
Exploration
David C. Sienko250,000289,933397,00036,36515,900989,198952,833900,897
Vice President –
General Counsel
Don Poirier*226,000314,950401,50082,95015,9001,041,300958,3501,036,9022
Former Vice President –
Corporate Development

*Mr. Poirier departed the Company at the end of 2015.
1The amounts reported in this column include 2015 salary, vested stock received in 2015, equity and cash portion of 2014 Annual Incentive, and equity and cash portion of 2012-2014 Long-term Incentive, which were paid in March 2015. Also includes performance-based shares that vested in 2015 for Mr. Baker.
2Dr. McDonald and Mr. Poirier’s realized compensation is reflected in Canadian dollars as reported on their T4.


www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

PROXY STATEMENT

Board of Directors Selection Process

Our current Bylaws requireNew York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) corporate governance standards. The Corporate Governance Guidelines were adopted by the Board to ensure that the Board is independent from management, that the Board adequately performs its function as the overseer of management, and to help ensure that the interests of the Board and management align with the interests of our shareholders.

We believe that operating with honesty and integrity has earned trust from our shareholders, credibility within our communities and dedication from our employees. Our directors, officers and employees are required to abide by our Code of Conduct to promote the conduct of our business in a consistently legal and ethical manner. Our Code of Conduct covers many topics, including conflicts of interest, confidentiality, fair dealing, proper use of the Company’s assets, and compliance with laws, rules and regulations. In addition to the Code of Conduct for directors, officers and employees, our CEO and Sr. Vice President and CFO are also bound by a separate Code of Ethics.

The Governance Committee has adopted procedures to receive, retain, and react to complaints received regarding possible violations of the Code of Conduct, and to allow for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding possible violations of the Code of Conduct. Our employees may submit any concerns regarding apparent violations of the Code of Conduct to their supervisor, our Vice President and General Counsel, the Chair of the Governance Committee, or through our anonymous telephone hotline.

Whistleblower Policy

We have a Whistleblower Policy adopted by our Audit Committee that encourages our employees, suppliers, contractors, shareholders, customers, or other stakeholders (collectively, “stakeholders”) to report to appropriate Company representatives, without fear of retaliation, any information relating to possible fraud or questionable accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters. Stakeholders may confidentially submit any concerns to the Company’s Vice President and General Counsel, or through an anonymous telephone hotline or a special website. The goal of this policy is to discourage illegal activity and business conduct that damages Hecla’s reputation, business interests, and our relationship with stakeholders.

In 2021, we did not less than five nor more than ninereceive any complaints under our Whistleblower Policy.

8     www.hecla-mining.com


Corporate Governance

Communications with the Board

Stakeholders wishing to communicate with our Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”) or with the independent directors as a group may do so by delivering or mailing the communication in writing to: Chairman of the Board, c/o Corporate Secretary, Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of our internal auditor and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters. From time to time, the Board may change the process by which stakeholders may communicate with the Board or its members. Please refer to our website at www.hecla-mining.com, selecting the tab entitled “Investors” and then the tab entitled “Governance and Ethics,” for any changes in this process.

Board Leadership Structure

Currently, the positions of CEO and Chairman are held by separate persons. The Board believes this structure is optimal for the Company at this time because it allows the CEO to focus on leading the Company’s business and operations, and the Chairman to serve as a sounding board and advisor to the CEO, and to lead the activities of the Board. The Board has also determined that having this structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of the Company, and it enhances the Board’s independence and, we believe, senior management’s accountability to the Board.

In the future, if the individual elected as Chairman also were to be the CEO, the independent directors would elect a Lead Independent Director for a one-year term. This would help ensure continued robust independent leadership of the Board.

Currently, our Chairman chairs meetings of the Board, as well as the executive sessions with independent members of the Board. The Chairman’s duties include:

chairing annual shareholder meetings;

overseeing the preparation of agendas for Board meetings;

preparing for executive sessions of the Board and providing feedback to the CEO;

staying current on developments to determine when it may be appropriate to alert the Board to significant pending developments; and

serving as a liaison between independent directors and the CEO with respect to sensitive issues.

Executive sessions of independent directors are included on the agenda for every regularly scheduled Board meeting. During 2021, executive sessions were held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The executive sessions are chaired by the Chairman. Our independent directors meet in executive sessions without management present unless the independent directors request their attendance. For the foregoing reasons, we have determined that our leadership structure is appropriate in the context of our specific circumstances.

Board Refreshment

In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Governance Committee reviews annually the composition and size of the Board, may be increased or decreased within that rangerecognizing the importance of refreshment to maintain a balance of tenure, diversity, skill sets and experience on our Board. Our Board currently consists of eight members, seven of whom the Board has affirmatively determined are independent. There are three Class III directors whose terms will expire at the Annual Meeting: Ted Crumley, Terry V. Rogers, and Charles B. Stanley. Messrs. Crumley and Rogers have reached the mandatory retirement age and will not stand for re-election. Due to these retirements, the Board will reduce its size from time-to-time by resolution approved byeight members to six members at the affirmative vote ofAnnual Meeting.

Since 2016, we have recruited four new Board members. These four additions to our Board are consistent with our objective to have a majorityBoard with expansive and diverse experience, a deep understanding of the Board.challenges and opportunities associated with our business and a focus on value and sustainability for the benefit of all stakeholders. With the upcoming retirement of Messrs. Crumley and Rogers, our director recruitment efforts are ongoing and further additions to the Board are anticipated within the next year.

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Directors

2022 Proxy Statement    9


Corporate Governance

Identifying and Evaluating Nominees for Director

Director Selection Process

1 Candidate Recommendations  LOGO  2 Governance Committee  LOGO  3 

Board of

Directors

  LOGO  4 

Shareholders

 

From shareholders, management, directors, and search firms 

•  Evaluates the Board’s needs and screens and interviews candidates

•  Reviews qualifications and expertise, tenure, regulatory requirements, and diversity

•  Recommends nominees

 Discusses, analyzes independence, and selects nominees for election Vote on nominees at annual meeting

The Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee uses a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. The committeeGovernance Committee is responsible for ensuring that the composition of the Board accurately addresses the needs of our business. In the event vacancies are anticipated, or arise, the committeeGovernance Committee considers various potential candidates for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the committeeGovernance Committee through current Board members, professional search firms, shareholders, or other persons. Consideration of new director nominee candidates typically involves a series of internal discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates. The committeeGovernance Committee then determines the best qualified candidates based on the established criteria and recommends those candidates to the Board for election atelection.

While the next annual meetingGovernance Committee and our Board prioritize maintaining a board that is comprised of shareholders (or sooner when appropriate).directors with a diverse set of skills, backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives, they also recognize the importance of balancing these qualifications with the overall tenure of directors in their long-term approach to board refreshment. The fresh viewpoints and philosophies newer directors bring, coupled with the valuable experience and institutional knowledge the longer-tenured directors possess, benefits the Board and its overall contribution to the Company.

The Board has appointed four highly qualified directors since 2016 who bring insight to areas such as mining, international business, acquisitions, operations, legal, risk management, geology, engineering, finance, and tax. To supplement our newer directors, our longer-tenured directors have extensive knowledge of our operations and have the perspective of overseeing our business activities through economic cycles and across differing competitive environments.

We hold the view that the continuing service of qualified incumbents promotes stability and continuity in the boardroom, contributing to the Board’s ability to work as a collective body, while giving us the benefit of familiarity and insight into our affairs that our directors have accumulated during their tenure. Recent additions to the Board provide new perspectives and diversity, while directors who have served for a number of years bring experience, continuity, institutional knowledge, and insight into the Company’s business and industry. Directors with relevant business and leadership experience provide the Board with a useful perspective on business strategy and significant risks, and an understanding of the challenges facing the business. Accordingly, the process for identifying nominees reflects our practice of re-nominating incumbent directors who (i) continue to satisfy the committee’sGovernance Committee’s criteria for membership on the Board, (ii) the committeeGovernance Committee believes continue to make important contributions to the Board, and (iii) consent to continue their service on the Board. Directors should also be able to commit the requisite time for preparation and attendance at regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings, as well as be able to participate in other matters necessary to ensure good corporate governance is practiced.

The committeeGovernance Committee reviews annually with the Board the composition of the Board as a whole and recommends, if necessary, measures to be taken so that the Board reflects the appropriate balance of knowledge, experience, skills, expertise, and diversity required for the Board as a whole and contains at least the minimum number of independent directors required by applicable laws and regulations.

Board members should possess such attributes and experience as are necessary for the Board as a whole and contain a broad range of personal

10     www.hecla-mining.com


Corporate Governance

characteristics, including diversity of backgrounds, management skills, mining, accounting, finance, and business experience. Directors should be able to commit the requisite timeSummarized below is a description of why each core competency is important for preparation and attendance at regularly scheduled Board and committee meetings, as well as be able to participate in other matters necessary to ensure good corporate governance is practiced.service on Hecla’s Board.

Knowledge, Skills and Experience

LOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGOLOGO

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Board Service on Public Companies

We value individuals who understand public company reporting responsibilities and have experience with the issues commonly faced by public companies. Five of our directors have served on boards of other public companies.

CEO Experience

These skills are important to gain a practical understanding of organizations and drivers of individual growth and development. Seven of our directors have had some experience in the administration of a multijurisdictional company. Two of our directors have experience as a chief executive officer.

Corporate Governance

Experience with governance principals and policies. All our directors have had experience in corporate governance.

Environmental and Social Responsibility

Experience with environmental and social responsibility initiatives, including sustainability, diversity, and inclusion. Six of our directors have experience in environmental and social responsibility.

Finance

We believe that an understanding of finance and financial reporting processes is important for our directors to monitor and assess the Company’s operating and strategic performance and to ensure accurate financial reporting and robust controls. It is important to have experience in capital markets, corporate finance, accounting, and financial reporting and several of our director’s satisfy the “accounting or related financial management experience” criteria set forth in the NYSE listing standards. Three of the eight directors satisfy the “audit committee financial expert” criteria set forth in regulations of the SEC, but only one of those directors sits on the Audit Committee. All of our directors have financial knowledge and are financially literate.

Geology, Mining and Engineering

It is important that some of our directors have experience in open-pit and underground mines, as well as knowing the science and technology of extracting minerals, exploration, geology, metallurgy, and geotechnical engineering experience. Two of our directors have experience managing mining operations. Three of our directors have experience in geology, mining, and/or engineering.

Industry Experience

Having experience in our industry or a similar industry contributes to a deeper understanding of our business strategy, operations, key performance indicators and competitive environment. All of our directors have experience in mining or a similar industry.

Industry Association Participation

Experience in organizations that support companies and employers in the mining industry and protect their rights. Three of our directors have chaired an industry organization. Seven of our directors have a long and highly regarded reputation in the industry.

International Business

With operations in Mexico and Canada and prospects for further expansion, international experience helps us understand opportunities and challenges. All of our directors have had international business experience.

Senior Leadership

Experience serving as CEO or a senior business executive, as well as hands-on leadership experience in core management areas, such as strategic and operational planning, financial reporting, compliance, risk management and leadership development, provides a practical understanding of how organizations like Hecla function. All of our directors have senior business leadership experience.

Legal and Compliance

Hecla is subject to a broad array of government regulations. Mining is impacted by changes in law or regulation in areas such as safety, environmental and disclosure. Several of our directors have experience in regulated industries, providing them with insight and perspective in working constructively and proactively with governments and agencies. Three of our directors have formal legal education and understand the legal risks and obligations of the Company.

2022 Proxy Statement    11


Corporate Governance

Knowledge, Skills and Experience

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO

Reputation in the Industry

        

Risk Management

Considering the Board’s role in risk oversight, we seek directors who can contribute to the identification, assessment and prioritization of risks facing the Company. All of our directors have experience with our business to understand key areas of risk.

        

Strategic Planning, Business Development, Business Operations

Experience defining and driving strategic direction and growth and managing the operations of a business or large organization. All of our directors have experience in setting and managing the strategic direction of a business.

        

Demographics

                

Race/Ethnicity

                

Asian/Pacific Islander

               

White/Caucasian

         

Gender

                

Male

          

Female

              

Board Tenure

                

Years – Average Tenure is 12 years. After Annual Meeting and retirement of Messrs. Crumley and Rogers, average tenure will be 9 years.

 21 5 27 6 6 15 15 1

In general, and as more fully outlined in our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines, in evaluating director candidates for election to our Board, the committeeGovernance Committee will: (i) consider if the candidate satisfies the minimum qualifications for director candidates as set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines; (ii) consider factors that are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders, including the knowledge, experience, integrity and judgment of each candidate; (iii) consider the contribution of each candidate to the diversity of backgrounds, experience and competencies which the Board desires to have represented, with such diversity being considered among the other desirable attributes of the Board; (iv) assess the performance of an incumbent director during the preceding term; (v) consider each candidate’s ability to devote sufficient time and effort to his or her duties as a director; (vi) consider a candidate’s independence and willingness to consider all strategic proposals; (vii) consider any other criteria established by the Board and any core competencies or technical expertise necessary to manage and direct the affairs and business of the Company, including, when applicable, to enhance the ability of committees of the Board to fulfill their duties; and (viii) determine whether there exists any special, countervailing considerations against nomination of the candidate.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement7



Table of ContentsDirector Qualifications, Evaluation, and Nomination

PROXY STATEMENT


Shareholder Nominees

The committee will consider persons recommended by shareholders as nominees for election as directors. Our Bylaws provide that any shareholder who is entitled to vote for the election of directors at a meeting called for such purpose may nominate persons for election to the Board by following the procedures set forth on page 87. Shareholders who wish to submit a proposed nominee to the committee should send written notice to the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee Chairman, c/o Corporate Secretary, Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, within the time period set forth on page 87. The notification should set forth all information relating to the nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for elections of directors pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), including the nominee’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected; the name and address of the shareholder or beneficial owner making the nomination or on whose behalf the nomination is being made; and the class and number of shares of stock of the Company owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder or beneficial owner. The committee will consider shareholder nominees on the same terms as nominees selected by the committee.

Regardless of how a candidate is brought to the committee, qualified candidates are subjected to one or more interviews with appropriate members of the Board. Chosen candidates are extended invitations to join the Board. If a candidate accepts, he or she is formally nominated.

Director Qualifications, Evaluation, and Nomination

The committee believes that nominees for election to the Board should also possess certain minimum qualifications and attributes. The nominee must: (i) exhibit strong personal integrity, character and ethics, and a commitment to ethical business and accounting practices; (ii) not be involved in ongoing litigation with the Company or be employed by an entity that is engaged in such litigation; and (iii) not be the subject of any ongoing criminal investigations in the jurisdiction of the United States, or any state, thereof,or internationally, including investigations for fraud or financial misconduct. Our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors will not be nominated for re-election after their 72nd birthday.

In connection with the director nominees who are up for re-electionelection at the Annual Meeting, the committeeGovernance Committee also considered the nominees’ rolesnominee’s role in: (i) overseeing the Company’s efforts in complying with its SEC disclosure requirements; (ii) assisting in improving the Company’s internal controls and disclosure controls; (iii) assisting with the development of the strategic plan of the Company; and (iv) working with management to implement the Company’s strategic plangoals and mission statement.plans. Directors are expected to exemplify high standards of personal and professional integrity and to constructively challenge management through their active participation and questioning. Our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that a director will not be nominated for re-election after their 75th birthday.

12     www.hecla-mining.com


Corporate Governance

In addition to fulfilling the above criteria, each nominee for election to the Board at the upcoming Annual Meeting brings a strong and unique background and set of skills to the Board, giving the Board as a whole competence and experience in a wide variety of areas, including corporate governance, executive management, legal, accounting, finance, mining, exploration, and board service. The committeeGovernance Committee has reviewed the nominees’ overall service to the Company during their terms, including the number of meetings attended, level of participation and quality of performance.

www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of ContentsMajority Voting for Directors and Director Resignation Policy

PROXY STATEMENT


Selection of New Directors in 2016

In December 2015, we were saddened to announceFebruary 2017, the passing of one of our directors, John H. Bowles. After Mr. Bowles’ passing, we reduced the size of the Board to six. After many discussions with potential director candidates, and careful consideration, on March 1, 2016, the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee recommended and the Board approved an increase inamendments to the Corporate Governance Guidelines to include a director resignation policy. The policy provides that any director who is not elected by a majority of votes cast shall tender his or her resignation to the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee will recommend to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation offer, or whether another action should be taken. In determining whether to recommend that the Board accept any resignation offer, the Governance Committee will consider all factors believed relevant by it. The Board will act on the Governance Committee’s recommendation within 90 days following certification of the election results. In deciding whether to accept the resignation offer, the Board will consider the factors considered by the Governance Committee and any additional information and factors that the Board finds relevant. If the Board accepts a director’s resignation offer pursuant to this process, the Governance Committee will recommend to the Board and the Board will thereafter determine whether to fill such vacancy or reduce the size of the Board. Any director who tenders their resignation pursuant to this provision will not participate in the proceedings of either the Governance Committee or the Board from sixwith respect to eight and appointed two new directors to our Board.

Mr. Stephen F. Ralbovsky was appointed astheir own resignation offer. If a Class II director (standing for election in 2018), filling a vacancy createddirector’s resignation is not accepted by the deathBoard, the director shall continue to serve until the next annual meeting of John H. Bowles. Mr. Ralbovskyshareholders or until their successor is duly elected and qualified, or their earlier resignation or removal.

Diversity

The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide the Board should include individuals with a certified public accountantdiverse range of experiences to give the Board depth and was a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP from February 1987 until his retirement in June 2014. He has over 36 years’ experience in taxation, auditing and accounting, where he specializedbreadth in the mining industry. The Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee and Board determined that Mr. Ralbovsky was independent under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards.mix of skills represented. The Board also appointed Mr. Ralbovskyseeks to serve oninclude diversity in professional experience, skills, industry background, race/ethnicity, national origin, and gender, as well as the Audit Committee andability of directors (and candidates for director) to devote sufficient time to performing their duties in an effective manner.

Size of the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee.Board of Directors

Mr. George R. Johnson was appointed asOur Bylaws require the Board to have not less than five nor more than nine members. The size of the Board may be increased or decreased within that range from time-to-time by resolution approved by the affirmative vote of a Class I director (standing for election in 2017), to fill a resulting vacancy whenmajority of the Board. On February 26, 2021, the Board increased the size of the Board from sixeight members to nine members due to the appointment of a new Class I director (Ms. Alice Wong). On May 19, 2021, the Board decreased the size of the Board from nine members to eight directors.members due to the retirement of Mr. Johnson is a mining engineerGeorge R. Nethercutt, Jr.

The retirement of Messrs. Rogers and most recently served as Senior Vice President of Operations at B2Gold Corporation from August 2009 until his retirement in May 2015. Mr. Johnson also held many positions with HeclaCrumley will cause an imbalance in the early 1980’s through 1999 and is very familiar with the Company’s operations. He has over 45 yearsnumber of foreign and domestic experience in underground and open-pit mine construction and operations management. The Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee and Board determined that Mr. Johnson was independent under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The Board also appointed Mr. Johnson to servedirectors on the Audit CommitteeBoard’s three classes of directors. The Company’s Bylaws and the Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical Committee.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement9



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

In accordance with ourRestated Certificate of Incorporation provide that the Board is divided into three classes. The termsnumber of office of the directors in each class expire at different times. There are threeof directors whose termsshall be as nearly equal in number as possible. In order to maintain balance among the classes, Alice Wong will expire at the 2016 Annual Meeting: Ted Crumley, Terry V. Rogers and Charles B. Stanley.

At a meeting held by the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee in February 2016, the committee determined that the three directors whose terms are expiring - Messrs. Crumley, Rogers and Stanley - were qualified candidates to stand for re-electionelection at the Annual Meeting andas a Class III director, together with Charles B. Stanley, each with a term to expire at the 2025 annual meeting of shareholders. Immediately following the Annual Meeting, the size of the Board designated Messrs. Crumley, Rogerswill be reduced to six.

Board’s Role in Oversight of Strategy and Stanley as nominees for re-election as directorsRisk Management

Our Board is engaged and involved in overseeing our strategy and takes an active role in risk oversight.

The Board oversees the strategic direction of the Company, each for a three-year term expiringand in 2019. Each nominee has accepteddoing so considers the nominationpotential rewards and agreed to serve as a director if elected by the Company’s shareholders.

It is intended that the proxies solicited hereby from our shareholders that do not provide voting instructions will be votedFOR the election of Ted Crumley, Terry V. Rogers and Charles B. Stanley. The Board knows of no reason why the nominees will be unable or unwilling to accept election. However, if any nominee becomes unable or is unwilling to accept election, the Board will either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select substitute nominees submitted by the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee. If substitute nominees are selected, proxies that do not provide voting instructions will be voted in favor of such nominees.

Director Qualifications and Biographical Information

Set forth below is biographical information for each of the director nominees, including the key qualifications, experience, attributes, and skills that led our Board to the conclusion that each of the director nominees should serve as a director. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Our Board includes individuals with strong backgrounds in executive leadership and management, accounting and finance, and Company and industry knowledge, and we believe that, as a group, they work effectively together in overseeing our business.

10 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Current Nominees for Election to the Board – Term Ending at the 2016 Annual Meeting

If elected, the nominees will each serve for a three-year term ending in 2019. The nominees are as follows:

     Ted Crumley

Former Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
OfficeMax Incorporated

Director since:1995
Board Chairman since 2006

Age:71

Other Directorships:
None

Hecla Committees:

Executive

Compensation

Mr. Crumley served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of OfficeMax Incorporated, a distributor of office products, from January 2005 until his retirement in December 2005. He was also Senior Vice President of OfficeMax Incorporated from November 2004 to January 2005, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Boise Cascade Corporation, a manufacturer of paper and forest products, from 1994 to 2004.

Board Qualification and Skills:

High Level of Financial Experience: Substantial financial experience gained from a long career with OfficeMax Incorporated and Boise Cascade Corporation.

Senior Leadership/Executive Officer Experience: Has over 30 years’ experience in management, finance and accounting in the natural resources industry. Served in numerous senior leadership positions, including Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of OfficeMax Incorporated and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Boise Cascade Corporation.

Significant Public Company Board Experience: Over 20 years of service on Hecla’s Board, including as Chairman since 2006.

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: With over 20 years’ of service on Hecla’s Board, Mr. Crumley understands all aspectsrisks of our business includingopportunities and challenges, and monitors the mining elements.

Designations: Mr. Crumley received his Bachelordevelopment and management of Business Administration with a major in Accounting from Idaho State University College of Business in 1969.risks that impact our strategic goals.

     Terry V. Rogers, C. Dir., H.R.C.C.C.

Former Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Cameco Corporation

Director since:2007

Age: 69

Other Directorships:
Centerra Gold Inc.

Hecla Committees:

Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical (Chair)

Compensation

Audit

Executive

Mr. Rogers served as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Cameco Corporation, a uranium producer, from February 2003 until his retirement in June 2007. He is a former President of Kumtor Operating Company, a gold producing company and a subsidiary of Cameco Corporation, where he served from 1999 to 2003 and has served on the Board of Directors of Centerra Gold Inc., a gold mining company, since February 2003.

Board Qualification and Skills:

High Level of Financial Experience: Financial experience gained from his senior leadership/executive officer experience with Cameco Corporation and Kumtor Operating Company.

Senior Leadership/Executive Officer Experience: Has experience in management in the mining industry. Served in numerous senior leadership positions, including Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Cameco Corporation, and former President of Kumtor Operating Company (a subsidiary of Cameco Corporation).

Significant Public Company Board Experience: In addition to serving on the Board of Hecla, has over 12 years of service on the Board of Centerra Gold Inc., including as independent lead director, chairman of the human resources and compensation committee, and a member of the audit committee.

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: Over 30 years’ experience in the mining industry, including, opencast, open-pit and underground operations in coal, gold, and uranium mines around the world.

Designations: Mr. Rogers received an Associate degree in Applied Science from the Superior Technical Institute in Wisconsin in 1972. He also obtained a Chartered Director (C. Dir.) designation from The Directors College in 2011, as wellBoard as a Human Resources and Compensation Committee Certified (H.R.C.C.C.) designation from The Directors College in 2013.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement11



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


     Charles B. Stanley

Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
QEP Resources, Inc.

Director since:2007

Age: 57

Other Directorships:
QEP Resources, Inc.

Hecla Committees:

Audit (Chair)

Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical

Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating

Mr. Stanley has been Chief Executive Officer and President of QEP Resources, Inc., an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company, since May 2010. He was appointed Chairman of the Board of QEP Resources, Inc. in May 2012. He also served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of QEP Midstream Partners, LP, a master limited partnership that owns, operates, acquires and develops midstream energy assets, from May 2013 to December 2014. He served as Chief Operating Officer of Questar Corporation, a Western U.S. natural gas-focused exploration and production, interstate pipeline and local distribution company, from March 2008 to June 2010; and Executive Vice President and Director of Questar Corporation from February 2002 to June 2010.

Board Qualification and Skills:

High Level of Financial Experience: Substantial financial experience gained from a long career with QEP Resources, Inc. and Questar Corporation.

Extensive Senior Leadership/Executive Officer Experience: In addition to his current position as Chief Executive Officer and President of QEP Resources, Mr. Stanley served in numerous other senior leadership positions, including Chief Executive Officer and President of QEP Midstream Partners, LP, and Chief Operating Officer of Questar Corporation.

Significant Public Company Board Experience: In addition to serving on the Board of Hecla, has served on the board of QEP Resources, Inc. the past 5 years and as Chairman of the Board since 2012. Prior to serving on QEP’s board, Mr. Stanley served on the board of Questar Corporation. He also serves on the boards of various natural gas industry trade organizations, including the American Exploration and Production Council and America’s Natural Gas Alliance.

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: Over 32 years’ experience in the international and domestic upstream and midstream oil and gas industry. He is a geologist with an extensive background in natural resources.

Designations: Mr. Stanley received a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology in 1981, as well as a Master of Science degree in Geology in 1983 from Virginia Tech.

The Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the election of Ted Crumley, Terry V. Rogers and Charles B. Stanley


12 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Our directors whose terms are not expiring this year follow. They will continue to serve as directors for the remainder of their terms or until their respective successors are appointed or elected.

Continuing Members of the Board – Term Ending at the 2017 Annual Meeting

     Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

President and Chief Executive Officer

Director since:2001

Age: 56

Other Directorships:
QEP Resources, Inc.

Hecla Committees:

Executive (Chair)

Mr. Baker has been our CEO since May 2003 and has served as our President since November 2001. He has served as a Director of QEP Resources, Inc., an independent natural gas and oil exploration and production company, since May 2010, as well as serving as a Director for Questar Corporation, a Western U.S. natural gas-focused exploration and production, interstate pipeline and local distribution company, from February 2004 through June 2010.

Board Qualification and Skills:

High Level of Financial Experience: Substantial financial experience gained in his roles of President, CEO, and previously as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

Extensive Senior Leadership/Executive Officer Experience: In addition to serving as Hecla’s President and CEO, served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer. Has 18 years’ management experience in the mining industry.

Significant Public Company Board Experience: In addition to serving on the Board of Hecla, has served on the board of QEP Resources for 11 years. He serves as chair of the audit committee and as a member of the governance committee for QEP Resources, Inc.

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: Over 29 years’ experience in the mining industry.

Designations: Mr. Baker received a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from Texas A & M University in 1981, and a law degree and Master of Business Administration from the University of Houston in 1985. He became a member of the State Bar of Texas in 1985, and received his Certified Public Accountant designation in 1986 from the Texas State Board of Public Accounting.

     Dr. Anthony P. Taylor

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Selex Resources Ltd.

Director since:2002

Age: 74

Other Directorships:
Caughlin Preschool Co.

Hecla Committees:

Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating (Chair)

Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical

Compensation

Dr. Taylor has served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Selex Resources Ltd., a private Ontario Corporation engaged in mineral exploration, since January 2012. Since October 2001, he has served as President and Director of Caughlin Preschool Co., a private Nevada corporation that operates a preschool, which he co-founded. He previously served as Executive Chairman of Crown Gold Corporation, a public Canadian minerals exploration company, from August 2010 to August 2012, after serving as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Gold Summit Corporation, a public Canadian minerals exploration company, from October 2003 to August 2010.

Board Qualification and Skills:

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: Over 51 years’ experience in the mining industry in all levels of exploration from a field geologist to senior management. Has extensive experience in lead, zinc, nickel, copper, diamond, gold and silver exploration from his work in Europe, Australia, South Africa, and North and South America.

Extensive Senior Leadership/Executive Officer Experience: Has extensive experience in management in the mining industry. Served in numerous senior leadership positions, including Executive Chairman of Crown Gold Corporation and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Gold Summit Corporation.

Significant Public Company Board Experience: Over 13 years of service on Hecla’s Board.

Designations: Dr. Taylor received his Bachelor of Science (with honors) in Geology from Durham University (U.K.) in 1964, and his Ph.D in Geology from Manchester University (U.K.) in 1974.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement13



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


     George R. Johnson

Former Senior Vice President of Operations
B2Gold Corporation

Director since:2016

Age: 67

Other Directorships:
None

Hecla Committees:

Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical

Audit

Mr. Johnson served as Senior Vice President of Operations of B2Gold Corporation, a Canadian-based gold producing company, from August 2009 until his retirement in May 2015. He is a former Senior Vice President of Russian Operations of Kinross Gold Corporation, a senior gold mining company, from March 2007 to August 2009, and Senior Vice President of Operations of Bema Gold Corporation, a gold producing company, from October 1999 to March 2007.

Board Qualification and Skills:

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: Over 45 years of foreign and domestic experience in underground and open-pit mine construction and operations management. Served as Vice President – Metal Mining for Hecla from May 1996 to 1999 where he was responsible for performance of Hecla’s metals division, including mines operated by Hecla and joint ventures with other companies, exploration programs, business development, capital projects and corporate technical services. He held various other positions with Hecla from 1983 to 1990, including as general manager of Hecla’s Lucky Friday mine from July 1986 to February 1989; mine superintendent from November 1984 to June 1986, and development foreman from October 1983 to 1984.

Senior Leadership/Executive Officer Experience: Has extensive experience in management in the mining industry. Served in numerous senior leadership positions including Senior Vice President of Operations for B2Gold Corporation, Senior Vice President of Russian Operations for Kinross Gold Corporation, and Senior Vice President of Operations for Bema Gold Corporation.

Designations: Mr. Johnson received a Bachelor of Science with a major in Mining Engineering from the University of Washington in 1972.

14 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


Continuing Members of the Board – Term Ending at the 2018 Annual Meeting

     George R. Nethercutt, Jr.

Chairman of The George Nethercutt Foundation and Of Counsel for Lee & Hayes PLLC

Director since:2005

Age: 71

Other Directorships:
Washington Policy Center
ARCADIS Corporation
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
International (Board of Chancellors)

Hecla Committees:

Compensation (Chair)

Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating

Mr. Nethercutt has served as Chairman of The George Nethercutt Foundation, a non-profit student leadership and civics education charity, since 2007, and was appointed Of Counsel for Lee & Hayes PLLC, a law firm, in September 2010. He has been a board member of Washington Policy Center, a public policy organization providing analysis on issues relating to the free market and government regulation, since January 2005; board member of ARCADIS Corporation, an international company providing consultancy, engineering and management services, since May 2005; and Board of Chancellors, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, a charity and advocate of juvenile diabetes research worldwide, since June 2011. He was a Principal of Nethercutt Consulting LLC, a strategic planning and consulting firm, from January 2007 to January 2012, and served as a member on the board of IP Street, a software company, from May 2011 to January 2015. He also served as U.S. Chairman of the Permanent Joint Board on Defense - U.S./Canada from April 2005 to December 2009; Member, U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2005; Member, Subcommittee on Interior, Agriculture and Defense Appropriations from 1995 to 2005; Member, Committee on Science and Energy from 1998 to 2005; and Vice Chairman, Defense Subcommittee on Appropriations from 2000 to 2004.

Board Qualification and Skills:

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: Served as a U.S. Congressman and focused on natural resource policies, mining legislation and environmental policies on public lands.

Extensive Government Leadership Experience: Has extensive political background, including working as a staff member in the U.S. Senate in Washington, D.C., where he focused on issues relating to oil and gas, natural resources, mining and commerce. Served as chief of staff to a U.S. Senator from Alaska, working on such issues as agriculture, fisheries, timber and mining. He had his own consulting business which consisted of representing clients with mining and natural resource issues.

Significant Public Company Board Experience: Over 10 years of service on Hecla’s Board.

Designations: Mr. Nethercutt received his Bachelor of Arts in English from Washington State University in 1967, and a law degree from Gonzaga University Law School in 1971. He has been a member of the Washington State Bar Association since 1972.

     Stephen F. Ralbovsky

Former Partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Director since:2016

Age: 62

Other Directorships:
None

Hecla Committees:

Audit

Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating

Mr. Ralbovsky was a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an accounting firm, from February 1987 until his retirement in June 2014, where he concentrated his practice on public companies operating in the mining industry. He previously served on the Board and as Treasurer of the American Heart Association – Arizona Affiliate, a non-profit organization dedicated to fighting heart disease, from July 1991 to June 1995; Board member (and President for one year) of Southwest Human Development, a non-profit dedicated to early childhood development, from June 1990 to June 1996; and Advisory Board member of Diocese of Phoenix Catholic Cemeteries and Mortuaries, a non-profit organization, from July 2009 to July 2012. Mr. Ralbovsky is also a member of several organizations, including: AICPA, Arizona Society of CPAs, National Mining Association, and Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.

Board Qualification and Skills:

High Level of Financial Experience: Over 36 years’ experience in taxation, auditing and accounting.

Extensive Knowledge of the Company’s Business and Industry: Over 36 years’ experience in accounting, where he was heavily involved in the mining industry with emphasis in global mining tax and royalty policy.

Extensive Senior Leadership Experience: Has extensive experience in leadership in the accounting industry. Served in numerous senior leadership positions, including US Mining Leader, US Mining Tax Leader, Global Mining Tax Leader and Tax Partner for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Designations: Mr. Ralbovsky received a Bachelor of Business Administration with a major in Accounting from Siena College in 1975. He also received a law degree from Albany Law School in 1978. He is licensed in D.C. and Arizona as a Certified Public Accountant.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement15



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS


COMPENSATION OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

The Compensation Committee of the Boardwhole is responsible for recommendingrisk oversight at the Company, with reviews of certain areas conducted by the relevant Board committees that regularly report to the Board the form and amount of compensation for our non-management directors. The compensation program is designed to provide pay that is competitive with directors in the Company’s peer group, which is described on page 38 of thisfull Board.

2022 Proxy Statement in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis. It consists of a combination of cash retainers and equity awards.    13

The committee periodically engages its compensation consultant to review compensation of the Company’s Board compared to the Company’s peer group. The following discussion of compensation applies only to our non-management directors, and does not apply to Mr. Baker who, as an employee of the Company, is compensated as an executive officer and does not receive additional compensation for his service as a director.

2015 Compensation Changes for Non-Management Directors


As a result of its periodic review of Board compensation, in 2015, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved an increase in the annual equity award under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan from $61,000 to $76,000.

Cash Compensation

Each non-management director receives an annual cash retainer for his service on the Board in the amount of $66,000. The Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual cash retainer in the amount of $90,000. For service on Board committees or as chair of the committees: (i) each non-management member of the Audit and Compensation Committees receives an annual fee of $12,000; (ii) each non-management member of the Executive, Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating, and Health Safety, Environmental and Technical Committees receives an annual fee of $8,000; (iii) the committee chair for each of the Audit andCompensation Committees receives an additional annual fee of $12,000; and (iv) the committee chair for each of the Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical and Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committees receives an additional annual fee of $8,000.

All of the above annual fees are paid in quarterly installments. No other attendance fees are paid to the non-management directors. The non-management directors do not receive stock options, non-equity incentive plan compensation, or any other compensation, except as described below.

Equity Compensation

In March 1995, we adopted the Hecla Mining Company Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors, which became effective following shareholder approval on May 5, 1995. The plan was amended July 18, 2002, February 25, 2004, May 6, 2005, December 10, 2007, and May 24, 2012. The plan terminates July 17, 2017, and is subject to termination by the Board at any time. Pursuant to the plan, on May 30 of each year, each non-management director is credited with a number of shares determined by dividing $24,000 by the average closing price for Hecla’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) for the prior calendar year. Non-management directors joining the Board after May 30 of any year are credited with a pro rata number of shares based upon the date they join the Board. These shares are held in a grantor trust, the assets of which are subject to the claims of our creditors, until delivered under the terms of the plan. Delivery of the shares from the trust occurs upon the earliest of: (i) death or disability; (ii) retirement from the Board; (iii) a cessation of the director’sservice for any other reason; (iv) a change in control of the Company (as defined in the plan); or (v) at the election of the director at any time, provided, however, that shares must be held in the trust for at least two years prior to delivery. Subject to certain restrictions, directors may elect delivery of the shares on such date or in annual installments thereafter over 5, 10 or 15 years. The maximum number of shares of common stock which may be credited pursuant to the plan is 1,000,000. As of December 31, 2015, there were 506,921 shares remaining under the plan.

In February 2010, we adopted the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan for executive officers, employees, directors, and certain consultants, which was approved by shareholders in June 2010, and became effective on August 25, 2010. Pursuant to the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, directors may be awarded grants of stock options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, or stock. In July 2015, the Compensation Committee recommended that the Board award $76,000

16 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

of additional stock to the directors as part of their compensation. The Board approved the additional award, and each of the directors received 31,148 additional shares under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan in July 2015.

As described more fully above, the following chart summarizes the annual cash and equity compensation for our non-management directors during 2015.

Non-Management Director Compensation for 2015

Fees
  DirectorAnnual
Retainer
($)
Committee
Meeting
Fees
($)
Committee
Chairman
Fees
($)
Totals Fees Paid in
Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
1
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
  
Ted Crumley,     156,000     20,000     0     176,000     25,0072
     0     277,008
Chairman76,0013
John H. Bowles66,00028,00012,000106,00025,00720207,008
 76,0013
George R. Nethercutt, Jr.66,00020,00012,00098,00025,00720199,008
76,0013
Terry V. Rogers66,00032,0008,000106,00025,00720207,008
76,0013
Charles B. Stanley66,00028,000094,00025,00720195,008
76,0013
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor66,00028,0008,000102,00025,00720203,008
76,0013

1The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For a description of the assumptions used in valuing the awards please see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
2On May 29, 2015, each non-management director received 8,041 shares of our common stock under the terms of the Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors. Based on our closing stock price on the NYSE on May 29, 2015 ($3.11), the grant date fair value for each grant of 8,041 shares credited to Messrs. Crumley, Bowles, Nethercutt, Rogers, Stanley and Taylor on May 29, 2015, was $25,007. (The amounts do not reflect the actual amounts that may be realized by the directors.)
3On July 1, 2015, each non-management director received 31,148 shares of our common stock under the terms of the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Based on our closing stock price on the NYSE on July 1, 2015 ($2.44), the grant date fair value for each grant of 31,148 shares credited to Messrs. Crumley, Bowles, Nethercutt, Rogers, Stanley and Taylor on July 1, 2015, was $76,001. (The amounts do not reflect the actual amounts that may be realized by the directors.)

2016 Compensation Changes for Non-Management Directors

Effective January 1, 2016, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved a 10% reduction in the annual cash compensation paid to non-management directors in 2016.

Other

The Company covers directors under its overall director and officer liability insurance policies, as well as reimbursing them for travel, lodging, and meal expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and committee meetings, meetings of shareholders, and for traveling to visit our operations. Directors are eligible, on the same basis as Company employees, to participate in the Company’s matching gift program, pursuant to which the Company matches contributions made to qualifying nonprofit organizations. The aggregate annual limit per participant is $5,000. Beyond these items, no other cash compensation was paid to any non-management director.

Retirement Age

The Company has no current retirement plan for non-management directors. Our Bylaws and Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that directors will not be nominated for re-election after their 72nd birthday (this policy was waived in 2014 when Dr. Anthony P. Taylor was nominated for re-election after his 72nd birthday). As of December 31, 2015, the average age of members of our Board was approximately 68 and the average tenure of our Board was approximately 11 years. With the addition of two new members to the Board in February 2016, the average age of members of our Board is now approximately 67 and the average tenure of our Board is approximately 8 years.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement17



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS


CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS

We believe that good corporate governance practices reflect our values and support our strong strategic and financial objectives and performance. Our corporate governance practices are generally reflected in our Bylaws, Corporate Governance Guidelines, and committee charters, which can be found at http://www.hecla-mining.com. The charters of each committee spell out the committees’ roles and responsibilities assigned to each by the Board. In addition, the Board has established policies and procedures that address matters such as chief executive officer succession planning, transactions with related persons, risk oversight communications with the Board by shareholders and other interested parties, as well as the independence and qualifications of our directors. This corporate governance section provides insights into how the Board has implemented these policies and procedures to benefit Hecla and our shareholders.

The Board’s Role and Activities in 2015

Hecla’s Board acts as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company on certain fundamental matters and advises and oversees management, who are responsible for the day-to-day operations and management of the Company. In carrying out its responsibilities,role, the Board reviews, evaluates and assesses Hecla’s long-term strategy. During 2015, there were four meetings of the Board. Directors are expected to make every effortto attend the Annual Meeting, all Board meetings and the meetings of the committees on which they serve. Alldiscusses with appropriate members of management whether the Board attended last year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which was heldrisk management processes designed and implemented by management are adequate in May 2015. In 2015, each director attended over 95% of the meetings of the Boardidentifying, assessing, managing, and the committees of which he was a member.

Role of Board in Risk Oversight

Our management is responsible for identifying and reviewingmitigating material risks facing the Company, including without limitation, strategic,financial, operational, financial, compensationsocial, and regulatory risks, and meets regularly as part of such responsibility to review and discuss the Company’s risk exposure. environmental risks.

The Board does not havebelieves that full and open communication between senior management and the directors is essential to effective risk oversight. Our Chairman regularly meets with our CEO on a standing risk management committee, but rather administers this oversight function directly throughvariety of matters, including business strategies, opportunities, key challenges, and risks facing the Board as a whole,Company, as well as throughmanagement’s risk mitigation strategies. Senior management attends all regularly scheduled Board meetings where they conduct presentations on various standing committees ofmatters involving our operations and are available to address any questions or concerns raised by the Board that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, the Board is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategicon risk exposure. The Board and its committees periodically receive risk management updates through business reports from management provided at meetings of the Boardmanagement-related or its committees throughout the year.other matters. Following consideration of the information providedpresented by management, the Board provides feedback and makes recommendations, as needed, which is designed to help minimize the Company’s risk exposure. We also believe that our leadership structure and the use of executive sessions aids the Board in risk oversight.

The Audit Committee is responsible for considering and discussing major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control these exposures. The committee regularly reviews and monitors compliance with securities and financial regulations, in addition to overseeing the audit work performed on behalf of the Company in the area of internal audit for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The committee meets at least quarterly to review the major financial risk exposures in connection with various matters, including the filing of quarterly reports with the SEC.

The Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee monitors the effectiveness of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and other corporate governance matters.

18 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS


The Compensation Committee assesses and monitors whether any of the Company’s compensation policies and programs have the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. In 2015, with the assistance of Mercer (US) Inc. (“Mercer”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (a compensation consulting firm engaged by the committee), the committee assessed the Company’s compensation arrangements to determine if their provisions and operation create undesired or unintentional risks of a material nature. The committee found that our compensation policies and practices do not create inappropriate or unintended significant risk to the Company as a whole.

To the extent any risks identified by each standing committee of the Board are material or otherwise merit discussion by the whole Board, the respective committee chair will raise such risks at the next scheduled meeting of the Board, or sooner if merited.

For the foregoing reasons, we have determined that our risk oversight is appropriate in the context of our specific circumstances, risk management efforts, and the Board’s administration of its oversight function.

Director Independence

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide, The chart below provides an overview of the allocation of risk management responsibilities among other things, that the Board will have a majority of directors who meetcommittees.

14     www.hecla-mining.com


Corporate Governance

LOGO

2022 Proxy Statement    15


Corporate Governance

Succession Planning

The Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the criteriaCompany’s succession planning process for independence required by the NYSE. In determining independence each year, the Corporate Governanceour CEO and Directors’ Nominating Committee affirmatively determines whether directors have any “material relationship” with the Company. When assessing the “materiality” of a director’s relationship with the Company, the committee considers all relevant factsother key senior executives and circumstances, not merely from the director’s standpoint, but from that of the persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. The committee alsoannually reviews the frequency or regularity of services or transactions between the Company and directors, whether the services or transactions are being carried out at arm’s length in the ordinary course of business and whether the services or transactions are being provided substantially on the same terms to the Company as those prevailing at the timeCompany’s succession plans for all key senior executives with input from unrelated parties for comparable services or transactions. Material relationships can include commercial, banking, industrial, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships. To guide its determination of whether a director is independent, the Board has adopted the following NYSE listing standards:

A director will not be independent if:

the director is, or has been, within the last three years, our employee, or an immediate family member4 is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer;5

the director or an immediate family member has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in directcompensation from us, other than director and committee fees and pension and other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

the director is: (i) a current partner or employee of a firm that is our internal or external auditor; (ii) the director has an immediate family member who is a current partner of a firm that is our internal or external auditor and who personally works on the Company’s audit; (iii) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of a firm that is our internal or external auditor and who personally works on the Company’s audit; or (iv) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years a partner or employee of a firm that is our internal or external auditor and personally worked on our audit within that time;

the director or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of our present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

the director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, us for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three calendar years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.


4An “immediate family member” includes a person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers- and fathers-in-law, sons- and daughters-in-law, brothers- and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such person’s home.
5The term “executive officer” has the same meaning specified for the term “officer” in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act, or any successor rule.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement19



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS


Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the committee undertook its annual review of director independence in February 2016. During this review, the committee considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his immediate family and Hecla and our subsidiaries and affiliates, including relationships described below and any reported on page 25 underCertain Relationships and Related Transactions. The committee also examined transactions and relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of our senior management or their affiliates. As provided in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the purpose of this review was to determine whether any such relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

Based upon an assessment of all facts and circumstances known to the committee, including, among other things, a review of questionnaires submitted by our directors, the committee and the Board affirmatively determined that the following directors are independent of the Company and its management under the standards set forth by the NYSE:

Terry V. RogersDr. Anthony P. Taylor
Charles B. StanleyGeorge R. Nethercutt, Jr.
Ted CrumleyStephen F. Ralbovsky
George R. Johnson

Messrs. Stanley and Baker both serve as members of the board of directors of QEP Resources, Inc., of which Mr. Stanley is also the chief executive officer. The committee reviewed this relationship with the Board, and the Board made the affirmative decision that this relationship did not disqualify Mr. Stanley from being independent. Neither Mr. Baker nor Mr. Stanley serves on the Compensation Committee of either Hecla or QEP Resources, Inc.

Mr. Baker is our President and CEO. As such, he cannot be deemed independent under the NYSE listing standards.

Directors are expected to immediately inform the Board of any material change in their circumstances or relationships that may impact their independence.

Family Relationships

There are currently no family relationships between the directors or executive officers of Hecla.

Board Leadership and Executive Sessions

Currently, the positions of CEO and Chairman of the Board (“Chairman”) are held by separate persons. The Board believes this structure is optimal for the Company at this time because it allows the CEO to focus on leading the Company’s business and operations, and the Chairman to serve as a sounding board and advisor to the CEO and to lead the activities of the Board. The Board has also determined that having a non-management director serve as Chairman is in the best interest of shareholders. This structure ensures a greater role for the independent directors in the oversight of the Company and it enhances the Board’s independence and, we believe, senior management’s accountability to the Board.

Mr. Ted Crumley chairs meetings of the Board, as well as the executive sessions with independent members of the Board. His duties include chairing annual meetings of shareholders, overseeing the preparation of agendas forBoard meetings, preparing for executive sessions of the Board and providing feedback to the CEO, staying current on developments to determine when it may be appropriate to alert the Board to significant pending developments, serving as a liaison between independent directors and the CEO with respect to sensitive issues, and other matters. Executive sessions of non-management directors are included on the agenda for every regularly scheduled Board meeting and during 2015, executive sessions were held at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. The executive sessions are chaired by the Chairman. Our non-management directors meet in executive sessions without management present, unless the non-management directors request their attendance.

For the foregoing reasons we have determined that our leadership structure is appropriate in the context of our specific circumstances.

20 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS


Board Self-Evaluation

Each year, the Board conducts a self-evaluation of its performance and effectiveness. As part of this process, each director completes an evaluation form on specific aspects of the Board’s role, organization and meetings. The collective comments are then presented by the chair of the Corporate Governance and Directors’ NominatingCommittee to the whole Board. As part of the evaluation, the Board assesses the progress in the areas targeted for improvement a year earlier, and develops actions to take to enhance the Board’s effectiveness over the next year. Additionally, each committee conducts an annual self-evaluation of its performance through a similar process.

Committees of the Board and Committee Assignments

The Board has five standing committees: Audit; Compensation; Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating; Health, Safety, Environmental & Technical; and Executive. Information regarding these committees is provided below. With the exception of the Executive Committee, all committees are composed entirely of independent directors. With the exception of the Executive Committee, the charters of each of the other committees are available on the Company’s website at http://www.hecla-mining.com under “Investors” by selecting “Corporate Governance.” You may also obtain copies of these charters by contacting the Company’s Investor Relations Department. The members of the Board on the date of this Proxy Statement, and the committees of the Board on which they serve, are identified below, along with the number of meetings held in 2015.

In 2015, the Audit Committee consisted of John H. Bowles (Chair), Charles B. Stanley, and Terry V. Rogers. After the death of Mr. Bowles in December 2015, the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee recommended and the Board approved the appointment of Charles B. Stanley as the Chair and also appointed Ted Crumley to the Audit Committee. As of the filing of our financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, on February 23, 2016, the committee members consisted of Charles B. Stanley (Chair), Ted Crumley and Terry V. Rogers.

At a meeting held in February 2016, the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee recommended and the Board approved the appointment of George R. Johnson and Stephen F. Ralbovsky to the Audit Committee, effective March 1, 2016. Mr. Johnson was also appointed to the Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical Committee, effective March 1, 2016. Mr. Ralbovsky was also appointed to the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee, effective March 1, 2016.

At the effective time of the appointments of Messrs. Johnson and Ralbovsky to the Audit Committee on March 1, 2016, Mr. Crumley withdrew as a member of the Audit Committee.

Executive Committee MembersFunctions of the CommitteeMeetings
in 2015

Phillips S. Baker, Jr., Chair
Ted Crumley
Terry V. Rogers

empowered with the same authority as the Board in the management of our business, except for certain matters enumerated in our Bylaws or Delaware law, which are specifically reserved to the whole Board

None*

Audit Committee Members1, 2, 3

Functions of the Committee

Meetings
in 2015

Charles B. Stanley, Chair
Terry V. Rogers
Ted Crumley4
George R. Johnson5
Stephen F. Ralbovsky5

assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities
review the integrity of our financial statements
review the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence
review the performance of our internal auditor and the independent auditor
review our compliance with laws and regulations, including disclosure controls and procedures
please refer to “Audit Committee Report” on page 32

8


*The Executive Committee did act by Unanimous Consent in Lieu of Meeting once in 2015.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement21



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS


Compensation Committee Members2Functions of the CommitteeMeetings
in 2015

George R. Nethercutt, Jr., Chair
Ted Crumley
Terry V. Rogers
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor

approve compensation levels and programs for the executive officers, including the CEO
administer our stock-based plans
please refer to the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 33

5

Corporate Governance and Directors’
Nominating Committee Members
2

Functions of the Committee

Meetings
in 2015

Dr. Anthony P. Taylor, Chair
George R. Nethercutt, Jr.
Charles B. Stanley
Stephen F. Ralbovsky5

consider matters of corporate governance
periodically review our Corporate Governance Guidelines and corporate procedures to ensure compliance with laws and regulations
review any director candidates, including those nominated or recommended by shareholders
identify individuals qualified to become directors consistent with criteria approved by the Board
recommend to the Board the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders, any special meeting of shareholders, or to fill any vacancy on the Board
review the appropriateness of the size of the Board relative to its various responsibilities
recommend committee assignments and committee chairpersons for the standing committees for consideration by the Board

4

Health, Safety, Environmental & Technical
Committee Members

Functions of the Committee

Meetings
in 2015

Terry V. Rogers, Chair
Charles B. Stanley
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor
George R. Johnson5

review and monitor health, safety and environmental policies
review the implementation and effectiveness of compliance systems
review the effectiveness of health, safety and environmental policies, systems and monitoring processes
review audit results and updates from management with respect to health, safety and environmental performance
review emerging health, safety and environmental trends in legislation and proposed regulations affecting the Company
review the technical activities of the Company
make recommendations to the Board concerning the advisability of proceeding with the exploration, development, acquisition or divestiture of mineral properties and/or operations

4


1The Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is financially literate and Messrs. Stanley, Rogers, Crumley and Ralbovsky each qualify as an audit committee ���financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.
2Each member of the Audit, Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee satisfies the definition of “independent director” as established in the NYSE listing standards and SEC rules.
3Mr. Rogers serves on the audit committee of one Canadian public company. During his tenure on the Audit Committee, Mr. Crumley did not serve on the audit committee of any other public company. Messrs. Stanley, Ralbovsky and Johnson do not serve on the audit committee of any other public companies.
4Effective March 1, 2016, Mr. Crumley withdrew from being a member of the Audit Committee.
5Messrs. Johnson and Ralbovsky were appointed to these Committees effective March 1, 2016.

22 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS


Diversity Policy

While the Board has not adopted a formal policy on diversity, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that, as a whole, the Board should include individuals with a diverse range of experience to give the Board depth and breadth in the mix of skills represented. The Board seeks to include an array of skills and experience in its overall composition ratherthan requiring every director to possess the same skills, perspective, and interests. This guideline is implemented by seeking to identify candidates who bring diverse skill sets, backgrounds, and experiences, including ethnic and gender diversity, to the Board when director candidates are needed.

Director Communications

Shareholders or other interested parties wishing to communicate with the Chairman or with the independent directors as a group may do so by delivering or mailing the communication in writing to: Chairman of the Board, c/o Corporate Secretary, Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to theattention of our internal auditor and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters. From time to time, the Board may change the process by which shareholders may communicate with the Board or its members. Please refer to our website at http://www.hecla-mining.com under the tab entitled “Investors” and then select the tab entitled “Corporate Governance” for any changes in this process.

Succession Planning

In light of the critical importance of executive leadership to the Company’s success, the Compensation Committee is charged with the responsibility of developing a process for identifying and evaluating candidates to succeed our CEO and to report annually to the Board on the status of the succession plan, including issues related to the preparedness for the possibility of an emergency situation involving senior management and assessment of the long-term growth and development of the senior management team.

The CEO and Director of Human Resources make a formal succession planning presentation to the Compensation Committee annually. The Compensation Committee reviews recommended candidates for senior management positions as part of the process to identify and gauge the availability of qualified candidates for those positions and receives reports concerning development plans that are utilized to strengthen the skills and qualifications of the candidates.Sr. Vice President – CAO. The criteria used when assessing the qualifications of potential CEO successors include, among others, strategic vision and leadership, operational excellence,experience, financial management, executive officer leadership development, ability to motivate employees, and an ability to develop an effective working relationship with the Board.

In 2015, the Compensation Committee conducted a full executive talent review of all NEOs, with an emphasis on CEO succession. In connection with that review, the Compensation Committee identified potential successors to the CEO.Emergency Succession Plan

In conjunction with the succession review, management also reviewed potential successors for the top management roles across Hecla. In connection with that review, we concluded that “ready now” potential successors exist for approximately one-third of those roles, which represents an increase in the level of readiness of our talent compared to previous years. We created development plans for the potential successors who were identified as being ready in one to two years or three to five years. By the end of 2015, we had greater visibility into our talent pool and we used that information to build the succession plans for the next tier of critical roles.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines also provide that in the event of the death, resignation, removal or incapacitation of the President and CEO, the Chairman will act as the President and CEO until a successor is duly elected. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Bylaws

They also provide that in the event of the death, resignation, removal or incapacitation of our current Chairman, the President and CEO will act as Chairman until hisa successor is duly elected.

In the event of an unexpected executive departure, the emergency succession plan allows for a smooth transfer of responsibilities to an individual who may or may not be permanently appointed to the new role.

In the event of a senior executive’s departure, both internal and external candidates may be considered for permanent appointment to such role.

Long-term Succession Plan

The long-term succession plan is intended to develop a pipeline of qualified talent for key roles.

The planning process includes a discussion of internal succession candidates, assessment of relevant skills and planning for professional development where necessary. Multiple internal succession candidates may be identified for an individual role and provided with relevant growth opportunities. The Board gains insight through direct exposure to internal succession candidates from their presentations to the Board, work with individual directors or Board committees, and participation in Board activities.

The Company’s short- and long-term business strategy will be considered when evaluating internal succession candidates and their skills.

Committees of the Board and Committee Assignments

The Board has six standing committees: Audit; Compensation; Governance and Social Responsibility; Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical; Executive; and Non-Executive Stock Award. Information regarding these committees is provided below. Except for the Executive Committee and Non-Executive Stock Award Committee, all committees are composed entirely of independent directors. The members of each committee are identified below, along with the number of meetings held in 2021.

16     www.hecla-mining.com


Corporate Governance


125 Years
  Audit Committee

Meetings in 2021: 6

 

2016 Proxy StatementPrimary Responsibilities23




Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS



Electronic Access to Corporate Governance Documents

Our corporate governance documents are available by accessing our website at http://www.hecla-mining.com under the tab entitled “Investors” and then selecting the tab entitled “Corporate Governance.” These include:

•  assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities;

Corporate Governance Guidelines;
Whistleblower Policy;
Charters

•  review the integrity of our financial statements;

•  review the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence;

•  review the performance of our internal auditor and the independent auditor;

•  review our compliance with laws and regulations, including disclosure controls and procedures;

•  review financial risks;

•  oversee the performance of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and internal audit firm;

•  review the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; and

•  oversee the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

See Report of the Audit Committee on page 30 for additional information.

2021 Meeting Attendance: 100%

Current Committee Members

Stephen F. Ralbovsky, Chair

George R. Johnson

Catherine J. Boggs

Alice Wong

= Financial Expert

All members of the Audit Committee are financially literate

No members on the Audit Committee serve on the audit committee of any other public companies

Committee consists of four independent directors

Compensation Committee

Meetings in 2021: 5

Primary Responsibilities

•  discharge the Board’s responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s executive officers;

•  approve the design of our compensation program;

•  approve compensation levels and programs for the executive officers, including the CEO;

•  administer the Company’s cash-based and equity- based incentive compensation plans; and

•  administer our stock-based plans.

See The Compensation Committee Process and Role of Management and Human Resources Department on page 38 for more information.

2021 Meeting Attendance: 100%

Current Committee Members

Terry V. Rogers, Chair*

Ted Crumley*

Charles B. Stanley

Catherine J. Boggs

Committee consists of four independent directors

2022 Proxy Statement    17


Corporate Governance

Governance and Social

Responsibility Committee

Meetings in 2021: 4

Primary Responsibilities

•  periodically review our Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code of Conduct, and Directors’ Nominatingother corporate procedures to ensure compliance with laws and regulations;

•  review any director candidates, including those nominated or recommended by shareholders;

•  identify individuals qualified to become directors consistent with criteria approved by the Board;

•  recommend to the Board the director nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders, any special meeting of shareholders, or to fill any vacancy on the Board;

•  review the appropriateness of the size of the Board relative to its various responsibilities;

•  recommend committee assignments and committee chairpersons for the standing committees for consideration by the Board;

•  recommend policies, programs, practices, metrics, performance indicators and progress concerning ESG matters to the Board; and

•  recommend to the Board any action on ESG and related matters that may be required or considered advisable.

See Sustainability and Corporate Governance on pages 3 and 8 for more information.

2021 Meeting Attendance: 100%

Current Committee Members

Catherine J. Boggs, Chair

Stephen F. Ralbovsky

George R. Johnson

Committee consists of three independent directors

Health, Safety, Environmental &and Technical CommitteesCommittee

Meetings in 2021: 4

Primary Responsibilities

•  review operational and exploration performance;

•  review operational, reserve, and other technical risks;

•  review and monitor health, safety, and environmental policies;

•  review the implementation and effectiveness of compliance systems;

•  review the effectiveness of health, safety and environmental policies, systems, and monitoring processes;

•  review audit results and updates from management with respect to health, safety, and environmental performance;

•  review emerging health, safety and environmental trends in legislation and proposed regulations affecting the Company;

•  review the technical activities of the Board;
Company; and

•  make recommendations to the Board concerning the advisability of proceeding with the exploration, development, acquisition, or divestiture of mineral properties and/or operations.

Code of Ethics for our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers; and

2021 Meeting Attendance: 100%

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees.

Current Committee Members

George R. Johnson, Chair

Terry V. Rogers*

Charles B. Stanley

Alice Wong

The information on our website is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

Executive Committee

Meetings in 2021: None

Primary Responsibilities

•  empowered with the same authority as the Board in the management of our business, except for certain matters enumerated in our Bylaws and Delaware law, that are specifically reserved to the whole Board.

2021 Meeting Attendance: N/A

Current Committee Members

Phillips S. Baker, Jr., Chair

Ted Crumley*

Terry V. Rogers*

Shareholders may also request a free copy of these documents from: Investor Relations,18     www.hecla-mining.com


Corporate Governance

Non-Executive Stock Award Committee

Meetings in 2021: None

Primary Responsibilities

•  empowered with the authority to make awards under the Hecla Mining Company 2010 Stock Incentive Plan to employees of the Company or any of its direct and indirect subsidiaries who are not executive officers of the Company or otherwise subject to the requirements of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

2021 Meeting Attendance: N/A

Current Committee Members

Phillips S. Baker, Jr., Chair

*

As previously disclosed, Messrs. Crumley and Rogers will retire as directors effective as of the date of our Annual Meeting.

Board and Committee Independence; Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board will have a majority of directors who meet the criteria for independence as defined in the NYSE rules. Based on information solicited from each director, and upon the advice and recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Board annually determines the independence of each of our directors in connection with the nomination process. Further, in connection with the appointment of any new director to the Board during the year, our Board makes the same determination. In making its recommendation to the Board, the Governance Committee, with assistance from the Company’s Corporate Secretary, evaluates responses to a questionnaire completed by each director regarding relationships and possible conflicts of interest between such director, the Company, management, the independent registered public accounting firm, and the internal audit firm. In its review of director independence, the Governance Committee considers the commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and familial relationships any director may have with the Company, management, the independent registered public accounting firm, and the internal audit firm.

Our Board has affirmatively determined that all current directors (other than Mr. Baker) have no material relationship with the Company and are independent according to the NYSE listing standards. The Board also has determined that each of the members of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees have no material relationship with the Company and satisfies the independence criteria (including the enhanced qualifications with respect to members of the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee) set forth in the applicable NYSE listing standards and SEC rules. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Stephen F. Ralbovsky qualifies as an “Audit Committee financial expert,” as such term is defined by the rules of the SEC.

Directors are expected to immediately inform the Board of any material change in their circumstances or relationships that may impact their independence.

Compensation Committee Procedures

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to set compensation for our executive officers, including annual compensation amounts and Short-term Incentive Plan and Long-term Incentive Plan criteria, evaluate the performance of our executive officers, and make awards to our executive officers under our stock incentive plans. The Compensation Committee also reviews, approves, and recommends to the Board any proposed plan or arrangement providing for incentive, retirement or other compensation to our executive officers and oversees our assessment of whether our compensation practices are likely to expose the Company to material risks. In addition, the Compensation Committee annually recommends to the Board the slate of officers for the Company, periodically reviews the functions of our officers, and makes recommendations to the Board concerning those functions.

2021 Board Meetings and Attendance

During 2021, there were four meetings of the Board. Directors are expected to make every effort to attend the Annual Meeting, all Board meetings, and the meetings of the committees on which they serve. All members of the Board attended last year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which was held in May 2021. In 2021, each director attended 100% of the Board meetings and the committee meetings in which they are a member.

2022 Proxy Statement    19


Corporate Governance

Director Orientation and Continuing Education

New directors undergo a comprehensive orientation program that introduces them to the Company, including our business operations, strategy, financial position, key members of management and governance structure. Directors also are encouraged to enroll in director education programs. Directors have contact with leaders throughout the organization and visit our mine sites, where they tour the facilities and interact directly with the personnel responsible for our day-to-day operations. These activities collectively help to ensure that new directors become, and existing directors remain, knowledgeable about the most important issues affecting our Company and our business.

Board and Committee Self-Evaluation Process

Our Board recognizes that a thorough, constructive evaluation process enhances our Board’s effectiveness and is an essential element of good corporate governance. Accordingly, every year, our Board and each committee of the Board conducts a self-evaluation of its performance and effectiveness. The Governance Committee oversees the annual self-evaluation process on behalf of the Board. Our Board and committee evaluations cover the following topics:

Board and committee composition, including skills, background, and experience;

Review of key areas of focus for the Board and committees, and effectiveness in overseeing those responsibilities;

Satisfaction of director performance, including that of the Board chair;

Board and committee information needs, and quality of materials presented;

Areas where the Board should increase its focus;

Satisfaction with the Board and committee schedules, agendas, time allocated for topics and encouragement of open communication and discussion;

Access to management, experts, and internal and external resources;

Oversight of financial reporting process and internal control procedures;

Ethics and compliance;

Company’s strategic direction and annual operating plan;

Succession planning;

Selection and evaluation process of Board candidates; and

Understanding risks.

Evaluation Process

   
1 Corporate
Governance Review
 LOGO 2 Annual Board and
Committee
Evaluations
  LOGO  3 Summary of
Evaluations
  LOGO  4 

Board and

Committee Review

 

Our self-evaluation process is conducted on an anonymous basis, using our board portal. We have found by using an anonymous evaluation process, the Board and committee members have a level of comfort in being able to critique the Board and/or the committees. The Board and each committee conduct annual self-evaluations through the use of electronic questionnaires that cover the topics discussed above. Hecla’s Corporate Secretary uses our board portal to generate a summarized report of our directors’ anonymous responses to the electronic questionnaires and submits the report to the appropriate chair of each committee of the Board for review before the next quarterly Board and/or committee meeting. Using the summaries of the self-evaluations as guides, our chair of the Governance Committee reviews the results of the Board evaluation, and each committee chair reviews the results of each committee evaluation. The self-evaluations and summaries are shared and discussed with the full Board and each committee. The objective is to allow the Board and each committee to share their perspectives and consider any necessary adjustments in response to the collective feedback from the self-evaluations.

20     www.hecla-mining.com


Corporate Governance

Director Candidates Submitted by Shareholders

Our Bylaws establish procedures governing the eligibility of nominees for election to our Board, and the proposal of business to be considered by our shareholders at an annual meeting of shareholders. For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting of shareholders by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to our Corporate Secretary. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408; (208) 769-4100.83815-9408, not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that in the event the date of the annual meeting of shareholders is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than the 120th day prior to such annual meeting of shareholders and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such annual meeting of shareholders or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Adjournment of a meeting shall not commence a new time period for giving shareholder’s notice as described above. Such shareholder’s notice must set forth:

(a)

As to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-11 thereunder, including such person’s written consent to being named in our Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected;

(b)

As to any other business that the shareholder proposes to bring before the meeting, if the shareholder has not otherwise complied with the rules and regulations under the Exchange Act for the inclusion of a shareholder proposal in our Proxy Statement, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, and any material interest in such business of such shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; and

(c)

As to the shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made:

(i)

the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on the Company’s books, and of such beneficial owner; and

(ii)

the class and number of Company shares which are owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder or beneficial owner.

The applicable time period for timely shareholder submissions pursuant to the above provisions for the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is January 26, 2023 (the 120th day preceding the anniversary of the 2022 Annual Meeting) to February 25, 2023 (the 90th day preceding such anniversary).

In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the SEC’s new universal proxy rule (once effective), any shareholder who intends to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees, must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rules Corporate Governance Guidelines14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 28, 2023.

The Corporate Governance Guidelines werechairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Bylaws and, if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with the Bylaws, to declare that such defective proposal shall be disregarded. The foregoing time limits also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of rules adopted by the BoardSEC relating to ensure thatthe exercise of discretionary voting authority.

2022 Proxy Statement    21


PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF CLASS III DIRECTORS

In accordance with our Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Board is independent from management,divided into three classes. The terms of office of the directors in each class expire at different times. There are three Class III directors whose terms will expire at the Annual Meeting: Ted Crumley, Terry V. Rogers, and Charles B. Stanley. Messrs. Crumley and Rogers have reached the mandatory retirement age and will not stand for re-election.

The respective retirements of Messrs. Crumley and Rogers otherwise would cause an imbalance in the number of directors in the Board’s three classes of directors. The Company’s Bylaws and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provide that the Board adequately performs its functionnumber of directors in each class of directors shall be as nearly equal in number as possible. In order to maintain balance among the overseerclasses, Alice Wong also will stand for election at the Annual Meeting as a Class III director, together with Mr. Stanley, each with a term to expire at the 2025 annual meeting of management,shareholders.

The Governance Committee determined that each of Ms. Wong and Mr. Stanley are qualified candidates to help ensure thatstand for election at the interests of the Board and management align with the interests of our shareholders. In December 2014, the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating CommitteeAnnual Meeting, and the Board amended the Corporate Governance Guidelines to more precisely track statutory requirements to improve its clarity and functionality, as well as to more closely match the Company’s evolving practices.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We believe that operating with honesty and integrity has earned trust from our shareholders, credibility within our community, and dedication from our employees. Our directors, officers and employees are required to abide by our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to promote the conduct of our business in a consistently legal and ethical manner. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics covers many topics, including conflicts of interest, confidentiality, fair dealing, proper use of the Company’s assets, and compliance with laws, rules and regulations. In addition to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethicsdesignated them for directors, officers and employees, our CEO, Chief Financial Officer and Controller are also bound by a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers.

The Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee has adopted procedures to receive, retain, and react to complaints received regarding possible violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and to allow for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding possible violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our employees may submit any concerns regarding apparent violations of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to their supervisor, our General Counsel, the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee, or through an anonymous telephone hotline.

Whistleblower Policy

We have a Whistleblower Policy adopted by our Audit Committee that encourages our employees to report to appropriate Company representatives, without fear of retaliation, certain accounting information relating to possible fraud. Our employees may submit any concerns regarding financial statement disclosures, accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters to the Audit Committee, our General Counsel, or through an anonymous telephone hotline. The goal of this policy is to discourage illegal activity and business conduct that damages Hecla’s reputation, business interests, and our relationship with shareholders.

24 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS



Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

We review all relationships and transactions with related persons to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. Transactions with related persons are those that involve our directors, executive officers, director nominees, greater than 5% shareholders, immediate family members of these persons, or entities in which one of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. Transactions that are reviewed as related party transactions by us are transactions that involve amounts that would exceed $120,000 (the current threshold required to be disclosed in the Proxy Statement under SEC regulations) and certain other transactions. Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, employees and directors have a duty to report any potential conflicts of interest to the appropriate level of management or to the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee. We evaluate these reports along with responses to our annual director and officer questionnaires for any indication of possible related party transactions. Our legal staff is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related party transactions. If a transaction is deemed by us to be a related party transaction, the information regarding the transaction is discussed with the Board. As required under the SEC rules, transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to Hecla or a related party are disclosed in our Proxy Statement.

In December 2007, we created the Hecla Charitable Foundation (the “Foundation”). We have made and intend to continue to make charitable contributions to the Foundation, which in turn has provided and intends to continue to provide grants to other organizations for charitable and educational purposes. James A. Sabala and Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald (our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President – Exploration, respectively) serveelection as directors of the Foundation. In December 2007,Company, for three-year terms expiring in 2025.

It is intended that the proxies solicited hereby from our Board made a contribution of 550,000 shares of our common stock to the Foundation. Since 2007, the Foundation has sold 279,860 shares of our common stock. Cash contributions totaling $2.0 million and $1.5 million were made by the Company to the Foundation during 2011 and 2010, respectively. The funds from the sale of the shares and the additional cash were put into various investment accounts. The Foundation is currently operating in a self-sufficient manner. The Company gave no additional funds to the Foundation during 2015. The Foundation holds 270,140 shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2015. The value of those shares based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2015 ($1.89), was $510,565. In 2015, the Foundation gave $331,575.13 in donations.

In 2015, we didshareholders that do not make any contribution to any charitable organization, of which a director served as an executive officer, which exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement25



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
AND BYLAWS TO REMOVE CERTAIN 80% SUPERMAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS


PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS TO REMOVE CERTAIN 80% SUPERMAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS

Overview

There are certain provisions in our Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) and Bylaws that can onlyprovide voting instructions will be revised through the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of our capital stock entitled to vote generally invoted FOR the election of directors. We referCharles B. Stanley and Alice Wong. If Mr. Stanley or Ms. Wong becomes unable or is unwilling to these shares as “Voting Stock”accept election, the Board will either reduce the number of directors to be elected or select substitute nominees submitted by the Governance Committee. If substitute nominees are selected, proxies that do not provide voting instructions will be voted in favor of such nominees.

Biographical Information

Set forth below is biographical information for the director nominees, including the key qualifications, experience, attributes, and to this voting requirement as “80% supermajority” throughout this Proposal 2 and Proposal 3. Certain of these provisions relateskills that led our Board to the authority to call special meetings of shareholders, and currently, only our Board hasconclusion that such authority.

Wedirector nominees should serve as a director. There are seeking the approvalno family relationships among any of our shareholdersdirectors or executive officers.

Our Board includes individuals with strong backgrounds in executive leadership and management, legal, accounting, finance, and company and industry knowledge, and we believe that, as a group, they work effectively together in overseeing our business.

22     www.hecla-mining.com


Proposal 1 — Election of Class III Directors

Current Class III Nominees for Election to amend our Certificate and Bylaws to remove those 80% supermajority voting requirements that impact who may call special meetings of shareholders, and replace them with two-thirds voting standards. We refer to this lower voting requirementthe Board – Terms Ending at the 2022 Annual Meeting

If elected, the nominees will serve for a three-year term ending in 2025. The nominees are as “two-thirds vote” throughout this Proposal 2 and Proposal 3. If approved, this proposal would become effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate with the Secretary of State of Delaware, which we intend to do promptly after the required shareholder approval is obtained, at which time the related amendmentfollows:

LOGO

Charles B. Stanley
Managing Member of Cutthroat Energy, LLC

Age: 63

Director since: 2007

Other Directorships: None

Hecla Committees:

•  Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical

•  Compensation

Mr. Stanley has been the Managing Member of Cutthroat Energy, LLC since 2019. Prior to that, Mr. Stanley was Chief Executive Officer and President of QEP Resources, Inc. from 2010 until his retirement in 2019. He was also Chairman of QEP’s Board of Directors from 2012 until his retirement in 2019.

Board Qualification and Skills: Mr. Stanley has over 35 years’ experience in the international and domestic upstream and midstream oil and gas industry. He is a geologist with an extensive background in natural resources. He gained his extensive financial experience from a long career with QEP Resources, Inc., and prior companies. In addition to his former position at QEP Resources, Inc., Mr. Stanley served in numerous other senior leadership positions, including Chief Executive Officer and President of QEP Midstream Partners, LP, and Chief Operating Officer of Questar Corporation. He served on the board of QEP Resources, Inc. for 8 years and as Chairman of the Board from 2012 until his retirement in 2019. Prior to serving on QEP’s board, Mr. Stanley served on the board of Questar Corporation for 8 years and has served on the boards of various oil and gas industry trade organizations.

LOGO

Alice Wong, ICD.D
Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Officer Cameco Corporation

Age: 62

Director since: 2021

Other Directorships: SaskEnergy Incorporated

Hecla Committees:

•  Audit

•  Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical

Ms. Wong has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Officer of Cameco Corporation since 2011. She was Cameco’s Vice President of Safety, Health, Environment, Quality and Regulatory Relations from 2008 to 2011, and Vice President of Investor, Corporate and Government Relations from 2005 to 2008. She has been a Board member of SaskEnergy Incorporated since December 2016, as well as a member of the Mining Association of Canada since June 2016, Canadian Nuclear Association since January 2013, and Saskatchewan Mining Association since January 2013. In 2021, Ms. Wong was named a Catalyst Honours Champion in recognition of her significant contributions to advancing women and championing inclusion in the workplace and being a role model for inclusive leadership in corporate Canada.

Board Qualification and Skills: Ms. Wong has been with Cameco for more than 30 years in increasingly senior leadership roles and has gained a wealth of experience from her diverse responsibilities. In her current role as Senior Vice President and Chief Corporate Officer, she provides executive oversight for human resources, safety, health, environment, quality, regulatory relations, business technology services, supply chain management, internal audit, and corporate ethics. She obtained her Corporate Directors Designation (ICD.D) from the ICD Rotman Director’s Education Program.

Required Vote

Pursuant to our Bylaws, would also become effective.

As described more fully below under Proposal 3, in 2014, we sought the approval of our shareholders to amend the Certificate and Bylaws to add a right permittingshareholders who have held at least a 25% “net long position” in our outstanding common stock for at least 120 days to call special meetings of shareholders, subject to the conditions set forth in our Bylaws (we refer to this as the “Special Meeting Proposal”). In order to implement the Special Meeting Proposal, an 80% supermajority vote of our shareholders was required. The 80% supermajority vote was not obtained in 2014 and as a result we were unable to implement the Special Meeting Proposal.

We are again proposing the Special Meeting Proposal at our 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. It is described in Proposal 3 below.

We believe that the 80% supermajority vote requirement is an impediment to implementing the Special Meeting Proposal because of the difficulty in getting the holders of that many shares to vote at a shareholders meeting. If instead of the 80% supermajority provisions, the required vote to implement the Special Meeting Proposal was two-thirds of the Voting Stock, we believe the Special Meeting Proposal would have a better chance to be approved by our shareholders. However, even with the change to the lower two-thirds vote requirement, there is no assurance that the Special Meeting Proposaleach director will be approved by the required vote of our shareholders. SeeRequired Vote, Our Board’s Recommendation and Additional Informationon page 28.

Current Provisions in Certificate and Bylaws

Currently, the Certificate states that shareholders can alter, amend or repeal certain Bylaws relating to calling a special meeting of shareholders, only if that action is approved by at least 80% supermajority rate (this supermajority voting provision is in Article V of the Certificate). Likewise, the Certificate currently states that at least 80% supermajority vote is necessary to alter, amend or repeal Article VII of the Certificate, which provides that special meetings of shareholders can only be called by our Board. Finally, the Bylaws also contain a similar provision regarding amending the provision therein concerning calling special meetings of shareholders.

26 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
AND BYLAWS TO REMOVE CERTAIN 80% SUPERMAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS


Set forth below are the relevant provisions of the Certificate and Bylaws:

Certificate

ARTICLE V.

Bylaws

In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by law, the Board is expressly authorized to make, repeal, alter, amend and rescind the bylaws of the Corporation by a majority vote of the entire Board at any regular or special meeting of the Board;provided, however that, notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws of the Corporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to (i) alter, amend or repeal any provision of the Bylaws which is substantially identical to and/or implements the last sentence of Article IV or Articles VI, VII or VIII, of this Certificate of Incorporation, or (ii) alter, amend or repeal any provision of this proviso to Article V.

ARTICLE VII.

Actions by Shareholders

Any action required or permitted to be taken by the shareholders of the Corporation must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation and may not be effected by any consent in writing by such shareholders.Special meetings of shareholders of the Corporation may be called only by the Board pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the entire Board. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal this Article VII.

Bylaws

ARTICLE VI.

Amendments

These Bylaws may be altered or repealed and Bylaws may be made at any annual meeting of the shareholders or at any special meeting thereof if notice of the proposed alteration or repeal of Bylaws to be made be contained in the notice of such meeting, by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of the voting stock of the Corporation. These Bylaws may also be altered or repealed and Bylaws may be madeelected by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Board of Directors, at any annualAnnual Meeting, whether in person or regular meeting ofby proxy. See What Votes are Required for the Board of Directors, or at any special meeting ofProposals on page 81.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” OR “ABSTAIN” on the Board of Directors if notice of the proposed alteration or repeal, or Bylaws or Bylaws to be made, be contained in the notice of such special meeting.nominees for election as directors.

Notwithstanding anything contained in these Bylaws to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of all of the shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal Section 4 or 6 of Article II, or Section 1, 2 or 3 of Article III, of these Bylaws.


125 Years
  LOGO     2016 Proxy Statement27



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 2 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
AND BYLAWS TO REMOVE CERTAIN 80% SUPERMAJORITY VOTING PROVISIONS


Proposed Amendments to Certificate and Bylaws

This Proposal 2 proposes to amend the Certificate and Bylaws so that future amendments to certain provisions within the Certificate and the Bylaws can be approved by a two-thirds vote of the outstanding shares rather than an 80% supermajority vote. Specifically, in this Proposal 2, we propose:

to amend the 80% supermajority voting requirement in Article V of the Certificate by specifying that the applicable threshold to amend the Bylaw provision relating to special meetings of shareholders is two-thirds. As a result, any future action by shareholders to alter, amend or repeal the Bylaw relating to calling a special meeting of shareholders would require approval by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock, voting together as a single class;

to amend the 80% supermajority voting requirement in Article VII of the Certificate by replacing the reference to “80 percent” with “two-thirds”, solely with respect to the provision in Article VII concerning the ability to call special meetings of shareholders. As a result, any future action by shareholders to alter, amend or repeal the provisions in the Certificate relating to calling a special meeting of shareholders would require approval by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock, voting together as a single class; and

to amend the 80% supermajority voting requirement in Article VI of the Bylaws by specifying that with respect to Section 4 of Article II of the Bylaws, the applicable vote threshold is two-thirds to amend. As a result, any future action by shareholders to alter, amend or repeal the Bylaw relating to calling a special meeting of shareholders would require approval by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock, voting together as a single class.

Required Vote, Our Board’s Recommendation and Additional Information

Our Board is committed to good governance practices and this Proposal 2 is the result of our Board’s ongoing review of our corporate governance principles. As part of that review, our Board recognizes that the chances of obtaining shareholder approval of the Shareholder Meeting Proposal described below in Proposal 3 in the future (if it is not approved at the 2016 Annual Meeting) may be improved if the changes to the Certificate and Bylaws described in this Proposal 2 are approved by our shareholders. Although Proposal 2 and Proposal 3 will each require the affirmative vote of holders of at least 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock, the approval of one of these proposals is not conditioned on the other, and if Proposal 2 is passed but Proposal 3 is not, then if in the future we again seek approval of the Special Meeting Proposal, it would only need to be approved by the lower two-thirds vote rather than the current 80% supermajority vote.

After receiving shareholder input and the advice of management and outside advisors, our Board considered the relative weight of the arguments in favor of and opposed to maintaining the 80% supermajority voting requirements described herein. As a result, and based upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Directors’ Nominating Committee, our Board, at its meeting on February 20, 2016, approved and declaredadvisable and in our shareholders’ best interests, the amendments to the Certificate and Bylaws described in this Proposal 2.

The above description is a summary, and is qualified by and subject to the full text of the proposed amendments to our Certificate and Bylaws, which are set forth inAppendix A andAppendix B, respectively. Additions of text contained in the appendices are indicated by underlining and deletions of text are indicated by strikeouts.

According to our current Certificate and Bylaws, approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of at least 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock.

Our Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR”“FOR” the amendments to the Certificateelection of IncorporationCharles B. Stanley and Bylaws to remove certain 80% supermajority voting requirements and replace them with two-thirds voting standards as described above.Alice Wong.

28 www.hecla-mining.com

 
125 Years

2022 Proxy Statement    23



TableProposal 1 — Election of Contents

PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS TO PERMIT SHAREHOLDERS TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES


PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS TO PERMIT SHAREHOLDERS TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCESClass III Directors

Overview

We are seeking the approval of our shareholders to amend our Certificate and Bylaws to add a right permitting shareholders who have held at least a 25% “net long position” in our outstanding common stock for at least 120 days to call special meetings of shareholders, subject to the conditions set forth in our Bylaws, as described below. Currently, shareholders do not have the right to call special shareholder meetings; only our Board can call such meetings. If approved, this proposal would become effective upon the filing of an amendment to our Certificate with the Secretary of State of Delaware, which we intend to do promptly after the required shareholder approval is obtained, at which time the related amendment to our Bylaws would also become effective.

We proposed these same amendments for shareholder approval at our 2014 Annual Shareholder Meeting. While shareholders owning almost 41% of our Voting Stock voted in favor of these amendments in 2014, the level of support was not sufficient to approve the amendments. SeeRequired Vote, Our Board’s Recommendation andAdditional Information below. Because our Board continues to believe that these amendments are appropriate, we are again asking shareholders to vote “For” these proposed amendments. In addition, under Proposal 2, we are seeking the approval of our shareholders to amend our Certificate and Bylaws to remove all 80% supermajority voting requirements that impact who may call special meetings of shareholders (other 80% supermajority voting requirements will be unaffected), and replace them with two-thirds voting standards. If Proposal 2 is passed, we believe it will improve the chances that an amendment permitting shareholders to call special meetings of shareholders under certain circumstances, if proposed in the future, would be adopted (if Proposal 3 is not adopted at the 2016 Annual Meeting). However, even if Proposal 2 is approved by the required vote of our shareholders, there is no assurance that this Proposal 3 will be approved by the required vote of our shareholders. SeeRequired Vote, Our Board’s Recommendation and Additional Informationon page 30.

Proposed Amendments to Certificate and Bylaws

This Proposal 3 proposes to amend the Certificate and Bylaws to implement the right of shareholders who have held at least a 25% “net long position” in our outstanding common stock for at least 120 days to call special meetings of shareholders, subject to compliance with the requirements set forth in our Bylaws, as proposed to be amended.

Our Board believes that establishing an ownership threshold of at least 25% in order for a shareholder (or group of shareholders) to request a special meeting strikes an appropriate balance between enhancing shareholder rights and avoiding the situations that could arise if the threshold were set so low that a small minority of shareholders, including shareholders with special interests, could force the Company to incur the time and expense of convening a special meeting to consider a matter of little or no interest to other shareholders. Organizing and preparing for a special meeting involves significant attention of our Board and management, which could divert their attention from performing their primary functions: to oversee and operate our business in the best interests of


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement29



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 3 – APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS TO PERMIT SHAREHOLDERS TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES


our shareholders. In addition, for every special meeting of shareholders, the Company incurs significant costs. Wedirectors whose terms are not expiring this year follow. They will continue to maintain our existing governance mechanisms that afford managementserve as directors for the remainder of their terms or until their respective successors are appointed or elected.

Continuing Class I Members of the Board – Term Ending at the 2023 Annual Meeting

LOGO

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer

Age: 62

Director since: 2001

Other Directorships: None

Hecla Committees:

•  Executive (Chair)

•  Non-Executive Stock Award Committee

Mr. Baker has been our Chief Executive Officer since May 2003 and has served as our President since November 2001. Mr. Baker served as Chairman of the Board for the National Mining Association from October 2017 to October 2020, and has been a Board member since September 2010. He served as a Director of QEP Resources, Inc. from May 2010 to March 2021.

Board Qualification and Skills: Mr. Baker has substantial financial experience gained in his roles of President, Chief Executive Officer, and previously as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. He has served as Hecla’s President for 19 years and as Chief Executive Officer for 17 years and has 25 years of executive and management experience in the mining industry. In addition to serving on the Board of Hecla, he served on the Board of QEP Resources, Inc. for 10 years, as well as serving as the chair of the audit committee and as a member of the governance committee for QEP.

LOGO

George R. Johnson
Former Senior Vice President of Operations with B2Gold Corporation

Age: 73

Director since: 2016

Other Directorships: B2Gold Corporation

Hecla Committees:

•  Health, Safety, Environmental and Technical (Chair)

•  Audit

•  Governance and Social Responsibility

Mr. Johnson served as Senior Vice President of Operations of B2Gold Corporation from August 2009 until his retirement in April 2015. He has served on the Board of Directors of B2Gold Corporation since March 2016.

Board Qualification and Skills: Mr. Johnson has over 45 years of foreign and domestic experience in underground and open pit mine construction and operations management as a mining engineer.

24     www.hecla-mining.com


Proposal 1 — Election of Class III Directors

Continuing Class II Members of the Board – Term Ending at the 2024 Annual Meeting

LOGO

Stephen F. Ralbovsky
Founder and Principal of Wolf Sky Consulting LLC

Age: 68

Director since: 2016

Other Directorships: None

Hecla Committees:

•  Audit (Chair)

•  Governance and Social Responsibility

Mr. Ralbovsky has been the Founder and Principal of Wolf Sky Consulting LLC since June 2014. Prior to that, he was a partner with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from February 1987 until his retirement in June 2014, where he concentrated his practice on public companies operating in the mining industry. He is a part-time Professor of Practice at the University of Arizona’s James E. Rogers College of Law. Mr. Ralbovsky is also a member of several organizations, including the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants, Arizona Society of CPAs, National Mining Association, and Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.

Board Qualification and Skills: Mr. Ralbovsky is a CPA and has over 40 years’ experience in taxation, auditing, and accounting, where he was specifically heavily involved in the mining industry with an emphasis in global mining tax and royalty policy. He has held leadership positions, including U.S. Mining Leader, U.S. Mining Tax Leader, Global Mining Tax Leader, and Tax Partner while employed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

LOGO

Catherine “Cassie” J. Boggs
Former General Counsel at Resource Capital Funds

Age: 67

Director since: 2017

Other Directorships: Capital Limited

Hecla Committees:

•  Governance and Social Responsibility (Chair)

•  Audit

•  Compensation

Ms. Boggs served as the General Counsel at Resource Capital Funds from January 2011 until her retirement in February 2019. She has served as a board member of Capital Limited since September 2021, as well as serving as an Intermittent Expert in mining with the US Department of Commerce’s Commercial Law Development Program since November 2019. She was a board member of Funzeleo from January 2016 to September 2021. She served as President of the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation from July 2012 to July 2013, and a board member of the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation from July 2011 to July 2015. She is an Adjunct Professor at the University of Denver, Sturm College of Law.

Board Qualification and Skills: Ms. Boggs has over 39 years’ experience as an attorney in the mining and natural resources sectors, in both domestic and international mining. She has extensive experience in leadership in the mining industry, having worked for Barrick Gold Company, serving in a variety of leadership roles, including serving as the CEO of Tethyan Copper Company, interim President of the African Business Unit, and as interim General Counsel of African Barrick Gold. She also has experience in due diligence, country and political risk assessments, and the structuring and implementation of risk mitigation strategies.

2022 Proxy Statement    25


COMPENSATION OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS

The Compensation Committee of the Board is responsible for recommending to the independent members of the Board the ability to respond to proposalsform and concernsamount of all shareholders, regardlesscompensation for our non-management directors. The independent members of the levelBoard consider the committee’s recommendation and make the final determination of share ownership.non-management director compensation.

EstablishingCompensation for non-management directors is designed to reflect current market trends and developments with respect to compensation of Board members. It consists of a 25% “net long position” threshold for the right to call a special meeting would ensure that matters proposed for consideration have significant support among our shareholders. A shareholder’s “net long position” is generally defined as the amountcombination of common stock in which the shareholder holds a positive (also known as “long”) economic interest, reduced by the amount of common stock in which the shareholder holds a negative (also known as “short”) economic interest. In addition, requiring that shareholders must have held their stock for at least 120 days helps to ensure that their economic interest in the Company’s affairs is more than transitory. Also during the required 120 day holding period, the Company will continue to make disclosure through its statutory filings, which may provide shareholders with information that might avoidcash retainers and an unnecessary call for special meetings of shareholders.equity award.

Compensation Consultant and Peer Group Benchmarking

The proposed amendmentCompensation Committee periodically engages an independent compensation consultant to benchmark director compensation against a peer group, which is the same group of companies the committee uses to benchmark executive compensation (see page 37 for a list of these companies). In 2021, the committee did not retain an independent compensation consultant to review director compensation. The committee reviewed our Bylaws contains proceduralnon-management director compensation, but no changes were made in 2021.

Components of Non-Management Director Compensation

Compensation Element

  Current
Value
 

Annual Board Retainer

  $98,000 

Annual Board Chair Retainer

  $120,000 

Annual Committee Chair Retainer for:

  

 

 

 

•  Health, Safety, Environmental & Technical Committee

  $12,000 

•  Audit Committee

  $12,000 

•  Compensation Committee

  $12,000 

•  Governance Committee

  $8,000 

•  Executive Committee

  $-- 

•  Non-Executive Stock Award Committee

  $-- 

Annual Equity

  $120,000 

Annual cash retainers are paid in quarterly installments. Other than annual cash retainers and information requirementsequity, no other attendance fees are paid to the non-management directors.

Equity Compensation

We maintain the Hecla Mining Company Stock Plan for shareholdersNonemployee Directors (“Director Stock Plan” or “plan”). The plan is currently scheduled to call a special meeting, including, without limitation, that (i) no business may be conducted at the special meeting except as set forth in the Company’s notice of meeting, (ii) a special meeting will not be held if similar businessterminate on May 15, 2027 and is subject to be covered at an annual or special meeting calledtermination by the Board at any time. Pursuant to be held within 90 days after the special meeting requestplan, before September 30 of each year, each non-management director is receivedcredited with a number of shares determined by dividing the annual equity retainer payable to each non-management director for service on the Board for the following year by the Secretary, (iii) no shareholder special meeting requestaverage closing price for Hecla’s common stock on the NYSE for the prior calendar year (the “Stock Retainer”). A minimum of 25% of the annual Stock Retainer under the Director Stock Plan is contributed to a grantor trust established by the Company. Each director may be made during the period commencing 90 dayselect, prior to the first anniversaryday of the applicable year, to have a greater percentage contributed to the grantor trust for that year. The remaining portion of the Stock Retainer will be transferred to the non-management director as soon as practicable.

Non-management directors joining the Board after September 30 of any year will be credited with a pro rata grant of shares when they join the Board. A minimum of 25% of their Stock Retainer for that year will be contributed to the trust. Each director may elect, within 30 days after becoming a participant in the Director Stock Plan, to have a greater percentage contributed to the grantor trust for that year. The remaining portion will be transferred to these directors as soon as practicable after they become members of the Board.

26     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of Non-Management Directors

The shares held in the grantor trust are subject to the claims of our creditors until delivered under the terms of the Director Stock Plan. Delivery of the shares from the trust occurs upon the earliest of: (i) death or disability; (ii) retirement from the Board; (iii) a cessation of the director’s service for any other reason; (iv) a change in control of the Company (as defined in the Director Stock Plan); or (v) a time elected by the director, except shares must be held in the trust for at least two years prior to delivery. As of December 31, 2021, there were 2,269,269 shares remaining available for issuance under the Director Stock Plan.

The following chart summarizes the annual cash and equity compensation for our non-management directors during 2021.

Non-Management Director Compensation for 2021

Director

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
  Stock
Awards
(1)
($)
  All Other
Compensation
(2)
($)
  Total
($)

Catherine J. Boggs

    106,000    265,736    --    371,736

Ted Crumley, Chairman

    218,000    265,736    --    483,736

George R. Johnson

    110,000    265,736    7,500    383,236

George R. Nethercutt, Jr.(3)

    49,000    --    --    49,000

Stephen F. Ralbovsky

    110,000    265,736    --    375,736

Terry V. Rogers

    110,000    265,736    3,750    379,486

Charles B. Stanley

    98,000    265,736    --    363,736

Alice Wong

    98,000    265,736    --    363,736
(1)

The amounts shown in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC Topic 718. For a description of the assumptions used in valuing the awards please see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. The stock awards column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock granted to each non-management director under the Director Stock Plan in 2021 as computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. For each director, the number of common shares granted was determined by dividing $120,000 by the average closing price for Hecla’s common stock on the NYSE for the prior calendar year ($4.0506) ($120,000 ÷ $4.0506 = 29,625). On June 8, 2021, each non-management director received 29,625 shares of our common stock under the terms of the Director Stock Plan. Based on our closing stock price on the NYSE on the date of grant of June 8, 2021 ($8.97), the grant date fair value for each grant of 29,625 shares was $265,736. (This amount does not reflect the actual amount that may be realized by each director).

(2)

Amounts in this column reflect matching contributions under the Company’s charitable matching gift program. See Political Contributions and Engagement on page 74.

(3)

Mr. Nethercutt retired from the Board in May 2021. He received no compensation after his retirement date.

Other

The Company covers directors under its overall director and officer liability insurance policies, as well as reimbursing them for travel, lodging, and meal expenses incurred in connection with their attendance at Board and committee meetings, meetings of shareholders, and for traveling to visit our operations. Directors are eligible, on the same basis as Company employees, to participate in the Company’s matching gift program, pursuant to which the Hecla Charitable Foundation matches contributions made to qualifying nonprofit organizations. Beyond these items, no other compensation was paid to any non-management director.

Non-Management Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

To more closely align the Company’s independent directors’ financial interests with those of the shareholder, in June 2012, the Compensation Committee and Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for our independent directors. Under these guidelines, each independent director is required to own shares of common stock (which includes shares held under the Hecla Mining Company Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors) valued at three times their annual cash retainer within five years of their appointment to the Board. In the event an independent director’s cash retainer increases, they will have three years from the date of the immediately preceding annual meetingincrease to acquire any additional shares needed to meet these guidelines.

Because of fluctuations in the Company’s stock price, in February 2016, the Compensation Committee and endingthe Board amended the stock ownership guidelines to provide a valuation methodology that consists of valuing the shares held by using the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the dateNYSE for the previous calendar year. Because share prices of all companies are subject to market volatility, the Board believes that it

2022 Proxy Statement    27


Compensation of Non-Management Directors

would be unfair to require a director to buy more shares simply because Hecla’s stock price drops. In the event there is a significant decline in Hecla’s stock price that causes a director’s holdings to fall below the applicable threshold, the director will not be required to purchase additional shares to meet the threshold, but they generally may not sell or transfer any shares until the threshold has again been achieved.

The following table summarizes the non-management director stock ownership as of December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 2021, all non-management directors met the guidelines, except for Ms. Wong, who has until February 2026 to satisfy the requirements of the next annual meeting, (iv) a special meeting request cannot cover business substantially similar to what was covered at an annual or special meetingownership guidelines.

Non-Management Director Stock Ownership as of December 31, 2021

Director

  Annual
Retainer
($)
  X
Annual
Retainer
  Total
Value
of Shares
to be
Held
($)
  Shares
Held
Directly
(#)
  Shares
Held in
Grantor
Trust
(1)
(#)
  Total
Shares
(#)
  Total Value of
Shares Held
by Director
(2)
($)
  Meets
Guidelines

Boggs

    98,000    3x    294,000    104,678    106,046    210,724    1,339,699    Yes

Crumley

    218,000    3x    654,000    76,536    250,056    326,592    2,076,341    Yes

Johnson

    98,000    3x    294,000    17,273    177,717    194,990    1,239,668    Yes

Ralbovsky

    98,000    3x    294,000    6,123    177,717    183,840    1,168,781    Yes

Rogers

    98,000    3x    294,000    36,117    138,119    174,236    1,107,723    Yes

Stanley

    98,000    3x    294,000    --    219,103    219,103    1,392,969    Yes

Wong(3)

    98,000    3x    294,000    --    29,625    29,625    188,344    N/A
(1)

As of December 31, 2021, the total amount of shares held in trust pursuant to the terms of the Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors by each of the above-named directors.

(2)

The value of shares held is determined by using the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the calendar year on the NYSE, which for 2021 was $6.3576.

(3)

Ms. Wong was appointed to the Board in February 2021. Under the Stock Ownership Guidelines, she has until February 2026 to satisfy the requirements of the ownership guidelines.

Additional information regarding shares held not more than 120 days before the special meeting request was received by the Secretary, (v) any shares beneficially owned or held of record as of the date of the request and sold by the requesting holder prior to the meeting will be treated as a revocation of the request to the extent of the shares sold, and (vi) the requesting shareholder’s notice must include information (as specifiednon-management directors is included in the amendment to the Bylaws) as to the business proposed to be conducted, as to each nominee (if applicable),Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and as to the shareholder giving notice and the beneficial owner, if any,Management table on whose behalf the proposal is made.page 75.

28     Required Vote, Our Board’s Recommendation and Additional Informationwww.hecla-mining.com

Our Board is committed to good governance practices and this Proposal 3 is the result of our Board’s ongoing review of our corporate governance principles. After receiving shareholder input and the advice of management and outside advisors, our Board considered the relative weight of the arguments in favor of and opposed to the ability of shareholders, under certain circumstances, to call special meetings as described herein. As a result, and based upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Director’s Nominating Committee, our Board, at its meeting on February 20, 2016, approved and declared advisable and in our shareholders’ best interests the amendments to the Certificate and Bylaws described in this Proposal 3.

The above description is a summary, and is qualified by and subject to the full text of the proposed amendments to our Certificate and Bylaws, which are set forth inAppendix C andAppendix D, respectively. Additions of text contained in the appendices are indicated by underlining and deletions of text are indicated by strikeouts.

Our Board has approved this proposal, and according to our current Certificate and Bylaws, approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of holders of at least 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock.

Our Board recommends that shareholders vote “FOR” the amendments to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to permit shareholders to call special meetings of shareholders under certain circumstances.

30 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS THE COMPANY’S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016


PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFICATION OF2

RATIFY THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS THE COMPANY’SOUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 20162022

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, evaluation, and oversighttermination, if necessary, of the independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit our financial statements. The committeeAudit Committee appointed BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”) as the independent registered public accounting firm for Hecla for the calendar year ending December 31, 2016.2022. BDO has been retained in that capacity since 2001. The committeeAudit Committee is aware that a long-tenured auditor may be believed by some to pose an independence risk. To address these concerns, the Audit Committee:

reviews all non-audit services and engagements provided by BDO, specifically with regard to the impact on the firm’s independence;

conducts a quarterly assessment of BDO’s service quality, and its working relationship with our committee:management;

reviews all non-audit services and engagements provided by BDO, specifically with regard to the impact on the firm’s independence;

conducts a quarterly assessment of BDO’s service quality, and its working relationship with our management;

conducts regular private meetings separately with each of BDO and our management;

interviews, and approves the selection of, BDO’s new lead engagement partner with each rotation; and

at least annually obtains and reviews a report from BDO describing all relationships between the independent auditor and Hecla.

conducts regular private meetings separately with each of BDO and our management;

interviews and approves the selection of BDO’s new lead engagement partner with each rotation;

at least annually, obtains and reviews a report from BDO, describing all relationships between the independent auditor and Hecla; and

reviews data relating to audit quality and performance, including the most recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board reports on BDO and its peer firms.

The members of the committeeAudit Committee believe that the continued retention of BDO to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of Hecla and itsour shareholders.

Although ratification is not required, the Board isand the Audit Committee are submitting the appointment of BDO to our shareholders for ratification because we value our shareholders’ views on the Company’sour independent registered public accounting firm, and as a matter of good corporategovernance practice. In the event that our shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, it will be considered as a direction to the Board and to the committeeAudit Committee to consider the appointment of a different firm. Even if the appointment is ratified, the committeeAudit Committee in its discretion may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such change would be in the best interest of the Company and ourits shareholders.

Representatives of BDO are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make statements and respond to appropriate questions from shareholders present at the meeting.

Required Vote

Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company. However, the Board feels that it is important for the shareholders to ratify the selection of BDO USA, LLP. This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. See What Votes are Required for the Proposals on page 81.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.

  LOGO   

The Audit Committee and Board recommend that shareholders vote “FOR” the ratification of“FOR” ratifying the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.2022.



125 Years

 2016 Proxy Statement31

2022 Proxy Statement    29



TableProposal 2 — Ratify the Appointment of ContentsBDO USA, LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022

PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS THE COMPANY’S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016


ReportPre-Approval Process

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and, if appropriate, pre-approving all audit, audit-related and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee charter authorizes the Audit Committee to establish a policy and related procedures regarding the pre-approval of audit, audit-related and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm.

The Audit Committee has delegated its pre-approval authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee,

The committee’s principal functions are who is authorized to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, andpre-approve services to specifically review: (i) the integrity ofbe performed by our financial statements; (ii) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence; (iii) the performance of our internal auditorregistered public accounting firm and the independent auditor; and (iv) our compliance with laws and regulations, including disclosure controls and procedures. During 2015,compensation to be paid for such services until the committee worked with management, our internal auditor and our independent auditor to address Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 internal control requirements. The committee met eight times in 2015.

The committee acts under a written charter as amended on December 1, 2015. You may obtain a copy of the charter in the “Investors” section of http://www.hecla-mining.com under “Corporate Governance.”

In performing its functions, the Audit Committee:

met with our internal auditor and independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the overall scope and plans for their respective audits, the results of their examinations and their evaluations of Hecla’s internal controls;

reviewed and discussed with management the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report;

discussed with our independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards; and

received the written disclosures and the letter from our independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent registered accountant’s communication with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with them matters relating to their independence.


Based on the review and discussions described in this report, and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilitiesnext regularly-scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee, referredprovided that in such case the Chair shall provide a report to above and in the Audit Committee Charter,at its next regularly-scheduled meeting of any services and compensation approved by the committee recommendedChair pursuant to the Board thatdelegated authority. On a periodic basis, management reports to the audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015, for filing with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted by
The Audit Committee of the
Board of Directors
actual spending for projects and services compared to the approved amounts.

Charles B. Stanley, Chairman6
Terry V. Rogers
Ted Crumley7

6Mr. Stanley assumed the role of chairman of the Audit Committee following the death of John H. Bowles in December 2015.
7Mr. Crumley was appointed to the Audit Committee following the death of Mr. Bowles. He subsequently withdrew, effective March 1, 2016, with the appointments of Mr. Ralbovsky and Mr. Johnson.

32 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 4 – RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF BDO USA, LLP AS THE COMPANY’S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016


Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table representspresents fees for professional audit services rendered by BDO for the audit of our annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20152020, and December 31, 2014,2021, and fees for other services rendered by BDO during those periods.

20152014
  Audit Fees1  $698,500$577,700  
Audit Related Fees287,000    87,000
Tax Fees33,60017,800
All Other Fees
Total$789,100$682,500

    2021   2020 

Audit Fees(1)

  $975,800   $1,041,500 

Audit Related Fees(2)

   93,000    93,000 

Tax Fees(3)

   --    10,000 

All Other Fees

   --    -- 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $1,068,800   $1,144,500 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
1(1)

Relates to services rendered in connection with the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements, quarterly reviews of financial statements included in our quarterly reportreports on Form 10-Q, and fees related to the registration of securities with the SEC. The 2020 fees include procedures related to the $475 million debt refinancing in February 2020.

2(2)Consisted principally

Consists of fees for audits of financial statements of employee benefit plans.plans financial statement audits.

3(3)

Consisted of fees for tax consultation and tax compliance services, tax planning and miscellaneous tax research.assistance in preparation of the Scientific Research & Experimental Development Tax Credits Application of Hecla Quebec (one of our subsidiaries), submitted to Revenue Canada (fiscal year 2020).

Report of the Audit Committee

The committee’s current practice requires pre-approvalAudit Committee acts under a written charter. You may obtain a copy of all audit servicesthe charter in the “Investors” section of www.hecla-mining.com under “Governance and permissible non-audit services to be provided byEthics.”

In the performance of its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee (1) reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm. The committee reviews each non-audit servicefirm the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021; (2) discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be provided and assessesdiscussed by the impactapplicable requirements of the service onPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and SEC; (3) received the written disclosures and the letter from the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee regarding independence; and (4) discussed with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm any relationships that may impact its objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the firm’s independence. OnDuring 2021, the Audit Committee worked with management, our internal auditor, and our independent auditor to address Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 internal control requirements. The Audit Committee met six times in 2021.

Company management is responsible for the assessment and determination of risks associated with the Company’s business, financial reporting, operations, and contractual obligations. The Audit Committee, together with the Board of Directors, is responsible for oversight of the Company’s management of risks. As part of its responsibilities for oversight of the Company’s management of risks, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the Company’s enterprise-wide risk assessment, and the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including discussions of individual risk areas as well as an annual summary of the overall process.

30     www.hecla-mining.com


Proposal 2 — Ratify the Appointment of BDO USA, LLP as Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022

The Audit Committee has discussed with both Hecla’s internal auditor and independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope of the plans for their respective audits. The Audit Committee regularly meets with a periodic basis,representative of the firm hired to serve as Hecla’s internal auditor and representatives of the independent registered public accounting firm, in regular and executive sessions, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of Hecla’s financial reporting and compliance programs.

Management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, including establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm also is responsible for performing an independent audit of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and issuing a report thereon. The Audit Committee relies, without independent verification, on the information provided to it and on the representations made by management reportsand the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Based on the review and discussion and the representations made by management and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the committeeBoard that the audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and filed with the SEC.

The material contained in this Audit Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material, is not deemed filed with the SEC, and is not incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made on, before, or after the date of this Proxy Statement and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this Audit Committee Report by reference therein.

Respectfully submitted by

The Audit Committee of the

Board of Directors

Stephen F. Ralbovsky, Chair

Catherine J. Boggs

George R. Johnson

Alice Wong

2022 Proxy Statement    31


PROPOSAL 3

APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Our Board seeks your vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to our NEOs for 2021 as set forth under the heading Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) on page 34 and in the accompanying compensation tables starting on page 57, and related material. The Board believes that our current executive compensation program is right for the Company and our shareholders. Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and motivate talented individuals who possess the executive experience and the leadership skills needed by the Company to maintain and increase shareholder value. We seek to provide executive compensation that is competitive with that provided by companies in our peer group within the mining industry. We also seek to provide both short- and long-term financial incentives to our executives that reward them for good performance and achieving financial results and strategic objectives that are expected to contribute to increased long-term shareholder value.

Underlying these incentives is a strong philosophy of “pay-for-performance” that forms the foundation of decisions regarding the actual spending forprojectscompensation of our NEOs. This compensation philosophy, which has been consistent over many years, is designed to align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our shareholders and services comparedis central to our ability to attract, retain and motivate executive leaders to guide the Company through market challenges over the long term.

The primary methods we use to align the interests of our NEOs with our shareholders include:

Placing a vast majority (78.6%) of the CEO’s total compensation at-risk;

Targeting total direct compensation of our NEOs’ at approximately the 50th percentile of peer compensation;

Striking the right balance between short- and long-term results; and

Selecting appropriate performance metrics, including market-based measures such as total shareholder return, annual financial and operational goals such as production and EBITDA, and individual performance goals that drive our long-term business strategy.

Some highlights of our 2021 executive compensation program include:

NEO compensation lower in 2021 than in 2020;

Our 2021 STIP aligns 2021 payments to actual performance on pre-established targets, effectively linking the Company’s financial performance to NEO pay;

Despite outstanding financial performance in 2021 and our total shareholder return above median, our 2019-2021 LTIP paid zero because the goals were not met; and

STIP and LTIP performance was negatively impacted by COVID-19, yet original STIP and LTIP goals were not modified.

In 2021, our shareholders voted 97% in favor of our executive compensation program. In considering how to vote on this proposal, we urge you to review the relevant disclosures in this Proxy Statement, particularly the CD&A section, which contains detailed information about our executive compensation program. We currently hold our “Say-on-Pay” advisory vote every year. We expect the next shareholder vote on the frequency of our “Say-on-Pay” advisory votes to occur at our annual meeting to be held in 2023.

The Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the approved amounts. In addition,extent there is any significant vote against the committee has delegated authorityNEO compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee will carefully review and consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation program.

32     www.hecla-mining.com


Proposal 3 — Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of Our Executive Compensation

We are asking shareholders to grant certain pre-approvalsapprove the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the committee chair. Pre-approvals grantedCompany’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table for 2021, and the related compensation tables and narrative in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2022 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, is hereby APPROVED.”

Required Vote

The advisory vote on executive compensation will require the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. See WhatVotes are Required for the committee chair are reportedProposals on page 81.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to approve the full committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.compensation of our NEOs.


125 Years
  LOGO     

2016 Proxy StatementThe Board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the compensation of our NEOs.33




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


2022 Proxy Statement    33


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

     

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS TO COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

 

 

    
           Executive Summary  35           

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

  56       
   

Key Operating and Significant Financial Results

  36     
   Benchmarking and Competitive Analyses  37    Compensation Committee Report  56   
   

The Compensation Committee Process and Role of Management and Human Resources Department

  38    Compensation of NEOs – Tables  57   
     

•  Summary Compensation Table for 2021

  57   
     

•  Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2021

  60   
   Compensation Philosophy and Objectives  39    

•  Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
    For 2021

  62   
   Elements of Total Compensation  41     
   

•  Total Compensation Mix

  42    

•  Stock Vested in 2021

  63   
   

Overview of our Compensation Decisions and Results for 2021

  43    

•  Stock Ownership for NEOs

  64   
     

•  Pension Benefits

  65   
   

•  Summary

  43    

•  Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2021

  65   
   

•  Base Salary

  43    

•  Potential Payments Upon Termination or
    Change in Control

  66   
   

•  Incentive Plans

  44     
   

•  Equity

  50    

•  CEO Pay Ratio

  71   
   Other  52    Other Benefits  72   
   Clawback Policy  53    

•  Retirement Plan

  72   
   Insider Trading Policy  53        
   Stock Ownership Guidelines  53        
   Change in Control Agreements  54        
   Tax and Accounting Considerations  55        
                       
                        
         
                           

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”), describes and analyzes our executive compensation philosophy and program in the context of the compensation paid during the last calendar year to our CEO, Sr. Vice President and CFO, and our three other most highly compensated executive officers during 2021, and any additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been provided, but for the fact that the individuals were not serving as executive officers at the end of the last completed calendar year.

Our Compensation Committee strives to design a fair and competitive compensation program for executive officers that will attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified and experienced executives, reward performance and provide incentives that are based on our performance, with an overall emphasis to maximizeon maximizing our long-term shareholder value. Our executive compensation program consists of several components, including base salary, annualshort- and long-term performance awards (paid in cash or equity), equity awards, a deferred compensation plan and retirement benefits. ThisCompensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) provides information regarding our compensation objectives, the relationship between the components of our compensation program and our objectives and factors considered by the committee in establishing compensation levels for our NEOs. The NEOsnamed executive officers who are discussed throughout this CD&A and in the compensation tables are:

Name

  Age Principal Position

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

5662President and CEO

Russell D. Lawlar

42Sr. Vice President and CFO
James A. Sabala
61

Lauren M. Roberts

Senior56Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerCOO

Robert D. Brown

Lawrence P. Radford5553Senior Vice President – Operations
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald59Senior Vice President – Exploration
David C. Sienko47Vice President – General Counsel
Don Poirier*57Former Vice President – Corporate Development and Sustainability

David C. Sienko

53Vice President and General Counsel

Lindsay A. Hall*

66Former Sr. Vice President and CFO

*Mr. Poirier departed

Retired in March 2021

34     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Glossary of CD&A Terms

committee

Compensation CommitteeNEONamed Executive Officer

STIP

Short-term Incentive Plan2010 Stock Plan2010 Stock Incentive Plan

LTIP

Long-term Incentive PlanKEDCPKey Employee Deferred Compensation Plan

PSUs

Performance-based SharesRetirement PlanHecla Mining Company Retirement Plan, a defined benefit retirement plan

RSUs

Restricted Stock UnitsSERPSupplemental Excess Retirement Plan

TSR

Total Shareholder ReturnSECSecurities and Exchange Commission

GAAP

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the Company at the end of 2015.United States

ESG

UCB

Environmental, Social and Governance

Underhand Closed Bench mining method

Dodd Frank Act

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection ActNYSENew York Stock Exchange

AIFR

All-Injury Frequency Rate401(k) PlanHecla’s Capital Accumulation Plan, a defined contribution retirement plan

Executive Summary

Hecla is a leadingthe largest primary low-cost silver producer within the United States – and the oldest NYSE-listed precious metals mining company in North America. In addition to two operating silver mines in Alaska (Greens Creek), and Idaho (Lucky Friday), and Mexico (San Sebastian) and is a gold producer with an operatingproducing mine in Quebec, Canada (Casa Berardi). We, we also produce lead and zinc. In addition to our diversified silver and gold operating cash-flow generating base, we have a number ofown several exploration properties and pre-development projects in six world-class silver and gold mining districts inthroughout North America. With an active

Overall, 2021 was a strong year for Hecla. We had good production and cash flow despite ongoing difficulties we faced with COVID-19, including a tight labor market, and supply chain challenges. We had record sales of $807.5 million with net income of $35.1 million for the year, resulting in a record adjusted EBITDA of $278.8 million.4 We generated $220.3 million of cash flow from operations, the second highest in our history, with $111.3 million in free cash flow for the year.5In addition, the Company ended the year with a strong balance sheet with over $210.0 million in cash, and paid a total of $20.7 million in dividends to our common and preferred shareholders.

Operationally, we produced 12.9 million ounces of silver and 201,327 ounces of gold. Although we did not reduce last year’s record low AIFR, our AIFR was still the second lowest in Hecla’s history and lower than the national average. We had record exploration and pre-development program, we have consistently grown expenditures of $47.9 million, which allowed us to add significantly to our reserve base for future production.reserves.

Our stock priceESG performance for the year had notable highlights, including (i) Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions were reduced 44% from 2019 baseline levels; (ii) we retired equivalent tonnage of United Nations Certified Emission Reduction credits to be net zero on Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions; (iii) our GHG Intensity score (Total Metric Tonnes GHG Emissions / Total Revenues US$M) was reduced by 53% from 201.92 to 94.8; and (iv) 99% of our electricity used at our mines was line power, of which 70% was generated from renewable hydropower.

Based on the Company’s 2021 performance, our committee determined that our STIP corporate performance was 115% of target. Despite achieving notable accomplishments for the year, we did not achieve our goals under the LTIP, and as a result payouts under that plan were zero. LTIP goals were negatively impacted by COVID-19 (as were STIP goals) yet despite this, the goals under the LTIP for 2019-2021 were not adjusted (nor were 2021 STIP goals adjusted). We believe this reflects that our compensation philosophy works and demonstrates the STIP is heavilysensitive to short-term performance and that the LTIP, while influenced by silver and gold prices,short-term events, is more sensitive to long-term performance, which fluctuate widely and are primarily driven by economic, political and regulatory factors that are difficult to predict and outside of our control. Silver, gold, and lead prices declined to annual averages of $15.70, $1,160, and $0.81, respectively in 2015, from average prices of $19.08 for silver, $1,266 for gold, and $0.95 for lead in 2014, and $23.79 for silver, $1,410 for gold, and $0.97 for lead in 2013. Average prices of zinc in 2015 decreased to $0.88 from $0.98 in 2014, and were slightly higher than the average of $0.87 in 2013. The decrease in metals prices negatively impacted our operating results in spite of increased production of silver, gold, and zinc in 2015 compared to 2014.is just as we intend.

We believe the drop in the prices was largely related to macroeconomic forces such as interest rates (actual and anticipated), strength of the U.S. dollar and the lack of realized or anticipated inflation. As the U.S. and other economies displayed signs of improvement, investor preference appears to have trended away from commodity-based silver and gold mining stocks toward potentially higher yields, furthering the decline in silver and gold industry market capitalization. As Hecla’s stock price is highly correlated and dependent on silver and gold prices, we were not immune to the industry shift. However, relative to our peers, we performed slightly above average (54th percentile). The chart on the next page shows the change in our share price in 2015 compared to each of the companies in our peer group.

34 www.hecla-mining.com4

A 125 Yearsnon-GAAP


measurement. See Appendix A for reconciliation to GAAP.




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS5

A non-GAAP measurement. See Appendix A for reconciliation to GAAP.



2015 Stock Price Change2022 Proxy Statement    35



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Key Operating and Significant Financial Results

In 2015, our business faced a challenging silver and gold price environment. We aggressively reduced costs while continuing to focus on safety and sustainability. During the year, we delivered on our production targets, improved operational efficiencies and kept all key projects on target and on budget.

The mining business requires long-term planning and implementation of operating strategies over several years to deliver successful operating and financial results. Accordingly, in the table below and summary that follows, we set forth our key operating and financial results for years 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 2013.2019.

As of and for the Year Ended December 31, 
  Key Results     2015     2014     2013  
Silver (ounces) produced11,591,60311,090,5068,919,728
Gold (ounces) produced189,327186,997119,989
Lead (tons) produced39,96540,25530,374
Zinc (tons) produced70,07367,96961,406
              
Sales of products$443,567$500,781$382,589
Net income (loss)$(86,968)$17,824$(25,130)
Basic income (loss) per common share$(0.23)$0.05$(0.08)
EBITDA8$107,316$151,532$69,130
Cash from operating activities (in millions)$106.4$83.1$26.6
Cash and cash equivalents (in millions)$155.2$209.7$212.2

8Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a measurement that is not in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA is used by management, and we believe is useful to investors, for evaluating our operational performance. A reconciliation of this non-GAAP measure to net income (loss), the most comparable GAAP measure, can be found in Appendix E underReconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement35



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


    As of and for the Year Ended December 31,

Key Results

  2021  2020 2019

Silver (ounces) produced

    12,887,240    13,542,957   12,605,234

Gold (ounces) produced

    201,327    208,962   272,873

Lead (tons) produced

    43,010    34,127   24,210

Zinc (tons) produced

    63,617    63,112   58,857

Sales of products (in millions)

   $807.5   $691.9  $673.3

Net income (loss) (in millions)

   $35.1   $(9.5)  $(94.9)

Basic income (loss) per common share

   $0.06   $(0.02)  $(0.19)

EBITDA (in millions)6

   $220.1   $203.3  $131.6

Cash from operating activities (in millions)

   $220.3   $180.8  $120.9

Cash and cash equivalents (in millions)

   $210.0   $129.8  $62.5

Despite lower metals prices in 2015 compared to 2014, we significantly improved our operating performance. Our overall operating and financial results are more fully described inManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2016. Our 20152022. During the 2021 STIP period, some of our achievements were as follows:

Operational:

produced 12.9 million ounces of silver and 201,327 ounces of gold;

achieved record throughput at our Casa Berardi Mine, which resulted in gold production of 134,511 ounces, as our mill optimization efforts delivered results, including an increase in recoveries by 4%;

developed the UCB mining method at the Lucky Friday Mine, which was utilized for approximately 86% of the tons mined in 2021 and assisted in managing seismicity and improving silver production by 75%, compared to 2020;

continued our trend of strong safety performance, as our AIFR for 2021 was 1.45, 40% below the U.S. national average for MSHA’s metal and nonmetal mines;

continued mitigation of the impacts of COVID-19 through the encouragement of vaccinations as they became available in the geographic locations where we operate, and refinement of our operational plans and procedures to protect our workforce, operations and communities while maintaining liquidity; and

purchased 300,000 tonnes of carbon offset credits for a total cost of $0.9 million, of which 76,550 tonnes CO2e were strong relativeretired in order for us to be carbon neutral in 2021, leaving an inventory of carbon credits for future retirement to remain carbon neutral in the near term.

Financial:

reported sales of products of $807.5 million, the highest in our 2014 results. In 2015, we achieved the following:history, reflecting a full year’s production from our Lucky Friday Mine;

achieved record silver productiongenerated $220.3 million in net cash provided by operating activities yielding $111.3 million of 11.6 million ounces, a 5% increase over 2014,free cash flow, both of which were the second highest in the Company’s history, at a cash cost, after by-product credit per silver ounce;9

produced 189,327 ounces of gold, a 1% increase over 2014, with a cash cost, after by-product credits, per gold ounce of $772;9

increased silver equivalent production 9% over 2014 and 159% over 2013 levels to 37.5 million ounces;

increased year-end silver reserve levels for the tenth consecutive year to the highest in Companyour history, with silver reserves up 2%;

achieved sales of products of $443.6 million, which was within 11% of our record sales in 2014 in spite of lower average prices for all metals we produce;

increased zinc production by 3% compared to 2014 production;

made the decision to develop a surface mine at our San Sebastian unit in the third quarter of 2015, and commenced production there in the fourth quarter;

acquired Revett Mining Company, giving us ownership of the Rock Creek project in northwestern Montana;

generated operating cash flow of $106.4 million, a 28% increase from 2014 despite lower metals prices; and

ended the year with a cash balance of $155.2 million.operations contributing positively;7


Shareholder Outreach and 2015 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

Overreduced the last three years, we have undertaken significant shareholder outreach efforts in an effort to elicit and understand the concerns of our shareholders. In response to shareholder concerns gleaned from our shareholder outreach, we made changes to our executive compensation program in 2014 and 2015, and we believe as a result of those changes, last year’s say-on-pay vote achieved 83% support. We believe that open dialogue with our shareholders and reflecting their feedback in our compensation decisions was critical to our success in achieving such a high percentage of support.

In 2015, and in advance of our 2016 Annual Meeting, we continued to reach out to our shareholders. We contacted investors that collectively held over 45% of our commonstock. We also held one-on-one discussions with the two major proxy advisory firms. The purpose of these meetings was to gain feedback on the changes we made to our executive compensation in 2014 and 2015 and to discuss any further concerns. A management team (excluding NEOs) held one-on-one discussions with shareholders holding over 10%minimum realized silver price threshold of our common stock.stock dividend to $20 from $25 per ounce and added $0.01 per share to the annual silver-linked component, our third dividend increase since June 2020. During our discussions, all2021, we returned a total of the changes made$20.7 million, or 19% of free cash flows to our executive compensation programcommon and preferred shareholders;

invested in 2014capital expenditures (excluding lease additions and 2015 were well-received. The one common issue raised duringother non-cash items) of approximately $109.0 million, including $49.6 million at Casa Berardi, $23.9 million at Greens Creek, $29.9 million at Lucky Friday, and $5.5 million at the Nevada operations;

spent a record $47.9 million on exploration and pre-development activities, which increased our conversations was to see more pay-for-performance disclosure intotal reserves for silver by approximately 11.5 million ounces, or 6%, and for gold by approximately 330,000 ounces, or 14%; and

released $58.4 million of valuation allowance on our Proxy Statement. We are constantly trying to improvedeferred tax assets, reflecting our compensation disclosures, including with respect to pay-for-performance.

Oversight and Determinationcurrent expectation of the Executive Compensation Programutilizing these tax assets.

Role of the Compensation Committee. The committee, consisting entirely of independent members (Nethercutt, Crumley, Rogers and Taylor), has primary responsibility for executive compensation decisions. The committee carries out its responsibilities under a charter approved by the Board. In 2014, the committee and the Board amended the committee’s charter to provide that the committeehas the authority to approve all executive compensation, including our CEO’s (but not that of our independent directors, which remains decided by the full Board). The committee receives assistance from its independent executive compensation consultant, Mercer, and uses this information in making decisions and conducting its annual review of the Company’s executive compensation program.

96

A Cash cost, after by-product credits, per ounce of silver and gold is a non-GAAP measurement, a measurement. See Appendix A for reconciliation of which to cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization, the most comparable GAAP measure, can be found in Appendix E underReconciliation of Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits and Cash Cost, After By-product Credits (non-GAAP) to cost of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (GAAP).GAAP.


36 www.hecla-mining.com7

A 125 Yearsnon-GAAP


measurement. See Appendix A for reconciliation to GAAP.




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Role of Independent 36     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Consultant. Mercer performs executive compensation services solelyDiscussion and Analysis

We achieved all the above while increasing our cash balance to $210.0 million, which was $80.2 million higher than on behalf of the committee, is engaged by and reports directly to the committee, meets separately with the committeeDecember 31, 2020, with no members of management present, and consults with the committee chair between meetings.

The committee has assessed Mercer’s independence in light of SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, and has determined that Mercer’s work does not raise any conflicts of interest or independence concerns. The Mercer consultants that worked with the committee were Tracy Bean, project manager, who was assisted by Raphael Katsman, a principal of Mercer.

Pursuant to a written agreement dated January 7, 2015, between Mercer and the Compensation Committee, below are the material aspects of the committee’s instructions to Mercer concerning the services the committee asked it to perform with respect to executive compensation and related matters in 2015:

evaluate the competitiveness of the total direct compensation package provided to Hecla’s executive officers; and specifically to compare Hecla’s current executive officer compensation with compensation provided to executives in similar roles in comparable organizations;

review updated information regarding Hecla’s executive compensation program and the positions to be benchmarked, including organization charts, position descriptions, current total compensation and other relevant data;

review last year’s peer group to determine if the included companies continue to be appropriate and if any additional companies should be considered for inclusion;

collect and analyze compensation data form the most recent proxy filings of the peer group and form the survey sources and summarize the market pay data by the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile levels and compare Hecla’s executive compensation levels to the proxy and survey data separately;

analyze the year-over-year change in compensation levels for Hecla compared to each market data source;

analyze Hecla’s long-term incentive and equity practices compared to peers;

prepare report to the Compensation Committee summarizing their methodology, findings and overall recommendations;

assist the committee in meeting its obligation to issue a Compensation Committee Report recommending inclusion of the CD&A in the proxy statement; and

provide ongoing advice and consultation throughout the year to assist the committee, including attendance at committee meetings, if needed.


In addition to providing technical support and input on market practices, the committee’s goal in using compensation and benefits consultants is to provide external benchmark information for assessing compensation relative to our compensation philosophy. As described on page 38 underBenchmarking Using Compensation Peer Groups, Mercer assisted the committee in identifying the appropriate companies to be included in our peer group for executive and director compensation and pay practices, and in benchmarking our executive and director pay against the peer group.

In July 2015, Mercer performed a competitive analysis and presented its findings and recommendations to the committee. The competitive analysis provided detailed comparative data for each executive officer position and assessed each component of pay, including base salary, short- and long-term incentives and total target compensation, as well as the mix of compensation among these pay elements. We compared this information to our executives’ compensation by similarity of position. The committee also reviewed our performance and carefully evaluated each executive’s performance during the year against established goals, leadership qualities, operational performance, business responsibilities, career with Hecla, current compensation arrangements and longterm potential.

The committee has established procedures that it considers adequate to ensure that Mercer’s advice to the committee remains objective and is not influenced by Company management. These procedures include: a direct reporting relationship between the Mercer consultant and the committee; a provision in the committee’s engagement letter with Mercer specifying the information and recommendations that can and cannot be shared with management; an annual update to the committee on Mercer’s financial relationship with Hecla, including a summary of the work performed for Hecla during the preceding 12 months; and written assurances from Mercer that within the Mercer organization, the Mercer consultants who perform services for Hecla has a reporting relationship determined separately from Mercer’s other lines of business and from its other work for Hecla.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement37



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The total amount of fees for executive compensation consulting services Mercer provided to the committee in 2015 was $108,688.

During 2015, management hired Mercer or its affiliates to provide consulting servicesdrawn on our benefit plans, including support under the Affordable Care Act. The total amountrevolving credit facility, as of fees for these additional consulting services in 2015 was $150,011. The decision to engage Mercer or its affiliates for these additional consulting services was madeDecember 31, 2021.

Benchmarking and Competitive Analyses

We have adopted a pay-for-performance philosophy that incentivizes performance by management, and neither the committee nor the Board approved these other services.

Role of Management. The committee considers input from the CEO in making determinations regarding our executive compensation program and the individual compensation of each executive officer (other than himself). As part of our annual review process, the CEO reviews the performance of each member of the executive team (other than the CEO), and their contribution to the overall performance of the Company. Approximately mid-year, the CEO presents recommendations to the committee regardingtargeting base salary adjustments, target annual incentive awards, stock-based grants, and long-term performance unit grants, based on a thorough analysis of relevant market compensation data comparing Hecla with an applicable peer group within the mining industry. The CEO and senior management also make recommendations to the committee regarding our annual and long-term quantitative goals and annual qualitative goals for the executive officers (other than the CEO), as well as recommendations regarding the participation in our stock-based compensation plans and amendments to the plans, as necessary.

Benchmarking Using Compensation Peer Groups. To attract and retain key executives, our goal is to provide competitive compensation. We generally align our NEO total compensation tosalaries slightly below the median of our peer companiesgroup but targeting incentives above the peer median. The total direct compensation of our NEOs is targeted at approximately the 50th percentile. The process of setting targeted compensation includes consideration of an NEO’s skills, experience, knowledge, and survey composite data. However, we allow total compensation to exceedreputation in the median when ourindustry, as well as Company performance and individual experience, responsibilities and performance warrant.needs.

Central to the pay review process is the selection of a relevant peer group. Because we operate in a global business that is dominated by Canadian companies, ourpeerour peer group reflects this with only fivetwo U.S. companies among our peer group. In addition, we have a corporate office in Vancouver, British Columbia, where one of our NEOs works. The committee reviews and determines the composition of our peer group on an annual basis, based on recommendations from Mercer.basis. In 2015,May 2021, the committee assisted by Mercer, removed one peer from the 2014 peer group (Allied Nevada Gold),added Equinox Gold and identified two new peers (B2Gold and Primero). For 2015, Hecla’sYamana Gold, as these companies are similar to Hecla in total revenue, total assets and/or market capitalization.

In 2021, our peer group was made up of the following 17 companies, whose aggregate profile was comparable to Hecla in terms of size, industry, and competition for executive talent.

CompanyAnnual Revenue1
($ millions US)
Market Cap1
($ millions US)
Total Assets1
($ millions US)
Corporate
Location
  IAMGOLD Corporation     1,008     1,019     4,223     Canada  
AuRico Gold Inc.2918282,282Canada
Centerra Gold Inc.7631,2291,629Canada
Pan American Silver Corporation7521,4002,018Canada
New Gold Inc.7262,1683,882Canada
Coeur Mining Inc.6365281,333United States
Stillwater Mining Company9447261,399United States
B2Gold Corp.4871,5012,119Canada
Alamos Gold Inc.170910880Canada
Detour Gold Corporation5361,2902,517Canada
Tahoe Resources Inc.3502,053976United States
Primero Mining275622915Canada
Silver Standard Resources Inc.300405986Canada
Thompson Creek Metals Company8073562,846United States
Royal Gold, Inc.2374,9162,892United States
Endeavour Silver Corp.197223266Canada
First Majestic Silver Corp.246590771Canada
Median4879101,629
Hecla Mining Company5011,0252,262United States

Company

  

Annual

Revenue(1)

($US millions)

   

Market Cap(1)

($US millions)

   

Total Assets(1)

($US millions)

   

Corporate

Location

  

TSR    

Peer    

Alamos Gold Inc.

   748         3,425         3,637        Canada  ●    

B2Gold Corp.

   1,789         5,920         3,362        Canada  ●    

Centerra Gold Inc.

   1,689         3,442         3,136        Canada  ●    

Coeur Mining Inc.

   785         2,658         1,404        United States  ●    

Eldorado Gold

   1,027         2,422         4,931        Canada  ●    

Equinox Gold

   843         3,127         2,672        Canada  ●    

First Majestic Silver Corp.

   364         3,491         1,238        Canada  ●    

IAMGOLD Corporation

   1,242         1,751         4,154 ��      Canada  ●    

New Gold Inc.

   643         1,499         2,250        Canada  ●    

Novagold

   --         3,223         224        Canada  

 

Oceana Gold

   500         1,361         2,253        Canada  ●    

Pan American Silver Corporation

   1,339         7,261         3,434        Canada  ●    

Pretium Resources

   618         2,155         1,431        Canada  ●    

Royal Gold, Inc.

   562         6,973         2,764        United States  

 

SSR Mining

   853         4,266         5,245        Canada  ●    

Torex Gold

   789         1,287         1,252        Canada  ●    

Yamana Gold

   1,561         5,481         8,423        Canada  

 

Median

   789         3,223         2,764        

 

  

 

Hecla Mining Company

   692         3,489         2,700        United States  

 

1(1)

In $US millions as of year-end 2014. 2020.


38 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The peer group is composed entirely of publicly held companies, most of which are engaged in the business of mining precious metals, with revenue, market capitalization and total assets within a reasonable range of Hecla’s. We believe these peer companies are appropriate because they are in the same industry, compete with us for executive talent, have executives in positions similar to ours, and are considered by the committee to be comparable to Hecla.

2022 Proxy Statement    37


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

During our shareholder outreach discussions, many of our largest shareholders have informed us that, compared to peer groups selected by proxy advisory firms, they consider the peer group chosen by us to be the most relevant and appropriate for compensation and performance benchmarking purposes. The peer group selected last year by Glass Lewis included 14 of our 17 selected peers. The peer group selected by Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) included only two of our 17 selected peers. The rest of the peer group selected by ISS contained U.S.-based companies in an acceptable rangethe industrial and specialty chemicals, plastics, coatings, nickel and cobalt-based alloys, steel products and other industries – companies and industries whose market fundamentals are materially different from that of the precious metals mining industry. We understand that ISS’s internal policies prohibit its selection of Canadian companies (which account for 15 of our peers) and require that Hecla be compared to companies having only similar revenue instead of similar market capitalization and/or total assets compared to Hecla.assets. We believe that a fair compensation peer group, in terms of both industry profile and size, should not be selected for Hecla without including Canadian mining companies.

In making compensation decisions theThe committee also reviews survey data provided by Mercer from the following mining and general industry survey sources:

Mercer US Mining Industry Compensation Survey

Mercer Canadian Mining Industry Compensation Survey

Mercer U.S. Premium Executive Remuneration Suite (general industry)


Base salaries are targeted between the 25th percentile and median (50th percentile), with incentive opportunities that can provide above-median total compensation based on performance. Compensation for NEOs within this group may be positioned higher or lower than market median where the committee believes appropriate, considering each executive’s roles and responsibilities and experience in their position within Hecla.

Mercer provided the committee with a report summarizingreviewed an analysis of executive compensation levels at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentiles of the peer group and the survey data for positions comparable to those held by each of our NEOs. The committee also received an analysis from Mercer comparingcompared the target total cash compensation (base salary plus target annual incentive)STIP) and target total direct compensation (base salary plus target annual incentiveSTIP plus the value of long-term incentives)LTIP target) for each of the NEOs against these benchmarks. For retention and competitive considerations, in comparison to the peer group data or survey data applicable to each NEO’s position, we generally target each NEO’s total cashdirect compensation at the median level and the total target compensation at or above the median level and deliver compensation above or below these levels when warranted by performance.

In 2015, target2021, total direct compensation (base salary, short- and long-term incentives) for our NEOs was betweentargeted at the approximate median and the 75th percentile of both the peer group and survey data.group.

The committee suggests that the following consideration be kept in mind regarding comparisons of our NEO compensation and Company performance against external benchmarks:

Standard industry classifications and groupings limited to U.S. companies alone are not appropriate to determine Hecla’s peers. There are very few public U.S. mining companies that are involved in the precious metals business. Most precious metals companies are in Canada with some employees who are U.S. citizens. This means that most of Hecla’s true peers are excluded from the U.S. industry classification. In addition, the limited number of U.S.precious metals companies of comparable size to Hecla means that companies from the broader “material” industry are substituted by some proxy advisors for comparison purposes. The performance of precious metal companies is often negatively correlated to the broader industry, so benchmarking Hecla’s Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) against chemical, construction materials, base metals and forest products companies is simply not relevant in determining relative performance.

Comparing Hecla’s TSR to other companies over discrete time periods is imperfect. TSR is the primary measure used by proxy advisors in comparing performance across companies. However, fairly measuring TSR for one company during times of high stock price volatility, such as that faced by Hecla and others in the precious metals industry over the past year, can be an imperfect point of comparison since the selection of starting and ending stock prices that are within several days or weeks of one another can produce very different TSR results. Moreover, comparisons with companies that are not in the same industry as Hecla, and therefore not subject to precious metals price volatility and other prevailing industry economic factors, is even more problematic.


In 2015,2021, the committee also approved a separate peer group to be used specifically with regard to TSR. The TSR, peer group is as follows:for purposes of our performance-based equity awards (PSUs)1, discussed below, which consisted of the following companies/funds:

IAMGOLD CorporationAuRico Gold Inc.*
First Majestic Silver Corp.Silver Standard Resources Inc.
DetourAlamos Gold CorporationCenterra Gold

Coeur Mining Inc.

Fortuna Silver
New Gold Inc.
B2Gold Corp.FresnilloOceanaGold
Centerra GoldGDX Vectors Gold Miner ETFPan American Silver Corporation
PrimeroCoeur MiningAlamos Gold Inc.*
Tahoe Resources Inc.Endeavour Silver Corp.

*AuRico Gold and Alamos Gold merged in 2015, and are now listed under Alamos Gold Inc.


125 Years
  2016 Proxy Statement39GDXJ Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETFPretium Resources
Eldorado GoldGLD Gold ShareSLV Silver Trust
Endeavour SilverHochschild MiningSSR Mining
Equinox GoldIAMGOLD CorporationTorex Gold
First Majestic Silver




TableThe Compensation Committee Process and the Role of ContentsManagement and Human Resources Department

Role of the Committee. The committee, consisting entirely of independent members (Rogers, Crumley, Stanley and Boggs), has primary responsibility for executive compensation decisions. The committee carries out its responsibilities under a charter approved by the Board. The committee has the authority to approve all executive compensation, including our CEO’s (but not that of our independent directors, which is decided by the full Board). In 2021, the committee did not receive assistance from an independent executive compensation consultant. The committee assessed the Company’s compensation arrangements to determine if their provisions and operation created undesired or unintentional risks of a material nature. The committee found that our compensation policies and practices do not create inappropriate or unintended material risk to the Company as a whole.

Role of Independent Human Resources Department. In past years, the committee has used a compensation consultant to perform executive compensation services solely on behalf of the committee. Since no significant concerns were raised by shareholders or proxy advisory firms during our most recent shareholder outreach, the committee decided not to use a compensation consultant during 2021 and instead had the Company’s human resources department review our executive compensation program. In 2021, the human resources department performed the following services:

evaluated the competitiveness of the total direct compensation package provided to Hecla’s executive officers; and specifically, compared Hecla’s current executive officer compensation with compensation provided to executives in similar roles at comparable peer organizations;

38     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS��

reviewed updated information regarding Hecla’s executive compensation program and the positions to be benchmarked, including organization charts, position descriptions, current total compensation and other relevant data;



reviewed last year’s peer group to determine if the included companies continue to be appropriate and if any additional companies should be considered for inclusion;

collected and analyzed compensation data from the most recent proxy filings of the peer group and summarized the market pay data and compared Hecla’s executive compensation levels to the peer group proxies;

analyzed the year-over-year change in compensation levels for Hecla compared to each market data source;

analyzed Hecla’s long-term incentive and equity practices compared to peers;

prepared a report to the committee summarizing the methodology used and findings; and

assisted the committee in meeting its obligation to issue a Compensation Committee Report recommending inclusion of the CD&A in the Proxy Statement.

In June 2021, Hecla’s human resources department presented its competitive analysis findings and recommendations to the committee. The competitive analysis provided detailed comparative data for each executive officer position and assessed each component of pay, including base salary, short- and long-term incentives and total target compensation, as well as the mix of compensation among these pay elements. The committee compared this information to the executives’ compensation by similarity of position. The committee also reviewed the Company’s performance and carefully evaluated each executive’s performance during the year against established goals, leadership qualities, operational performance, business responsibilities, career with Hecla, current compensation arrangements and long-term potential.

Role of Management. The committee considers input from the CEO in making determinations regarding our executive compensation program and the individual compensation of each NEO (other than the CEO). As part of our annual review process, the CEO reviews the performance of the other NEOs and their contribution to the overall performance of the Company. Approximately mid-year, the CEO presents recommendations to the committee regarding base salary adjustments, target STIP awards, stock-based grants, and LTIP unit grants, based on a thorough analysis of relevant market compensation data comparing Hecla with an applicable peer group within the mining industry. The CEO and Sr. Vice President – CAO also make recommendations to the committee regarding the Company’s short-term quantitative and qualitative goals, and long-term goals for the NEOs (other than the CEO), as well as recommendations regarding the participation in the Company’s stock-based compensation plans and amendments to the plans, as necessary.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

WeManagement and the Board recognize that the mining industry is cyclical, influenced by market factors, and can include wide swings in the prices for precious metals, which are beyond our management’s control, and can significantly influence our profitability and share price. Further, we operate in a competitive and challenging industry. Over the past decade, a worldwide mining boom has significantly increased the demand for executives with mining-related skillsindustry, and experience. In addition, the supply of mining executives is very limited, particularly in the United States. As a result, having a viable compensation strategy is critical to our success.

We expect top-level performance from our executive management team even during downturns in our industry and during periods of Company expansion. Accordingly, the criteria that the committee has established for our performance-based awards have sometimes been very challenging to achieve. Nevertheless, even in years for which we have incurred a net loss, we have often performed better than most of our industry peers in key respects (e.g., reserves and resources). The committee considers this and other factors in evaluating discretionary awards.

Our compensation philosophy is to pay our NEOs competitive levels of compensation that best reflect their individual responsibilities and contributions to the Company, while providing incentives to achieve our business and financial objectives. While comparisons to compensation levels at companies in our peer group are helpful in assessing the overall competitiveness of our compensation program, we believe that our executive compensation program must also must be internally consistent and equitable in order for the Company to achieve our corporate objectives.

The pay-for-performance philosophy of our executive compensation programs described in this Proxy Statement plays a significant role in our ability to produce strong operating, exploration, strategic, and financial results. It enables us to attract and retain a highly experienced and successful team to manage our business. Our payThe programs strongly support our business objectives and are aligned with the value provided to our shareholders. Further, as

2022 Proxy Statement    39


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

an executive’s level of responsibility within our organization increases, so does the percentage of totalcompensationtotal compensation that we link to performance – through the annual incentiveshort- and long-term incentive programs, as well as share performance.

In setting policies and practices regarding compensation, the guiding philosophy of the committee is to:

have compensation that is primarily at-risk and based on strategic objectives and tactical activities; and

acquire, retain and motivate talented executives.

have compensation that is primarily at-risk and based on strategic objectives and tactical activities; and

acquire, retain, and motivate talented executives.

The committee believes that a mix of both cash and equity incentives is appropriate, as annual cash incentives reward executives for achieving both short- and long-term quantitative and qualitative goals, while equity incentives align the interests of our executives with those of otherour shareholders. In determining the amount of the cash and equity incentives, the committee considers each officer’s total compensation on both a short- and long-term basis to assess the retention and incentive value of his or hertheir overall compensation.

The committee conducts its annual review process near the end of each calendar year in order to align each executive’s compensation awards with the Company’s operational, financial and strategic results for the calendar year.

We also maintain (or avoid) the following pay practices that we believe enhance our pay-for-performance philosophy and further align our NEOs’ interests with those of shareholders:

We DO Have these Practices

our shareholders have the opportunity annually to cast an advisory vote on our executive compensation;

incentive award metrics that are generally objective and tied to Company performance;

78.6% of CEO’s and 73.5% of the other NEOs’ pay is at risk;

63.4% of total compensation for the CEO is performance-based;

57.7% of total compensation for the other NEOs is performance-based;

We DO NOT Have these Practices

we grant PSU that have value based on how our TSR ranks within our selected peer group and have no value if the share performance does not achieve the 50th percentile in the peer group;

rigorous stock ownership requirements for our executive officers and directors;

our change in control agreements contain double trigger payments and upon a change of control, contain no excise tax gross up provision;

100% of the CEO’s STIP compensation is tied solely to Company performance;

time-based equity awards that generally vest over a three-year period to promote retention;

equity awards that are performance-based depend on relative share performance (as well as certain time-based service requirements);

our Insider Trading Policy provides that directors and officers are prohibited from hedging or pledging any securities of the Company;

each of the Company’s incentive plans (STIP, LTIP, KEDCP, and 2010 Stock Plan) have clawback provisions;

our NEOs, including our CEO, generally must remain employed with the Company through the payment date of their short- and long-term awards, or the awards are forfeited, except in the cases of death, disability, or in some cases retirement; and

our Insider Trading Policy prohibits all directors, executive officers, and certain other employees from purchasing or selling any Company securities three weeks before through two days after the public release of any of our periodic results, or at any other time during the year while in possession of material non-public information about the Company.

We DO NOT Have these Practices

×✕  

Repricing of stock optionsoptions;

×

Perquisites;

×Perquisites

Excise tax gross-ups

gross-ups; and


×We DO Have these Practices
✓  Incentiveaward metrics that are objective and tied to Company performance
81%of CEO and 71% of NEO pay is at-risk
Over65% of total compensation for the CEO is performance-based
46%of total compensation for NEOs other than the CEO is performance-based
100%of the CEO’s annual incentive compensation is tied solely to Company performance
Rigorousstock ownership requirements for our NEOs and directors
Compensationrecoupment “Clawback” policy
Double-triggerchange

Single-trigger change in control severance for NEOs

Equityawards that vest over a three-year period to promote retention
Anti-hedgingpolicyarrangements.


40 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


40     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Elements of Total Compensation

We have a multifaceted compensation program. For the year ended December 31, 2015,2021, our executive compensation program consisted of the following elements:

BASE SALARY

Pay Element

Metrics / Objective

Base Salary

Objective:Provide a fixed level of cash compensation for performing day-to-day responsibilities generally responsibilities.

Key Feature: Designed to be at less than median of peers.approximately the 50th percentile.

Key Features:Terms: Base salary reviews are performed in the middle of each year for the 12-month period from July 1 to June 30.

Terms:Paid semi-monthly.


INCENTIVE PAY

Annual Incentive PlanPay

STIP

Objective:Focus executives on achieving the Company’s short-term goals, and the performance steps necessary to achieve longer-term objectives.

Key Features: BasedThe Company’s STIP pool is targeted at a fixed percentage of all salaried employees’ targeted STIP, but the actual bonus pool is based on achievement of Company goals and individual performance.goals. Some goals are quantitative, such as EBITDA, production, and cash position,AIFR, while others are qualitative.qualitative and reflect strategic objectives and tactical activities. Many qualitative goals have quantitative components, such as “increase mill recovery by 2.5%.” Weighting of the corporate performance is targeted at 50% quantitative corporate performance goals, 25% qualitative/other goals (which may include both (i) qualitative, goals for specific NEOs and their related parts of our business or Hecla as a whole, and (ii) other quantitative goals related to specific NEOs and their related part of our business or Hecla as a whole), and 25% discretionary factor asthat is determined byat the discretion of the committee. Except for the CEO, executive incentive pay is based on a combination of corporate and individual performance.

Terms:Determined by the committee and paid in a single payment following the performance year.period. Awarded in the first quarterhalf of each year. Designed to be awarded in cash but may be paid in equity (in full or part). Any NEO receiving a STIP award must be employed with the Company at the time of payment, except for a termination due to death or disability, or their award is forfeited.

Long-term Incentive Plan

LTIP

Objective:Focus executives on longer-term value creation as determined by the specific targets of the plan.

Key Features:Based on corporate goals achieved over a three-year performance period. A new three-year performance period begins each calendar year and performance units are granted in the first half of each year. Each three-year plan identifies key long-term objectives that are expected to create long-term value for shareholders such as operating performance, increasing reserves and production, generating cash flow and resources, increasing shareholder return, and developing significant capital programs.returns.

Terms:Determined by the committee and paid in a single payment following the three-year performance period. Awarded in the first quarterhalf of each year. Designed to be awarded in cash but may be paid in equity (in full or part). Any NEO receiving a LTIP award must be employed with the Company at the time of payment, or their award is forfeited, except in the cases of death, disability, or in some cases retirement. At the time of an employee’s retirement, in order to receive any LTIP award that otherwise becomes payable, the employee must at least be age: (i) 60 and have 15 or more years of service with the Company; (ii) 65 and have seven or more years of service with the Company; or (iii) 68. If the participant meets these age and years of service requirements, their prorated portion for outstanding plan periods will be paid after the completion of those plan periods.

2022 Proxy Statement    41


Compensation Discussion and Analysis



125 YearsPay Element


  2016 Proxy Statement41Metrics / Objective



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


EQUITY

Restricted Stock Units and Stock OptionsEquity

Objectives:RSUs

Objective: Align management’s interests with those of shareholders and provide incentive for NEOs to remain with the Company for the long term.

Key Features: Restricted stock unitRSU awards are denominated in shares and delivered in stock with a vesting schedule of three years for NEOs. Stock option awards generally vest immediately with a five-year expiration period.

Terms: Restricted stock unitsRSUs are granted in the second quarterbetween May and August of each year. In recentIf a NEO leaves the Company for any reason, other than death, disability, or in some cases retirement, before the vesting date, they will forfeit their RSUs. Also, if a NEO retires before their RSUs have vested, they must meet certain requirements in order for their RSUs to continue to vest based on the applicable vesting schedule. At the time of an employee’s retirement, in order to receive any unvested RSUs, the employee must at least be age: (i) 60 and have 15 or more years only restricted stock unit awardsof service with the Company; (ii) 65 and have been made.seven or more years of service with the Company; or (iii) 68.

Performance-based Shares

Objectives:PSUs

Objective: Provide incentive for CEONEOs to remain with the Company for the long term and to align CEO’sthe NEO’s interests with those of shareholders.

Key Features: Performance-based sharesPSUs realize more value the higher the TSR ranks within the selected peer group and have no value if the share performance falls below the 50th percentile among the peer group.

Terms: Performance-based sharesPSUs are granted to the CEONEOs in the second quarter of each year and are based on a three-year TSR. If a NEO leaves the Company for any reason, other than death, disability, or in some cases retirement, before the vesting date, they will forfeit their PSUs. Also, if a NEO retires before their PSUs have vested, they must meet certain requirements in order for their PSUs to continue to vest based on the applicable vesting schedule. At the time of an employee’s retirement, in order to receive any unvested PSUs, the employee must at least be age: (i) 60 and have 15 or more years of service with the Company; (ii) 65 and have seven or more years of service with the Company; or (iii) 68.


KEY EMPLOYEE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

KEDCP

Objective:Increased exposure to the Company to the extent deferred compensation is tied to the value of Hecla stock, while also providing a tax deferral opportunity and encouraging financial planning.

Key Features:Allows for the voluntary deferral of base salary, annual incentiveSTIP pay, long-term incentiveLTIP pay and restricted stock unitequity award payouts.

Terms: Generally, employeeEmployee must make election in the previous year to defer in the coming year.


BENEFITS

Objectives:Benefits

Objective: Attract and retain highly qualified executives.

Key Features:Participation in retirement plans, partial company-paid health, dental and vision insurance, life insurance, and accidental death and dismemberment insurance.

Terms:Same terms for all U.S. permanent full-time salaried employees.U.S.-based executives. Non-U.S. executives receive similar benefits.


42 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Total Compensation Mix

Our executive compensation program – composed primarily of base salary, short- and long-term incentives, and equity awards – is intended to align the interests of our NEOs with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The program is designed to accomplish this by rewarding performance that results in an increase in the value of our shareholders’ investment in Hecla. We believe that the proportion of at-risk, performance-based compensation should comprise a significant portion of executive pay.

The mix of compensation for our CEO and other NEOs, which we believe is similar to our peer group, is shown below.

2015 Target Compensation Structure. The following table lists total 2015 target compensation for the NEOs.

CEO Mix of Target Pay


LOGO

42     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Other NEO Mix of Target Pay


  NEOBase Salary
($)
Annual Incentive
Target Award
($)
Long-term Incentive
Plan Target Award
($)
Equity
($)
Total
($)
Baker       605,000       605,000       950,000       1,000,0001       3,160,000  
Sabala380,000304,000340,000345,0001,369,000
Radford380,000304,000340,000335,0001,369,000
 McDonald275,000220,000260,000300,0001,055,000
 Sienko250,000150,000190,000154,000744,000
Poirier226,000135,600205,000200,000766,600

LOGO

2021 Target Compensation Structure. The following table lists total 2021 target compensation for the NEOs.

NEO

  Base
Salary
($)
   STIP
Target Award
($)
   LTIP
Target Award
($)
   Equity(1)
($)
   Total
($)
 

Baker

   700,000    770,000    810,000    1,000,000    3,280,000 

Lawlar

   265,000    185,500    270,000    280,000    1,000,500 

Roberts

   380,000    380,000    360,000    375,000    1,495,000 

Brown

   264,000    184,800    270,000    265,000    983,800 

Sienko

   265,000    185,500    270,000    250,000    970,500 

Hall*

   --    --    --    --    -- 
1*

Retired in March 2021

(1)

Consists of $500,000 in restricted stock unitsthe target values for RSUs and $500,000 in performance-based shares.PSUs as follows:


NEO

  RSUs
($)
  PSUs
($)
  

Total Equity  

Award
Value
($)

Baker

    500,000    500,000    1,000,000

Lawlar

    170,000    110,000    280,000

Roberts

    225,000    150,000    375,000

Brown

    160,000    105,000    265,000

Sienko

    150,000    100,000    250,000

Hall

    --    --    --

Individual base salaries and annual incentiveSTIP targets for the NEOs are based on the scope of each NEO’s responsibilities, individual performance, and market data. At the beginning of each year, we also define the keystrategickey strategic objectives each NEO is expected to achieve during that year, which are evaluated and approved by the committee.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement43



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Overview of our Compensation Decisions and Results for 20152021

Summary

In 2021:

base salaries of our NEOs were unchanged, except for our CEO, who received a 10.2% increase;

the assessment of our STIP corporate performance was 115% of target with quantitative factors contributing 31% (target of 50%), qualitative factors contributing 34% (target of 25%) and discretionary factors contributing 50% (target of 25%);

the 2019-2021 LTIP resulted in no payout to the NEOs; and

Base Salary

for the 2019-2021 period, share performance against the compensation peer group achieved above target results, and our TSR ranked second highest among the 12 peers in our group. As a result, the PSUs awarded in 2019 were issued to our NEOs. See 2019-2021 PSU Results on page 52 for further information.


Base Salary

Design. Pursuant to our market positioning policy, theThe committee targets NEO base salaries betweenat approximately the 2550th percentile and median ofamong Hecla’s peer group for our NEOs.group. An individual NEO’s base salary may be set above or below this market range for that particular position, depending on the committee’s subjective assessment of the individual NEO’s experience, recent performance and expected future contribution, retention concerns, and the recommendation of our CEO (other than for himself). The committee does not use any type of quantitative formula to determine the base salary level of any of the NEOs. The committee reviews NEO salaries at least annually as partof its overall competitive market assessment, as described above.previously described. Typically, the committee makes annual salary adjustments in the middle of each year for the 12-month period from July 1 to June 30.

2022 Proxy Statement    43


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Analysis and Decision. In July 2015,June 2021, the committee reviewed a marketan analysis prepared by Mercer. Thethe Sr. Vice President – CAO. Except for Mr. Lawlar, due to his promotion to Sr. Vice President and CFO in March 2021, and Mr. Baker, the NEO base salaries for all of our NEOs remained unchanged as their salaries were comparablenot adjusted in 2021. Mr. Baker’s base salary was increased by 10.2% to bring his base salary to the base salaries of other executives in our peer group. Our NEOs base salaries have remained unchanged since July 1, 2014.50th percentile.

The following table shows annual base salaries for all NEO’sNEOs from July 1, 20142020 through December 31, 2015:2021:

Base Salary for NEOs July 1, 20142020 through December 31, 20152021

  NEO       7/1/14 to
6/30/15
Salary
($)
       7/1/15 to
12/31/15
Salary
($)
       Percentage
Increase
(%)
  
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.605,000605,0000
James A. Sabala380,000380,0000
Lawrence P. Radford380,000380,0000
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald275,000275,0000
David C. Sienko250,000250,0000
Don Poirier226,000226,0000

NEO

  

7/1/20 thru

6/30/2021

Salary
($)

   

7/1/2021 thru  

12/31/2021  

Salary  

($)  

Baker

   635,000    700,000  

Lawlar(1)

   170,000    265,000

Roberts

   380,000    380,000 

Brown

   264,000    264,000 

Sienko

   265,000    265,000 

Hall(2)

   380,000    -- 
Incentive Plans(1)

Prior to Mr. Lawlar’s promotion from Treasurer to Sr. Vice President & CFO in March 2021, his base salary was $170,000. Upon his appointment as Sr. Vice President and CFO, on March 1, 2021, his base salary was increased to $265,000.


(2)

Mr. Hall retired in March 2021.

Company Performance and Relationship to NEOCompensation. Our incentive compensation plans include the Hecla Mining Company Annual Incentive Plan and the Hecla Mining Company Executive and Senior Management Long-Term Performance Payment Plan. The plans include performance measures of the most important factors we believe contribute to Hecla’s sustained long-term success that can lead to improved stock price performance.Plans

Hecla Mining Company Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”)STIP.

Consistent with Hecla’s pay-for-performance philosophy, substantially all salaried employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate in the AIP. LateSTIP. Early in the prior year, or early in the current year, the committee approves a company-wide, short-term incentivecompanywide STIP pool that is available for payment to salaried employees, including the NEOs, the amount of which is based in part on Company performance during the prior year.

AIP Components. In 2014, the AIP was amended to use a more formulaic approach to awards, with less committee discretion. The AIP includes the following components and relative weights:

quantitative corporate performance factors comprising 50% of the targeted award;

qualitative/other goals, normally comprising 25% of the targeted award; and

a discretionary factor as determined by the committee, normally comprising 25% of the targeted award.

While each component can achieve two and a half times the target (250%) with respect to the component, the maximum total payout is limited to two times the target award level (200%).

44 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


For 2015, the quantitative corporate performance factors were divided into three factors (including weighting): production (20%), adjusted EBITDA (20%) and cash (10%).

The production factor converts gold, lead and zinc to silver equivalent at a ratio of 71 oz. silver to 1 oz. gold, 19.2 lb. lead to 1 oz. silver, and 17.25 lb. zinc to 1 oz.silver. Our production target requires that we achieve 35 million silver equivalent ounces. Maximum payout is attained if production achieves 37 million ounces. The minimum payout requires 32 million ounces. To achieve targeted payout a 2% increase over 2014 silver equivalent production levels was necessary, while the maximum payout requires a 7% increase.

Production Goal Metrics

2015 Production in Silver Equivalent Ounces
2015 Production Metrics% Performance Value
37.0 mmMaximum                               50%
36.0 mm40%
35.0 mmTarget20%
32.0 mmMinimum10%
<32.0mm0%

The adjusted EBITDA target was $155 million. Maximum payout is achieved if adjusted EDITDA is $170 million, which is $15 million more than target or approximately a 10% improvement in adjusted EBITDA. There is no payout if EBITDA is less than $130 million.

Adjusted EBITDA Goal Metrics

2015 Adjusted EBITDA Metrics% Performance Value
$170 mmMaximum                               50%
$165 mm40%
$155 mmTarget20%
$130 mmMinimum10%
< $130mm0%

The cash position target is $175 million, adjusted for acquisitions at year-end. Maximum payout is achieved if our cash position at year-end is at or above $200 million, which was the cash position at the beginning of 2015. The threshold payout level is $160 million, below which no payout is earned.

Cash Goal Metrics

2015 Cash Metrics  Factor Value
$200 mmMaximum                  25%
$190 mm20%
$175 mmTarget10%
$160 mmMinimum5%
< $160 mm0%

Target Opportunities. Each NEO has a target STIP award opportunity expressed as a percentage of base salary, along with minimum and maximum award levels.salary. The target award opportunities areis determined based on the following: market assessments and the committee’s market positioning policy; the individual NEO’s organization level, scope of responsibility and ability to impact Hecla’s overall performance; and internal equity among the NEOs. ActualawardsActual awards are paid after the end of each annualSTIP performance period (usually end of March or beginning of April) and can range from 0% to 200% of the target awards, based on the committee’s assessment of our actual performance and the achievement of an individual NEO’s goals. Having a limit on our maximum awardSTIP awards reduces the likelihood of windfalls to executives and encourages financial discipline. It is also competitive with typical peer group practice.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement45



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


For 2015,2021, target AIPSTIP award opportunities for the NEOs were as follows:

NEO

Target Annual Incentive
STIP

(% of base salary)

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

  110%

Russell D. Lawlar

70%

Lauren M. Roberts

100%

James A. Sabala80%

Robert D. Brown

Lawrence P. Radford8070%

David C. Sienko

Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald8070%

Lindsay A. Hall*

David C. Sienko600%
Don Poirier60

%


The market analysis prepared by Mercer in July 2015 indicated that annual incentives were generally at the median of peers.
*

Retired in March 2021

Performance Measures and Components. Our management develops proposed targets for each Company performance measure based on a variety of factors, including historical corporate performance, internal budgets, forecasts and growth targets, market expectations and strategic objectives. The committee reviews the targets

44     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and adjusts them, as it deems appropriate. The committee believes that linking annual incentive awards to pre-establishedAnalysis

and goals, and creates a performance-based compensation strategy consistent with shareholder interests. The committee also believesthatbelieves that incentive compensation targets should be established to drive real and sustainable improvements in operating performance and the strategic position of the Company.

2015 AIP – AnalysisThe STIP includes the following components and Decisions. The committee reviewedrelative weights:

quantitative corporate performance factors (measured from January to December) comprising 50% of the performance versustargeted award;

qualitative goals (measured from February 2021 to February 2022) comprising 25% of the AIP goals on targeted award; and

a quarterly basis. For 2015, based on the assessmentdiscretionary factor (measured from February 2021 to February 2022) as determined by the committee comprising 25% of the Company’s overalltargeted award.

Each component can achieve two times the target percentage, with the maximum total payout limited to two times the total target award level (200%).

Quantitative Corporate Performance Factors. For 2021, the quantitative corporate performance on both qualitative and quantitative measures as well as relevant discretionary factors under the AIP,STIP were divided into four factors (including weighting): production (20%), Adjusted EBITDA less capital (20%), AIFR reduction (5%), and energy use intensity reduction (5%).

2021 Production Metrics

2021 Production in Silver Equivalent Ounces (includes all metals)

   

 

Production Result

   

 

  Factor Value  

 

110%

    Maximum    40%  

 

 

 

100%

    Target    20%  

 

 

 

<96%

   

 

 

 

    0%  

 

 

 

The production factor converts gold, lead, and zinc to silver equivalent at ratios of 78.0 oz. silver to 1 oz. gold, 23.0 lb. lead, and 14.0 lb. of zinc. We exceeded the committee determined Company performancebudgeted production in gold, but fell slightly behind in silver, lead, and zinc. The combined metal production results were approximately 98% of budget. We converted gold, lead, and zinc to beequivalent silver ounces at 115%year-end budgeted prices. The 2021 production goals resulted in 98% of the target (outlevel, and a factor value of a possible range of 0-200%)9.8%. The 115% measure was determined as described below and on pages 47 and 48.

2021 Adjusted EBITDA Less Capital Metrics

For 2015, Company performance for quantitative AIP purposes was as follows:

2015 AIP Quantitative Measure ResultsTargetActualPerformance
Value
Production
       Silver equivalent ounces35.0 mm ozs.37.5 mm ozs.                       50%

Adjusted EBITDA

Factor Value

$155250 mm

Maximum40%

$116.7160 mm

Target20%

<$80 mm

0%
Cash

$175 mm

$155.2 mm0%


As reflected inThe Adjusted EBITDA less capital goal measures the table above, only the production portioncash generation of the AIPCompany. The Adjusted EBITDA less capitaltarget was $160 million.8 Maximum payout would have been achieved and it exceeded the threshold required for the maximum level. Theif Adjusted EBITDA less capital was at least $250 million. There would have been no payout if Adjusted EBITDA less capital was less than $80 million. Actual adjusted EBITDA less capital was $164.9 million, which is between target and cash performance factors were both below threshold level. Therefore,maximum levels. The Adjusted EBITDA less capital metric resulted in a 21.1% factor value.

AIFR Metric

AIFR Result

   

 

   Factor Value   

 

 

5%

   Maximum    10 

 

 

 

2.5%

   Target    5%  

 

 

 

<0%

     0 

8

Adjusted EBITDA less capital is a non-GAAP measurement. See Appendix A for a reconciliation to GAAP.

2022 Proxy Statement    45


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The AIFR target was a 2.5% reduction from the committee determined that2020 AIFR. Threshold was set at the quantitative2020 rate of 1.22. Hecla’s actual AIFR for 2021 was 1.45%, which resulted in a factor accounted for 50%value of the target 2015 AIP award (out of a possible 0 to 125% of the target 2015 award)0%.

Energy Usage Intensity

Reduction in Energy

Use Intensity

   

 

  Factor Value  

 

4%

    Maximum    10%  

 

 

 

2%

    Target    5%  

 

 

 

<0%

       0%  

This goal incentivizes the Company to reduce the amount of energy used to produce an equivalent ounce of silver. Threshold was set at a flat rate from 2020, and target was set at a 2% reduction. The 2021 energy use intensity increased by 3%, which resulted in a factor value of 0%.

Qualitative Corporate Performance Factors. In addition to quantitative corporate performance factors, our AIPSTIP has a component that is based on qualitative and other goals relating not only to Hecla as a whole, but also to each NEO. This component is targeted to account for 25% of the total AIP targetSTIP award but can account for 00% to 62.5%50% of the target award.

For our 2015 AIP, qualitativeQualitative objectives for NEOs included thoseare over one hundred initiatives and tasks related to most aspects of Hecla’s business including, but not limited to: (i) safety and health, (ii) environmental, (iii) technology and environment, (ii) processinnovation, (iv) continuous improvement, (iii)(v) operations, (iv) financial condition, (v)(vi) finance/accounting/IT, (vii) employee development, (viii) mine life extension, exploration, and reserve growth, (vi) development projects, (vii) exploration, (viii) legal, (ix) investor relations, (x) human capital development,sustainability, and (xi) government and community relations – with quantifiable targets within those categories where applicable. The specific objectives for each NEO are chosen to reflect each NEO’s individual responsibilities, with shared goals where appropriate. While mostlegal.

We met or exceeded many of the key qualitative goals are subjectiveand made substantial progress towards others in nature, to the extent possible, objective and quantifiable targets are set in order to improve accountability for results.

46 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


For 2015, the2021. The committee assessed qualitative performance under this component at 35% of the target award (above the 25% target and within the possible range of 0-62.5%)34%. The committee based its assessment on more than a hundred goals and the following factors:are some of the goals that were achieved:

injury improvement target goals were not universally met; however, year-on-year improvements were achieved at Casa Berardi and with respect to Hecla’s overall rates. MSHA citations were down significantly in 2015 compared to 2014, and were the lowest in the last five years. The San Sebastian startup proceeded without incident;

achieved 5% increase in silver recovery at Greens Creek;

Greens Creek tailings project was completed;

made the decision to develop a surface mine at our San Sebastian unit in the third quarter of 2015 and commenced production there in the fourth quarter;

successful exploration program helped to achieve the startup of the San Sebastian unit in 2015;

successful resolution of legal cases;

three new analysts initiated coverage of the Company with an improved quality of analyst reporting and increase in “Buy” ratings;

successful shareholder outreach program helped to achieve a 83% favorable vote on say-on-pay; and

achieved health benefit changes reducing costs and ensuring ACA compliance.

secured control of additional priority lands near the Lucky Friday Mine;

developed a plan to address bottlenecks in the Lucky Friday Mine concentrator to utilize available grinding capacity;

modernized the Lucky Friday Mine underground bonus system with the use of the UCB mining method;

significantly improved the long-range plan at the Lucky Friday Mine;

1.5 million tons milled, and produced 134,511 gold ounces at our Casa Berardi Mine;

commenced the Hecla Leadership Program;

resolved multiple litigation matters;

replaced production and added an additional 20 million equivalent silver ounces;

saved $1 million in property insurance costs; and

underground mine life at the Casa Berardi Mine was extended in the long-range plan to 2027.

Discretionary Factor. The final component of our AIPSTIP is at the discretion of the committee (based on Company and individual performance) and it is targeted to account for 25% of the total AIP targetSTIP award but can account for 00% to 62.5%50% of the target award. For 2015,2021, the committee determined the discretionary factor performance value to be at 30% of the target award (above the 25% target and within the possible range of 0-62.5%)50%. The committee based its assessment primarily on the following significant performance results by Hecla in 2015:2021:

Hecla stock performed wellrecorded second highest free cash flow in 2015 relativeHecla’s history at $111.3 million;9

returned a total of $20.7 million in dividends to our common and preferred shareholders;

achieved net zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions;

had income and mining tax benefit of $29.6 million, driven primarily by recognizing the value from deferred tax assets;

reduced a component of the concentrate treatment costs at the Lucky Friday Mine from $25/ton to $3/ton over the next 3 years ($11 million savings in the long-range plan);

achieved strong vaccination rates at Greens Creek, Casa Berardi, and San Sebastian;

achieved significant progress in ESG reporting;

reduced enterprise risk regarding Lucky Friday concentrate sales;

increased engagement with analysts and investors;

recovered approximately $800,000 in insurance proceeds related to Johnny M litigation;

Casa Berardi Mine improved employee satisfaction and retention;

established the Hecla Environmental Science Endowment at the University of Alaska Southeast;

reduced our energy consumption/total kWh/tons milled by 16% from 2020;

9

A non-GAAP measurement. See Appendix A for reconciliation to peers in a difficult market;
GAAP.

46     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

prepared the Technical Report Summaries for Greens Creek, Lucky Friday, and Casa Berardi mines;

transitioned responsibility for Nevada accounting to corporate office;

identified a program in which the Quebec government will offset a portion of the cost of some projects through a discount to the hydropower cost; and

diversified risk regarding our bank counterparty for bullion purchases.

2021 STIP Measure Results

Results

Performance

Value

Quantitative

 

Production

10%*

San Sebastian open-pit and milling brought into production by year-end 2015 and produced 81,677 silver ounces and 870 gold ounces in the fourth quarter of 2015;

 

Adjusted EBITDA less capital

21%*

doubling of the San Sebastian silver and gold resources;

 

AIFR

0%

Casa Berardi’s access of a newly discovered high grade stope with an increase in mine life;

 

Energy Use Intensity

0%

Casa Berardi made substantial progress advancing the East Mine Crown Pillar open-pit project, including obtaining permitting in place for the project;

 

Qualitative

34%

strong production performance at Greens Creek offsetting shortfalls at Lucky Friday and to some degree at Casa Berardi. Higher silver production at Greens Creek partially offset by lower production at Lucky Friday;

 

Discretionary

50%

acquisition and integration of Revett Mining Company;

 

Total Performance Value

115%
*

achieved higher silver and gold production by 5% and 1% respectively, comparedRounded to 2014;

increased overall proven and probable reserves at December 31, 2015 compared to 2014, with silver reserves increasing by 2% and overall reserves at year-end 2015 representing the highest level in the Company’s history; and

took several steps to satisfy liabilities while minimizing - or in some cases avoiding - the use of cash.nearest whole number

In additionNEO Year-end 2021 Performance. The STIP qualitative, quantitative, and discretionary factors resulted in a corporate performance that the committee concluded to be 115% of target. NEOs’ performance is based on a combination of corporate performance, individual goals, and the strong performance realized by our NEOs within their functional area and as part of the executive team, each NEO made significant contributions to Hecla’s 2015 performance.

Messrs. Baker, Radford and McDonald were instrumental in getting the San Sabastian mine into production by fourth quarter 2015.impact they have on shareholder value. The committee believes that our NEOs’ performance goals should support and help achieve the startupCompany’s strategic objectives and be tied to their areas of responsibility. Individual performance goals for each NEO, except the CEO, were proposed by the CEO and reviewed and approved by the committee.

After the end of the San Sebastian mine wasyear, our CEO reviews each of the other NEO’s progress against their individual performance goals and makes a tremendous accomplishment forrecommendation to the Company.

Mr. Radford’s leadership was also instrumental in developingcommittee. When making its award determinations, the organization and acquiringcommittee did not assign a specific weighting to any of the work force needed to get the San Sebastian mine into production, achieving higher recoveries at Greens Creek, reducing geotechnical risk in underground operations, advancing the open-pit project at Casa Berardi, and combined operations achieving higher production.

Dr. McDonald oversees the exploration program that helped the Company make the decision to start up the San Sebastian mine and continued to increase reserves.

Mr. Sabala was instrumental in managing Hecla’s cash position in 2015, effectively managing working capital, implementing creative methods for pension funding, taking a lead roleindividual’s goals, but instead reviewed each NEO’s progress against their individual goals in the acquisitionaggregate. The following is a summary description of Revett Mining Company, negotiating credit agreements and improving capital market relationships.the performance goal results for each of the NEOs for 2021, except our CEO, who is discussed separately on the following page.


125 Years
Mr. Lawlar  2016 Proxy StatementYear-end47 2021 Performance Results

•  Instrumental in managing Hecla’s cash position;

•  Improved terms of Lucky Friday concentrate sales;

•  Filling investor relations role;

•  Managed budget optimization model upgrade; and

•  Led marketing effort for property insurance, resulting in $1 million in savings.

Mr. RobertsYear-end 2021 Performance Results

•  Successfully led a strong operating performance notwithstanding a tight labor market and ongoing challenges due to COVID-19;

•  Advanced the UCB mining method;

•  Improved tonnage rates and throughput at our Casa Berardi Mine; and

•  Advanced innovation and capital projects at our operating properties.

Mr. BrownYear-end 2021 Performance Results

•  Negotiated ore processing agreements with third party mills;

•  Facilitated the acquisition of various mining interests;

•  Instrumental in developing and advancing our ESG program; and

•  Successfully led the effort to achieve net zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions in 2021.

Mr. SienkoYear-end 2021 Performance Results

•  Successfully resolved multiple legal matters;

•  Provided support on contractual issues regarding capital projects; and

•  Assisted with various regulatory, financial, and tax matters.


2022 Proxy Statement    47



Compensation Discussion and Analysis

CEO TableYear-end 2021 Performance. Mr. Baker’s STIP is based entirely on corporate performance. Under Mr. Baker’s leadership in 2021, we recorded the second highest free cash flow in the Company’s history, returned a total of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


$20.7 million in dividends to our common and preferred shareholders, achieved net zero Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions, improved operating performance at our mines, and increased our silver equivalent ounce reserves. The committee awarded Mr. Sienko was successful in resolving several significant regulatory and legal cases involving environmental, health and safety, and litigation issues, while also supporting acquisition activities relatedBaker 115% of his targeted STIP award due to Revett Mining Company,his leadership and the fundingoverall strong performance of pension plans.the Company.

Mr. Poirier was instrumentalThe committee evaluated each NEO’s performance in managing their functions, the acquisitionprogress they made towards their individual goals and the Company’s goals as discussed above, and the overall success of Revett Miningthe Company in 2021. The NEOs completed various goals during the year, and the overall performance of the Company exceeded expectations during 2021. As a result, the committee determined each of the NEO’s performance under the STIP to be between 100% and 130% of target.

2021 STIP Award Summary. Based on the assessment by the committee of the Company’s overall performance on both quantitative and qualitative measures, as well as relevant discretionary factors under the assessmentSTIP, the committee determined Company performance to be at 115% of several potential large scale acquisitions.

target. Set forth in the table below is each NEO’s target award and actual award, which was paid 50%entirely in cash and 50% in Hecla common stock issued under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.cash.

NameBase Salary
(12/31/15)
($)
     Base
Salary
Factor
(%)
     Target
Annual
Incentive
($)
     % to
Target1
(%)
     Actual
Award2
($)
     Cash
Received
($)
     Equity
Received3

(#)
  
  Phillips S. Baker, Jr.605,000100605,000115695,750347,875147,404
James A. Sabala380,00080304,000125380,000190,00080,508
Lawrence P. Radford380,00080304,000165500,000250,000105,932
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald275,00080220,000110242,000121,00051,271
David C. Sienko250,00060150,000100150,00075,00031,780
Don Poirier226,00060135,60099.56135,00067,50028,602

Name

  Base Salary
($)
  Base Salary
Factor
(%)
  Target
STIP
($)
  % to
Target
(1)
(%)
  Actual
Award
(2)
($)

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

    700,000    110    770,000    115    885,500 

Russell D. Lawlar

    265,000    70    185,500    100    185,500

Lauren M. Roberts

    380,000    100    380,000    110    418,000

Robert D. Brown

    264,000    70    184,800    129    237,600

David C. Sienko

    265,000    70    185,500    116    214,650

Lindsay A. Hall*

    --    --    --    --    --
1*

Retired in March 2021. Upon his retirement, he forfeited any rights he may have had with respect to the 2021 STIP.

(1)

The percentages listed for each of the NEOs includesgenerally include corporate achievement of goals and individual performance.

2(2)

The amount reported in this column was paid in cash and equity to the NEO and is also reportedincluded in theSummary Compensation Table for 2021 on page 6257 under “Non-EquityNon-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”

3The equity portion of the 2015 AIP award was determined by subtracting the cash portion from the total award to determine the equity value, then dividing that by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on February 19, 2016 ($2.36)Compensation.

Hecla Mining Company Executive and Senior Management Long-Term Performance Payment Plan (“LTIP”).LTIP

We use the LTIP to focus executivesemployees on meeting long-term (three-year) corporate performance goals. The LTIP is also designed to attract and retain executivesemployees in a highly competitive talent market. The committee takes into accountconsiders mining and general industry market practices, as well as the long-term objectives of the LTIP,Company, when determining the terms and conditions of long-term incentive goals, such as resource additions, production, and cash flow generation.

Under the LTIP, a new performance period begins each calendar year and runs for three years. The three-year performance period recognizes that some value-creating activities require a significant period of time to be implemented and for measurable results to accrue. Starting a new performance period each year also gives the committee flexibility to adjust for new business conditions, circumstances, or priorities in setting the performance metrics and goals for each three-year cycle. Performance units are assigned to each NEO at the beginning of each three-year period and provide the basis for the amount of awards made to each NEO under the LTIP. Performance units are designed to encourage management to deliver long-term value. Performance units reinforce Hecla’s business strategy by clearly establishing our key performance elements (e.g., reserve and resource growth, production growth, and cash flow, #4 Shaft completion, and relative TSR)flow) and the associated long-term performanceobjectivesperformance objectives that must be met for us to be successful and create value for shareholders.

The 2013-2015 LTIP units have a target value of $125 each, and a maximum potential value of $300 each. Performance units are paid out as soon as practicable afterin the first half of the year following the end of each performance period, upon approval by the committee. At the discretion of the committee, the payouts may be in the form of cash, common stock, restricted stock units, or a combination of these forms.both.

Summary of 2019-2021 LTIP. In February 2019, the committee approved the 2019-2021 LTIP, which differed from prior period LTIPs in a few respects. First, the number of measured performance goals was reduced from four to three. Second, the total target value of each unit was reduced from $100 to $90 (i.e., each of the three measured

2013-2015 LTIP.48     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

performance goals have a target of $30). Third, the TSR factor, which was previously a stand-alone unit value factor, was removed and converted to a multiplier with a value of 10% to 250% based on relative performance. The tables below summarizemultiplier was capped at 100% if the absolute share return was negative.

The measured performance unit valuation rangesgoals for the 2019-2021 LTIP were silver-equivalent reserve growth, production growth, and mine site operating cash flow #4 Shaft completion, and TSR for the 2013-2015 plan period – the five performance goals approved by the(less capital). The committee in February 2013. Theseconcluded that these are important goals for the following reasons:

Silver equivalent reserve growth.Silver equivalentgrowth. Silver-equivalent reserve growth remains a fundamental value creator.Wecreator. We need to replace and add reserves to extendmineextend mine lives and grow production. This is critical to the achievement of our long-term success. ReservesIn the context of this plan, reserves include the silver equivalent of gold andbut not base metals.

Cash flow.The design Silver equivalent reserve and resource growth includes gold converted to silver equivalent at a ratio of the cash flow goal is identical78.0 silver ounces to that contained in prior years since silver cost per ounce and production are key elements in creatingshareholder value. When used in the context of our LTIP, “cash flow” is measured by comparing (i) the actual1.0 gold ounce.


48 www.hecla-mining.com 
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

cash cost, after by-product credits multiplied by actual silver/gold production versus (ii) budgeted cash cost, after by-product credits multiplied by the budgeted silver/gold production over a three-year period. “Cash cost, after by-product credits,” a non-GAAP measure, includes all direct and indirect operating cash costs related directly to the physical activities of producing the primary metal, including mining, processing and other plant costs, third-party refining expense, on-site general and administrative costs, royalties and mining production taxes, and offsets that amount by theproduction value of all metals other than the primary metal produced at each unit.
Silver production growth.

Production growth. One of the most important components of value creation is demonstrableproduction growth.
growth (includes silver and gold, but not base metals).

TSR.TSR provides a performance metric relative to ourpeers. This objective differs from the other objectives which are focused on activities that in an absolute sense should be value drivers: reserves, production (enhanced by #4 Shaft completion), and

Mine site operating cash flow. TSR measures the price appreciation of our shares, including dividends paid during the performance period, and thereby simulates the actual investment performance of Hecla shares. Any payout is based on how Hecla’s TSR performance compares to the TSRflow less capital. The cash contribution goal takes into account capital expenditures at each of the common sharesmine sites. We endeavor to ensure that each operating site generates free cash flow, and this net cash contribution goal reflects that operating philosophy. The silver and gold costs per ounce, production and capital expenditures at each mine site are those contained in our long-range plan for the three-year period. This goal also includes the impact associated with any acquisitions (or dispositions) of a group of our peer companies.

#4 Shaft completion.In order to achieve production growth at the Lucky Friday, it is important that the #4 Shaft be completed on schedule.operating mine sites.

TSR is a key element of the LTIP because it provides a relative performance metric to our peers. This component of the LTIP is different than the other components in that the TSR serves as a multiplier (either positive or negative). This component insures alignment of the results of the other components with share performance. If our relative TSR performance is in the 2013-2015 Performance Unit Valuationmid-range (7th – 9th), the multiplier is 100% of the value achieved by the other three components, and thus has no positive or negative affect on the unit value earned. If our relative TSR is in the top 6, the multiplier is positive, and thus would enhance the unit value because the relative TSR was strong. If our relative TSR is in the bottom 6, the multiplier is negative. If the relative TSR is in the top 3, the TSR multiplier is 250%. Regardless of the unit value earned by the unit value factors, in the event the absolute TSR is negative, the multiplier is limited to no greater than 100%. In order to achieve maximum levels, we must maintain a positive TSR on an absolute basis. The 2019-2021 peer group consists of the following companies:

Silver Reserve Growth
Ounce Target
(millions)
Additional Reserve
(millions)
     Unit Value
  250100$100.00  
20050$50.00
 18030$25.00
16010$5.00

Cash Flow
% of TargetUnit Value
  115%$50.00  
110%$42.50 
105%$32.50
100%$25.00
 95%$22.50
90%$20.00
85%$17.50
80%$15.00
75%$12.50
70%$10.00
65%$7.50
60%$0.00

#4 Shaft Completion

IAMGOLD

New Gold

Alamos Gold

Hochschild Mining

Fresnillo

First Majestic

B2Gold

Pan American Silver

Oceana Gold

Centerra Gold

Silver Standard

Detour Gold

Coeur d’Alene Mines

Endeavour Silver

2019-2021 LTIP Targets and Results

Measured Performance Goal

 100% Completion DateTarget Amount

Silver-equivalent reserve growth

Unit Value 420 million oz.

Production growth

6/30/15108 million oz. (avg. of 36 million oz. per year)

Mine site operating cash flow less capital

 $50.00
12/31/15$25.00
2/15/16$10.00375 million
Silver Production Growth
Target
(in mm ozs.)
Average
Annual Target
(in mm ozs.)
     Performance
Unit Value
  65.121.7$50.00  
 56.118.7 $40.00
24.118.0$25.00
51.617.2$10.00

Total Shareholder Return
%ile rank within
Peer Group Companies
Unit Value
  100%$50.00  
 90%$45.00 
80%$40.00
70%$35.00
60%$30.00
50% $25.00
25%$15.00
<25%$0.00



125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement49



TableBecause none of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

2013-2015the three measured performance goal targets were achieved for the 2019-2021 performance period, each unit received zero payout. This rendered the TSR element of the LTIP – Analysis and Decisionsas inapplicable, even though Hecla’s relative TSR over the three-year LTIP period ranked 1st among the 14 peer companies (inclusive of Hecla). The committee assessedranking of 1st placed us in the 250% multiple level. However, with no unit value component to apply the multiple, the overall LTIP performance under the 2013-2015 LTIP as follows:was $0 per unit out of a targeted payout of $90 per unit.

Performance MeasureTargetActual
Performance
% of
Target
Value
Earned
Per Unit
  Silver Reserve Growth       30.0 silver oz.       25.4 silver oz.       85%       $20.50  
added (millions)added (millions)
Production Growth54.1 silver oz.59.2 silver oz.109%$43.50 
(millions)(millions)
Cash Flow$848.49 cash$884.98 cash 104%$31.50
flow (millions)flow (millions)
 Total Shareholder Return 50% Hecla 69.2% Hecla138%$34.50
ranking vs. peersranking vs. peers
#4 Shaft CompletionShaft Completed10/26/160%No Payout
by 2/15/16completion date
Total Earned Per Unit$130.00

During this three-year period performancethe results of our LTIP were negatively affected by COVID-19. For example, in production,2020, COVID-19 restrictions inhibited our ability to perform definition drilling, which limited our ability to replace reserves. COVID-19 also created significant operational challenges in 2020, and to a lesser degree in 2021. These operational challenges played a role in our lower than targeted production. During the three-year LTIP period our reserves dropped 190,000 silver-equivalent ounces from our baseline of 413 million equivalent ounces. The LTIP threshold was set at 420 million equivalent ounces, and as a result, no payout was achieved. Production over the LTIP period was 92.3 million silver-equivalent ounces, which was 85% of target, and resulted in a payout of $0 per

2022 Proxy Statement    49


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

unit. The three-year mine site operating cash flow generation, and TSR exceeded theless capital was $156 million, but only 42% of target, and silver reserve growth exceeded the threshold, but was below target, while #4 Shaft completion was below the threshold. Aswhich resulted in a result, with a range in potential value per unitpayout of $0 to $300, in February 2016, the committeedetermined that the total 2013-2015 LTIP payout was $130.00 per unit. The committee and the Board further approved payout ofconsidered modifying the LTIP awardstargets for the 2019-2021 performance period to be 50% in cashadjust for the effects of COVID-19, but ultimately chose to retain the original goals and 50% in Hecla common stock issued underthus the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.payable value was zero.

2019-2021 LTIP Award Summary

The following chart shows the number of performance units awarded in 20132019 to each NEO, the unitNEO. There was no value achieved under the total amount2019-2021 LTIP, and thus the NEOs did not receive an LTIP payout.

Name

2019-2021
Performance
Units
(#)
Unit
Value
($)

Total  
Amount  

of Award  

($)  

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

10,000----  

Russell D. Lawlar

1,267(1)----  

Lauren M. Roberts

3,222(2)----  

Robert D. Brown

3,000----  

David C. Sienko

3,000----  

Lindsay A. Hall

4,000(3)----  
(1)

Mr. Lawlar’s 2019-2021 LTIP units were prorated because he was not promoted to Sr. Vice President and CFO until March 2021.

(2)

Mr. Robert’s 2019-2021 LTIP units were prorated because he joined the Company in August 2019.

(3)

Mr. Hall retired from the Company in March 2021. Upon his retirement, he forfeited his 2019-2021 LTIP award.

Equity

We have no program, plan, or practice to time the grant of stock-based awards relative to the release of material non-public information or other corporate events. All equity grants to executive officers are approved by the committee at regularly scheduled meetings or, in limited cases involving key recruits or promotions, by a special meeting or unanimous written consent. The grant date is the meeting date, or a fixed, future date specified at the time of the grant. Under the terms of our 2010 Stock Plan, the fair market value of any award (numberis determined by the closing price of units x $130.00 = amount received), andour common stock on the amountNYSE on the date of cash and numbergrant or a fixed, future date specified at the time of shares received.grant. In addition, the committee typically makes equity grants to NEOs in the first half of the year.

Name     2013-2015
Performance Units
(#)
     Unit Value
($)
     Total Amount
of Award1
($)
     Cash
Received
($)
     Equity
Received2
(#)
  
  Phillips S. Baker, Jr.8,250130.001,072,500536,250227,225
James A. Sabala3,400130.00442,000221,00093,644
Lawrence P. Radford3,000130.00390,000195,00082,627
 Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald2,600130.00338,000169,00071,610
David C. Sienko1,900130.00247,000123,50052,331
Don Poirier2,050130.00266,500133,25056,462

1The amount reported in this column was paid in cash and equity to the NEO and is also reported in theSummary Compensation Table on page 62 under “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.”
2The equity portion of the 2013-2015 LTIP award was determined by subtracting the cash portion from the total award to determine the equity value, then dividing that by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE on February 19, 2016 ($2.36).

Restricted Stock UnitsRSUs. Restricted stock units (“RSUs”)

RSUs are granted to the NEOs under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan and/or the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. RSUs are used to retain our NEOs and align their interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders. The committee awarded RSUs to each NEO RSUs in July 2015.June 2021. The RSUs vest in three equal amounts with vesting dates of June 21, 2016,2022, June 21, 2017,2023, and June 21, 2018.2024. SeeGrants of Plan-Based Awards for 20152021 on page 64.60.

In December 2014, the committee amended the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and Key Employee Deferred Compensation PlanKEDCP so that any RSUs vesting after 2014 would no longer be credited with dividend equivalents. In order to incentivize RSU recipients to continue working for the Company, RSU awards require both an age and years of service trigger in order to qualify for vesting of the RSUs as of the employee’s retirement. The 2010 Stock Plan provides that for purposes of the RSU awards, RSU recipients who retire under the Retirement Plan must be at least age: (i) 60 and have 15 or more years of service with the Company; (ii) 65 and have seven or more years of service with the Company; or (iii) 68, in order to receive their unvested RSUs after retirement. If one of the above requirements is met, the recipients will receive their RSUs on the applicable vesting dates. In 2018, we amended our 2010 Stock Plan to provide for a double-trigger vesting acceleration upon a change of control.

50     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In 2015,2021, we granted RSUs to 96approximately 100 employees including all NEOs, under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.Plan, including the NEOs as follows:

NEO

  Value of RSUs
Units
  

Number  

of Shares(1)   

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

   $500,000    63,452  

Russell D. Lawlar

   $170,000    21,574  

Lauren M. Roberts

   $225,000    28,553  

Robert D. Brown

   $160,000    20,305  

David C. Sienko

   $150,000    19,036  

Lindsay A. Hall(2)

   $--    --  
50 www.hecla-mining.com(1)
125 Years

Number of shares was determined by dividing the value of the RSUs awarded by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on June 21, 2021 ($7.88).




(2)

Mr. Hall was not awarded any RSUs in 2021, as he retired in March 2021.

TablePSUs

We grant PSUs to certain executive officers, including our NEOs. The value of Contentsthe awards is based on the ranking of the TSR performance of our common stock relative to the TSR performance of the common stock of a group of peer companies over a three-year measurement period. The number of shares to be issued is based on the target value of the awards divided by the share price at grant date. The compensation cost is measured using a Monte Carlo simulation to estimate their value at grant date.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Performance-based Shares. In July 2015,June 2021, the committee and the independent Board members granted 204,918 performance-based sharesPSUs to our CEO,NEOs with a grant datetarget value of $500,000, comprising one-half of his total equity awards in 2015.listed below. The value of these performance-basedsharesPSUs will be based on the TSR of our common stock for the three-year period from January 1, 20152021, through December 31, 2017,2023, based on the following percentile rank listed below within a group of peer companies:companies.

NEO

  Target Value of
PSUs
  

Number  

of Shares(1)   

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

   $500,000    63,452  

Russell D. Lawlar

   $110,000    13,959  

Lauren M. Roberts

   $150,000    19,036  

Robert D. Brown

   $105,000    13,325  

David C. Sienko

   $100,000    12,690  

Lindsay A. Hall(2)

   $--    --  
(1)

Number of shares was determined by dividing the target value of the PSUs by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on June 21, 2021 ($7.88).

(2)

Mr. Hall was not awarded any PSUs in 2021, as he retired in March 2021.

Company TSR Rank Among Peers

TSR Performance Multiplier

50thpercentile

Threshold award at 50% of target

60thpercentilepercentile

Target award at grant value

100thpercentile

Maximum award at 200% of target

If Hecla’s performance is below the 50thpercentile, the award is zero. If Hecla’s performance is between the 50thand 100thpercentile, the award is prorated. For any award, the number of shares issued in 2018 at the conclusion of the three-year performance period (December 31, 2023), will be baseddetermined by using the share price on the date of original grant date share price (July 1, 2015)(June 21, 2021) of $2.44.$7.88.

Hecla’s TSR performance versus that of our peer group will be based on a comparison of the average closing share price over the last sixty (60) calendar days prior to January 1, 2015, as2021 (the base price) with the base price and average closing share price over the last sixty (60) calendar days of the three-year performance period to determine relative share value performance and ranking among peers.

For 2015, the2022 Proxy Statement    51


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The industry peer group used for purposes of the 2021-2023 TSR performance-based awardPSUs discussed above is listed on page 39.38.

2013 – 2015 Performance-based Shares – Analysis and Decision.2019-2021 PSU ResultsOn June 21, 2013,

In February 2022, the committee and independent memberscertified the results of the Board of DirectorsPSUs granted 170,648 performance-based shares of Hecla’s common stock, whichin 2019 to our executive officers. These PSUs had a target value of $500,000three-year performance period ended December 31, 2021, with the potential of up to 200% of this target value (subject to specific performance termsvesting and conditions established for these shares) to our CEO under the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan. These performance-based shares were awardedpayout based on the Company’s TSR compared to our peer group (consisting of Hecla common stock for the three-year period12 companies) from January 1, 20132019 through December 31, 2015, using2021. The following table shows the following percentile rank withincalculation of the PSU results at the end of the three-year performance period on December 31, 2021. During this three-year performance period, Hecla ranked 2nd relative to our peer group companies:companies, which resulted in a payout percentage of 91.97% of the executives’ targeted PSU award values.

100thpercentile rank = maximum award at 200% of target

50thpercentile rank = target award at grant value

25thpercentile rank = threshold award at 50% of target

To determine the relative share performance, Hecla’s TSR performance versus that of peer group companies was based on a comparison of the average closing share price over the last sixty (60) calendar days prior to January 1, 2013, as the2019 (the base price, comparedprice) with the average closing share price over the last sixty (60) calendar days of the three-year performance period (ending(ended December 31, 2015)2021).


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement51



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following table showsbelow details the calculationvalue of the performance-based share results at the end of the three-year performance period on December 31, 2015. Hecla’s TSR ranked 5th among the 13 companies in the peer group based on TSR from 2013 through 2015, including dividends paid during that period. Ranking 5th places Hecla at 69.2% among the peer companies, which equates to an award value of $692,000 or 236,177 shares at the $2.93 closing price of Hecla’s common stock on June 21, 2013.

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN – January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2015
Peer NameAverage Stock
Price over 60-day
period leading up to
1/1/2013
($)
Average Stock
Price over 60-day
period leading up to
12/31/15
($)
Dividends Paid
(1/1/13 thru
12/31/15)
($)
TSR thru
12/31/15
(%)
Rank
(#)
Payout
($)
  Centerra Gold     9.33     7.69     0.48     -17.58     1     1,000,000  
Stillwater Mining11.488.98-21.782923,000
Pan American Silver19.168.161.28-57.443846,000
Silver Standard14.235.39-62.124769,000
Hecla5.792.000.04-65.465692,000
New Gold10.573.12-70.486615,000
Endeavour Silver8.251.95-76.367538,000
TARGET PAYOUT500,000
Eldorado Gold13.993.300.16-76.448462,000
First Majestic Silver22.014.36-80.199385,000
Alamos Gold18.523.500.26-81.1010308,000
 THRESHOLD PAYOUT250,000
IAMGOLD12.311.620.13-86.8811
Coeur d’Alene Mines24.092.59-89.2512
Golden Star Resources1.790.19-89.3913
Allied Nevada Gold30.300.00-100.0014

Stock Options.The ability to grant stock options under the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan expired in May 2010. All outstanding stock options granted under that plan expired on May 5, 2015. In June 2010, our shareholders approved the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Any stock options granted under this plan will be issued with an exercise pricePSUs based on the fair market value (the closing sales priceestimated outcome as of our common stock on the NYSE on the date of grant).

Ingrant. These values for the past five years, we have not issued any stock options to2019 PSUs are reflected in the applicable Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2019 tablefrom our NEOs (or any other employee). Before that time, we granted stock options to key employees during2020 Proxy Statement, and the second quarterrealized value of the calendar year and made occasional grants to new employeescommon stock received upon hire.settlement of the awards on February 28, 2022.

Executive

Target Number of
PSUs Granted in 2019  

(#)

Value of Awards
Reported as
Compensation in Year  
of Grant
(1)

($)

Number of 2019 PSUs  
Earned

(#)

Realized Value of  
Awards
(2)

($)

Baker

 271,739 -- 520,833 2,999,998

Roberts

 74,627 -- 143,035 823,882

Brown

 62,500 -- 119,792 690,002

Sienko

 54,348 -- 104,167 600,002

(1)

Consistent with the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 718, the value of PSUs is based on the estimated outcome as of the date of grant. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, this result is based on a relative TSR result modeled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the PSUs for accounting purposes determined in accordance with SEC rules and do not reflect the actual economic value that was realized by the NEO at the end of the relevant three-year performance period.

(2)

Reflects the closing price of our common stock on February 28, 2022 ($5.76), the date on which the executive’s received shares underlying their 2019 PSUs.

Other

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan.Plan. We maintain the Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (the “KEDCP”),KEDCP, a nonqualified deferred compensation plan, under which participants may defer all or a portion of their annual base salary, performance-based compensation awarded under our AIPSTIP and LTIP, RSUs and RSUsPSUs granted under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Participants may elect to have their deferred base salary and AIPcash STIP or cash LTIP awards valued based on Hecla common stock and credited to a stock account. Deferred RSUs and PSUs are credited to a stock account. The KEDCP provides for discretionary matching contributions on base salary, AIPSTIP and LTIP amounts deferred to a stock account and discretionary companyCompany contributions that are credited to a participant’s stock account. The deferral features promote alignment of the interests of participants with those of our shareholders. Investment accounts are credited monthly with an amount based on the prime rate for corporate borrowers. Participants receive distributions from their accounts only upon separation from service with us, a fixed date or schedule selected by the participant, death, disability, an unforeseeable emergency, or a change in control, as these events are defined under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts deferred are unfunded and unsecured obligations of Hecla, receive

52 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

no preferential standing, and are subject to the same risks as any of our other general obligations. Additional details about the KEDCP are described in the narrative accompanying theNonqualified Deferred Compensation for 20152021 table on page 67.65.

Benefits.Benefits. We provide our employees with a benefits package that is designed to attract and retain the talent needed to manage Hecla. As part of that all U.S.benefits package, most U.S salaried employees, including the U.S.

52     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

NEOs, are eligible to participate in the Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan, (the “Retirement Plan”), the Capital Accumulation Plan (aour 401(k) plan, which includes matching contributions by Hecla of up to 6%), health, vision, and dental coverage, and paid time off, including vacations and holidays. All Canadian salaried employees, including NEOs are eligible to participate in a similar benefits package. NEOs are eligible to receive certain additional benefits, as described below. The committee intends for the type and value of such benefits offered to be competitive with general market practices.

Other Qualified and Nonqualified Benefit Plans.Plans. Under the Retirement Plan, which is a defined benefit plan, upon normal retirement, each participant isparticipants in the final average salary plan are eligible to receive a monthly benefit equal to a certain percentage of their final average annual earnings for each year of credited service. Participants in the cash balance plan are eligible to take a lump sum distribution of their benefits. Additional details about the Retirement Plan are in the narrative accompanying thePension Benefitstable on page 76.65. Under Hecla’sthe unfunded Supplemental Excess Retirement Plan,SERP, the amount of any benefits not payable under the Retirement Plan by reasonbecause of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and/or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, and the reductioncertain reductions of benefits, if any, due to a deferral of salary made under our KEDCP, willmay be paid out of our general funds to any employeeemployees who may beare adversely affected. The Retirement Plan and Supplemental Excess Retirement PlanSERP define earnings for purposes of the plans to include base salary plus any other cash incentives up until July 1, 2013, after which only base salary plus one-half of AIPSTIP compensation is included (no LTIP compensation is included).

Personal Benefits.Benefits. We do not provide company-paid cars, country club memberships, or other similar perquisites to our executives. The only material personal benefit provided by Hecla is a relocation benefit, which is offered as needed to meet specific recruitment needs.

Clawback Policy

At itsIn February 2013, meeting, the Compensation Committeecommittee adopted a clawback policy with respect to incentive awards to executive officers. The policy provides that in the event of a restatement of our financial results as a result of material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements, the Board will review incentive compensation that was paid to our current and former executive officers under the Company’s AIPSTIP and LTIP (or any successor plans) based solely on the achievement of specific corporate financial goals (“Incentive Award”) during the period of the restatement. If any Incentive Award would have been lower had it been calculated based on the Company’s restated financial results, the Board will, as and to the extent it deems appropriate, including with respect to intent or level of culpability of the relevant individual(s), seek to recover from any executive whose conduct is determined by the Board to be the cause or partial cause of the restatement,officer, any portion of an Incentive Award paid in excess of what would have been paid based on the restated financial results. The policy does not apply in any situation where a restatement is not the result of material non-compliance with financial reporting requirements, such as any restatement due to a change in applicable accounting rules, standards or interpretations, a change in segment designations or the discontinuance of an operation.

In December 2015, the Compensation Committeecommittee amended each of itsour incentive plans (AIP,(STIP, LTIP, KEDCP, and 2010 Stock Incentive Plan) to include a clawback provision consistent with the Clawback Policy.clawback policy described above.

Insider Trading Policy

Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors, executive officers (as defined under Section 16 of the Exchange Act) and certain other employees designated as insiders from purchasing or selling any Company securities three weeks before through two days after the public release of any of our periodic results (including the filing of any Form 10-Q or Form 10-K), or at any other time during the year while in possession of material non-public information about the Company. In addition, directors and officers are prohibited from short-term trading, short sales, options trading, trading on margin, hedging or pledging any securities of the Company.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement53



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Change in Control Agreements

We have entered into a change in control agreementagreements (“CIC Agreement”Agreements”) with each of our NEOs. Under the terms of our CIC Agreements, the CEO and the other NEOs are entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events, including termination of employment (with or without cause) following a change in control of the Company. The specific terms of these arrangements, as well as an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscal calendar year-end, are described in detail in the section entitledPotential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control and Terminationon page 68.66.

2022 Proxy Statement    53


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The termination of employment provisions of the CIC Agreements were entered intoare intended to address competitive concerns when the NEOs wereare recruited to Hecla by providing these individuals with a fixed amount of compensation that would offset the risk of leaving their prior employer or foregoing other opportunities to join the Company. At the time of entering into these arrangements, the committee considered the aggregate potential obligations of the Company in the context of the desirability of hiring the individual and thetheir expected compensation upon joining Hecla.

In March 2015, the committee approved an amendment to the CIC Agreement with each of our NEOs to eliminate the excise tax gross-up provision and to include a provision for a “Best Net After Tax Payment,” which reduces the amount received by the NEO upon a change in control if the NEO would receive a greater after-tax benefit than he would receive if full several benefits were paid, taking into account all applicable taxes including any excise tax.

The committee believes that these CIC Agreements are important for a number of reasons, including providing reasonable compensation opportunities in the unique circumstances of a change in control that are not provided by other elements of our compensation program. Further, change in control benefits, if structured appropriately, serve to minimize the distraction caused by a potential transaction and reduce the risk that key executives will leave Hecla before a transaction closes. The committee also believes that these agreements motivate the executives to make decisions that are in the best interests of our shareholders in the event of a pending change in control. These agreements provide executives with the necessary job stability and financial security during a change in control transaction and the subsequent period of uncertainty to help them stay focused on managing Hecla rather than on their own personal employment situation. The committee believes that all of these objectives (i) serve our shareholders’ interests. The committee also believes that change in control provisionsinterests, (ii) are an essential component of the executive compensation program and, (iii) are necessary to attract and retain senior talent in the highly competitive talent market in which we compete.

The change in control provisions were developed by the Company and the committee based on market and industry competitive practices. The Company and the committee periodically review the benefits provided under the CIC Agreements to ensure that they serve our interests in retaining our key executives, are consistent with market and industry practice, and are reasonable.

54     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Our compensation programs are affected by each of the following:

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We take into accountconsider certain requirements of GAAP in determining changes to policies and practices for our stock-based compensation programs.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code Section 162(m)”), generally provides generally that compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the CEO or to anyand certain other NEO (other than the chief financial officer)employees, including NEOs (“covered employees”), of a public company will not be deductible for U.S. federal income tax purposes unless such compensation is paid pursuant to one of the enumerated exceptions set forth in Code Section 162(m).purposes.

Our primary objective in designing and administering our compensation policies is to support and encourage the achievement of our strategic goals and to enhance long-term shareholder value. We also believe that it is important to preserve flexibility in administering compensation programs. For these and other reasons, the committee has determined that it will not necessarily seek to limit executive compensation to the amount that would be fully deductible under Code Section 162(m). Further, although we received shareholder approval for our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan at our 2010 Annual Meeting, there is no assurance that such approval satisfied or continues to satisfy the shareholder approval requirements under Code Section 162(m) necessary for amounts awarded under that plan to be fully deductible by Hecla. As a result of the foregoing, amounts awarded or paid under any of our compensation programs,

54 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

including salaries, annual incentive awards, performance awards, stock options and RSUs, may not qualify as performance-based compensation that is excluded from the limitation on deductibility.

The committee will continue to monitor developments and assess alternatives for preservingmanaging the deductibility of compensation payments and benefits to the extent reasonably practicable, as determined by the committee to be consistent with our compensation policies and in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.

In 2015, Mr. Baker, our President and CEO, and Mr. Radford, our Senior Vice President – Operations, earned amounts subject to Section 162(m) in excess of $1 million, therefore a portion of each of those officer’s total compensation is not deductible by Hecla.

Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.Code. Section 409A imposes additional significant taxes in the event that an executive officer or director receives “deferred compensation” that does not satisfy the requirements of Section 409A. We believe that we have designed and operated ourOur plans appropriatelyare intended to be exempt from, or comply with, Section 409A.

2022 Proxy Statement    55


Future Compensation Actions

Base Salaries for 2016

In December 2015, due to budget reductions for 2016, our CEO’s base salary was reduced by 20%, and all other NEO’s base salary was reduced by 10%, effective through all of calendar year 2016.

NEO1/1/16 to 12/31/16
Salary
($)
      Percentage
Decrease
(%)
  Phillips S. Baker, Jr.484,00020  
James A. Sabala342,00010
Lawrence P. Radford342,00010
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald247,50010
 David C. Sienko225,00010
Don Poirier*0

* Mr. Poirier departed the Company at the end of 2015.

2016 AIP

In February 2016, the committee approved the 2016 AIP goals. The AIP factors were divided into the following components, which may be modified by the committee from time to time, including with respect to the relative weights:

quantitative corporate performance factors comprising 50% of the targeted award;

qualitative/other goals, comprising 25% of the targeted award; and

a discretionary factor as determined by the committee, comprising 25% of the targeted award.

While each component can achieve two and a half times the target (250%), the maximum total payout is limited to two times the target award level (200%).

For the 2016 AIP, the quantitative corporate performance factors are divided into four factors (including weighting): adjusted EBITDA (15%), production (15%), cash (15%) and work-related injury rate reduction (5%).


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement55



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The adjusted EBITDA target is $150 million. Maximum payout is achieved if adjusted EBITDA is $225 million, which is $75 million more than target. There is no payout if adjusted EBITDA is less than $100 million. Further, this component of the AIP does not assume fixed metals prices. For AIP purposes, “adjusted EBITDA” is defined as our earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, with additional adjustments for items which we believe are not indicative of the Company’s ongoing operations.

Adjusted EBITDA Goal Metrics

2016 Adjusted EBITDA Metrics% Performance Value
$225mmMaximum                              30%
$185mm20%
$150mmTarget15%
$135mmMinimum10%
<$100mm0%

The production factor converts gold, lead and zinc to silver equivalent at a ratio of 78 oz. silver to 1 oz. gold, 19.0 lb. lead to 1 oz. silver, and 20.7 lb. zinc to 1 oz. silver. Our production target requires that we achieve 42.6 million silver equivalent ounces. Maximum payout is attained if production achieves 44 million ounces. The threshold payout requires production of 39 million ounces, below which no payout is earned. Achievement of target requires a 9% increase over 2015 silver equivalent production, while achievement of the maximum payout requires a 15% increase.

Production Goal Metrics

2016 Production in Silver Equivalent Ounces
2016 Production Metrics% Performance Value
44.0mmMaximum                              30%
43.0mm20%
42.0mmTarget15%
40.0mmMinimum10%
<39.0mm0%

The cash target is $100 million in cash on hand at December 31, 2016. Maximum payout is achieved if our cash position at year-end is at or above $155 million, which is the cash position at the beginning of 2016. The threshold payout level is $75 million, below which no payout is earned.

Cash Goal Metrics

2016 Cash Metrics% Performance Value
$155mmMaximum                              30%
$120mm20%
$100mmTarget15%
$85mmMinimum10%
<$75mm0%

56 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


The work-related injury rate reduction target is a reduction in injury rates of 15% at year-end 2016 from 2015 results. Maximum payout is achieved if there is a 35% reduction in injury rates at year-end. The threshold payout level is 5%, below which no payout is earned.

Work-Related Injury Rate Reduction Metrics

  2016 AIFR Metrics% Performance Value  
35%     Maximum                                   10%
25%  7.5%
15%Target 5%
5%Minimum2.5%
<5%0%

The qualitative/other goals are recommended by management, approved by the committee, and cover the areas of safety and health, operations, financial and cost controls, development projects, exploration, growth, legal, investor relations, industry visibility, human capital development and government and community affairs.

2014-2016 LTIP

In February 2014, the committee approved the 2014-2016 LTIP, which has a target unit value of $125. The 2014-2016 LTIP has three major changes from the 2013-2015 LTIP:

silver equivalent reserve growth includes gold converted to silver equivalent at 60 to 1, instead of silver resource growth; and

because controlling costs currently is a major focus of investors in precious metals companies, the cash flow metric payout is achieved only if cash flow is at least 80% of target compared to 65% of target for the 2013-2015 plan, and maximum payout is 50% higher than the 2013-2015 plan if 115% of target is realized; and

with relative TSR, a minimum payout is only achieved if share performance is as good as or better than 50% of our peers. The target payout of $25 requires performance at 60% of our peers, compared to 50% in the 2013-2015 plan, and having the best performance pays four times target ($100) compared to two times target ($50) in the 2013-2015 plan.

Except as noted, the 2014-2016 LTIP includes the same components as the 2013-2015 LTIP, and increases the maximum potential payout from $300 to $375 per unit.

2014-2016 Performance Unit Valuation

  Silver Equivalent Reserve Growth  
Ounce Target
(millions)
Additional Reserve (millions)
(replacement in situ)
Unit Value
 400103 (191)          $100.00
33740 (128)$50.00
32730 (118)$25.00
30710 (98)$5.00
  Silver Equivalent Production Growth  
Target
(in mm ozs.)
Average
Annual Target
(in mm ozs.)
Unit Value
75.025.0                  $50.00 
 72.024.0$40.00
70.523.5 $25.00
68.022.6$10.00



125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement57



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


  Cash Flow  
% of TargetUnit Value
115%                $75.00
110%$50.00
 105%$35.00
100% $25.00
95% $22.50
90%$20.00 
85%$17.50
80%$15.00
 
 #4 Shaft Completion
100% Completion DateUnit Value
12/31/15$50.00
5/1/16$25.00
After 8/1/16$0.00
Total Shareholder Return
  %ile rank within Peer Group CompaniesUnit Value  
100%               $100.00 
90%$75.00
80%$50.00
70% $35.00
60% $25.00
50%$15.00
<50%$0.00


2015-2017 LTIP

In March 2015, the committee approved the 2015-2017 LTIP, which has a target unit value of $100. The 2015-2017 LTIP has the same factors as the 2014-2016 LTIP, with the exception of the #4 Shaft completion metric, which was removed as the project nears completion. The only other factor that is different from the 2014-2016 LTIP is as follows:

silver equivalent reserve and resource growth includes gold converted to silver equivalent at 71 to 1.

Except as noted, the 2015-2017 LTIP includes the same components as the 2014-2016 LTIP, with a maximum potential payout of $375 per unit.

2015-2017 Performance Unit Valuation

  Silver Equivalent (includes Gold)
Reserve Growth
  
Ounce Target
(millions)
Additional Reserve (millions)
(replacement in situ)
Unit Value
420     100 (175)               $100.00 
36040 (115) $50.00
350 30 (105)$25.00
3200 (75)$5.00
Silver Equivalent (includes Gold)
Production Growth
Target
(in mm ozs.)
Average
Annual Target
(in mm ozs.)

Unit Value
  82.527.5                  $75.00  
78.526.2$50.00
 77.025.7 $25.00 
74.524.8$10.00


58 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


  Cash Flow  
% of TargetUnit Value
115%              $100.00 
110%$50.00 
105%$35.00
100%$25.00
95%$22.50
90%$20.00
85%$17.50
80%$15.00
Total Shareholder Return
  %ile rank within Peer Group Companies     Unit Value  
100%         $100.00
90%$75.00
80%$50.00
 70%$35.00
60%$25.00
50%$15.00
<50%$0.00


2016-2018 LTIP

In February 2016, the committee approved the 2016-2018 LTIP, which has a target unit value of $100. The 2016-2018 LTIP has the same factors as the 2015-2017 LTIP, with a maximum potential payout of $375 per unit.

2016-2018 Performance Unit Valuation

Silver Equivalent (includes Gold)
Reserve Growth
Ounce Target
(millions)
Additional Reserve (millions)
(replacement in situ)
Unit Value
  423      100 (184)              $100.00  
36340 (124)$50.00
353 30 (114)$25.00
3230 (84)$5.00
 
Cash Flow
% of TargetUnit Value
 115%$100.00
110% $50.00
105% $35.00 
100%$25.00
90%$15.00
Silver Equivalent (includes Gold)
Production Growth
Target
(in mm ozs.)
Average
Annual Target
(in mm ozs.)

Unit Value
  93.0      31.0                    $75.00  
89.5 29.5 $50.00
87.029.0$25.00
84.028.0$10.00 

Total Shareholder Return
  %ile rank within Peer Group Companies      Unit Value  
100%        $100.00
90%$75.00
80%$50.00 
 70% $35.00
60%$25.00
50%$15.00
<50%$0.00



125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement59



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The members of the Compensation Committee are set forth in theCompensation Committee Report.Report. There are no members of the Compensation Committeecommittee who were officers or employees of Hecla or any of our subsidiaries during the fiscalcalendar year, formerly were officers of Hecla or any of our subsidiaries or had any relationship otherwise requiring disclosure under the proxy rules promulgated by the SEC or the NYSE.

60 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed theCompensation Discussion and Analysis CD&A with Hecla’s managementSr. Vice President – CAO and its independent compensation consultant. Basedbased on its review and discussions, the committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, theCompensation Discussion and Analysis CD&A included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference in Hecla’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2021.

Respectfully submitted by

The Compensation Committee of the

Board of Directors

Terry V. Rogers, Chair

Catherine J. Boggs

Ted Crumley

Charles B. Stanley

56     www.hecla-mining.com


Respectfully submitted by
The Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors
George R. Nethercutt, Jr., Chair
Ted Crumley
Terry V. Rogers
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement61



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Summary Compensation Table for 20152021

The following compensation tables provide information regarding the compensation of our CEO, CFO, and fourthree other NEOs who were the most highly compensated inofficers for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015.2021, determined in accordance with SEC rules. Also included is our former Sr. Vice President and CFO, who retired in March 2021.

Name and Principal
Position
YearSalary1
($)
Bonus2
($)
Stock
Awards3
($)
Option
Awards3
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation4
($)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings5
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
   Phillips S. Baker, Jr.      2015      605,000            1,727,1746            1,768,250      599,477      15,9007      4,715,801   
President and CEO2014605,0001,438,2882,303,538164,09915,6004,526,525
2013575,2081,073,8741,497,375692,92215,3003,854,679
James A. Sabala2015380,000583,700822,000174,07515,90071,975,675
Senior Vice President2014366,458887,623954,800279,69015,6002,504,171
and CFO2013341,458344,999825,750268,47415,3001,795,981
Lawrence P. Radford2015380,000556,694890,000105,11415,90071,947,708
Senior Vice President –2014366,458709,326886,77598,27715,6002,076,436
Operations2013341,458300,000589,95091,19715,3001,337,905
Dr. Dean W. A. McDonald92015275,000480,468580,000110,74315,90081,462,111
Senior Vice President -2014275,000562,276 721,875214,38415,6001,789,135
Exploration2013279,443300,000455,400183,41716,2101,234,470
 David C. Sienko2015 250,000 289,933  397,000 36,365 15,9007989,198
Vice President and 2014250,000 376,900543,72578,31815,600 1,264,543
General Counsel2013241,875154,001387,90060,69315,300 859,769
Don Poirier92015226,000314,950401,50082,95015,90081,041,300
Vice President –2014226,000412,820459,800165,34815,6001,279,568
Corporate Development2013233,080199,999370,620130,94016,210950,849

Name and Principal

Position

  Year  Salary(1)
($)
  Stock
Awards
(2)
($)
 Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)
($)
  Change in
Pension
Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
(4)
($)
 All Other
Compensation
($)
 Total
($)

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

President and CEO

    2021    664,792    1,370,005(5)    885,500    824,973   19,830(7)    3,765,100  
    2020    635,000    937,292   1,970,300    1,628,345   19,571   5,190,508
    2019    635,000    399,999   1,575,950    2,452,596   18,801   5,082,346

Russell D. Lawlar

Sr. Vice President and CFO

    2021    245,209    361,398(5)    185,500    39,682   19,270(7)    851,059

Lauren M. Roberts(8)

Sr. Vice President and COO

    2021    380,000    486,004(5)    418,000    314,706   19,830(7)    1,618,540
    2020    380,000    511,878   829,563    275,046   9,151   2,005,638
    2019    142,501    225,000   214,783    53,083   3,453   638,820

Robert D. Brown(9)

Vice President – Corporate Develop. & Sustainability

    2021    264,000    342,705(5)    237,600    73,393(6)    19,440(7)    937,138
    2020    264,000    363,661   404,280    111,007   19,065   1,162,013
    2019    264,000    150,000   390,150    140,532   18,750   963,432

David C. Sienko

Vice President – General Counsel

    2021    265,000    323,999(5)    214,650    43,798   19,389(7)    866,836
    2020    256,875    341,254   432,875    207,581   19,009   1,257,594
    2019    250,000    150,000   437,750    308,601   18,345   1,164,696

Lindsay A. Hall(9), (10)

Former Sr. Vice President and CFO

    2021    95,000    --(5)    --    181,600(6)    29,462(7)    306,062
    2020    380,000    511,878   981,000    208,234   19,065   2,100,177
    2019    380,000    225,000   724,250    254,053   18,750   1,602,053
1(1)

Salary amounts include both base salary both earned and paid in cash during the fiscal year listed.

2(2)In accordance with SEC rules, the “Bonus” column will only disclose discretionary cash bonus awards. In

Represents RSUs awarded, and PSUs granted in each of 2013, 2014fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2015, there were no discretionary cash bonuses awarded to any NEO.

32019. The amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” column and the “Option Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards granted to each NEO computed in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 12 – Stockholders’ Equity to our calendar year 2021 consolidated financial statements, which is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2022 (the “Form 10-K”). RSUs generally vest in three substantially equal annual installments beginning on June 21 of the year following the date of grant. Consistent with the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 718, the value of PSUs is based on the estimated outcome as of the date of grant. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For718, this result is based on a description of the assumptions used in valuing the awards, please see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.relative TSR result modeled using a Monte Carlo simulation. Please see theGrants of Plan-Based Awards for 20152021 table on page 6460 for more information about the awards granted in 2015.2021. The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the PSUs for accounting purposes determined in accordance with SEC rules and do not reflect the actual economic value that may be realized by the NEO at the end of a relevant three-year performance period.


62 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years

2022 Proxy Statement    57



TableCompensation of ContentsNamed Executive Officers

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


4(3)

This column represents the cash performance payments awarded and earned by the NEOs for the calendar years 2013, 20142021, 2020 and 20152019 under our AIPSTIP and for the LTIP plan periods 2011-2013, 2012-20142019-2021, 2018-2020 and 2013-2015.2017-2019. The 2013 AIP2021 STIP was paid in cash, and 2011-2013there was no 2019-2021 LTIP paid. The 2020 STIP and 2018-2020 LTIP awards were paid 50% in cash, and 50% in common stock up to target level payout, with any portion above target alsothe 2019 STIP was paid in cash, while the form of RSUs that vested in August 2014. The 2014 AIP and 2012-20142017-2019 LTIP awards were paid 75% in cash and 25% in common stock. The 2015 AIP andstock of the 2013-2015 LTIP awards were paid 50% in cash and 50% in common stock.Company. The awards for each of the plan years are as follows:


NameYearAIP
Award
($)
LTIP Plan
Period
LTIP
Units
(#)
Unit
Value
($)
LTIP
Award
($)
Total AIP
and LTIP
($)
Total AIP
and LTIP
Paid in
Cash
($)
Total AIP
and LTIP
Paid in
Shares
(#)
      Baker     2015     695,750     2013-2015     8,250     130.00     1,072,500     1,768,250      884,125     374,629*   
2014919,6002012-20148,250167.751,383,9382,303,5381,727,653173,983
2013544,5002011-20138,250115.50952,8751,497,375684,750237,610
Sabala2015380,0002013-20153,400130.00442,000822,000411,000174,153*
2014418,0002012-20143,200167.75536,800954,800716,10072,115
2013479,2502011-20133,000115.50346,500825,750283,125158,662
Radford2015500,0002013-20153,000130.00390,000890,000445,000188,559*
2014 467,4002012-20142,500 167.75419,375886,775665,08166,977
2013399,3752011-20131,650115.50190,575 589,950215,625109,452 
McDonald2015242,000 2013-20152,600130.00338,000580,000  290,000122,881*
2014302,5002012-2014 2,500167.75419,375721.875541,40654,522
2013247,5002011-20131,800115.50207,900455,400193,125 76,689
Sienko 2015150,0002013-20151,900130.00247,000397,000198,50084,110*
2014225,0002012-20141,900167.75 318,725543,725407,79441,067
2013180,0002011-20131,800115.50207,900387,900165,00065,175
Poirier2015135,0002013-20152,050130.00266,500401,500200,75085,064*
2014124,3002012-20142,000167.75335,500459,800344,85034,728
2013162,7202011-20131,800115.50207,900370,620157,80062,228
 

*Shares were valued based on the closing price of Hecla’s common stock on the NYSE on February 19, 2016 ($2.36).


Name  Year  STIP
Award
($)
  LTIP Plan
Period
  LTIP
Units
(#)
 Unit
Value
($)
  LTIP
Award
($)
  Total STIP
and LTIP
($)
  Total STIP
and/or
LTIP
Paid in
Cash
($)
  Total
STIP
and/or
LTIP
Paid in
Shares
(#)

Baker

    2021    885,500    2019-2021    10,000   --    --    885,500    885,500    --
    2020    1,206,500    2018-2020    11,400   67.00    763,800    1,970,300    1,970,300    --
    2019    444,500    2017-2019    11,400   99.25    1,131,450    1,575,950    444,500    621,676

Lawlar

    2021    185,500    2019-2021    1,267(i)    --    --    185,500    185,500    --

Roberts

    2021    418,000    2019-2021    3,222(ii)    --    --    418,000    418,000    --
    2020    703,000    2018-2020    1,889(ii)    67.00    126,563    829,563    829,563    --
    2019    159,600    2017-2019    556(ii)    99.25    55,183    214,783    159,600    30,320

Brown

    2021    237,600    2019-2021    3,000   --    --    237,600    237,600    --
    2020    203,280    2018-2020    3,000   67.00    201,000    404,280    404,280    --
    2019    92,400    2017-2019    3,000   99.25    297,750    390,150    92,400    163,599

Sienko

    2021    214,650    2019-2021    3,000   --    --    214,650    214,650    --
    2020    231,875    2018-2020    3,000   67.00    201,000    432,875    432,875    --
    2019    140,000    2017-2019    3,000   99.25    297,750    437,750    140,000    163,599

Hall

    2021    --    2019-2021    4,000(iii)    --    --    --    --    --
    2020    646,000    2018-2020    5,000   67.00    335,000    981,000    981,000    --
    2019    228,000    2017-2019    5,000   99.25    496,250    724,250    228,000    272,665

5(i)

Mr. Lawlar’s 2019-2021 LTIP units were prorated because he was not appointed Sr. Vice President and CFO until March 2021.

(ii)

Mr. Robert’s 2017-2019, 2018-2020 and 2019-2021 LTIP units were prorated because he joined the Company in August 2019.

(iii)

Mr. Hall retired from the Company in March 2021. Upon his resignation his 2019-2021 LTIP units were forfeited.

(4)

The amounts reported in this column for 20152021 are changes between December 31, 20142020 and December 31, 20152021 in the actuarial present value of the accumulated pension benefits. NonePension values will typically increase from year-to-year due to increasing age, years of service, and average annual earnings, and can fluctuate significantly due to changes in the amountsassumptions used to determine the present value. The Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column is calculated pursuant to SEC requirements and is based on assumptions used in preparing the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable calendar years. Specifically, the interest discount rate used in the calculations is based on the rates of return available on fixed income investments which can significantly change year-to-year affecting comparability with the prior year. The Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensations Earnings increased from 2020 to 2021 due to the participants’ higher age, years of service, and average annual earnings. However, the increased value was partially offset due to an increase in the discount rate from 2.64% on December 31, 2020 to 2.86% at December 31, 2021. For example, Mr. Baker’s Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings would have been $245,000 higher if the discount rate had not increased by 0.22% from the prior year. For this reason, the Company cautions that the values reported in thisthe Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column are above-market nonqualified deferred compensation earnings.may not represent the value that an NEO will actually accrue, or receive, under the Company’s retirement plans during any given year.

6(5)

Includes: (i) restricted stock units (204,918)RSUs granted to Mr. Bakereach NEO on July 1, 2015;June 21, 2021, and (ii) performance-based shares (204,918)PSUs awarded to Mr. Bakereach NEO on July 1, 2015.June 21, 2021. SeePerformance-based SharesGrants of Plan-Based Awards for 2021 table on page 60 and PSUs on page 51 for a description of the performance-based shares.PSUs.

7(6)

As non-U.S. citizens, Mr. Hall and Mr. Brown are not participants in the Retirement Plan, but they do participate in the SERP. In lieu of participation in the Retirement Plan, Mr. Hall and Mr. Brown are expected to receive a similar supplemental benefit as if they had participated in this plan. See Retirement Plan on page 72 for a description of non-U.S. employee’s retirement benefits.

58     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

(7)

Includes the following:

 NEO

  Matching
401(k)
Contribution
($)
 Annual
Life
Insurance
Premium
($)
 Other
($)
 Total
($)

Baker

    17,400   2,430   --   19,830  

Lawlar

    17,400   1,870   --   19,270  

Roberts

    17,400   2,430   --   19,830  

Brown

    17,400(i)    2,040(ii)    --   19,440  

Sienko

    17,400   1,989   --   19,389  

Hall

    --(i)    233(ii)    29,229(iii)    29,462  

(i)

These amounts are Hecla’s matching contributions made under Hecla’s Capital Accumulation Plan for the NEOs.

8These amounts are for retirement contributions made on behalf of Dr. McDonaldpaid to Mr. Hall and Mr. Poirier.Brown in lieu of the 401(k) match. Canadian employees are excluded from participation in the Hecla Capital Accumulation401(k) Plan. Dr. McDonaldMr. Hall and Mr. PoirierBrown are paid in Canadian funds. The amounts reported are in U.S. dollars based on the applicable exchange rates as reported by the Bank of Canada from time-to-time.

(ii)

Life insurance premium is paid in Canadian funds.

(iii)

Mr. Hall’s “Other” is vacation payout at the time of his retirement.

(8)

Mr. Roberts deferred the amount of $292,603 to the KEDCP in 2021. The Wall Street Journal from time-to-time.amount reported in this table is the total amount of base salary and/or STIP and LTIP cash compensation he received before his deferrals. See Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2021 on page 65 for further information.

9(9)Dr. McDonald

Mr. Hall and Mr. PoirierBrown receive their compensation in Canadian funds. The amounts reported for Dr. McDonaldMr. Hall and Mr. PoirierBrown are in U.S. dollars based on the applicable exchange rates as reported inThe Wall Street Journalby the Bank of Canada from time-to-time during this time period.



(10)
125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement63

Mr. Hall retired in March 2021.


2022 Proxy Statement    59



TableCompensation of ContentsNamed Executive Officers

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the NEOs during 2015.2021.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 20152021

 Long-Term
Performance

Plan Units
(#)


Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive

Plan Awards
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards
Other
Stock

Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)
Closing
Market

Price on
Date of
Grant
($)
Grant Date
Fair Value

of Stock
and Option
Awards1
($)
NameGrant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
 Phillips S. Baker, Jr.                      
       Common Shares23/5/15173,9833.31575,884
       Restricted Stock37/1/15204,9182.44500,000
       Performance Shares7/1/15102,4594204,9184409,83642.44651,290
       LTIP59,50001,187,5003,562,500
       AIP60605,0001,210,000
James A. Sabala
       Common Shares23/5/1572,1153.31238,701
       Restricted Stock37/1/15141,3932.44344,999
       LTIP53,4000425,0001,275,000
       AIP60304,000608,500
Lawrence P. Radford
       Common Shares23/5/1566,9773.31221,694
       Restricted Stock37/1/15137,2952.44335,000
       LTIP53,4000425,0001,275,000
       AIP60304,000608,500
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald
       Common Shares23/5/1554,5223.31180,468
       Restricted Stock37/1/15122,9502.44300,000
       LTIP52,6000325,000975,000
       AIP60300,000600,000
David C. Sienko
       Common Shares23/5/1541,0673.31135,932
       Restricted Stock37/1/1563,1152.44154,001
       LTIP51,9000237,500712,500
       AIP60150,000300,000
Don Poirier
       Common Shares23/5/1534,7283.31114,950
       Restricted Stock37/1/1581,9672.44200,000
       LTIP52,0500256,250768,750
       AIP60135,600271,200

     

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
  Grant
Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and
Option
Awards
(1)
($)
 

Name

 Grant
Date
  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
 

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

         

RSUs(2)

  6/21/21         63,452   500,002 

PSUs(3)

  6/21/21      31,726   63,452   126,904   63,452   870,003 

LTIP(4)

   --   810,000   4,725,000      

STIP(5)

   --   770,000   1,540,000      

Russell D. Lawlar

         

RSUs(2)

  6/21/21         21,574   170,003 

PSUs(3)

  6/21/21      6,980   13,959   27,918   13,959   191,395 

LTIP(4)

   --   270,000   1,575,000      

STIP(5)

   --   185,500   371,000      

Lauren M. Roberts

         

RSUs(2)

  6/21/21         28,553   224,998 

PSUs(3)

  6/21/21      9,518   19,036   38,072   19,036   261,006 

LTIP(4)

   --   360,000   2,100,000      

STIP(5)

   --   380,000   760,000      

Robert D. Brown

         

RSUs(2)

  6/21/21         20,305   160,003 

PSUs(3)

  6/21/21      6,663   13,325   26,650   13,325   182,702 

LTIP(4)

   --   270,000   1,575,000      

STIP(5)

   --   184,800   369,600      

David C. Sienko

         

RSUs(2)

  6/21/21         19,036   150,004 

PSUs(3)

  6/21/21      6,345   12,690   25,380   12,690   173,995 

LTIP(4)

   --   270,000   1,575,000      

STIP(5)

   --   185,500   371,000      

Lindsay A. Hall(6)

   --   --   --   --   --   --   --   -- 
1(1)We account for equity-based

The RSU amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards granted to each NEO computed in accordance with stock-based accounting rules (FASB ASC Topic 718). Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 12 – Stockholders’ Equity to our calendar year 2021 consolidated financial statements, which is included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 22, 2022 (the “Form 10-K”). RSUs generally vest in three substantially equal annual installments beginning on June 21 in the year following the date of grant. Consistent with the requirements of FASB ASC Topic 718, pursuant to which we recognize compensation expensethe value of performance-based share awards to an employeePSUs is based on the estimated outcome as of the date of grant. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, this result is based on a relative TSR result modeled using a Monte Carlo simulation. The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of the award onPSUs for accounting purposes determined in accordance with SEC rules and do not reflect the grant date. Compensation expense of restricted stock and RSU awards to an employee is based onactual economic value that may be realized by the stock priceNEO at grant date. The compensation expense for restricted stock and RSUs is recognized over the vesting period.

2Represents the number of shares of common stock awarded on March 5, 2015 to all NEOs under the termsend of the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. These shares were awarded as part of the 2014 AIP and 2012-2014 LTIP awards, of which 25% was paid in equity.relevant three-year performance period.

3(2)

Represents the number of RSUs granted on July 1, 2015,June 21, 2021 to the NEOs under the terms of the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. The restrictions generally lapse for one-third of the RSUs on June 21, 2016, one-third on2022, June 21, 2017,2023, and one-third on June 21, 2018,2024, at which time the units are converted into shares of our common stock. The grant date fair value of the RSUs is the number of restricted sharesRSUs multiplied by the closing price of the Company common stock on the grant date of July 1, 2015June 21, 2021 ($2.44)7.88).

4(3)

Represents the number of performance-based shares of Hecla common stock,PSUs granted under the 2010 Stock Plan, having a target value of $500,000for each NEO of: Mr. Baker, $500,000; Mr. Lawlar, $110,000; Mr. Hall, $0; Mr. Roberts, $150,000; Mr. Brown, $105,000; and Mr. Sienko, $100,000, with the potential of up to 200% of this target value (subject to specific performance terms and conditions established for these shares)PSUs) awarded to Mr. Bakerthe NEOs under

60     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Determination of the actual number of these performance-based shares to be received by Mr. Bakerin settlement of these PSUs will be based on the basis of the TSR of Hecla common stock for the three-year period from January 1, 20152021 through December 31, 2017,2023, based on the following percentile rank within peer group companies:

 

100thpercentile rank = maximum award at 200% of target;

60thpercentile rank = target award at grant value;

50thpercentile rank = threshold award at 50% of target.

Hecla’s TSR performance versus that of peer group companies will be based on a comparison of the average share price over the last 60 calendar days prior to January 1, 2015, as2021 (as the base price, andprice) with the average share price the last 60 calendar days of the three-year performance period, plus dividends, to determine relative share value performance and ranking among peers.


64 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


5(4)

Represents the potential value of the payout for each NEO under the 2015-20172021-2023 LTIP period if the threshold, target, or maximum goals are satisfied for all performance measures. The potential payouts are performance-driven and therefore completely at risk.at-risk. The business measurements and performance goals for determining the payout are described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis beginning CD&A starting on page 34.48. Dollar amounts shown are valued as follows on a per unit basis: Threshold, $0; Target, $125;$90; and Maximum, $375. As reflected in theSummary Compensation Table, awards were paid out in March 2016$525. The number of units awarded to each NEO for the three-year2021-2023 LTIP period 2013-2015. Awards were paid 50% in cash and 50% in Hecla’s common stock issued under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.are as follows:

NEO

2021-2023 LTIP
Units
(#)

6Baker

9,000

Lawlar

3,000

Roberts

4,000

Brown

3,000

Sienko

3,000

Hall

--

(5)

Represents the potential value of the payout for each NEO under the 2015 AIP2021 STIP described in the CD&A starting on page 44. The total payout to each NEO under the 2015 AIP2021 STIP is described in footnote 43 to theSummary Compensation Table for 2021 on page 62. Awards were paid 50%58.

(6)

Mr. Hall retired from the Company in cash and 50% in Hecla’s common stock issued under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.March 2021.

2022 Proxy Statement    61


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

The following table provides information on the current holdings of stock awards by the NEOs. This table includes unvested RSUs and performance-based shares.unvested PSUs. There were no unexercised stock options held by any NEO at year-end.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Calendar Fiscal Year-End for 20152021

Option AwardsStock Awards
 Name  Number of
Securities

Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities

Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise

Price
($)
  Option
Grant

Date
  Option
Expiration

Date
  Number
of Shares

or Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested1
(#)
  Market
Value of

Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested as
of 12/31/152
($)
  Equity
Incentive

Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights that
have Not
Vested
(#)
  Equity
Incentive

Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout Value
of Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested3
($)
  
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.362,811685,713
151,5154286,363
204,9185387,295
James A. Sabala121,228229,121
Lawrence P. Radford265,101501,041
Dr. Dean W. A. McDonald217,686411,427
David C. Sienko111,747211,202
Don Poirier145,124274,284

   Stock Awards

Name

  Number of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That
Have Not
Vested
(1)
(#)
  Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have
Not
Vested
(2)
($)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That
Have
Not Vested
(#)
 

Equity Incentive  

Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or
Other Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(3)
($)

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

    223,923    1,168,878   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

          132,013(4)    689,108
          63,452(5)    331,219

Russell D. Lawlar

    43,833    228,808   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

          13,959(5)    72,866

Lauren M. Roberts

    115,371    602,237   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

          49,505(4)    258,416
          19,036(5)    99,368

Robert D. Brown

    82,682    431,600   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

          34,653(4)    180,889
          13,325(5)    69,557

David C. Sienko

    79,213    413,492   

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

          33,003(4)    172,276
          12,690(5)    66,242

Lindsay A. Hall

    --    --    --   --
1(1)

The following table shows the dates on which the restricted stock unitsRSUs in the outstanding equity awards table vest and the corresponding number of shares, subject generally to continued employment through the vest date.


Number of Unvested Restricted Stock Units
     Vesting DateBakerSabala*RadfordMcDonaldSienkoPoirier
6/21/16     56,883     39,249     34,130     34,130     17,520     22,753  
6/21/1668,30647,13145,76540,98321,03827,322
6/25/1650,50534,84833,83830,30315,55620,202
8/5/1626,000
6/21/1768,30645,76540,98321,03827,322
6/25/1750,50533,83830,30315,55620,202
6/21/1868,30645,76540,98421,03927,323
Total362,811121,228265,101217,686111,747145,124

   Number of Unvested Restricted Stock Units

Vesting Date

  Baker  Lawlar  Roberts  Brown  Sienko  

June 21, 2022

    137,617    22,851    71,583    51,545    50,022  

June 21, 2023

    65,155    13,791    34,271    24,369    22,846  

June 21, 2024

    21,151    7,191    9,517    6,768    6,345  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

    223,923    43,833    115,371    82,682    79,213  
   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
(2)*Mr. Sabala is retiring effective June 13, 2016. Mr. Sabala will not receive any RSU’s that vest in 2017 or 2018.

2

The market value of the RSUs is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE as of December 31, 2015,2021, which was $1.89.$5.22.

3(3)

The market value of the performance-based sharesPSUs is based on the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE as of December 31, 2015,2021, which was $1.89.$5.22.

4(4)

Award of performance-based shares,PSUs, the value of which will be determined on the basis of the TSR of Hecla common stock for the three-year period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2016.

5Award of performance-based shares, the value of which will be determined on the basis of the TSR of Hecla common stock for the three-year period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement65



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The following table shows information concerning the exercise of stock options and the number of stock awards that vested during calendar year 2015 for each of the NEOs, and the value realized on the exercise of options and vesting of stock awards during calendar year 2015.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2015

Option Awards1Stock Awards
NameNumber of Shares
Acquired on Exercise
(#)
Value Realized on
Exercise
($)
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting
(#)
Value Realized
on Vesting
($)
  Phillips S. Baker, Jr.               173,9832,7       
137,0693636,000
56,8834,7
35,9205101,294
 50,5056,7
James A. Sabala72,1152238,701
39,2494112,645
23,491566,245
34,849698,274
Lawrence P. Radford66,9772221,694
34,130497,953
15,948544,973
33,839695,426
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald54,5222180,468
34,130497,953
21,121559,561
30,303685,454
David C. Sienko41,0672135,932
17,520450,282
11,063531,198
15,555643,865
Don Poirier34,7282114,950
22,753465,301
13,865539,099
20,202656,970

1There were no stock options exercises in 2015. All remaining stock options expired in May 2015.
2The NEOs were awarded common stock on March 5, 2015, as part of their 2014 AIP and 2012-2014 LTIP being paid 25% in common stock. The shares were awarded at the price of $3.31, which was the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on March 5, 2015.
3Performance-based shares received in March 2015 based on the TSR of Hecla common stock for the three-year period from January 1, 20122020 through December 31, 2014. The share price2022. For purposes of determining the amounts reflected in this column, it is assumed that threshold performance was achieved as of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

(5)

Award of PSUs, the value of which will be determined by usingbased on the closing priceTSR of Hecla’sHecla common stock onfor the NYSE on June 25, 2012 ($4.64),three-year period from January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2023. For purposes of determining the date of grantamounts reflected in this column, it is assumed that threshold performance was achieved as of the performance-based shares.end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021.

62     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

The following table shows information concerning the number of stock awards that vested during calendar year 2021 for each of the NEOs, and the value realized on the vesting of stock awards during calendar year 2021.

Stock Vested in 2021

    Stock Awards

Name

  Number of
Shares
Acquired
on Vesting
(#)
 

Value  

Realized on  

Vesting  

($)  

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

    43,516(1)    342,906  
    72,464(2)    571,016  
    44,005(3)    346,759  
    520,833(4)    2,999,998  

Russell D. Lawlar

    4,351(1)    34,286  
    9,058(2)    71,377  
    6,601(3)    52,016  

Lauren M. Roberts

    37,313(2)    294,026  
    24,753(3)    195,054  
    143,035(4)    823,882  

Robert D. Brown

    17,407(1)    137,167  
    27,174(2)    214,131  
    17,602(3)    138,704  
    119,792(4)    690,002  

David C. Sienko

    15,231(1)    120,020  
    27,174(2)    214,131  
    16,502(3)    130,036  
    104,167(4)    600,002  

Lindsay A. Hall(5)

    --   --  
4(1)

The NEOs were granted these RSUs on June 21, 2013.19, 2018. On June 21, 2015,2021, the restrictions lapsed, and each NEO received his units in the form of shares of our common stock. The shares vested at the price of $2.87, whichvalue realized was based on the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on June 22, 2015.21, 2021, which was $7.88.

5(2)The NEOs

Messrs. Baker, Lawlar, Brown and Sienko were granted these RSUs on June 25, 2012.21, 2019. Mr. Roberts was granted his RSUs on August 5, 2019, the date of his appointment as Sr. Vice President and COO. On June 25, 2015,21, 2021, the restrictions lapsed, and each NEO received his units in the form of shares of our common stock. The shares vested at the price of $2.82, whichvalue realized was based on the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on June 25, 2015.21, 2021, which was $7.88.

6(3)

The NEOs were granted these RSUs on June 25, 2014.22, 2020. On June 25, 2015,21, 2021, the restrictions lapsed, and each NEO received his units in the form of shares of our common stock. The shares vested at the price of $2.82, whichvalue realized was based on the closing sales price of our common stock on the NYSE on June 25, 2015.21, 2021, which was $7.88.

7(4)

Reflects the PSUs earned for the 2019-2021 performance period that ended on December 31, 2021, because performance targets were met. The value shown as realized on vesting is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on February 28, 2022 ($5.76), which was the date on which the executive’s received the shares underlying their PSUs. See 2019-2021 PSU Results on page 52 for further information.

(5)

Mr. Hall retired from the Company in March 2021. Any unvested RSUs or PSUs he had at the time of his retirement were forfeited and did not vest.

2022 Proxy Statement    63


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

Stock Ownership Guidelines for NEOs

We believe that it is important to encourage our executive officers to hold a material amount of our common stock and to link their long-term economic interest directly to that of our shareholders. To achieve this goal, in June 2012, the committee and Board established stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s senior management. The guidelines for the CEO are six times base salary, and for the other executive officers, two times base salary. These guidelines must be achieved by the later of (i) June 2017 or (ii) five years after the executive officer is hired to such position. Unvested RSUs and shares held directly are considered owned for purposes of the guidelines. If an executive officer becomes subject to a greater ownership amount due to a promotion or an increase in base salary, they must meet the higher ownership requirement within three years.

Because of fluctuations in the Company’s stock price, in February 2016, the committee and the Board amended the stock ownership guidelines to provide a valuation methodology that consists of valuing the shares held by using the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE for the previous calendar year. Because share prices of all companies are subject to market volatility, the Board believes that it would be unfair to require an executive to buy more shares simply because Hecla’s stock price drops. In the event there is a significant decline in Hecla’s stock price that causes an executive’s holdings to fall below the applicable threshold, the executive will not be required to purchase additional shares to meet the threshold, but they generally may not sell or transfer any shares until the threshold has again been achieved.

The following table summarizes the NEO stock ownership guidelines and their status as of December 31, 2021, based on the average closing price of our common stock on the NYSE for calendar year 2021 ($6.3576). With the exception of Mr. Lawlar, as of December 31, 2021, all NEOs met the guidelines. In the calculations for our NEOs, we include shares directly held, shares held in their 401(k) account, and unvested RSUs. We do not include unexercised stock options or unvested performance-based shares.

NEO Stock Ownership as of December 31, 2021

NEO

  Annual
Base
Salary
($)
  X
Annual
Base
Salary
  Total
Value of
Shares to
be Held
($)
  Shares
Held
Directly
(#)
 Unvested
RSUs
(#)
  Total
Shares
(#)
  Total Value
of Shares
Held by NEO
at 12/31/21
($6.3576)
(1)
($)
  Meets
Guidelines

Baker

    700,000    6x    4,200,000    4,135,831(2),(3)    223,923    4,359,754    27,717,572    Yes

Lawlar

    265,000    2x    530,000    13,289(3)    43,833    57,122    363,159    No

Roberts

    380,000    2x    760,000    447,166(2),(3)    115,371    562,537    3,576,385    Yes

Brown

    264,000    2x    528,000    211,238   82,682    293,920    1,868,626    Yes

Sienko

    265,000    2x    530,000    584,853(3)    79,213    664,066    4,221,866    Yes
(1)

The value of shares held is determined by using the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the calendar year on the NYSE, which for 2021 was $6.3576.

(2)

Includes 1,795,964 shares for Mr. Baker deferred theand 339,119 shares into his stock accountfor Mr. Roberts deferred under the termsKEDCP.

(3)

Except for Mr. Brown, includes Hecla Mining Company common shares held in such officer’s 401(k) account.

Additional information regarding shares held by our NEOs is included in the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table on page 75.

64     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

Pension Benefits

The following table shows pension information under the Retirement Plan and the SERP for the NEOs as of December 31, 2021. The terms and conditions for participation in, and payments from, these plans are described on page 72 under Retirement Plan. The actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit is determined using the same assumptions used for financial reporting purposes except that retirement age is assumed to be the normal retirement age of 65, or the current age if eligible for early retirement. These assumptions in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Name

  Plan Name  Number
of Years
Credited
Service
(#)
  Present
Value  of
Accumulated
Benefit
($)
  

Payments  

During  

Last  

Calendar  

Year  

($)  

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

  Retirement Plan    20    1,254,492    --  
  SERP       10,041,761    --  

Russell D. Lawlar

  Retirement Plan    10    168,092    --  
  SERP       760    --  

Lauren M. Roberts

  Retirement Plan    10    159,249    --  
  SERP       514,335    --  

Robert D. Brown(1)

  Retirement Plan   

 

 

 

    N/A    N/A  
  SERP    6    461,447    --  

David C. Sienko

  Retirement Plan    11    535,898    --  
  SERP       452,893    --  

Lindsay A. Hall(1), (2)

  Retirement Plan   

 

 

 

    N/A    N/A  
  SERP    5    926,450    --  
(1)

As non-U.S. citizens, Mr. Hall and Mr. Brown are not participants in the KEDCP. He may not receiveRetirement Plan; however, they do participate in the shares until a “Distributable Event,” as defined under the KEDCP, and will not realize value until the shares are distributed to him.SERP.


66 www.hecla-mining.com(2)
125 Years

Mr. Hall retired in March 2021.




Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The table below provides information on the nonqualified deferred compensation of the NEOs in 2015.2021.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 201512021

NameExecutive Stock
Contributions in
Last FYE2
(#)
Registrant
Contributions in
Last FYE
($)
Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FYE
($)
Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
Aggregate
Balance of Stock at
Last FYE
(#)
  Phillips S. Baker, Jr.     299,488                    299,488  
James A. Sabala
Lawrence P. Radford
Dr. Dean W. A. McDonald3
David C. Sienko
Don Poirier3

Name

  Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
($)
 Registrant
Contributions in
Last FY
($)
 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last FY
($)
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
  

Aggregate  

Balance of  

Stock  

At Last FYE  

($)(1)  

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

    --   --   --    --    9,374,932  

Russell D. Lawlar

    --   --   --    --    --

Lauren M. Roberts

    292,603(2)    29,260(2)    --    --    1,770,201

Robert D. Brown(3)

    --   --   --    --    --

David C. Sienko

    --   --   --    --    --

Lindsay A. Hall(3), (4)

    --   --   --    --    --
1(1)No cash compensation was

Total amount of deferred by NEOs in 2015.

2Vested stock deferred intoshares held under the KEDCP as of December 31, 2021. The value shown in 2015.this column is the value of the total amount of shares held in the KEDCP multiplied by our closing stock price on the NYSE on December 31, 2021 ($5.22). The number of shares so held is as follows: Baker, 1,795,964 shares; and Roberts, 339,119 shares.

3(2)

Mr. Roberts deferred a portion of his 2021 base salary and his 2020 STIP cash award to the KEDCP. The total amount of compensation deferred to the KEDCP ($292,603) was credited to a stock account and converted to share units on a quarterly basis. The Company match in 2021 was $29,260 and was credited to Mr. Robert’s stock account and converted to share units. The deferred executive contribution cash amount is reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2021 on page 57 as part of Mr. Roberts total 2021 compensation. The total amount of shares held by Mr. Roberts under the KEDCP is reported in the Security Ownership of CertainBeneficial Owners and Management Table on page 75.

(3)

Canadian employees are not eligible to participate in our deferred compensation plan.

(4)

Mr. Hall retired in March 2021.

2022 Proxy Statement    65


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

Pursuant to the Company’s KEDCP, executives and key employees, including the NEOs, may defer all or a portion of their base salary, andcash or equity awards earned under the LTIP and AIP (including common stock),STIP, and any vested RSUs or vested PSUs granted under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan. Deferral elections are made by the individual generally in the year prior to the beginning of the plan year for amounts to be earned or granted in the following year. Base salary, AIPSTIP and LTIP amounts deferred under the KEDCP are credited to either an investment account or a stock account at the participant’s election. Amounts credited to an investment account are valued in cash, credited with deemed interest, and distributed with deemed interest in cash upon a distributable event. RSUs and other common stock awarded (PSUs) under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan and deferred by a participant are credited to a stock account. Amounts credited to the stock account of a participant are valued based upon our common stock and are delivered to the participant in shares of our common stock upon a distributable event.

The KEDCP also provides for corporate matching amounts where the participants elect to have their base salary, AIPSTIP or LTIP cash awards credited to a stock account. Matching contributions are also valued based on our common stock and distributed upon a distributable event in stock. The ability to defer compensation into a company stock account promotes alignment of the interests of participants with those of our common shareholders. It also provides for corporate discretionary allocations of amounts valued based upon our common stock and credited to a stock account.

As of the end of the last day of each calendar month, an additional amount is credited to the investment account of the participant equal to the product of (i) the average dailybalancedaily balance of the investment account for the month, multiplied by (ii) the annual prime rate for corporate borrowers quoted at the beginning of the quarter byThe Wall Street Journal(or (or such other comparable interest rate as the Compensation Committeecommittee may designate from time to time).

The amounts credited to the investment or stock account of a participant under the KEDCP are distributable or payable within 75 days of the earliest to occur of the following distribution events: (i) the date on which the participant separates from service with us, with the distribution delayed for six months for certain “specified employees”;employees;” (ii) “disability” as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; (iii) the participant’s death; (iv) a fixed date or fixed schedule selected by the participant at the time the deferral election was made; (v) an “unforeseeable emergency,” as defined in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; (vi) a “change in control” of the Company, as defined in regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service;Service under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code; and (vii) termination of the KEDCP.

The KEDCP is at all times considered to be entirely unfunded both for tax purposes and for purposes of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and no provision will at any time be made with respect to segregating our assets for the payment of any amounts under the KEDCP. Any funds that may be invested for purposes of fulfilling our promises under the KEDCP are for all purposes to be part of our general assets and available to general creditors in the event of a bankruptcy or insolvency of the Company. Nothing contained in the KEDCP will constitute a guarantee by us that any funds or assets will be sufficient to pay any benefit under the KEDCP.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement67



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control and Termination

We have a change in control agreement (“CIC Agreement”) with each of our NEOs (Messrs. Baker, Sabala, McDonald, Poirier, RadfordLawlar, Roberts, Brown and Sienko).

In March 2015, the Compensation Committee approved an amendment to each The CIC Agreement eliminatingfor Mr. Hall was terminated upon his retirement from the excise tax gross-up provision and adding a “Best Net After Tax Payment,” which reduces the amount received by the NEO upon a changeCompany in control if the NEO would receive a greater after-tax benefit than he would if full severance benefits were paid, taking into account all applicable taxes including any excise tax. SeePayments Made Upon a Change in Control on next page.March 2021.

The CIC Agreements provide that each of the NEOs shallwill serve in such executive position as the Board may direct. The CIC Agreements become effective only upon a change in control of the Company (the date of such change in control is referred to as the “Effective Date”). The term of employment under the CIC Agreements is threetwo years from the Effective Date (except for Mr. RadfordMessrs. Baker and Sienko, who haseach have a term of twothree years from the Effective Date). Any CIC Agreements entered into with newly hired executives will contain an employment term of two years from the Effective Date. The CIC Agreements automatically extend for an additional year on each anniversary date of the agreements unless we give notice of nonrenewal 60 days prior to the anniversary date. Under the CIC Agreements, a change in control is, with certain limitations, deemed to occur if: (i) an individual or entity (including a “group” under Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) becomes the beneficial owner of 20% or more of either the then outstanding shares of common stock of the Company or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; (ii) as the

66     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

result of a tender offer, merger, proxy fight or similar transaction, the persons who were previously directors of the Company cease to constitute a majority of the Board; (iii) consummation of the sale of all, or substantially all, of the assets of the Company (with certain limitations) occurs; or (iv) the approval of a plan of dissolution or liquidation.

The CIC Agreements are intended to ensure, among other things, that in the event of a change in control, each NEO will continue to focus on adding shareholder value. We seek to accomplish this by assuring that each NEO continues to receive payments and other benefits equivalent to those he was receivingbeing received at the time of a change in control for the duration of the employment term under of the CIC Agreement. The CIC AgreementsalsoAgreements also provide that should an NEO’s employment be terminated either (i) by the NEO for good reason, or (ii) by the Company (other than for cause or disability) after the Effective Date of the CIC Agreement, hethe NEO would receive from us a lump-sum defined amount generally equivalent to three times the aggregate of his thenthe annual base salary rate, the highest STIP and his highest annual incentivethe prorated LTIP during the three-year period, prior to the Effective Date. For Mr. RadfordMessrs. Lawlar, Roberts, and Brown, and any other CIC Agreements entered into hereafter, the lump-sum defined amount is generally equivalent to two times.

The NEOs would also be entitled to lump-sum payments representing the difference in pension and supplemental retirement benefits to which they would be entitled on (i) the date of actual termination, and (ii) the end of the three-year (or two-year where applicable) employment period under the CIC Agreements. We would also maintain such NEO’s participation in all benefit plans and programs (or provide equivalent benefits if such continued participation was not possible under the terms of such plans and programs).

AnA NEO whose employment has terminated would not be required to seek other employment in order to receive the defined benefits.

The following table starting on page 70 reflectssummarizes the circumstances under which our NEOs would receive severance benefits upon termination or a change in control.

Summary of Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Compensation

Element

Termination
Following a
Change in Control(1)
Termination due to
Death or Disability
Involuntary
Not
For Cause
or
Voluntary
Termination
For Cause
Termination
Retirement
  Base SalaryMessrs. Baker and Sienko receive three times their annual base salary. Messrs. Lawlar, Roberts, and Brown receive two times their annual base salary.N/AN/AN/AN/A
  STIPMessrs. Baker and Sienko receive three times the highest STIP paid in the last three years. Messrs. Lawlar, Roberts, and Brown receive two times the highest STIP paid in the last three years.N/AN/AN/AN/A

2022 Proxy Statement    67


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

Compensation

Element

Termination
Following a
Change in Control(1)
Termination due to
Death or Disability
Involuntary
Not
For Cause
or
Voluntary
Termination
For Cause
Termination
Retirement
  LTIPMessrs. Baker and Sienko receive three times the highest LTIP paid in the last three years. Messrs. Lawlar, Roberts, and Brown receive two times the highest LTIP paid in the last three years.Each NEO would receive a prorated portion of any LTIP plan in which the NEO was a participant. The surviving spouse or other beneficiary would receive the payment based on actual performance.N/AN/ATo qualify for vesting of long-term award benefits, the employee must retire under the Retirement Plan and be at least age: (i) 60 and have 15 or more years of service with the Company; (ii) 65 and have 7 or more years of service with the Company; or (iii) 68. If the participant meets these age and years of service requirements, their prorated portion for outstanding plan periods will be paid after the completion of those plan periods based on actual performance.
  RSUsAll unvested RSUs may vest upon a change in control.(2)All unvested RSUs would vest immediately as of the date of such disability or death and would be delivered to the NEO, spouse, or beneficiary.N/AN/AIf an employee retires before their RSUs have vested, they must meet certain requirements for their RSUs to continue to vest based on the applicable vesting schedule. To qualify for vesting of RSUs, the employee must retire under the Retirement Plan and be at least age: (i) 60 and have 15 or more years of service with the Company; (ii) 65 and have 7 or more years of service with the Company; or (iii) 68.
  PSUsAll unearned PSUs may immediately become earned and vested at 100% of target level as of the date of the change in control.(2)The TSR performance goal would be deemed achieved at 100% of target level as of the date of such disability or death and would be delivered to the NEO, spouse, or beneficiary.N/AN/ATo qualify for vesting of unearned PSUs, the employee must retire under the Retirement Plan and be at least age: (i) 60 and have 15 or more years of service with the Company; (ii) 65 and have 7 or more years of service with the Company; or (iii) 68.

68     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of Named Executive Officers

Compensation

Element

Termination
Following a
Change in Control(1)
Termination due to
Death or Disability
Involuntary
Not
For Cause
or
Voluntary
Termination
For Cause
Termination
Retirement
  Health and
  Welfare
  Benefits
Messrs. Baker and Sienko would receive three years of health and welfare benefits and disability and life insurance premiums would be paid for such three-year period. In addition to any earned, but unused vacation, they would be eligible for up to $20,000 in outplacement assistance and the 401(k) match would be deposited in their accounts. For Messrs. Lawlar, Roberts, and Brown, the same would apply, but for two years.Unused vacation and the 401(k) match would be deposited in their account.N/AN/AUnused vacation and the 401(k) match would be deposited in their accounts.

(1)

This means an involuntary termination without cause or voluntary termination for good reason within the stated period (three or two years) after the change in control.

(2)

Our 2010 Stock Plan provides for a double-trigger vesting.

The following tables reflect the amount of compensation payablethat would be paid to each of theour NEOs in the event of a termination of suchthe NEO’s employment under the terms of the NEO’s CIC Agreement. That table also shows the amount of compensation payable to each NEO upon voluntary termination; involuntary not for cause termination; for cause termination; termination following a change in control; andscenarios listed in the event of disability or death oftables and should be read in conjunction with the NEO.disclosure above. The amounts shown assume that such termination was effective as of December 31, 2015,2021 and thus include amounts earned through such time, and are estimates of the amounts whichthat would be paid out to each NEO upon such NEO’s termination. The tables only include additional benefits that result from the NEOs upon their termination.termination and do not include any amounts or benefits earned, vested, accrued, or owing under any plan for any other reason. Please see Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2021 on page 60, Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2021 on page 62, Pension Benefits table on page 65, and the section entitled Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for 2021 on page 65 for additional information. The actual amounts to be paid out can only be determined at the time of such NEO’s separation from Hecla.

Termination Payments and Benefits for Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

  Termination Following
a Change in Control
($)
   Disability
($)
   Death
($)
 

Base Salary(1)

  

 

2,100,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

STIP(2)

  

 

3,619,500

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Unvested RSUs(3)

  

 

1,168,878

 

  

 

1,168,878

 

  

 

1,168,878

 

Unearned PSUs(4)

  

 

1,020,327

 

  

 

1,020,327

 

  

 

1,020,327

 

LTIP

  

 

3,394,350

(5) 

  

 

749,997

(6) 

  

 

749,997

(6) 

Benefits & Perquisites:

      

Health and Welfare Benefits(7)

  

 

60,155

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Life Insurance Benefits(8)

  

 

12,148

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Outplacement

  

 

20,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  

 

11,395,358

 

  

 

2,939,202

 

  

 

2,939,202

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Payments Made Upon Termination2022 Proxy Statement. For voluntary and involuntary not for cause terminations, NEOs may receive: (i) a prorated portion    69


Compensation of short-term performance compensation; (ii) any amounts due under matured long-term performance compensation plans; (iii) one monthNamed Executive Officers

Termination Payments and Benefits for Russell D. Lawlar

  Termination Following
a Change in Control
($)
   Disability
($)
   Death
($)
 

Base Salary(1)

  

 

530,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

STIP(2)

  

 

371,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Unvested RSUs(3)

  

 

228,808

 

  

 

228,808

 

  

 

228,808

 

Unearned PSUs(4)

  

 

72,866

 

  

 

72,866

 

  

 

72,866

 

LTIP

  

 

80,400

(5) 

  

 

214,017

(6) 

  

 

214,017

(6) 

Benefits & Perquisites:

      

Health and Welfare Benefits(7)

  

 

45,090

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Life Insurance Benefits(8)

  

 

7,149

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Outplacement

  

 

20,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  

 

1,355,313

 

  

 

   515,691

 

  

 

   515,691

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Termination Payments and Benefits for Lauren M. Roberts

  Termination Following
a Change in Control
($)
   Disability
($)
   Death
($)
 

Base Salary(1)

  

 

760,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

STIP(2)

  

 

1,406,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Unvested RSUs(3)

  

 

602,237

 

  

 

602,237

 

  

 

602,237

 

Unearned PSUs(4)

  

 

357,784

 

  

 

357,784

 

  

 

357,784

 

LTIP

  

 

253,126

(5) 

  

 

360,000

(6) 

  

 

360,000

(6) 

Benefits & Perquisites:

      

Health and Welfare Benefits(7)

  

 

34,407

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Life Insurance Benefits(8)

  

 

8,099

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Outplacement

  

 

20,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  

 

3,441,653

 

  

 

1,320,021

 

  

 

1,320,021

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Termination Payments and Benefits for Robert D. Brown

  Termination Following
a Change in Control
($)
   Disability
($)
   Death
($)
 

Base Salary(1)

  

 

528,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

STIP(2)

  

 

475,200

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Unvested RSUs(3)

  

 

431,600

 

  

 

431,600

 

  

 

431,600

 

Unearned PSUs(4)

  

 

250,445

 

  

 

250,445

 

  

 

250,445

 

LTIP

  

 

595,500

(5) 

  

 

270,000

(6) 

  

 

270,000

(6) 

Benefits & Perquisites:

      

Health and Welfare Benefits(7)

  

 

6,444

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Life Insurance Benefits(8)

  

 

7,812

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Outplacement

  

 

20,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  

 

2,315,001

 

  

 

   952,045

 

  

 

   952,045

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

70     www.hecla-mining.com


Compensation of health and welfare benefits; and (iv) any earned, but unused vacation. Neither of these terminations would impact their vested retirement plans and the 401(k) match would be deposited in their accounts.Named Executive Officers

Termination Payments and Benefits for David C. Sienko

  Termination Following
a Change in Control
($)
   Disability
($)
   Death
($)
 

Base Salary(1)

  

 

795,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

STIP(2)

  

 

695,625

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Unvested RSUs(3)

  

 

413,492

 

  

 

413,492

 

  

 

413,492

 

Unearned PSUs(4)

  

 

238,517

 

  

 

238,517

 

  

 

238,517

 

LTIP

  

 

893,250

(5) 

  

 

270,000

(6) 

  

 

270,000

(6) 

Benefits & Perquisites:

      

Health and Welfare Benefits(7)

  

 

26,387

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Life Insurance Benefits(8)

  

 

10,723

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

Outplacement

  

 

20,000

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

--

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  

 

3,092,994

 

  

 

922,009

 

  

 

   922,009

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

68 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Payments Made Upon Retirement. The NEOs could receive a prorated portion of any short-term performance compensation and a prorated portion of any long-term compensation in effect at the time of their retirement. They would also receive one month of health and welfare benefits and any earned but unused vacation, and the 401(k) match would be deposited in their accounts. As of December 31, 2015, Mr. Baker was the only NEO that qualified for early or regular retirement from the Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan.

Payments Made Upon Death or Disability. Upon death or disability, the NEOs would receive a prorated portion of any short-term performance compensation, as well as a prorated portion of any long-term compensation plans in which the NEO was a participant. In both cases, retirement payments would be reduced in accordance with the terms of the plans and, in the case of death, the surviving spouse or other beneficiary would receive the payments. They would also receive one month of health and welfare benefits and any accrued, but unused vacation and the 401(k) match would be deposited in their accounts.

Payments Made Upon a Change in Control. If a change in control occurs as defined in the NEOs’ CIC Agreements, they would be eligible for a prorated portion of any short-term performance compensation and a prorated portion of any long-term performance compensation as though they had been employed for an additional three years. They would also receive three years of health and welfare benefits and disability and life insurance premiums would be paid for such three year period. In addition to any earned, but unused vacation, they would be eligible for up to $20,000 in outplacement assistance and the 401(k) match would be deposited in their accounts. Payment would be as if the NEO had been employed for an additional two years under the CIC Agreement with Mr. Radford and any other CIC Agreements entered into hereafter.

The CIC Agreements provide for specified payments and other benefits if the NEO’s employment is terminated either (i) by the NEO for good reason, or (ii) by Hecla or its successor other than for cause, death or disability, withinthe three years (two years for Mr. Radford) following a change in control, or prior to a change in control if it can be demonstrated that the termination was related to a potential change in control. These payments and benefits include the following:

(1)

all accrued obligations;

a lump-sum payment equal toRepresents three times the sum of the NEO’s then annual base salary and the NEO’s highest annual and long-term incentive payment for the three years prior to the change in control, with multiples of two years under the CIC Agreement with Mr. Radford and any other CIC Agreement entered into hereafter;

a lump-sum payment equal to the difference in the Retirement Plan and Supplemental Plan benefits to which the NEO would be entitled on (i) the date of actual termination, and (ii) three years later (two years later under the CIC Agreement with Mr. Radford and any other CIC Agreement entered into hereafter); and

for Messrs. Baker Sabala, McDonald, Sienko and Poirier, the continued participationSienko. Represents two times annual base salary for three years in all of Hecla’s benefits plansMessrs. Lawlar, Roberts, and programs to which the NEO would be entitled on the date of the change in control (or provision of equivalent benefits if such continued participation was not possible under the terms of such plans and programs), or two years in the case of Mr. Radford and any other CIC Agreement entered into hereafter.Brown.


In addition, the CIC Agreements, in conjunction with our equity compensation plans, provide for immediate vesting of all stock options and restricted stock awards in the event that, following a change in control, the NEO is terminated without cause or leaves for good reason (i.e., a “double trigger”). In such a situation, the LTIP would also pay out a prorated award based on target performance, regardless of actual performance. However, this payment directly offsets the cash severance payment by the same amount. These plan provisions are intended to recognize the value of the NEO’s long-term contribution to Hecla and to permit management decisions to be made without undo concern about possible termination following a change in control.


(2)
125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement69



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon Termination
Voluntary
Termination on

12/31/15
($)
Involuntary
Not For

Cause
Termination on
12/31/15
($)
For Cause
Termination on

12/31/15
($)
Termination
Following a

Change in
Control on
12/31/15
($)
Disability on
12/31/15

($)
Death on
12/31/15

($)
  Phillips S. Baker, Jr.                          
       Short-term Performance Compensation695,750695,7502,758,8001695,750695,750
       Stock Options 
       Restricted Stock685,713
       Long-term Performance Compensation1,072,5001,072,5001,072,5004,151,81422,022,5002,022,500
Benefits & Perquisites:
       Retirement Plans34,131,4414,131,4414,131,4416,862,3166,923,5614,579,218
       Deferred Compensation4566,032566,032566,032566,032566,032566,032
       Health and Welfare Benefits51,5131,5131,51354,4621,5131,513
       Disability Income6740,329
       Life Insurance Benefits711,103325,000
       Change in Control Payment81,815,000
       Earned Vacation Pay946,53646,53646,53646,53646,53646,536
       Outplacement20,000
              Total6,513,7726,513,7725,818,022  16,971,77610,996,2218,236,549
James A. Sabala
       Short-term Performance Compensation380,000380,0001,437,7501380,000380,000
       Stock Options
       Restricted Stock229,121
       Long-term Performance Compensation442,000442,000442,0001,610,4002782,000782,000
Benefits & Perquisites:
       Retirement Plans31,250,5321,250,5321,250,5322,245,5851,275,181899,095
       Health and Welfare Benefits51,0511,0511,05137,8331,0511,051
       Disability Income6418,489
       Life Insurance Benefits711,103325,000
       Change in Control Payment81,140,000
       Earned Vacation Pay921,92221,92221,92221,92221,92221,922
       Outplacement20,000
              Total2,095,5052,095,5051,715,5056,753,7142,878,6432,409,068
Lawrence P. Radford
       Short-term Performance Compensation500,000500,0001,000,0001500,000500,000
       Stock Options
       Restricted Stock501,041
       Long-term Performance Compensation390,000390,000390,000838,7502730,000730,000
Benefits & Perquisites:
       Retirement Plans3336,228336,228336,228497,606544,166355,787
       Health and Welfare Benefits51,5131,5131,51336,3081,5131,513
       Disability Income6779,908
       Life Insurance Benefits77,402325,000
       Change in Control Payment8760,000
       Earned Vacation Pay921,92221,92221,92221,92221,92221,922
       Outplacement20,000
              Total1,249,6631,249,663749,6633,683,0292,577,5091,934,222

70 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


Executive Benefits and
Payments Upon Termination
Voluntary
Termination on

12/31/15
($)
Involuntary
Not For

Cause
Termination on
12/31/15
($)
For Cause
Termination on

12/31/15
($)
Termination
Following a

Change in
Control on
12/31/15
($)
Disability on
12/31/15

($)
Death on
12/31/15

($)
  Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald                          
       Short-term Performance Compensation242,000242,000907,5001242,000242,000
       Stock Options
       Restricted Stock411,427
       Long-term Performance Compensation338,000338,000338,0001,258,1252598,000598,000
Benefits & Perquisites:
       Retirement Plans3990,271990,271990,2711,643,0211,186,681813,909
       Health and Welfare Benefits538838838813,968388388
       Disability Income6363,769
       Life Insurance Benefits77,674189,000
       Change in Control Payment8825,000
       Earned Vacation Pay915,86515,86515,86515,86515,86515,865
       Outplacement20,000
              Total1,586,5241,586,5241,344,524     5,102,5802,406,7031,859,162
David C. Sienko 
       Short-term Performance Compensation150,000150,000675,0001150,000150,000
       Stock Options
       Restricted Stock211,202
       Long-term Performance Compensation247,000247,000247,000956,1752437,000437,000
Benefits & Perquisites:
       Retirement Plans3252,798252,798252,798380,971702,777423,004
       Health and Welfare Benefits544744744716,097447447
       Disability Income6952,799
       Life Insurance Benefits79,531251,000
       Change in Control Payment8750,000
       Earned Vacation Pay914,42314,42314,42314,42314,42314,423
       Outplacement20,000
              Total664,668664,668514,6683,033,3992,257,4461,275,874
Don Poirier*
       Short-term Performance Compensation135,000135,000488,1601135,000135,000
       Stock Options
       Restricted Stock274,284
       Long-term Performance Compensation266,500266,500266,5001,006,5002471,500471,500
Benefits & Perquisites:
       Retirement Plans3710,480710,480710,4801,183,558992,656664,225
       Health and Welfare Benefits538838838813,968388388
       Disability Income6425,116
       Life Insurance Benefits78,500226,000
       Change in Control Payment8678,000
       Earned Vacation Pay913,03813,03813,03813,03813,03813,038
       Outplacement20,000
              Total1,125,4061,125,406990,4063,686,0082,037,6981,510,151

*Mr. Poirier departed the Company at the end of 2015.
1Represents three times the highest annual incentiveSTIP payment paid in the last three years for Messrs. Baker Sabala, McDonald, Sienko and Poirier.Sienko. Represents two times the highest annual incentiveSTIP payment paid in the last three years to Messrs. Roberts and Brown. Represents two times the 2021 STIP payment paid to Mr. Lawlar.

(3)

In the event of a qualifying termination following a change in control, any unvested RSUs will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of the change in control termination. In the event of termination by reason of disability or death, the unvested RSUs will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of disability or death. The value is based on the closing price of Hecla’s common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021 ($5.22). Please see the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2021 table on page 62 for more information.

(4)

For unearned PSUs, the values included in the table are based on the number of unearned PSUs that would have vested if termination occurred on the last business day of 2021, assuming target performance (195,465 shares for Mr. Radford.Baker, 13,959 shares for Mr. Lawlar, 68,541 shares for Mr. Roberts, 47,978 shares for Mr. Brown, and 45,693 shares for Mr. Sienko), multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021 ($5.22). In the event of a change in control, any unearned performance-based shares will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of the change in control. In the event of termination by reason of disability or death, the unearned performance-based shares will become immediately earned and vested as of the date of disability or death. The totals listed in the disability and death columns are based on the number of performance-based shares that would have vested if disability or death would have occurred on the last business day of 2021 assuming target performance for each of the NEOs, multiplied by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021 ($5.22).

2(5)

Represents three times the highest long-term incentiveLTIP payment paid in the last three years for Messrs. Baker Sabala, McDonald, Sienko and Poirier.Sienko. Represents two times the highest long-term incentiveLTIP payment paid in the last three years for Messrs. Roberts and Brown. Represents two times the highest LTIP payment paid to Mr. Radford.Lawlar for the 2018-2020 LTIP plan period.

3(6)

Represents the prorated portion of outstanding LTIP plans for 2020-2022 and 2021-2023.

(7)

Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of qualified and nonqualified retirement plans to which the NEO would be entitled. Mr. Baker is the only NEO that qualified for early or regular retirement on December 31, 2015, under our retirement plan.



125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement71



Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS



4Reflects the lump-sum present value of shares held in Mr. Baker’s stock account under our KEDCP, based on the Company’s closing stock price on the NYSE on December 31, 2015 ($1.89).
5Reflects the estimated lump-sum value of all future premiums, which will continue to be paid by the Company on behalf of Messrs. Baker Sabala, McDonald,and Sienko and Poirier under our health and welfare benefit plans for three years upon a termination following a change in control and for one month otherwise.control. Reflects the estimated lump-sum value of all future premiums, which will continue to be paid by the Company on behalf of Mr. RadfordMessrs. Lawlar, Roberts and Brown under our health and welfare benefit plans for two years upon a termination following a change in control and for one month otherwise.control.

6(8)

Reflects the estimated lump-sum present value of all future payments which the NEO would be entitled to receive under our disability program.

7Reflects the estimated lump-sum value of the cost of coverage for life insurance provided by us to the NEO; provided, however, that the amount reflected under the heading “Death” reflects the estimated present value of the proceeds payable to the NEO’s beneficiaries upon his death.
8Represents three times annual base salary for Messrs. Baker, Sabala, McDonald, Sienko and Poirier. Represents two times annual base salary for Mr. Radford.
9Represents lump-sum payment of earned vacation time accrued.
each NEO.

72 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



TableCEO Pay Ratio

We believe our executive compensation program should be internally consistent and equitable to motivate our employees to create shareholder value. Our committee strives to design a fair and competitive compensation program that will attract, motivate, and retain employees, reward performance, and provide incentives based on our performance. As required by SEC rules, the committee reviewed a comparison of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

AsCEO pay to the pay of our “median employee.” The median employee was determined from a review of our employees as of December 31, 2015,2021. In this review, we applied the Company has three equity incentiveaverage 2021 U.S. Dollar exchange rate, as reported by Bloomberg, to the Canadian Dollar. We determined our median employee by ranking employees from highest to lowest, excluding our CEO, based on W-2 earnings statement or comparable annual earnings statement for non-U.S. employees.

The total compensation plans that have been approved byfor the shareholders under which sharesmedian employee was calculated in the same manner as our CEO.

For 2021, the annual total compensation of our CEO was $4,740,576, and the Company’scommon stock have been authorized for issuanceannual total compensation of our median employee was $108,760. The ratio of CEO pay to directors, officers, employees, and consultants. All outstanding awards relatethe pay of our median employee was 44 to our Common Stock.1.

Number of Securities To
Be Issued Upon
Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available For
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders:
     2010 Stock Incentive PlanN/A11,975,936
     Stock Plan for Nonemployee DirectorsN/A506,921
     Key Employee Deferred Compensation PlanN/A638,911
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by
Security Holders
Total13,121,768


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement73



Table of Contents

OTHER BENEFITS

2022 Proxy Statement    71


OTHER BENEFITS

Retirement Plan

OurExcept for our NEOs who are Canadian citizens, our NEOs participate in the Hecla Mining Company Qualified Retirement Plan, (the “Retirement Plan”), which covers substantially all of ouris a defined benefit plan. Canadian NEOs participate in Canada’s public retirement income system, which includes the following components: (i) the Canada (or Quebec) Pension Plan, which is a contributory, earnings-related social insurance program, and (ii) the Old Age Security program. In addition, the Registered Retirement Savings Plan is a tax-deferred individual savings plan available to Canadian employees. Mexican employees except for certain hourly employees who are coveredparticipate in Mexico’s public retirement income system, which is based on contributions the employee, employer and the government submit to the retirement savings system. The system is administered through savings accounts managed by separate plans. private fund managers selected by the participant.

Contributions to the Retirement Plan, and the related expense or income, are based on general actuarial calculations and, accordingly, no portion of our contributions, and related expenses or income, is specifically attributable to our officers. We also have an unfunded Supplemental Excess Retirement Plan adopted in November 1985 (the “SERP”)the SERP under which the amount of any benefits not payable under the Retirement Plan by reason of the limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code and/or the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended (the “Acts”), and the loss, if any, due to a deferral of salary made under our KEDCP and/or our 401(k) Plan will be paid out of our general funds to any employee covered by the SERP who may be adversely affected. Under the Acts, the current maximum annual pension benefit payable by the Retirement Plan to any employee is $210,000,$230,000 (for 2021), subject to specified adjustments, and is calculated using earnings not in excess of $265,000.more than $290,000. Upon reaching the normal retirement age of 65, each participant is eligible to receive annual retirement benefits in monthly installments for life equal to, for each year of credited service, 1% of final average annual earnings (defined as the highestaveragehighest average earnings of such employee for any 36 consecutive calendar months for participants hired on or before June 30, 2013, and as the highest average earnings of such employee for any 60 consecutive calendar months, for participants hired after June 30, 2013, during the final 120 calendar months of service) up to the applicable covered compensation level (which level is based on the Social Security maximum taxable wage base) and 1.75% of the difference, if any, between final average annual earnings and the applicable covered compensation level. The Retirement Plan and SERP define earnings for purposes of the plans to be “a wage or salary for services of employees inclusive of any bonus or special pay including gain-sharing programs, contract miners’ bonus pay and the equivalent,” except that on or after July 1, 2013, earnings are defined as “base salary or wages for personal services and elective deferrals plus (i) elective deferrals not includable in the gross income of the Employeeemployee under Code Sections 125, 132(f)(4), 402(e)(3), 402(h), 403(b) and 457, (ii) one-half (1/2) of any performance basedperformance-based or annual incentiveSTIP bonus, (iii) one-half (1/2) of any safety incentive award, (iv) paid time off, other than pay while on disability leave, (v) any post-employment payment for services performed during the course of employment that would have been paid to the Employeeemployee prior to the severance from employment if the Employeeemployee had continued in employment with an Employer,Hecla, and (vi) compensation for overtime at the Employee’semployee’s regular rate of pay.”

74 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years

72     www.hecla-mining.com



Table of ContentsOther Benefits

OTHER BENEFITS

The following table shows estimated aggregate annual benefits under our Retirement Plan and the SERP payable upon retirement to a participant who retires in 20152021 at age 65 having the years of service and final average annual earnings as specified. The table assumes Social Security covered compensation levels as in effect on January 1, 2015.2021.

Estimated Annual Retirement Benefits

Final AverageYears of Credited Service
   Annual Earnings     5     10     15     20     25     30     35   
 $100,000$5,931$11,862$17,792$23,723$29,654$35,585$41,515
150,00010,30620,61230,91741,22351,52961,83572,140
200,00014,68129,36244,04258,72373,40488,085102,765
250,00019,05638,11257,16776,22395,279114,335133,390
 300,00023,43146,86270,29293,723117,154140,585 164,015 
350,00027,80655,61283,417111,223139,029166,835194,640
400,00032,18164,36296,542128,723160,904193,085225,265
450,00036,55673,112109,667 146,223182,779219,335255,890
500,00040,931 81,862122,792163,723204,654 245,585286,515
550,000 45,30690,612135,917181,223226,529271,835317,140
600,00049,68199,362149,042198,723248,404298,085347,765
650,00054,056108,112 162,167216,223270,279324,335378,390
700,00058,431116,862175,292233,723 292,154350,585409,015
750,00062,806125,612188,417251,223314,029376,835439,640
800,00067,181134,362201,542268,723335,904403,085470,265
850,00071,556143,112214,667286,223357,779429,335500,890
900,00075,931151,862227,792303,723379,654455,585531,515
950,00080,306160,612240,917321,223401,529481,835562,140
1,000,00084,681169,362254,042338,723423,404508,085592,765

Final Average

Annual Earnings

  Years of Credited Service 
  5   10   15   20   25   30   35 

$  100,000

  

$

5,204

 

  

$

10,408

 

  

$

15,612

 

  

$

20,816

 

  

$

26,020

 

  

$

31,224

 

  

$

36,428

 

    150,000

  

 

9,579

 

  

 

19,158

 

  

 

28,737

 

  

 

38,316

 

  

 

47,895

 

  

 

57,474

 

  

 

67,053

 

    200,000

  

 

13,954

 

  

 

27,908

 

  

 

41,862

 

  

 

55,816

 

  

 

69,770

 

  

 

83,724

 

  

 

97,678

 

    250,000

  

 

18,329

 

  

 

36,658

 

  

 

54,987

 

  

 

73,316

 

  

 

91,645

 

  

 

109,974

 

  

 

128,303

 

    300,000

  

 

22,704

 

  

 

45,408

 

  

 

68,112

 

  

 

90,816

 

  

 

113,520

 

  

 

136,224

 

  

 

158,928

 

    350,000

  

 

27,079

 

  

 

54,158

 

  

 

81,237

 

  

 

108,316

 

  

 

135,395

 

  

 

162,474

 

  

 

189,553

 

    400,000

  

 

31,454

 

  

 

62,908

 

  

 

94,362

 

  

 

125,816

 

  

 

157,270

 

  

 

188,724

 

  

 

220,178

 

    450,000

  

 

35,829

 

  

 

71,658

 

  

 

107,487

 

  

 

143,316

 

  

 

179,145

 

  

 

214,974

 

  

 

250,803

 

    500,000

  

 

40,204

 

  

 

80,408

 

  

 

120,612

 

  

 

160,816

 

  

 

201,020

 

  

 

241,224

 

  

 

281,428

 

    550,000

  

 

44,579

 

  

 

89,158

 

  

 

133,737

 

  

 

178,316

 

  

 

222,895

 

  

 

267,474

 

  

 

312,053

 

    600,000

  

 

48,954

 

  

 

97,908

 

  

 

146,862

 

  

 

195,816

 

  

 

244,770

 

  

 

293,724

 

  

 

342,678

 

    650,000

  

 

53,329

 

  

 

106,658

 

  

 

159,987

 

  

 

213,316

 

  

 

266,645

 

  

 

319,974

 

  

 

373,303

 

    700,000

  

 

57,704

 

  

 

115,408

 

  

 

173,112

 

  

 

230,816

 

  

 

288,520

 

  

 

346,224

 

  

 

403,928

 

    750,000

  

 

62,079

 

  

 

124,158

 

  

 

186,237

 

  

 

248,316

 

  

 

310,395

 

  

 

372,474

 

  

 

434,553

 

    800,000

  

 

66,454

 

  

 

132,908

 

  

 

199,362

 

  

 

265,816

 

  

 

332,270

 

  

 

398,724

 

  

 

465,178

 

    850,000

  

 

70,829

 

  

 

141,658

 

  

 

212,487

 

  

 

283,316

 

  

 

354,145

 

  

 

424,974

 

  

 

495,803

 

    900,000

  

 

75,204

 

  

 

150,408

 

  

 

225,612

 

  

 

300,816

 

  

 

376,020

 

  

 

451,224

 

  

 

526,428

 

    950,000

  

 

79,579

 

  

 

159,158

 

  

 

238,737

 

  

 

318,316

 

  

 

397,895

 

  

 

477,474

 

  

 

557,053

 

  1,000,000

  

 

83,954

 

  

 

167,908

 

  

 

251,862

 

  

 

335,816

 

  

 

419,770

 

  

 

503,724

 

  

 

587,678

 

Benefits listed in the pension table are not subject to any deduction for Social Security or other offset amounts. As of December 31, 2015,2021, the following executive officers have completed the indicated number of full years of credited service: P.Mr. Baker, 1420 years; J. Sabala, 7Mr. Lawlar, 10 years; L. Radford, 4Mr. Roberts, 10 years; D. McDonald, 9Mr. Brown, 6 years; D.Mr. Sienko, 511 years; and D. Poirier, 8Mr. Hall, 5 years.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement75

2022 Proxy Statement    73



OTHER MATTERS

TableCertain Relationships and Related Transactions

On a quarterly basis, we review all relationships and transactions with related persons to determine whether such persons have a direct or indirect material interest. Transactions with related persons are those that involve our directors, executive officers, director nominees, greater than 5% shareholders, immediate family members of Contents

OTHER BENEFITS

Pension Benefits

The following table shows pensionthese persons, or entities in which one of these persons has a direct or indirect material interest. Transactions that are reviewed as related party transactions by us are transactions that involve amounts that would exceed $120,000 (the current threshold required to be disclosed in the Proxy Statement under SEC regulations) and certain other transactions. Pursuant to our Code of Conduct, employees and directors have a duty to report any potential conflicts of interest to the appropriate level of management or to the Governance Committee. Our Board and NEOs respond to a quarterly related party transaction questionnaire prepared by our corporate legal department. We then evaluate these quarterly reports along with responses to our annual director and officer questionnaires for any indication of possible related party transactions. Our legal staff is primarily responsible for the development and implementation of processes and controls to obtain information from the directors and executive officers with respect to related party transactions. If a transaction is deemed by us to be a related party transaction, the information regarding the transaction is discussed with the Board. As required under the SEC rules, transactions that are determined to be directly or indirectly material to Hecla Miningor a related party are disclosed in our Proxy Statement.

In December 2007, we created the Hecla Charitable Foundation (the “HCF”), which has provided and intends to continue to provide grants to other organizations for charitable and educational purposes. Mr. Phillips S. Baker, Jr., our CEO, serves as a director of the HCF, and Russell D. Lawlar, our Sr. Vice President and CFO, serves as Vice President of the HCF. In December 2007, our Board approved a contribution of 550,000 shares of our common stock to the HCF. Since 2007, the HCF sold the 550,000 shares of our common stock. In May 2020, our Board approved a contribution of 650,000 shares of our common stock to the HCF. Cash contributions totaling $2.0 million and $1.5 million were made by the Company Retirement Planto the HCF during 2011 and 2010, respectively. The funds from the sale of the shares and the SERP for the NEOsadditional cash were put into various investment accounts. The HCF is currently operating in a self-sufficient manner. The HCF holds 160,000 shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2015.2021. The terms and conditions for participation in, and payments from, these plans are described above under “Retirement Plan.” The actuarial present value of accumulated benefit isdetermined using the same assumptions used for financial reporting purposes except that retirement age is assumed to be the normal retirement age of 65, or the current age if eligible for early retirement. These assumptions are described in the pension footnotes to our financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

   Name      Plan Name      Number of Years
Credited Service
(#)
      Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit
($)
      Payments During
Last Calendar Year
($)
   
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.Hecla Mining Company Retirement Plan14415,383 
Hecla Mining Company Supplemental Excess
  Retirement Plan3,716,058
James A. SabalaHecla Mining Company Retirement Plan7316,695
Hecla Mining Company Supplemental Excess 
Retirement Plan933,837
Lawrence P. RadfordHecla Mining Company Retirement Plan4125,114
Hecla Mining Company Supplemental Excess  
Retirement Plan 211,114
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonaldHecla Mining Company Retirement Plan9341,029
Hecla Mining Company Supplemental Excess
Retirement Plan649,242
David C. SienkoHecla Mining Company Retirement Plan5121,159
Hecla Mining Company Supplemental Excess
Retirement Plan131,639
Don PoirierHecla Mining Company Retirement Plan8280,758
Hecla Mining Company Supplemental Excess
Retirement Plan429,722

76 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 5 – APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

PROPOSAL 5 – APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION

Our Board, pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, seeks your vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs as set forth under the headingCompensation Discussion and Analysis on page 34 and in the accompanying compensation tables on page 62, and related material. The Board believes strongly that the Company’s current executive compensation program is right for the Company and our shareholders at the current time. The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, and motivate talented individuals who possess the executive experience and the leadership skills needed by the Company in order to maintain and increase shareholder value. The Company seeks to provide executive compensation that is competitive with that provided by companies in our peer group within the mining industry. The Company also seeks to provide both near-term and long-term financial incentives to our executives that reward them for good performance and achieving financial results and strategic objectives that are expected to contribute to increased long-term shareholder value.

Underlying these incentives is a strong philosophy of “pay-for-performance” that forms the foundation of decisions regarding the compensation of our NEOs. This compensation philosophy, which has been consistent over many years, is designed to align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of our shareholders and is central to our ability to attract, retain and motivate executive leaders to guide the Company through market challenges over the long-term.

The Company has demonstrated consistent strong financial performance both in the short-term and in the long-term. The Company believes that its NEOs have contributed significantly to these achievements. Their tenure with the Company ranges from 5 years to 14 years, providing the Company with consistent, steady and experienced leadership that has been able to guide the Company to consistent strong financial performance over multi-year periods.

The Board strongly believes in the effectiveness and appropriateness for the Company of its executive compensation program. We believe this confidence is shared by our shareholders, as evidenced by the favorable vote of 83% of our shareholdersthose shares based on the similar proposal presented at last year’s annual meeting. Our compensation practices did not change materially from calendar year 2014 to calendar year 2015 and the Board hopes that our shareholders will continue to believe in the effectiveness and appropriateness of our executive compensation program, and will express that belief through a favorable vote on this proposal at this Annual Meeting.

The vote is advisory and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or the Board. However, the Board and the Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the NEO compensation as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, the Compensation Committee will carefully review and consider the voting results when evaluating our executive compensation program.

We are asking shareholders to approve the following resolution at the 2016 Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Summary Compensation Table for 2015, and the related compensation tables and narrative in the Proxy Statement for the Company’s 2016 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, is hereby APPROVED.”

The Board recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the compensation of our named executive officers.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement77



Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Guidelines and Timing of Equity Awards. We have no program, plan or practice to time the grant of stock-based awards relative to the release of material non-public information or other corporate events. All equity grants to executive officers are approved by the Compensation Committee at regularly scheduled meetings or, in limited cases involving key recruits or promotions, by a special meeting or unanimous written consent. The grant date is the meeting date or a fixed, future date specified at the time of the grant. Under the terms of our 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, the fair market value is the closing stock price of our common stock on the NYSE on December 31, 2021 ($5.22), was $835,200.

In 2021, we did not make any contribution to any charitable organization, of which a director served as an executive officer, which exceeded the dategreater of grant. In addition,$1 million or 2% of the Compensation Committee typically makes equity grantscharitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues.

Political Contributions and Engagement

Government policy is one of the most powerful external forces affecting us today. New laws and changes to NEOsexisting laws can fundamentally impact the Company’s operations and the markets where it does business – and in turn, our bottom line, thereby affecting us and our employees, retirees, communities, and shareholders. It is important for government leaders to understand the impact of such actions. Because the impact of government policy is so critical to our survival and success, we participate in the first half of the year.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In an effort to more closely alignpolitical process and advocate in a responsible and constructive manner on issues that advance the Company’s non-management directors’ financial interests with thosegoals and protect shareholder value. We are committed to the highest standard of the shareholders,ethical conduct in June 2012, the Compensation Committeeour involvement in policymaking and Board adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-management directors. Under these guidelines, each non-management director is encouraged to own shares of common stock (which includes shares held underpolitical process. We maintain the Hecla Mining Company Stock PlanPolitical Action Committee (“Hecla PAC”), which is a forum for Nonemployee Directorsour employees and directors to voluntarily contribute to a fund that supports the election of candidates to Congress that support a regulatory and legislative environment constructive to the operation and development of our mines. The Hecla PAC is organized under the provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 and the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan) valued at three times their annual cash retaineramendments of 1974, 1976 and should comply1979. Decisions about contributions to specific federal candidates are made by members of the Hecla PAC. In total, our employees contributed approximately $17,217 to the Hecla PAC in 2021, and our directors contributed $12,500 in 2021. The Hecla PAC then contributed those funds to federal candidates, state and local parties, and associations who are advocates for the natural resources industry. We file all required Hecla PAC contribution reports with the guidelines within five yearsFederal Election Commission.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports

Section 16(a) of the adoption of the guidelines. AnyExchange Act requires our directors, appointed or elected after June 2012 are expected to achieve their expected value requirement within five years of their appointment or election to the Board.

In the event a non-management director’s cash retainer increases, he or she will have three years from the date of the increase to acquire any additional shares needed to meet these guidelines.

Similarly, we believe that it is important to encourage our executive officers, to hold a material amountand holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC reports regarding their ownership and to linkchanges in their long-term economic interest directly to thatownership of our shareholders. To achieve this goal, in June 2012,

74     www.hecla-mining.com


Other Matters

common stock. These persons are required by the Compensation Committee and Board established stock ownership guidelines for the Company’s senior management. The guidelines for the CEO are six times base salary, which should be achieved within five years of the adoption of the guidelines. The guidelines for all other executive officers are two times base salary, which should be achieved within five years of the adoption of the guidelines. Unvested shares of restricted stock units and shares held directly are considered owned for purposes of the guidelines. Any executive officer employed after June 2012 is requiredSEC to achieve his or her expected value requirement within five years of the date that the executive officer assumes his or her position. If an NEO becomes subject to a greater ownership amount due to a promotion or an increase in base salary, the NEO is expected to meet the higher ownership threshold within three years.

Because of fluctuations in the Company’s stock price, in February 2016, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Directors amended the stock ownership guidelines to provide a valuation methodology that consists of valuing the shares held by using the average closing price of the Company’s common stock on the NYSE for the previous calendar year. Because share pricesfurnish us with copies of all companies are subjectSection 16(a) forms they file. The SEC has designated specific due dates for these reports, and we must identify in this Proxy Statement those persons who did not file these reports when due. To our knowledge, and based solely on our review of copies of such forms, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no such forms were required, we believe that during the calendar year ended December 31, 2021, all filing requirements applicable to market volatility, the Board believes that it would be unfair to require an executive or Board member to buy more shares simply because Hecla’s stock price drops. In the event there is a significant decline in Hecla’s stock price that causes an executive’s or Board member’s holdings to fall below the applicable threshold, the executives or Board members will not be required to purchase additional shares to meet the threshold, but they generally may not sell or transfer any shares until the threshold has again been achieved. The stock ownership guidelines also provide that if any executive or Board member falls below their required holdings, they shall have three years to achieve the required ownership level.

The following tables summarize the non-managementour officers, directors and NEO’s stock ownership guidelines and their status as of December 31, 2015, based on the average closing pricegreater than 10% owners of our common stock were timely satisfied, with the exception of Mr. Baker filing a late Form 4 on March 3, 2021 to report shares sold by him on February 24, 2021. The late filing was due to Mr. Baker’s stock brokerage firm not communicating that they had sold the NYSE for calendar year 2015 ($2.6071). As of December 31, 2015, all NEOs metshares in a timely manner.

Shareholder proposals to be included in next year’s Proxy Statement

We will comply with Rule 14a-8 under the guidelines. In the calculations forExchange Act with respect to any shareholder proposals that meet that rule’s requirements. We will review shareholder proposals intended to be included in our NEOs, we include shares directly held and unvested RSUs. We do not include unexercised stock options or performance-based shares.

In June 2014, the Compensation Committee recommended and the Board approved increases to cash retainersProxy Statement for the Chairman2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which are received by us at our principal executive offices located at 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, no later than December 7, 2022. Such proposals must be submitted in writing and should be sent to the attention of our Corporate Secretary.

You may contact the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the Board,relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making shareholder proposals and for each chair of the committees. Due to these increases in 2014, Mr. Crumley has until June 2017 to comply with the stock ownership guidelines.

78 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Non-Management Director Stock Ownership as of December 31, 2015

    Director      Annual
Retainer
($)
      X
Annual
Retainer
      Total Value
of Shares to
be Held
($)
      Shares
Held
Directly
(#)
      Shares
Held in
Directors
Trust1
(#)
      Total
Shares
(#)
      Total Value of
Shares Held by
Director
($2.6071)
($)2
      Meets
Guidelines
    
 Bowles*66,0003x 198,00088,26348,233136,496355,859 Yes
Crumley156,0003x468,000 99,26374,349173,612452,624No 
Nethercutt 66,000 3x198,00083.263 49,648 132,911 346,512Yes
Rogers66,0003x198,00083,26343,396126,659330,213Yes
Stanley66,0003x198,00083,26343,396126,659330,213Yes
Taylor66,0003x198,00056,648367,810124,458324,474Yes

*Mr. Bowles passed away on December 2, 2015.
1As of December 31, 2015, the total amount of shares held in trust pursuant to the terms of the Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors by each of the above-named directors.
2The value of shares held is determined by using the average closing price of the Company’s common stock for the previous calendar year on the NYSE, which for 2015 was $2.6071.
3Includes 2,500 shares held in an IRA by Dr. Taylor.

Executive Stock Ownership as of December 31, 2015

    NEO      Annual
Base
Salary
($)
      X
Annual
Base
Salary
      Total Value
of Shares
to be Held
($)
      Shares
Held
Directly
(#)
      Unvested
RSUs
(#)
      Total
Shares
(#)
      Total Value of
Shares Held
by NEO at
12/31/15
($2.6071)1
($)
      Meets
Guidelines
    
Baker 605,000 6x3,630,000 1,925,770362,8112,288,5815,966,560Yes
Sabala380,0002x760,000261,472250,338511,8101,334,340 Yes
Radford380,0002x760,000255,371 265,101 520,4721,356,923Yes
McDonald275,0002x550,000276,103217,686493,7891,287,357Yes
Sienko250,0002x500,000167,788111,747279,535728,776Yes
Poirier226,0002x452,000210,644145,124355,768927,523Yes

1Average closing price of Hecla’s common stock on the NYSE for calendar year 2015.

Additional information regarding shares held by the non-management directors and our NEOs is included in theSecurity Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management table on the following page.nominating director candidates.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table shows the number and percentage of the shares of common stock beneficially owned by each current director and each named executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table for 2021 beneficially owned as of Hecla, andMarch 28, 2022, our record date for the Annual Meeting, as well as the number owned by all current directors and executive officers as a group, as of March 23, 2016.group. On thatthe record date, all of such persons together beneficially owned an aggregate of lessthan one percent1.6% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Except as otherwise indicated, the directors, nominees and officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares listed, including shares which the individual has the right to acquire, by exercising stock options but has not done so.


125 Years
 2016 Proxy StatementTitle of
Class
79Shares Beneficially OwnedPercent of
Class

Name of Beneficial Owner

NumberNature

Phillips S. Baker, Jr.

President and CEO

2,620,520(1)Direct(2)
46,787401(k) Plan  
223,923RSU(3)
1,795,964Deferred(4)
195,465PSU(5)

Common4,882,659*    

Robert D. Brown

266,941Direct(2)

Vice President – Corporate Development & Sustainability


– –

82,682


401(k) Plan  

RSU(3)

47,978PSU(5)

Common397,601*    

Russell D. Lawlar

Sr. Vice President and CFO

9,200Direct(2)
4,243401(k) Plan  
43,833RSU(3)
13,959PSU(5)

Common71,235*    

Lauren M. Roberts

Sr. Vice President and COO

207,208Direct(2)
5,591401(k) Plan  
115,371RSU(3)
339,119Deferred(4)
68,541PSU(5)

Common735,830*    

2022 Proxy Statement    75



Table of ContentsOther Matters

   Title of
Class
  Shares Beneficially Owned Percent of
Class
 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 Number   Nature

David C. Sienko

Vice President and General Counsel

   654,902   Direct(2) 
   3,780   401(k) Plan   
   79,213   RSU(3) 
   45,693   PSU(5) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   783,588     *     

Catherine J. Boggs

Director

   104,678   Direct(2) 
   106,046   Indirect(6) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   210,724     *     

Ted Crumley

Director

   76,536   Direct(2) 
   250,056   Indirect(6) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   326,592     *     

George R. Johnson

Director

   17,273   Direct(2) 
   177,717   Indirect(6) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   194,990     *     

Stephen F. Ralbovsky

Director

   6,123   Direct(2) 
   177,717   Indirect(6) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   183,840     *     

Terry V. Rogers

Director

   36,117   Direct(2) 
   138,119   Indirect(6) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   174,236     *     

Charles B. Stanley

Director

   --   Direct(2) 
   219,103   Indirect(6) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   219,103     *     

Alice Wong

Director

   --   Direct(2) 
   29,625   Indirect(6) 
  

 

 

    
  Common   29,625     *     

All current directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group (15 individuals)

  Common   8,433,039     1.6
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION


Shares Beneficially Owned
Name of Beneficial
Owner
Title of ClassNumberNaturePercent of
Class
Phillips S. Baker, Jr.          1,862,4591     Direct2     
  President and CEO362,811RSU3  
 674,117Deferred Shares4
356,433Performance-based Shares5
Common3,255,820*
Dr. Dean W.A. McDonald340,370Direct2
Senior Vice President – Exploration217,686RSU3
Common558,056*
Don Poirier295,708Direct2
Former Vice President – Corporate Development145,124RSU3
Common440,832*
Lawrence P. Radford377,650Direct2
Senior Vice President – Operations265,101RSU3
Common642,751*
James A. Sabala374,3426Direct2
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer250,338RSU3
Common624,680*
 David C. Sienko221,369Direct2
Vice President and General Counsel111,747RSU3
Common333,116*
Ted Crumley99,263Direct2
Director74,349Indirect7
Common173,612*
George R. Johnson
DirectorCommon2,010Indirect7*
Stephen F. Ralbovsky
DirectorCommon2,010Indirect7*
George R. Nethercutt, Jr.83,263Direct2
Director49,648Indirect7
Common132,911*
Terry V. Rogers83,263Direct2
Director43,396Indirect7
Common126,659*
Charles B. Stanley83,263Direct2
Director43,396Indirect7
Common126,659*
Dr. Anthony P. Taylor54,148Direct2
Director2,500IRA
67,810Indirect7
Common124,458*
All current directors, nominee directors and officers as a group
(15 individuals)Common6,754,6171.8%

*

Represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent, based upon 380,842,223538,906,433 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of March 23, 2016.28, 2022.

1(1)

Includes 223,6422,443,767 shares held jointly with Mr. Baker’s spouse, as to which Mr. Baker shares voting and investment power.

2(2)

“Direct” means shares held of record and any shares beneficially owned through a trust, broker, financial institution, or other nominee, and with respect to which the officer or director has sole or shared voting power.

3(3)

“RSU” means restricted stock units awarded under the KEDCP or 2010 Stock Incentive Plan that have not vested. See footnote 1 of theOutstanding Equity Awardsat Calendar Fiscal Year-End for 20152021 on page 65.62.

4(4)

“Deferred Shares” means stock that has vested or been awarded but is deferred until a distributable event under the terms of the KEDCP. See Nonqualified Deferred Compensationfor 2021 on page 65.


80 www.hecla-mining.com(5)
125 Years



Table of Contents

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION


5Performance-based Shares”PSUs” means performance-based equity, based on a three-year TSR. SeePerformance-based SharesPSUs on page 51 andOutstanding Equity Awards at Calendar Fiscal Year-End for 20152021 table on page 65.62.

6(6)All shares are held jointly with Mr. Sabala’s spouse, as to which Mr. Sabala shares voting and investment power.
7

“Indirect” means shares credited to each independent director, all of which are held indirectly in trust pursuant to our Stock Plan for Nonemployee Directors. Each director disclaims beneficial ownership of all shares held in trust under the stock plan. SeeCompensation of Non-Management Directors on page 16.26.

76     www.hecla-mining.com


Other Matters

To our knowledge, as of March 23, 2016,28, 2022, the only “beneficial owners” (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) of more than 5% of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting are shown in the table below:

Title of ClassName & Address of
Beneficial Owner
Amount & Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
Percent of
Class
  Common      Van Eck Associates Corporation1      47,063,834      12.4%  
666 Third Ave. – 19thFloor
New York, NY 10017
CommonThe Vanguard Group, Inc.225,273,0866.6%
 100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
CommonBlackRock, Inc.320,427,9035.4%
55 East 52ndStreet
New York, NY 10055

Title of Class

  Name & Address of Beneficial Owner  Amount & Nature of
Beneficial  Ownership
    Percent of  
Class

Common

  

Van Eck Associates Corporation(1)

666 Third Ave. – 9th Floor

New York, NY 10017

    46,917,332    8.7%

Common

  

The Vanguard Group, Inc.(2)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

    50,767,632    9.4%

Common

  

BlackRock, Inc.(3)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

    40,459,141    7.5%

Common

  

Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(4)

Building One

6300 Bee Cave Rd.

Austin, TX 78746

    28,755,674    5.3%
1(1)

Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 11, 2016,2022, with the SEC by Van Eck Associates Corporation. Van Eck Associates Corporation has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to all shares.

2(2)

Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 11, 2016,10, 2022, with the SEC by The Vanguard Group, Inc. The Vanguard Group, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 469,494 shares, shared voting power with respect to 45,100613,674 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 24,778,66449,677,744 shares, and shared dispositive power with respect to 494,4221,089,888 shares.

3(3)

Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 26, 2016,February 1, 2022, with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 19,560,31239,585,267 shares and sole dispositive power with regardrespect to 20,427,90340,459,141 shares.



(4)
125 Years

Based solely on a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 8, 2022, with the SEC by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power with respect to 28,206,956 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 28,755,674 shares.

2022 Proxy Statement    77


FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

How can I attend the Annual Meeting?

Attending the Annual Meeting in Person


 When:  Thursday,May 26, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. PDT

 Where:  Elks Lodge #331, 419 Cedar St., Wallace, Idaho

  2016 Proxy Statement81



This year, the Annual Meeting will be conducted in person and online via live webcast. All shareholders are invited to participate either in person or online. If participating in person we look forward to seeing you in Wallace, Idaho. To participate in the Annual Meeting, please arrive at the Elks Lodge by 8:15 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time and present yourself at the registration desk. Shareholders wishing to vote in person during the Annual Meeting may pick up a ballot when they check in to the Annual Meeting.

Table of ContentsAttending the Virtual Meeting

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE


SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

 When:  Thursday,May 26, 2022, at 8:30 a.m. PDT

Where:  Live webcast online at http://www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC reports regarding their ownership and changes in their ownership of our stock. These persons are required by the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of copies of such forms, or written representations from certain reporting persons that no such forms were required, we believe that during the calendar year ended December 31, 2015, all filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than 10% owners of our common stock were complied with.

82 www.hecla-mining.com  
125 Years



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING

Record Date, Shares OutstandingThis year, the Annual Meeting will be conducted in person and Quorum

online via live audio webcast. All shareholders are invited to participate either in person or online. If you were a holder of Hecla common stock either as a“shareholder of record”or asparticipating online, participants are encouraged to submit questions during the“beneficial owner”of shares held in street name as of the Record Date, you may vote your shares Annual Meeting by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting does not automatically revoke a proxy previously submitted by you and we encourage shareholders to cast their votes by proxy even if they intend to participate in the Annual Meeting. Shareholders wishing to vote electronically during the Annual Meeting must follow the instructions for voting by logging in to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2002.

To participate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your proxy card or your voting instruction form. The Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 8:30 a.m. PDT and we encourage you to access the website prior to the start time. Online access will be available beginning at 8:15 a.m. PDT.

The virtual Annual Meeting platform is fully supported across web browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets, and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure they have a strong Internet connection wherever they intend to participate in the virtual Annual Meeting. Participants should also allow plenty of time to login to ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the Annual Meeting.

If you wish to submit a question, you may do so in two ways. If you want to ask a question before the meeting, then beginning at 8:30 a.m. PDT on May 24, 2022, and until 11:59 p.m. PDT on May 25, 2022, you may log into www.proxyvote.com and enter your 16-digit control number. Once past the login screen, click on “Question for Management,” type in your question, and click “Submit.” Alternatively, if you want to submit your question during the meeting, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022, type your question into the “Ask a Question” field, and click “Submit.”

Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. Questions regarding personal matters, including those related to other matters that are not pertinent to the meeting, may not be answered. Any questions pertinent to meeting matters that cannot be answered during the meeting due to time constraints can be sent to our Company email address at hmc-info@hecla-mining.com. We will answer your questions as soon as practical after the meeting.

If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Virtual Shareholder Meeting log-in page.

78     www.hecla-mining.com


Frequently Asked Questions

What is a “shareholder of record”?

A shareholder of record or registered shareholder (“record owner”) is a shareholder whose ownership of Hecla stock is reflected directly on the books and records of our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company. If you hold Hecla stock through a bank, broker, or other intermediary, you are not a shareholder of record. Instead, you hold your stock in “street name,” and the record owner of your shares is usually your bank, broker, or other intermediary. If you are not a record owner, please understand that Hecla does not know that you are a shareholder, or how many shares you own.

I want to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting. What procedures must I follow?

The Annual Meeting will be conducted in person and virtually. All shareholders will be able to attend the Annual Meeting via webcast by entering the 16-digit control number included on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card, or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022 (“Annual Meeting Website”). If you do not have a control number, you will be able to register as a guest; however, you will not be able to vote or submit questions before or during the meeting.

No recording of the Annual Meeting is allowed, including audio and video recording.

What can I do if I need technical assistance during the Annual Meeting?

If you encounter any difficulties accessing the annual Meeting webcast, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting Website log-in page.

Are there Rules of Conduct for the Annual Meeting?

Yes, the Rules of Conduct for the Annual Meeting will be available on the Annual Meeting Website on the date of the Annual Meeting, and at the place of the in person Annual Meeting. The Rules of Conduct will provide information regarding the rules and procedures for participating in the Annual Meeting.

What is the “record date” for the Annual Meeting?

March 28, 2022

How many shares of Hecla stock are outstanding?

As of the Record Date, 380,842,223March 28, 2022, there were 538,906,433 shares of common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.be voted. Shares of our common stock that are held by us in our treasury are not counted as shares outstanding and will not be voted. Each shareholder has one vote for each share of common stock held as of the Record Date.

I understand that a “quorum” of shareholders is required for Hecla to transact business at the Annual Meeting. What constitutes a quorum?

A quorum must be present in order for business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. A quorum consists of the presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or represented by proxy, of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of the Record Date. Shares represented by proxies marked “Abstain” and “broker non-votes” are counted in determining whether a quorum is present for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker

Which Hecla shares will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Hecla’s common stock ($0.25 par value capital stock) is the only class of security entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each record owner and each shareholder who holds stock in street name at the close of business as of the record date is entitled to one vote for each share held at the meeting, or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does notany adjournment or postponement.

How can I vote on a particular proposal because the broker or nominee does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.my shares?

Votes Required for the Proposals

Under NYSE rules, if ourIf your shares are held in “street name”your name, you have the right to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions listed below. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name. Since a beneficial owner is not the shareholder of

2022 Proxy Statement    79


Frequently Asked Questions

record, you may not vote your shares at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from your broker or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting.

Whether you hold shares directly as a shareholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may vote without participating in the Annual Meeting. You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held beneficially in street name, by submitting voting instructions to your broker or nominee. In most cases, you will be able to do this by using the Internet, by telephone, or by mail if you received a printed set of the Proxy Materials.

To vote by mail:

Mark, sign, and date your proxy card; and

Return your proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

To vote by proxy over the Internet:

Have your proxy card or Notice available;

Log on to the Internet and visit the website noted on your proxy card or Notice (www.proxyvote.com);

Follow the instructions provided; and

Do not mail your proxy card.

To vote by proxy by telephone:

Have your proxy card available;

Call the toll-free number listed on your proxy card (1-800-690-6903);

Follow the recorded instructions; and

Do not mail your proxy card.

To vote during the Annual Meeting:

Shares may be voted at the meeting by completing a ballot online during the meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022;and

Shares may be voted in person at the meeting by completing a ballot during the meeting.

To vote your 401(k) Plan shares:

If you participate in the Hecla Mining Company Capital Accumulation Plan (“401(k) Plan”) and hold shares of our common stock in your 401(k) Plan account as of the Record Date, you will receive a request for voting instructions from the plan trustee (“Vanguard”) with respect to your 401(k) Plan shares. You are entitled to direct Vanguard how to vote your 401(k) Plan shares. If you do not provide voting instructions to Vanguard by 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 24, 2022, the Hecla shares in your 401(k) Plan account will be voted by Vanguard in the same proportion as the shares held by Vanguard for which voting instructions have been received from other participants in the 401(k) Plan.

May I change or revoke my proxy?

Yes. If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting, in any of the following ways:

By sending a written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary, if such notice is received prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting, at our principal executive offices: Hecla Mining Company, Attn: Corporate Secretary, 6500 N. Mineral Dr., Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815-9408.

By submitting a later-dated proxy to our Corporate Secretary prior to the vote at the Annual Meeting; or

By voting online during the meeting if you are a “shareholder of record” or a “beneficial owner.”

If you hold your shares in street name, you should contact your broker for information on how to revoke your voting instructions and provide new voting instructions.

If you hold your shares in the 401(k) Plan, you may revoke your previously provided voting instructions by filing with Vanguard either a written notice of revocation or a properly executed proxy bearing a later date prior to the deadline for voting your 401(k) Plan shares. If you hold your Hecla shares outside of the 401(k) Plan, you may vote those shares separately.

80     www.hecla-mining.com


Frequently Asked Questions

Will my votes be confidential?

Yes. All shareholder meeting proxies, ballots, and tabulations that identify individual shareholders are kept confidential and are not available for examination. In addition, the identity or the vote of any shareholder is not disclosed except as required by law.

What is a “broker discretionary voting”?

This refers to the NYSE rule allowing brokers to vote their customers’ shares on certain “routine” matters in the Proxy Statement at the brokers’ discretion when they have not received timely voting instructions from their customers. The NYSE rules on broker discretionary voting prohibit banks, brokers, and other intermediaries from voting uninstructed shares on certain matters, including the election for directors. Therefore, if you hold your stock in street name and you do not indicate how you wish to vote,instruct your bank, broker, is only permitted to exercise its discretion to vote your shares on certain “routine” matters. Proposal 1 (Election of Directors), Proposal 2 (Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to Remove Certain 80% Supermajority Voting Provisions), Proposal 3 (Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to Permit Shareholders to Call Special Meetings of Shareholders Under Certain Circumstances), and Proposal 5 (Approval of Executive Compensation), are not “routine” matters, whereas Proposal 4 (Ratification of Appointment of BDO USA, LLP) is a “routine” matter. Accordingly, if you do not direct your brokeror other intermediary how to vote for a director in Proposal 1 or how to vote for Proposals 2, 3 and 5, your broker is not permitted to exercise discretion and is not permitted to vote your shares on such matters. This is called a “broker non-vote.”

Proposal 1 – Election of Directors. Pursuant to our Bylaws, each director will be elected by a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. A properly executed proxy card marked “WITHHOLD” with respect to the election of directors will not be voted (and therefore will not be considered a vote cast) and will not count “FOR” the nominee or nominees for which the vote was withheld. Any shares not voted (whether by abstentions, broker non-votes or otherwise) have the same impact as an instruction to withhold authority in the election of directors, andno votes will not affect the election of directors.be cast on your behalf. It is important that you cast your vote.

You may vote “FOR” the nominees for election as directors, or you may “WITHHOLD” authority to vote for one or more of the nominees.

Please note that this election of directors is an uncontested election, meaning that there is only one candidate for each of the three directorships to be elected at the Annual Meeting. In the future, if an election for a board seat is contested at an annual or special meeting, the candidate who receives the most “FOR” votes would be the winner of the election (assuming a quorum is present at the meeting) because instructions to withhold authority, abstentionAre abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered to be counted as votes cast for purposes of determining a majority vote under our Bylaws. As a result, all director elections under our Bylaws are effectively determined in the same manner as would be the case under a “plurality” voting standard.cast?

Proposal 2 – Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to Remove Certain 80% Supermajority Voting Provisions. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock.No. Abstentions and broker non-votes have the effect of a vote against this proposal.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement83



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


Proposal 3 – Approval of Amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to Permit Shareholders to Call Special Meetings of Shareholders Under Certain Circumstances. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of 80% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Abstentions and broker nonvotes have the effect of a vote against this proposal.

Proposal 4 – Ratification of the Appointment of BDO USA, LLP as Independent Auditors. This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. Abstentions or shares that are not voted are not counted as votes cast for this purpose.and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

How can I contact Hecla’s transfer agent?

Contact our transfer agent either by writing American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219, or by telephoning 1-800-937-5449.

TheWhat happens if I don’t vote on a proposal on the proxy card?

If you properly sign and return your proxy card or complete your proxy via the telephone or Internet, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you sign and return your proxy card but do not specify how you want your shares voted they will be voted FOR (i) the election of the nominees for Director as set forth under Election of Class III Directors; (ii) ratification of the appointment of ourthe independent registered public accounting firm for calendar year 2016 is considered a “routine” matteraccountants; and brokers that are not directed how to vote are permitted to vote shares held in street name for their clients(iii) approval, on this item.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to ratify the appointmentan advisory basis, of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.

Proposal 5 – Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation. The advisory vote on executive compensation requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. Abstentions or shares that are not voted are not counted as cast for this purpose.

Even though your vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the Board’s Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

ProxiesWhat is a Proxy?

A “proxy” is your legal appointment in a written document of another person to vote the shares that you own in accordance with your instructions. The persons you appoint to vote your shares are also called proxies. We have designated Phillips S. Baker, Jr., our President and CEO, and Michael B. White, our Corporate Secretary, asproxiesas proxies for the Annual Meeting. When you sign the proxy card, you appoint Phillips S.each of Messrs. Baker Jr. and Michael B. White as your representatives at the Annual Meeting. As your representatives, they will vote your shares at the Annual Meeting (including any adjournment or postponement) as you have instructed them on your proxy card.

Proxies Submitted but not VotedWhat Votes are Required for the Proposals?

If you properly sign and return your proxy card or complete your proxy via the telephone or Internet, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you sign and return your proxy but do not specify how you want your shares voted they will be voted FOR the election of all nominees for Director as set forth under “Election of Directors,” FOR the amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylawsto remove certain 80% supermajority voting provisions, FOR the amendments to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to permit shareholders to call special meetings of shareholders under certain circumstances, FOR ratification of the appointment of the independent registered public accountants, and FOR the advisory vote on executive compensation,

Methods of Voting

IfUnder NYSE rules, if your shares are held in yourstreet name and you have the rightdo not indicate how you wish to vote, your broker is only permitted to exercise its discretion to vote your shares on certain “routine” matters. Proposal 2 (Ratify the Appointment of BDO USA, LLP) is a “routine” matter. Proposal 1 (Election of Class III Directors), and Proposal 3 (Approval, on an advisory basis, of our Named Executive Officer Compensation) are “non-routine” matters. Accordingly, if you do not direct your broker how to vote for Proposals 1 or 3, your broker is not permitted to exercise discretion and is not permitted to vote your shares on such matters. This is called a “broker non-vote.”

Proposal 1 – Election of two Class III Directors. Pursuant to our Bylaws, each director will be elected by the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. Under a majority of votes cast standard, the shares voted “for” a nominee must exceed the number voted “against” that nominee. Shareholders may vote “for,” “against” or “abstain” with respect to this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast, and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. A properly executed proxy card marked “AGAINST” with respect to the election of directors will have an effect on the outcome of the vote. If the votes cast “against” an incumbent director exceed the number of votes cast “for” the

2022 Proxy Statement    81


Frequently Asked Questions

director, the director will not be elected, will remain on the board as a holdover director and must stand for election at the next annual meeting of shareholders, absent his or her earlier resignation or removal. See Majority Voting for Directors and Director Resignation Policy on page 13 for a description of our director resignation policy.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” on each nominee for election as a director.

Proposal 2 – Ratify the Appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2022. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company. However, the Board feels that it is important for the shareholders to approve the selection of BDO USA, LLP. This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast, and thus will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Votes marked “AGAINST” will have an effect on the outcome of the vote. The appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for calendar year 2022 is considered a “routine” matter and brokers that are not directed how to vote are permitted to vote shares held in street name for their customers on this proposal.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to ratify the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.

Proposal 3 – Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of our Executive Compensation. For more information on approval of our executive compensation see “Proposal 3 – Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of our Executive Compensation” beginning on page 32. The advisory vote on executive compensation will require the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, whether in person or by proxy. Under a majority of votes cast standard, the shares voted “for” Proposal 3 must exceed the number voted “against” Proposal 3 for the proposal to be approved. Abstentions and broker non-votes are not counted as votes cast for this purpose and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Votes marked “AGAINST” will have an effect on the outcome of the vote. Even though your vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the Board’s Compensation Committee will review the voting results and take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” on the proposal to approve the compensation of our NEOs.

Discretionary voting by proxies on other matters. Aside from the proposals discussed above, no other proposals have been timely submitted in accordance with our Bylaws, and we do not know of any other proposal that may be presented at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name. Since a beneficial ownerHowever, if any other business is not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in personproperly presented at the Annual Meeting, unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from your broker or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the rightproxy gives authority to Phillips S. Baker, Jr., and Michael B. White to vote theon such matters at their discretion.

Assuming there is a proper quorum of shares at the Annual Meeting.

Whether you hold shares directly as a shareholder of record or beneficially in street name, you may vote without attending the Annual Meeting. You may vote by granting a proxy or, for shares held beneficially in street name, by submitting voting instructions to your broker or nominee. In most cases, you will be able to do this by using the Internet, by telephone, or by mail if you received a printed set of the Proxy Materials.

84 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


To vote by mail:

Mark, sign and date your proxy card; and

Return your proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

To vote by proxy over the Internet:

Have your proxy card or Notice available;

Log on to the Internet and visit the website noted on your proxy card or Notice (www.proxyvote.com);

Follow the instructions provided; and

Do not mail your proxy card.

To vote by proxy by telephone:

Have your proxy card available;

Call the toll-free number listed on your proxy card (1-800-690-6903);

Follow the recorded instructions; and

Do not mail your proxy card.

To vote in person if you are a registered shareholder of record:

Attend our Annual Meeting;

Bring a valid photo identification; and

Deliver your completed proxy card or ballot in person.

To vote in person if you hold your shares in “street name” (through a broker, financial institution or other nominee):

Attend our Annual Meeting;

Bring a valid photo identification; and

Obtain from your broker a document that allows you to vote the shares held for your benefit, attach that document to your completed proxy card or ballot and deliver it in person.

To vote your 401(k) Plan shares:

If you participate in the Hecla Mining Company Capital Accumulation Plan and hold shares of our common stock in your plan account as of the Record Date, you will receive a request for voting instructions from the plan trustee (“Vanguard”) with respect to your plan shares. You are entitled to direct Vanguard how to vote your plan shares. If you do not provide voting instructions to Vanguard by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 18, 2016, the Hecla shares in your plan account will be voted by Vanguard in the same proportion as the shares held by Vanguard for which voting instructions have been received from other participants in the plan.

Deadline for Voting

The deadline for voting by telephone or electronically is 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on May 18, 2016. If you are a registered shareholder and attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. “Street name” shareholders who wish to vote at the meeting will need to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds their shares.

Revoking a Proxy

If you are a shareholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before your proxy is votedrepresented at the Annual Meeting, how many shares are required to approve the proposals being voted upon in any of the following ways:this Proxy Statement?

ProposalVote Required

By sending a written noticeDo abstentions count

as votes cast?

Is broker discretionary voting allowed?
Election of revocation to our Corporate Secretary, if such notice is received prior toClass III DirectorsMajority of votes castNoNo
Ratify the vote at the Annual Meeting, at our principal executive offices:Appointment of BDO LLPMajority of votes castNoYes
Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation *Majority of votes castNoNo

*

Advisory and non-binding

Hecla Mining Company
Attn: Corporate Secretary
6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200
Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815-9408

By submitting a later-dated proxy to our Corporate Secretary prior to

82     www.hecla-mining.com


Frequently Asked Questions

Where can I find the vote at the Annual Meeting; or

By voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

If you hold your shares in street name, you should contact your broker for information on how to revoke your voting instructions and provide new voting instructions.

If you hold your shares in the Hecla Mining Company Capital Accumulation Plan, you may revoke your previously provided voting instructions by filing with Vanguard either a written notice of revocation or a properly executed proxy bearing a later date prior to the deadline for voting plan shares. If you hold your Hecla shares outside of the plan, you may vote those shares separately.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement85



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


Costs of Solicitation

We will bear all costs and expenses relating to the solicitation of proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing and distributing these Proxy Materials. We have hired Broadridge to assist us in mailing these Proxy Materials. Additionally, we have retained Morrow & Co., LLC, 470 West Ave., Stamford, Connecticut to assist in the solicitation of votes for an estimated fee of $8,000, plus reimbursement of certain out-of-pocket expenses. Solicitations may be made personally or by mail, facsimile, telephone, or via the Internet. However, if you choose to access the Proxy Materials over the Internet, youare responsible for any Internet access charges you may incur. Arrangements will be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the shares of common stock held by such persons, and we will reimburse such brokerage firms, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with such activities.

Resultsresults of the Annual MeetingMeeting?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. We will publish finalthe results in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we expect to file with the SEC within four business days of the Annual Meeting. After the Form 8-K is filed, you may obtain a copy by visiting the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov,www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml, visiting our website at www.hecla-mining.com under “Investors,” and then selecting “Financial Reports & Filings,” or contacting our Investor Relations Department by writing to Investor Relations Department, Hecla Mining Company, 6500 N. Mineral Dr., Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815-9408 or by sending an email to hmc-info@hecla-mining.com.

Annual Report

OurI received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. What does this mean?

Consistent with common practice and in accordance with SEC rules, Hecla is distributing proxy materials to some shareholders over the Internet by sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) that explains how to access our Proxy Materials and vote online. If you received a Notice and would like a printed copy of the proxy materials (including the Annual Report, Proxy Statement, and a proxy card in the case of record owners, or a voting instruction form in the case of shareholders holding shares in street name), please follow the instructions included in your Notice.

I received my proxy materials in hard copy. How may I arrange to Shareholders, consistingreceive electronic delivery of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and other information, is being made available to shareholders with this Proxy Statement. Shareholders may obtain a copy of our Annual Report for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015, without cost, by written or oral request to:

Hecla Mining Company
Attention: Jeanne DuPont
6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200
Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408
Telephone: 208-769-4100

You can also access our SEC filings, including ourMaterials, Annual Reports, on Form 10-K,News Releases, and all amendments thereto, ondocuments filed with the SEC website at https://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml orSEC?

We want to communicate with you in the way that is most convenient for you. Our Proxy Materials are available on our website at http://www.hecla-mining.com.

Householding Instead of receiving paper copies of next year’s Proxy Materials by mail, you can elect to receive an email message that will provide a link to those documents online. By opting to access your Proxy Materials online, you will:

Gain faster access to your Proxy Materials;

Save us the cost of producing and mailing documents to you; and

Help preserve environmental resources.

If you are a shareholder of record, you may request and consent to electronic delivery of future Proxy Materials by following the instructions on your proxy card or by visiting our website at www.hecla-mining.com under “Investors,” and then selecting “Electronic Proxy Request.” If your shares are held in street name, please contact your broker, and ask about the availability of electronic delivery. If you select electronic delivery, we will discontinue mailing the Proxy Materials to you beginning next year and you will be sent an email message notifying you of the Internet address or addresses where you may access the Proxy Materials. You can receive a free paper or email copy of this year’s Proxy Materials by requesting prior to May 12, 2022. If you would like to request a copy of the Proxy Materials for this and/or future shareholder meetings, you may (i) visit www.proxyvote.com, (ii) call 1-800- 579-1639, or (3) send an email to sendmaterial@proxyvote.com. If sending an email, please include your control number (indicated on your Notice) in the subject line. Your consent to electronic delivery will remain in effect until you revoke it. If you selected electronic delivery last year, we will not mail the Proxy Materials to you this year and you will receive an email message with the Internet address where you may access the Proxy Materials for the current year.

Shareholders may also elect to receive notice of our filings with the SEC, annual reports, and news releases by email. You may sign up for this service by visiting our website at www.hecla-mining.com under “Investors” and selecting “Receive Email Alerts.”

What is “householding” and does Hecla do this?

Many brokerage firms, financial institutions and transfer agents have instituted “householding” procedures for beneficial owners and shareholders of record. Householding is when a single copy of our Proxy Materials is sent to a household in which two or more shareholders reside if they appear to be members of the same family. This practice is designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and postage costs, as well as natural resources.

If you are a beneficial owner, you may have received householding information from your broker, financial institution, or other nominee shareholder in the past. Please contact the shareholder of record directly if you have

2022 Proxy Statement    83


Frequently Asked Questions

questions, require additional copies of our Proxy Materials,or wish to revoke your decision to household and thereby receive multiple copies. You should also contact the shareholder of record if you wish to institute householding. These options are available to you at any time.

86 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING


Shareholders of record who share an address and would like to receive a separate copy of our Proxy Materials for future annual meetings, or have questions regarding the householding process, may contact our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, either by written request or by telephone at the address and telephone number listed above.at: American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11219 – Telephone: 1-800-937-5449. By contacting American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, shareholders of record sharing an address can also request delivery of multiple copies of our Proxy Materials in the future.

Who is making this proxy solicitation and approximately how much will these solicitation activities cost?

We will bear all costs and expenses relating to the solicitation of proxies, including the costs of preparing, assembling, printing, mailing, and distributing these Proxy Materials. We have hired Broadridge to assist us in mailing these Proxy Materials. Additionally, we have retained Morrow Sodali LLC, 333 Ludlow Street, Fifth Floor, South tower, Stamford, Connecticut to assist in the solicitation of votes for an estimated fee of $9,000, plus reimbursement of certain Electronic Delivery ofout-of-pocket expenses. Solicitations may be made personally or by mail, facsimile, telephone, or via the Internet. However, if you choose to access the Proxy Materials over the Internet, you are responsible for any Internet access charges you may incur. Arrangements will be made with brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for forwarding solicitation materials to the beneficial owners of the shares of common stock held by such persons, and we will reimburse such brokerage firms, custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in connection with such activities.

Where can I get a copy of Hecla’s Annual Report?

Our Annual Report to Shareholders, consisting of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, and other information, is being made available to shareholders with this Proxy Statement. Shareholders may obtain a copy of our Annual Report for the calendar year ended December 31, 2021, without cost, by written or oral request to: Hecla Mining Company, Attention: Investor Relations, 6500 N. Mineral Dr., Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408 – Telephone: 208-769-4100

You can also access our SEC filings, including our Annual Reports News Releaseson Form 10-K, and Documents Filed withall amendments thereto, on the Securities and Exchange Commission

We want to communicate with you in the way that is most convenient for you. You may choose to receive either a full set of printed materials – which will include an Annual Report, Proxy Statement, and proxy card (“Proxy Materials”) –SEC website at www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml or an email with instructions for how to view the materials and vote online. If you are a shareholder of record, you may request and consent to electronic delivery of future Proxy Materials by following the instructions on your proxy card or by visiting our website at http://www.hecla-mining.com under “Investors,” selecting “Annual Reports,” and then selecting “Electronic Proxy Request.“Financial Reports & Filings. If your shares are held in street name, please contact your broker and ask

Where can I find additional information about the availability of electronic delivery. If you select electronic delivery, we will discontinue mailing the Proxy Materials to you beginning next year and you will be sent an email messagenotifying you of the Internet address or addresses where you may access the Proxy Materials. Your consent to electronic delivery will remain in effect until you revoke it. If you selected electronic delivery last year, we will not mail the Proxy Materials to you this year and you will receive an email message with the Internet address where you may access the Proxy Materials for the current year. This process is designed to expedite shareholders’ receipt of Proxy Materials, lower the cost of the Annual Meeting, and help conserve natural resources.Hecla?

Shareholders may also elect to receive noticeThe principal executive office of our filings with the SEC, annual reports and news releases by email. You may sign up for this service by visiting our website at http://www.hecla-mining.com under “Investors” and selecting “Subscribe for Updates”.

Shareholder List

A list of shareholders eligible to vote at the meeting will be available for examination by any shareholder for any purpose relevant to the meeting during ordinary business hours for at least ten days prior to May 19, 2016, at Hecla’scorporate offices,Company is located at 6500 N. Mineral Dr., Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815. Our telephone number at this address is 208-769-4100. Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “HL.”

We file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-Kand other information with the SEC. As an electronic filer, our public filings are maintained on the SEC’s Internet site that contains reports, proxy statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.

Our annual report for the year ended December 31, 2021, including financial statements and schedules, is included with this Proxy Statement.

We maintain a company website at www.hecla-mining.com from which you can alternatively access the reports we file with the SEC. Our committee charters and other important corporate governance documents are also available on our website.

84     www.hecla-mining.com


Frequently Asked Questions

Other than the items in the Proxy Statement, what other items of business will be addressed at the offices of Paine Hamblen LLP, located at 717 West Sprague Avenue, Suite 1200, Spokane, Washington.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement87



Table of Contents

PROVISIONS OF HECLA’S BYLAWS WITH RESPECT TO SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS


PROVISIONS OF HECLA’S BYLAWS WITH RESPECT TO SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS

You may submit proposals for consideration at future annual shareholder meetings, including director nominations, as follows:

Shareholder proposals at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Our Bylaws establish procedures governing the eligibility of nominees for election to our Board, and the proposal of business to be considered by our shareholders at an Annual Meeting of Shareholders. For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an Annual Meeting of Shareholders by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to our Corporate Secretary. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice shall be delivered to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices located at 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders;provided, however, that in the event the date of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be delivered not earlier than the 120th day prior to such Annual Meeting of Shareholders and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such Annual Meeting of Shareholders or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Adjournment of a meeting shall not commence a new time period for giving shareholder’s notice as described above. Such shareholder’s notice shall set forth:

(a)As to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act and Rule 14a-11 thereunder, including such person’s written consent to being named in our Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected;
(b)As to any other business that the shareholder proposes to bring before the meeting, if the shareholder has not otherwise complied with the rules and regulations under the Exchange Act for the inclusion of a shareholder proposal in our Proxy Statement, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting, and any material interest in such business of such shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; and
(c)As to the shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made:
(i)the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on the Company’s books, and of such beneficial owner; and
(ii)the class and number of Company shares which are owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder or beneficial owner.

The applicable time period for timely shareholder submissions pursuant to the above provisions for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is January 19, 2017 (the 120th day preceding the anniversary of the 2016 Annual Meeting) to February 18, 2017 (the 90th day preceding such anniversary).

The chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Bylaws and, if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with the Bylaws, to declare that such defective proposal shall be disregarded. The foregoing time limits also apply in determining whether notice is timely for purposes of rules adopted by the SEC relating to the exercise of discretionary voting authority.

88 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

PROVISIONS OF HECLA’S BYLAWS WITH RESPECT TO SHAREHOLDER
PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS


Shareholder proposals to be included in next year’s Proxy Statement

In addition to the foregoing section, we will comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act with respect to any shareholder proposals that meet that rule’s requirements. We will review shareholder proposals intended to be included in our Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders which are received by us at our principal executive offices located at 6500 N. Mineral Drive, Suite 200, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815-9408, nolater than December 5, 2016. Such proposals must be submitted in writing and should be sent to the attention of our Corporate Secretary.

You may contact the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices for a copy of the relevant Bylaw provisions regarding the requirements for making shareholder proposals and nominating director candidates.


125 Years
2016 Proxy Statement89



Table of Contents

OTHER BUSINESS


OTHER BUSINESSMeeting?

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any matters that will be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than those described above. However, should other business properly be brought before the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted thereon at the discretion of the persons acting thereunder.

By Order of the Board of Directors
    LOGO

Michael B. White

Corporate Secretary


April 4, 201612, 2022

90 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



TableTo the extent that this proxy statement is incorporated by reference into any other filing by the Company under the Securities Act of Contents1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the sections of this proxy statement entitled Compensation Committee Report and Audit Committee Report (to the extent permitted by SEC rules) will not be deemed incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise in such filing.

APPENDIX A


2022 Proxy Statement    85


APPENDIX A

Certificate of Incorporation

ARTICLE V

Bylaws

In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by law, the Board is expressly authorized to make, repeal, alter, amend and rescind the Bylaws of the Corporation by a majority vote of the entire Board at any regular or special meeting of the Board; provided, however that, notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws of the Corporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to (i) alter, amend or repeal any provision of the Bylaws which is substantially identical to and/or implements the last sentence inSection 4 of Article IV, or Articles VI, VII (subject to the proviso at the end of this sentence) or VIII, of this Certificate of Incorporation, or (ii) alter, amend or repeal any provision of this proviso to Article V;further provided that, notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws of the Corporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66.67% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to (i) alter, amend or repeal any provision of the Bylaws which is substantially identical to and/or implements the last sentence of Article VII of this Certificate of Incorporation, or (ii) alter, amend or repeal this further proviso to Article V.

ARTICLE VII.

Actions by Shareholders

Any action required or permitted to be taken by the shareholders of the Corporation must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation and may not be effected by any consent in writing by such shareholders. Special meetings of shareholders of the Corporation may be called only by the Board pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the entire Board.Except as set forth in the final sentence of this Article VII, andNnotwithstanding anythingelse contained in this Certificate of Incorporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal this Article VII.Notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66.67% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal the second and final sentences of this Article VII.


125 Years
2016 Proxy StatementA-1



Table of Contents

APPENDIX B


APPENDIX B

BYLAWS

ARTICLE VI.

Amendments

These Bylaws may be altered or repealed and Bylaws may be made at any annual meeting of shareholders or at any special meeting thereof if notice of the proposed alteration or repeal of Bylaws to be made be contained in the notice of such meeting, by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of the voting stock of the Corporation. These bylaws may also be altered or repealed and Bylaws may be made by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Board of Directors, at any annual or regular meeting of the Board of Directors, or at any special meeting of the Board of Directors if notice of the proposed alteration or repeal, or Bylaw or Bylaws to be made,, be contained in the notice of such special meeting.

Notwithstanding anything contained in these Bylaws to the contrary,(i) the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of all of the shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal Section 4, (subject to clause (ii) below) or 6 of Article II, Section 1, 2 or 3 of Article III, of these Bylaws,and (ii) notwithstanding the foregoing, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 66.67% of the voting power of all of the shares of the capital stock of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal the first sentence of Section 4 of Article II of these Bylaws.

B-1 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

APPENDIX C


APPENDIX C

CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

ARTICLE VII.

Actions by Shareholders

Any action required or permitted to be taken by the shareholders of the Corporation must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation and may not be effected by any consent in writing by such shareholders. Special meetings of shareholders of the Corporation may be called only by the Board pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the entire Board,except as otherwise permitted by the Bylaws of the Corporation. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Certificate of Incorporation to the contrary, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least 80% of the voting power of the then outstanding shares of Voting Stock, voting together as a single class, shall be required to alter, amend or repeal this Article VII.


125 Years
2016 Proxy StatementC-1



Table of Contents

APPENDIX D


APPENDIX D

BYLAWS

ARTICLE II.

Meetings of Shareholders

Section 1.Annual Meetings. Annual meetings of shareholders for the election of directors and for such other business as may be stated in the notice of the meeting, shall be held at such place, either within or without the State of Delaware, and at such time and date as the Board of Directors by resolution, shall determine and as set forth in the notice of the meeting. In the event the Board of Directors fails so to determine the time, date and place of meeting, the annual meeting of shareholders shall be held at the principal executive office of the Corporation at 10:00 a.m. on the first Wednesday in May. If the date of the annual meeting shall fall upon a legal holiday, the meeting shall be held on the next succeeding business day. The annual meeting may be adjourned by the chairman of the meeting from time to time and place to place. At any adjourned annual meeting the Corporation may transact any business which might have been transacted at the original annual meeting. The Board of Directors acting by resolution may postpone and reschedule any previously scheduled annual meeting of shareholders upon public notice or disclosure given prior to the date previously scheduled for such meeting of shareholders.

Section 2.Voting. Each shareholder who is entitled to vote pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Incorporation and these Bylaws, or who is entitled to vote pursuant to the laws of the State of Delaware, shall be entitled to vote in person or by proxy, but no proxy shall be voted after three years from its date unless such proxy provides for a longer period. All elections for directors and all other questions shall be decided by majority vote except as otherwise provided by the Certificate of Incorporation, these Bylaws or the laws of the State of Delaware.

A complete list of the shareholders entitled to vote at any meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected, arranged in alphabetical order, with the address of each, and the number of shares held by each, shall be open to the examination of any shareholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the meeting, either at a place within the city where the meeting is to be held, which place shall be specified in the notice of the meeting, or if not so specified, at the place where the meeting is to be held. The list shall also be produced and kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time thereof, and may be inspected by any shareholder who is present.

The CEO shall appoint three Inspectors of Election prior to each meeting of shareholders. Upon his or her appointment, each such Inspector shall take and sign an oath faithfully to execute the duties of Inspector at such meeting with strict impartiality and to the best of his or her ability. Such Inspectors shall determine the number of shares outstanding, the voting power of each such share, the number of shares present at the meeting and whether a quorum is present at such meeting. The Inspectors shall receive votes and ballots and shall determine all challenges and questions as to the right to vote and shall thereafter count and tabulate all votes and ballots and determine the result. Such Inspectors shall do such further acts as are proper to conduct the elections of directors and the vote on other matters with fairness to all shareholders. The Inspectors shall make a certificate of the results of the elections of directors and the vote on other matters. No Inspector shall be a candidate for election as a director of the Corporation nor shall any such candidate be appointed an Inspector.

Section 3.Quorum. Except as otherwise required by law, by the Certificate of Incorporation or by these Bylaws, the presence, in person or by proxy, of shareholders holding a majority of the voting power of the outstanding stock of the Corporation shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the shareholders. In case a quorum shall not be present at any meeting, a majority in interest of the shareholders entitled to vote thereat, present in person or by proxy or the chairman of the meeting, shall have the power to adjourn the meeting from time to time, without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until the requisite amount of stock entitled to vote shall be present; provided, however, that if such adjournment is for more than thirty days, or if after such adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at

D-1 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

APPENDIX D


such adjourned meeting. At any such adjourned meeting at which the requisite amount of stock entitled to vote shall be represented, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as originally noticed; but only those shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting as originally noticed shall be entitled to vote at any adjournment or adjournments thereof unless the Board of Directors shall have fixed a new record date for such adjournment or adjournments pursuant to Section 4 of Article V of these Bylaws.

Section 4.Special Meetings.

(A) General.

Special meetings of shareholders may be called only by(i) the Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the entire Board of Directors, or (ii) solely to the extent required by Section 4(B), the Secretary of the Corporation. Special meetings of shareholders may be held at such place, either within or without the State of Delaware, and at such time and date as shall be stated in the notice of the meeting. The special meeting may be adjourned by the chairman of the special meeting from time to tie and place to place. At any adjourned special meeting the Corporation may transact any business which might have been transacted at the original special meeting. The Board of Directors acting by resolution approved by a majority of the entire Board of Directors may postpone and reschedule any previously scheduled special meeting of shareholders upon public notice or disclosure given prior to the date previously scheduled for such meeting of shareholders.

(B)Shareholder Requested Special Meetings.

(1)     Special meetings of the shareholders (each a “Shareholder Requested Special Meeting”) shall be called by the Secretary upon the written request of a shareholder (or a group of shareholders formed for the purpose of making such request) who or which has held at least 25% Net Long Beneficial Ownership (as defined below) of the outstanding common stock of the Corporation continuously for at least 120 days as of the date of submission of the request (the “Requisite Percent”). Compliance by the requesting shareholder or group of shareholders with the requirements of this section and related provisions of these bylaws shall be determined in good faith by the Board of Directors, which determination shall be conclusive and binding on the Corporation and the shareholders.
“Net Long Beneficial Ownership” (and its correlative terms), when used to describe the nature of a shareholder’s ownership of common stock of the Corporation, shall mean those shares of common stock of the Corporation as to which the shareholder in question possesses (x) the sole power to vote or direct the voting, (y) the sole economic incidents of ownership (including the sole right to profits and the sole risk of loss), and (z) the sole power to dispose of or direct the disposition. The number of shares calculated in accordance with clauses (x), (y) and (z) shall not include any shares (1) sold by such shareholder in any transaction that has not been settled or closed, (2) borrowed by such shareholder for any purposes or purchased by such shareholder pursuant to an agreement to resell or (3) subject to any option, warrant, derivative or other agreement or understanding, whether any such arrangement is to be settled with shares of common stock of the Corporation or with cash based on the notional amount of shares subject thereto, in any such case which has, or is intended to have, the purpose or effect of (A) reducing in any manner, to any extent or at any time in the future, such shareholder’s rights to vote or direct the voting and full rights to dispose or direct the disposition of any of such shares or (B) offsetting to any degree gain or loss arising from the sole economic ownership of such shares by such shareholder.
(2)     A request for a Shareholder Requested Special Meeting must be signed by the Requisite Percent of the record holders (or their duly authorized agents) and be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation by registered mail, return receipt requested.
Such request shall (A) set forth a statement of the specific purpose or purposes of the meeting and the matters proposed to be acted on at such special meeting, (B) bear the date of signature of each shareholder (or duly authorized agent) signing the request, (C) include (w) the name and address, as they appear in the Corporation’s stock ledger, of each shareholder signing such request (or on whose behalf the Shareholder


125 Years
2016 Proxy StatementD-2



Table of Contents

APPENDIX D


Special Meeting Request is signed), (x) the class, if applicable, and the number of shares of common stock of the Corporation that are owned of record and beneficially by each such shareholders, (y) documentary evidence of such shareholder’s record and beneficial ownership of such stock and (z) a certification from each such shareholder that the shareholders signing the request in the aggregate satisfy the Net Long Beneficial Ownership requirement of these Bylaws, (D) set forth all information relating to each such shareholder (and if the matter proposed to be acted on at such special meeting involves the election of directors, each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election) that must be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest (even if an election contest is not involved), or is otherwise required, in each case, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), (E) describe any material interest of each such shareholder in the specific purpose or purposes of the meeting, and (F) include an acknowledgement by each shareholder and any duly authorized agent that any disposition of shares of common stock of the Corporation as to which such shareholder has Net Long Beneficial Ownership as of the date of delivery of the special meeting request and prior to the record date for the proposed meeting requested by such shareholder shall constitute a revocation of such request with respect to such shares. In addition, the shareholder and any duly authorized agent shall promptly provide any other information reasonably requested by the Corporation to allow it to satisfy its obligations under applicable law.
Any requesting shareholder may revoke a request for a special meeting at any time by written revocation delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation. If, following such revocation at any time before the date of the Shareholder Requested Special Meeting, the remaining requests are from shareholders holding in the aggregate less than the Requisite Percent, the Board of Directors, in its discretion, may cancel the Shareholder Requested Special Meeting.
(3)     Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Secretary shall not be required to call a special meeting of shareholders if (A) the request for such special meeting does not comply with this Section 4(B), (B) the Board of Directors has called or calls an annual or special meeting of shareholders to be held not later than ninety (90) days after the date on which a valid request has been delivered to the Secretary (the “Delivery Date”), (C) the request is received by the Secretary during the period commencing ninety (90) days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting and ending on the date of the next annual meeting, D) the request contains an identical or substantially similar item (a “Similar Item”) to an item that was presented at any meeting of shareholders held within one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the Delivery Date (and, for purposes of this clause (D) the election of directors shall be deemed a “Similar Item” with respect to all items of business involving the election or removal of directors), (E) the request relates to an item of business that is not a proper subject for action by the shareholders of the Corporation under applicable law, or (F) the request was made in a manner that involved or would involve a violation of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act or other applicable law.
(4)     Any Shareholder Requested Special Meeting shall be held at such date, time and place within or without the state of Delaware as may be fixed by the Board of Directors; provided, however, that the date of any Shareholder Requested Special Meeting shall be not more than sixty (60) days after the record date for such meeting (the “Meeting Record Date”), which shall be fixed in accordance with Article V, Section 4 of these Bylaws, provided that, in no event shall the Meeting Record Date be more than twenty (20) days after the date on which a valid request for a Shareholder Requested Special Meeting, which complies with the requirements of this section and related provisions of these Bylaws, is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation. In fixing a date and time for any Shareholder Requested Special Meeting, the Board of Directors may consider such factors as it deems relevant within the good faith exercise of business judgment, including, without limitation, the nature of the matters to be considered, the facts and circumstances surrounding any request for the special meeting and any plan of the Board of Directors to call an annual meeting or a special meeting.
(5)     Business transacted at any Shareholder Requested Special Meeting shall be limited to the purpose(s) stated in the request; provided, however, that nothing herein shall prohibit the Corporation from submitting additional matters to a vote of the shareholders at any Shareholder Requested Special Meeting.

D-3 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

APPENDIX D


Section 5.Notice of Meetings. Written notice, stating the place, date and time of any annual or special meeting of shareholders, and the general nature of the business to be considered thereat, shall be given to each shareholder entitled to vote at such meeting at his address as it appears on the records of the Corporation, not less than ten nor more than sixty days before the date of the meeting.

Section 6.Shareholder Action. Any action required or permitted to be taken by the shareholders of the Corporation must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation and may not be effected by any consent in writing by such shareholders.

Section 7.Chairman of a Meeting. At each meeting of the shareholders the Chairman of the Board, or if he shall be absent therefrom, the President, or if he shall be absent therefrom, another officer of the Corporation chosen by the Board of Directors, shall act as chairman of the meeting or preside thereat.

Section 8.

(A)Annual Meetings of Shareholders.

(1)     Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors of the Corporation and the proposal of business to be considered by the shareholders may be made at an annual meeting of shareholders (a) pursuant to the Corporation’s notice of meeting, (b) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or (c) by any shareholder of the Corporation who was a shareholder of record at the time of giving of notice provided for in this By-Law, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who complied with the notice procedures set forth in this By-Law.
(2)     For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder pursuant to clause (c) of paragraph (A)(1) of this By-Law, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than 30 days or delayed by more than 60 days from such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not earlier than the 120thday prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90thday prior to such annual meeting or the 10thday following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment of an annual meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above. Such shareholder’s notice shall set forth (a) as to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection as a director, all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act’) and Rule 14a-11 thereunder (including such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected); (b) as to any other business that the shareholder proposes to bring before the meeting, a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting, the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting and any material interest in such business of such shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made; (c) as to the shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf of the nomination or proposal is made (i) the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on the Corporation’s books, and of such beneficial owner and (ii) the class and number of shares of the Corporation which are owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder and such beneficial owner.
(3)     Notwithstanding anything in the second sentence of paragraph (A)(2) of this By-Law to the contrary, in the event that the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors of the Corporation is increased and there is no public announcement naming all of the nominees for Director or specifying the size of the increased Board of Directors made by the Corporation at least 100 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a shareholder’s notice required by this By-Law shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it shall be


125 Years
2016 Proxy StatementD-4



Table of Contents

APPENDIX D


delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Corporation.

(B)Special Meetings of Shareholders. Only such business shall be conducted at a special meeting of shareholders as shall have been brought before the meeting pursuant to the Corporation’s notice of meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at a special meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected pursuant to the Corporation’s notice of meeting (1) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or (2)provided that the Board of Directors has determined that directors shall be elected at such special meeting, by any shareholder of the Corporation who is a shareholder of record at the time of giving of notice provided for in this By-Law, who shall be entitled to vote at the meeting andwho (y) in the case of a special meeting of shareholders called pursuant to clause (i) of the first sentence of Section (4)(A) of Article II of these Bylaws, complies with the notice procedures set forth in this By-Law, or (z) in the case of a Shareholder Requested Special Meeting, complies with the requirements set forth in section 4(B) of Article II of these Bylaws. In the event the Corporation calls a special meeting of shareholders for the purpose of electing one or more directors, any such shareholder may nominate a person or persons (as the case may be), for election to such position(s) as specified in the Corporation’s notice of meeting, if(i) in the case of a special meeting of shareholders called pursuant to clause (i) of the first sentence of Section (4)(A) of Article II of these Bylaws, the shareholder’s notice required by paragraph (A)(2) of this By-Law shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not earlier than the 120th day prior to such special meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to such special meeting or the 10th day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board of Directors to be elected at such meeting, or (ii) in the case of a Shareholder Requested Special Meeting, the shareholder complies with the requirements set forth in Section 4(b) of Article II of these Bylaws. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment of a special meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above.

(C) General.

(1)Only such persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in this By-Law shall be eligible to serve as directors and only such business shall be conducted at a meeting of shareholders as shall have been brought before the meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in this By-Law. The Chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made in accordance with the procedures set forth in this By-Law and, if any proposed nomination or business is not in compliance with this By-Law, to declare that such defective proposal shall be disregarded.
(2)For purposes of this By-Law, “public announcement” shall mean disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press or comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Sections 13, 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
(3)Notwithstanding the foregoing provision of this By-Law, a shareholder shall also comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act with respect to the matters set forth in this By-Law. Nothing in this By-Law shall be deemed to affect any rights of (i) shareholders to request inclusion of the proposals in the Corporation’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act or (ii) the holders of any series of Preferred Stock to elect directors under specified circumstances.

D-5 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

APPENDIX E


APPENDIX E

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures to GAAP

Reconciliation of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (non-GAAP) to Net Income (Loss) (GAAP)

Reconciliation of Cash Provided by Operating Activities (GAAP) to Free Cash Flow (non-GAAP)

The non-GAAP measure of free cash flow is calculated as net cash provided by operating activities (GAAP) less additions to properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests (GAAP). Management believes that, when presented in conjunction with comparable GAAP measures, free cash flow is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance. The following table reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow:

Dollars are in thousands

  December 31,
2021
 

Net cash provided by operating activities (GAAP)

  $220,337 

Less: Additions to properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests (GAAP)

   (109,048
  

 

 

 

Free cash flow10

  $111,289 
  

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Mine Site Cash Provided by Operating Activities (GAAP) to Mine Site Operating Cash Flow Less Capital (non-GAAP)

The non-GAAP measure of mine site operating cash flow less capital, which is a performance measure for our LTIP, is calculated as mine site cash provided by operating activities, less additions to properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests. Management believes that, when presented in conjunction with comparable GAAP measures, mine site operating cash flow less capital is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance. The following table reconciles mine site cash provided by operating activities to mine site operating cash flow less capital:

Dollars are in thousands

  December 31,
2021
 

Mine site cash provided by operating activities

  $445,927 

Less: Additions to properties, plants equipment and mineral interests

   (289,821
  

 

 

 

Mine site operating cash flow less capital

  $156,106 
  

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) to Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (non-GAAP)

The non-GAAP measure of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“EBITDA”) is calculated as net income (loss) before the following items: interest expense, income tax benefit provision, (benefit), and depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense. Management believes that, when presented in conjunction with comparable GAAP measures, EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance. The table below presents reconciliations between the non-GAAP measure EBITDA to the GAAP measure of net income (loss)loss to the non-GAAP measure EBITDA for the years ended December 31, 2015, 20142021, 2020 and 20132019 (in thousands).

Year ended December 31,
     2015     2014     2013
Net income (loss) (GAAP)$(86,968)$17,824$(25,130)
Interest expense, net of amount capitalized125,38926,77521,689
Income tax provision (benefit)56,310(5,240)(9,795)
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization112,585112,17382,366
EBITDA$107,316$151,532$69,130

1On April 12, 2013, we completed an offering of $500 million in aggregate principal amount of our Senior Notes due May 1, 2021 (the “Notes”), and issued additional Notes in 2014 to fund one of our defined benefit pension plans. SeeNote 6ofNotes to Consolidated Financial Statementsin our Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015, for more information. The Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.875% per year from the date of original issuance or from the most recent payment date to which interest has been paid or provided for. Interest on the Notes is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing November 1, 2013.


125 Years
2016 Proxy StatementE-1



    Year ended December 31, 
    2021  2020  2019 

Net income (loss) (GAAP)

  

$

35,095

 

 

$

(9,457

 

$

(94,909

Interest expense

  

 

41,945

 

 

 

49,569

 

 

 

48,447

 

Income tax (benefit) provision

  

 

(29,569

 

 

8,199

 

 

 

(18,318

Depreciation, depletion, and amortization

  

 

172,651

 

 

 

155,006

 

 

 

196,408

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

EBITDA

  

$

220,122

 

 

$

203,317

 

 

$

131,628

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Table of Contents

APPENDIX E10

Free cash flow is calculated as cash provided by operating activities (GAAP) less additions to properties, plans, equipment, and mineral interests (GAAP). Free cash flow is a measure used by management to evaluate the Company’s operating performance but should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operations, as that term is defined by GAAP.



Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP) to Net Income (Loss) (GAAP)

2022 Proxy Statement    A-1


Appendix A

Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) (GAAP) to Adjusted EBITDA Less Capital (non-GAAP)

The non-GAAP measure of Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”)EBITDA less capital for use in STIP performance measurement is calculated as net lossincome (loss) before the following items: interest expense, income tax provision,benefit, depreciation, depletion, and amortization expense, exploration expense, pre-development expense, acquisition costs, loss (gain) on disposition of properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests, suspension costs, foreign exchange gains, gainsloss (gain), unrealized loss (gain) on derivative contracts, provisional price gains,(gains) losses, provisions for closed operationsexpense,operations expense, stock-based compensation, unrealized losses on investments, interest and other income, and lossincome/expense, gain on sale of investments. Management believes that, when presented in conjunction with comparable GAAP measures, Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluatinginvestments (“adjusted EBITDA”) less capital expenditures at our operating performance. operations.

The following table reconciles net (loss)loss to Adjustedadjusted EBITDA less capital (in thousands):

Year Ended
December 31,
2015
Net (loss)         $(86,968)
Plus: Interest expense, net of amount capitalized25,389
Plus: Income taxes56,310
Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization111,489
Plus: Exploration expense17,745
Plus: Pre-development expense 4,213
Plus: Acquisition costs2,162
(Less): Foreign exchange (gain)(24,551)
Less: Gains on derivative contracts (8,252)
(Less): Provisional price (gains)(634)
Plus: Provision for closed operations and environmental matters12,036
Plus: Stock-based compensation5,425
Plus: Unrealized losses on investments3,333
(Less): Other(872)
Adjusted EBITDA$116,825

Reconciliation of Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits Per Silver/Gold Ounce and Cash Cost, After By-product Credits Per Silver/Gold Ounce (non-GAAP) to Cost of Sales and Other Direct Production Costs and Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (GAAP)

The tables below present reconciliations between the non-GAAP measures of Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits Per Silver/Gold Ounce and Cash Cost, After By-product Credits Per Silver/Gold Ounce to the GAAP measure of cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization for our operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 (in thousands, except costs per ounce and gold ounces produced).

    Year Ended
December 31,
 
    2021  2020 

Net income (loss)

  

$

35,095

 

 

$

(9,457

Plus: Interest expense, net of amount capitalized

  

 

41,945

 

 

 

49,569

 

Plus: Income taxes

  

 

(29,569

 

 

8,199

 

Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization

  

 

172,651

 

 

 

155,006

 

�� 

 

 

  

 

 

 

EBITDA

  

 

220,122

 

 

 

203,317

 

Less: Depreciation, depletion and amortization not at operating mines

  

 

(858

 

 

(6,896

Plus: Ramp-up and Suspension costs

  

 

23,012

 

 

 

24,911

 

Plus: Loss on disposition of properties, plants, equipment and mineral interests

  

 

87

 

 

 

572

 

Less/plus: Foreign exchange loss (gain)

  

 

(417

 

 

4,605

 

Plus: Unrealized losses on derivative contracts

  

 

11,903

 

 

 

5,578

 

Less: Provisional price gains

  

 

(9,349

 

 

(8,008

Plus: Provision for closed operations and environmental matters

  

 

17,964

 

 

 

6,189

 

Plus: Stock-based compensation

  

 

6,081

 

 

 

6,458

 

Plus/less: Unrealized losses (gains) on investments

  

 

4,295

 

 

 

(10,272

Plus: Adjustments of inventory to net realizable value

  

 

6,524

 

 

 

--

 

Plus: Foundation grant

  

 

--

 

 

 

1,970

 

Less/plus: Other

  

 

(584

 

 

2,260

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA11

  

 

278,780

 

 

 

230,684

 

Less: Capital expenditures at operating mines

  

 

(108,855

 

 

(99,939

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA less capital

  

$

169,925

 

 

$

130,745

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Cash Cost, After By-product Credits Per Silver/Gold Ounce is an important operating statistic that we utilize to measure each mine’s operating performance. It also allows us to benchmark the performance of each of our mines versus those of our competitors. As a primary silver mining company, we also use the statistic on an aggregate basis - aggregating the Greens Creek, Lucky Friday and San Sebastian mines, but not Casa Berardi, which is a primary gold mine - tocompare our performance with that of other primary silver mining companies. Similarly, the statistic is useful in identifying acquisition and investment opportunities as it provides a common tool for measuring the financial performance of other mines with varying geologic, metallurgical and operating characteristics.

Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits Per Silver/Gold Ounce include all direct and indirect operating cash costs related directly to the physical activities of producing metals, including mining, processing and other plant costs, third-party refining expense, on-site general and administrative costs, royalties and mining production taxes. By-product credits include revenues earned from all metals other than the primary metal produced at each unit. Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver/Gold Ounce, provides management and investors an indication

E-2 www.hecla-mining.com11
125 Years

Adjusted EBITDA is a measure used by management to evaluate the Company’s operating performance but should not be considered an alternative to net income, as that term is defined by GAAP. In addition, the Company may use it when formulating performance goals and targets under its incentive program.


A-2     www.hecla-mining.com



Table of Contents

APPENDIX E


of operating cash flow, after consideration of the average price, received from production. Management also uses this measurement for the comparative monitoring of performance of our mining operations period-to-period from a cash flow perspective. Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver/Gold Ounce is a measure developed by precious metals companies (including the Silver Institute) in an effort to provide a uniform standard for comparison purposes. There can be no assurance, however, that our reporting of this non-GAAP measure is the same as that reported by other mining companies.

The Casa Berardi section below reports Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce for the production of gold, its primary product, and by-product revenues earned from silver, which is a by-product at Casa Berardi. Only costs and ounces produced relating to units with thesame primary product are combined to represent Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Ounce. Thus, the gold produced at our Casa Berardi unit is not included as a by-product credit when calculating Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce for the total of Greens Creek, Lucky Friday and San Sebastian, our combined silver properties.

As depicted in the Total, Greens Creek, Lucky Friday and San Sebastian Unit tables below, by-product credits comprise an essential element of our silver unit cost structure distinguishing our silver operations due to the polymetallic nature of their orebodies. By-product credits included in our presentation of Cash Cost, After Byproduct Credits, per Silver Ounce include:

 Total, Greens Creek. Lucky Friday
and San Sebastian Units
In thousands (except per ounce amounts)Year ended December 31,
      2015     2014     2013
By-product value, all silver properties:
       Zinc$87,383$95,7016$77,616
       Gold59,01961,87166,907
       Lead55,95566,08248,973
       Total by-product credits$202,357$223,654$193,496
 
By-product credits per silver ounce, all silver properties
       Zinc$7.56$8.65$8.71
       Gold5.105.597.51
       Lead4.845.975.50
       Total by-product credits$17.50$20.21$21.72

By-product credits included in our presentation of Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce for our Casa Berardi Unit include:

 Casa Berardi Unit3
In thousands (except per ounce amounts)Year ended December 31,
     2015     2014     2013
Silver by-product value457464262
Silver by-product credits per gold ounce3.573.624.19

Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization is the most comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP to Cash Cost, After By-product Credits. The sum of the cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization forour operating units in the tables below is presented in our Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) (in thousands) included in our audited financial statements which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015.


125 Years
2016 Proxy StatementE-3



Table of Contents

APPENDIX E


 

Total, Greens Creek, Lucky Friday
and San Sebastian Units

In thousands (except per ounce amounts)Year ended December 31,
     2015     2014     2013
Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits1$269,971$276,842$254,460
By-product credits(202,357)(223,654)(193,496)
Cash Cost, After By-product Credits67,61453,18860,964
Divided by silver ounces produced11,56211,0658,907
       Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce23.3525.0228.56
       By-product credits per silver ounce(17.50)(20.21)(21.72)
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$5.85$4.81$6.84
Reconciliation to GAAP:
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$67,614$53,188$60,964
       Depreciation, depletion and amortization67,81572,93663,098
       Treatment costs(80,239)(82,639)(76,823)
       By-product credits202,357223,654193,496
       Change in product inventory1,632(1,649)(246)
       Reclamation and other costs1,3192,0462,100
       Cost of sales and other direct production costs and
       depreciation, depletion and amortization (GAAP)$260,498$267,536$242,589

 Greens Creek Unit
In thousands (except per ounce amounts)Year ended December 31,
     2015     2014     2013
Cash Cost, Before by-Product Credits1$196,443$199,247$203,496
By-product credits(163,394)(176,650)(170,563)
Cash Cost, After By-product Credits33,04922,59732,933
Divided by silver ounces produced8,4527,8267,448
       Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce23.2425.4627.32
       By-product credits per silver ounce(19.33)(22.57)(22.90)
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$3.91$2.89$4.42
Reconciliation to GAAP:
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$33,049$22,597$32,933
       Depreciation, depletion and amortization56,55363,50555,265
       Treatment costs(63,284)(63,313)(67,341)
       By-product credits163,394176,650170,563
       Change in product inventory4,222(1,706)(159)
       Reclamation and other costs1,3421,9491,947
       Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation,
       depletion and amortization (GAAP)$195,276$199,682$193,526

E-4 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

APPENDIX E


 Lucky Friday Unit
In thousands (except per ounce amounts)Year ended December 31,
     201520142013
Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits1$72,052     $77,595     $50,964
By-product credits(38,035)(47,004)(22,933)
Cash Cost, After By-product Credits34,01730,59128,031
Divided by silver ounces produced3,0283,2391,459
       Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce23.7923.9534.93
       By-product credits per silver ounce(12.56)(14.51)(15.72)
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$11.23$9.44$19.21
Reconciliation to GAAP:
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$34,017$30,591$28,031
       Depreciation, depletion and amortization11,2629,4317,833
       Treatment costs(16,915)(19,326)(9,482)
       By-product credits38,03547,00422,933
       Change in product inventory(1,154)57(405)
       Reclamation and other costs(23)97153
       Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation,
       depletion and amortization (GAAP)$65,222$67,854$49,063

 San Sebastian Unit2
In thousands (except per ounce amounts)Year ended December 31,
     2015     2014     2013
Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits1$1,476    $    $
By-product credits(928)
Cash Cost, After By-product credits548
Divided by silver ounces produced82
       Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce18.07
       By-product credits per silver ounce(11.36)
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Silver Ounce$6.71$$
Reconciliation to GAAP:
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$548$$
       Treatment costs(40)
       By-product credits928
       Change in product inventory(1,436)
       Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation,
       depletion and amortization (GAAP)$$$


125 Years
2016 Proxy StatementE-5



Table of Contents

APPENDIX E


 Casa Berardi Unit3
In thousands (except ounce and per ounce amounts)Year ended December 31,
     2015     2014     2013
Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits1$99,129$106,438$59,717
By-product credits(457)(464)(262)
Cash Cost, After by-product credits98,672105,97459,455
Divided by gold ounces produced127,891128,24462,532
       Cash Cost, Before By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce775.11829.97954.98
       By-product credits per gold ounce(3.57)(3.62)(4.19)
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits, per Gold Ounce$771.54$826.35$950.79
Reconciliation to GAAP:
       Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$98,672$105,974$59,455
       Depreciation, depletion and amortization43,67438,19818,030
       Treatment costs(670)(564)(268)
       By-product credits457464262
       Change in product inventory1,9703,151(3,766)
       Reclamation and other costs455820142
       Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion
       and amortization (GAAP)$144,558$148,043$73,855

 Total, All Locations
In thousandsYear ended December 31,
201520142013
Reconciliation to GAAP:               
Cash Cost, After By-product Credits$166,286$159,162$120,419
Depreciation, depletion and amortization111,489111,13481,128
Treatment costs(80,909)(83,203)(77,092)
By-product credits202,814224,118193,758
Change in product inventory3,6021,502(4,012)
Reclamation and other costs1,7742,8672,242
Cost of sales and other direct production costs and depreciation, depletion
and amortization (GAAP)$405,056$415,580$316,443

1Includes all direct and indirect operating costs related directly to the physical activities of producing metals, including mining, processing and other plant costs, third-party refining and marketing expense, on-site general and administrative costs, royalties and mining production taxes, after by-product revenues earned from all metals other than the primary metal produced at each unit.
2Commercial production began at the San Sebastian unit in the fourth quarter of 2015. See theSan Sebastian Segmentsection of our Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015 for further discussion.
3On June 1, 2013, we completed the acquisition of Aurizon Mines Ltd., which gave us 100% ownership of the Casa Berardi mine in Quebec, Canada. The information presented reflects our ownership of Casa Berardi commencing as of that date. SeeNote 15 of NotestoConsolidated Financial Statementsin our Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2015, for more information. The primary metal produced at Casa Berardi is gold, with a by-product credit for the value of silver production.

E-6 www.hecla-mining.com
125 Years



Table of Contents

MEETING TO BE HELD AT:

Eric A. Johnston Auditorium
Northwest Museum of Arts & Culture
2316 W. 1st Avenue
Spokane, Washington

For directions contact (509) 456-3931



Table of Contents



Table of Contents

HECLA MINING COMPANY
6500 N. MINERAL DRIVE, SUITE 200
COEUR D'ALENE, ID 83815

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.








TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
E04596-P76532          

HECLA MINING COMPANY

6500 N. MINERAL DRIVE

SUITE 200

COEUR D’ALENE, ID 83815

    LOGO

VOTE BY INTERNET

Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 25, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022

You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 25, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

D78874-P68937                         KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — —

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

HECLA MINING COMPANY

ForWithholdFor All
 AllAllExcept

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR"“FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND "FOR"“FOR” PROPOSALS 2 3, 4 AND 53.

To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.


 1.     ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
 
Nominees:
01)     Ted Crumley
02)Terry V. Rogers
03)Charles B. Stanley
ForAgainstAbstain

1.  ELECTION OF CLASS III DIRECTORS

2.     PROPOSAL to approve amendments to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to remove certain 80% supermajority voting provisions.

Nominees:

ForAgainstAbstain

1a.   Charles B. Stanley

3.PROPOSAL to approve amendments to the Company's Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws to permit shareholders to call special meetings of shareholders under certain circumstances.

1b.  Alice Wong

4.PROPOSAL to ratify and approveForAgainstAbstain

2.  Ratify the selectionappointment of BDO USA, LLP, as the Company'sour independent registered public accounting firm for the calendar year ending December 31, 2016.

2022.

 
5.Approval,

3.  Approve, on an advisory basis, of named executive officer compensation.

 
6.

4.  In theirthe Proxies’ discretion on all other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournmentadjournments or adjournmentspostponements thereof.

This proxyProxy will be voted as specified. If no specification is made, this proxyProxy will be voted FOR“FOR” the election of the threetwo nominees for Director and FOR“FOR” the approval of Proposals 2 3, 4 and 5.3. This proxyProxy also delegates discretionary authority to vote with respect to any other business which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

IF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNET OR TELEPHONE PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE, AND PROMPTLY RETURN THE PROXY CARD USING THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.


Please sign

NOTE: The Proxy must be signed exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator,name or other fiduciary, pleasenames appear on this card. Executors, administrators, trustees, partners, etc., should give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If the signer is a corporation, or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by duly authorized officer.officer(s), who should specify the title(s) of such officer(s).


 
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date



Table of Contents









Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting:

The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.









— — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — — — — — — — — — — —  — — — 

D78875-P68937        

E04597-P76532
HECLA MINING COMPANY
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
May 26, 2022
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3

Phillips S. Baker, Jr. or Michael B. White or either of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Hecla Mining Company to be held in person at the Elks Lodge #331, 419 Cedar St., Wallace, Idaho, 83873 and virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/HL2022 on May 26, 2022, or at any postponement or adjournment thereof.

You may attend the meeting in person or via the Internet and vote electronically during the meeting. Have the information that is printed on the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. Shares represented by this Proxy will be voted as directed by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote “FOR” each of the nominees for director and “FOR” Proposals 2 and 3.

In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side

HECLA MINING COMPANY
Eric A. Johnston Auditorium
Northwest Museum of Arts & Culture
2316 W. 1st Avenue
Spokane, Washington

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
May 19, 2016

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR LISTED IN ITEM 1 AND "FOR" PROPOSALS 2, 3, 4 AND 5

The undersigned, revoking any previous proxies, hereby appoints PHILLIPS S. BAKER, JR. and MICHAEL B. WHITE, and each of them, proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution, to attend the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders on May 19, 2016, and any adjournments or postponements thereof, and there to vote the undersigned's shares of Common Stock of the Company on the following matters as described in the Board of Directors Proxy Statement for such meeting, a copy of which has been received by the undersigned.

This Proxy will be voted as specified. If no specification is made, this Proxy will be voted FOR the election of the three nominees for Director and FOR the approval of Proposals 2, 3, 4 and 5. This proxy also delegates discretionary authority to vote with respect to any other business which may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Continued and to be signed on reverse side